High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
96 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 96 judgments found.

96 judgments
April 2014
Failure to convict before sentencing makes the judgment null; omnibus sentencing unlawful; evidence was insufficient, so no retrial ordered.
  • Criminal law — conviction and sentence — mandatory requirement to enter conviction under section 235(1) CPA — Criminal Procedure Act s 235(1)
  • Criminal procedure — Sentencing — omnibus sentence unlawful where accused convicted on multiple counts — Penal Code s 36
  • Evidence — Recent possession — Insufficiency of suspicious evidence to sustain conviction
30 April 2014
The appellant's conviction and sentence were quashed for failure to convict before sentencing and for an unlawful omnibus sentence.
  • Criminal law — Omnibus sentence unlawful — need to specify count for each sentence — Penal Code s 36
  • Criminal procedure — Mandatory requirement to enter conviction before sentence — Failure to convict before passing sentence vitiates judgment — Criminal Procedure Act s 235(1)
  • Evidence — Circumstantial evidence and recent possession — Requirements and misapplication in proving handling of stolen property — Proof beyond reasonable doubt
30 April 2014
A pre‑commencement land suit remained within the statutory transition and did not expire; appeal allowed and remitted for merits hearing.
  • Land Disputes Courts Act s54(3) transitional two‑year grace; extension of time under s54(4)/Chief Justice circular; jurisdiction of District Court for pre‑commencement land suits; remission to District Land and Housing Tribunal; striking out for alleged expiry.
30 April 2014
Where only general damages are claimed the High Court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction; a DED cannot be sued in place of the District Council.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Local government — capacity to sue — legal personality of District Council v. District Executive Director
    • — Pecuniary jurisdiction — general versus specific damages — forum competence
30 April 2014
Reported
Court overruled objections: nominal filing-fee requirement obsolete and application not time-barred; hearing set for 10/2/2014.
  • Administrative law — appeals from professional disciplinary body — competence of appeal where statutory nominal filing fee not paid
  • Administrative law — Limitation
    • — commencement of time for filing after court direction to file formal application
    • — Obsolete statutory requirements and practical impossibility of compliance
30 April 2014
Erasure for participating in a doctors' strike was excessive and discriminatory; reduced to repeat internship and reinstatement.
  • Administrative law — appeals from professional disciplinary bodies — Whether permanent erasure is excessive or discriminatory — Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act ss 29, 29A
30 April 2014
Whether permanent erasure for a doctor’s participation in a strike was excessive and discriminatory.
  • Administrative law
    • — Comparative sanctions — Discrimination in disciplinary penalties — Reinstatement and rehabilitation
    • — Medical practitioners — Participation in strike — Appropriateness of erasure from register
    • — Sentencing — Excessiveness and discrimination in professional discipline — Aggravating factors and mitigation
30 April 2014
Court found erasure for participating in a doctors' strike excessive and ordered the appellant to repeat internship.
  • Criminal law — sentencing — Excessiveness of permanent erasure — Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Human rights — Equality of treatment — Discriminatory punishment compared to sanctions imposed on other doctors
30 April 2014
Belated alibi unsupported by statutory notice may be disregarded; being caught red‑handed establishes identity and upholds conviction.
  • Criminal law
    • — Identification at scene — Possession of alleged stolen property at arrest as proof of identification
    • — alibi — requirement of prior notice under s.194(4)-(5) CPA and weight of unsupported alibi
  • Criminal procedure — Admissibility of exhibits — Non‑tendering of physical items immaterial where independent evidence proves offence
30 April 2014
Gift to spouse held irrevocable; mother awarded custody; Ada Estate deemed matrimonial asset with TShs.10,000,000 compensation.
  • Family law — Child custody — welfare principle and tender years doctrine
  • Family law — Matrimonial procedure
    • — Judgment on admission not favored
    • — limits on applying Civil Procedure Code in matrimonial proceedings
  • Family law — Matrimonial property — substantial improvement and contribution, equitable division/compensation
30 April 2014
Extension to appeal granted after respondent's concession and prisons officer's affidavit justified the delay.
  • Criminal procedure — Extension of time to appeal — delay justified by factors beyond applicant's control — concession by Republic — affidavit of prisons officer admissible despite mislabelling
29 April 2014
Court found the land claim time‑barred under Limitation Decree Cap 12; neither party produced registered title.
  • Evidence — Proof of title — Need for official land search or documentary proof to establish transfer
  • Land law — Limitation of actions — Accrual on dispossession and twelve‑year period — Limitation Decree Cap 12, Art.131 and s.3
29 April 2014
An accused cannot be convicted of a different offence without statutory authority and proper amendment of the charge.
  • Criminal law — amendment of charges — limits and safeguards
  • Criminal law — Evidence Act s.16 not an offence
    • — conviction on different charge without statutory authority is invalid
    • — relates to state of mind
  • Criminal law — Substitution of charge
29 April 2014
Reporting suspected bank fraud to police was a duty and did not constitute malicious prosecution absent malice or lack of probable cause.
  • Tort
    • — * Effect of nolle prosequi / discharge under s.98(a) Criminal Procedure Act — not necessarily termination in favour of accused
    • — Malicious prosecution — elements: initiation, malice, absence of reasonable and probable cause, termination in favour, damages
    • — reasonable and probable cause — investigations and branch manager’s responsibility to secure transactions
28 April 2014
Malicious prosecution claim failed: defendants reasonably reported suspected bank loss; nolle prosequi not a favourable termination.
  • Tort — Malicious prosecution — elements required: initiation by defendant, malice and lack of reasonable/probable cause, termination in plaintiff's favour, and damages.* Duty to report suspected criminal loss by corporate officers to police and head office.* Reasonable and probable cau — temporary discontinuance, not necessarily a favourable termination for malicious prosecution purposes.* Proof of damages required for malicious prosecution claim
28 April 2014
Interim injunction granted to restrain demolition pending trial due to triable issues, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience.
  • Civil procedure — Interim injunction — Conditions for grant (prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience) — Giella v Cassman Brown (1973) EA 358 applied
28 April 2014
Court granted interim injunction restraining the respondent from demolishing the applicant's house pending determination of triable issues.
  • Land law — Interim injunction — wayleave for electric power transmission line — triable issue as to encroachment and entitlement to compensation — irreparable harm and balance of convenience considered
28 April 2014
Court extended time, reassigned case to Speed Track II and allowed filing of application for leave to amend the plaint.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Scheduling orders and speed tracks — Departure from expired scheduling order and refixing on new speed track — Order VIIIA r.4 (interests of justice)
    • — amendment of pleadings — Leave to amend plaint — Order VI r.17 (requirement to file formal application before determination)
28 April 2014
Court extended scheduling deadline and allowed filing for leave to amend plaint, prioritizing merits over procedural technicalities.
  • Civil procedure — Order VIIIA r.4
    • — Departure from scheduling orders permitted in the interests of justice
    • — extension of time where both parties contributed to delay
  • Civil procedure — Order VI r.17
    • — Amendment of plaint
    • — registry refusal does not obviate filing
28 April 2014
Where the cause of action arose in Arusha, the suit was properly instituted there; striking-out for lack of territorial jurisdiction was erroneous.
  • Civil procedure — territorial jurisdiction
28 April 2014
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove the applicant committed cattle theft beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law — Cattle theft
    • — burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt
    • — prisoner custody and potential vicarious responsibility of custodial officers
28 April 2014
Primary Courts may not distribute estates; administrator's Form No.6 distribution stands absent proof to the contrary.
  • Evidence — documentary and oral proof
    • — Proof of testamentary intention
    • — oral will insufficient without admissible documentary proof (Form No. 6)
  • Probate law — Distribution of estate
28 April 2014
High Court lacks jurisdiction over civil disputes from revenue laws; Tax Appeals Board has exclusive jurisdiction.
  • Tax law — Customs seizures — disputes
  • Tax law — Jurisdiction
  • Tax law — Quasi‑judicial powers
    • — Board/Tribunal can grant interim/equitable relief by resort to civil procedure and common law
    • — High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain or grant injunctions in such matters absent demonstration that special forum lacks appropriate remedy
25 April 2014
Partial allowance of appeal and retrial ordered due to reliance on documentary evidence not formally admitted.
  • Civil procedure — Admissibility of documentary evidence — Reliance on documents not formally admitted — Retrial ordered
  • Contract law — parol evidence rule — oral evidence cannot vary written contract
25 April 2014
Appellate court ordered retrial after finding trial record defective for failure to admit key documents and reliance on unproven oral evidence.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — retrial ordered where interests of justice require it (Fatehali Manji)
  • Contract law — Loan agreement — Repayment terms: lump sum v instalments and admissibility of parol/oral variations
  • Evidence — Documentary evidence — Annexures to pleadings are not evidence unless formally tendered and admitted during trial
25 April 2014
Plaintiff failed to prove defendants' liability for missing bank credit files; claim dismissed.
  • Civil procedure — ex-parte proceedings — Plaintiff still bears burden of proof on the balance of probabilities — Plaintiff must prove case despite defendant's absence
  • Evidence
    • — Admissions — Binding effect of admissions and sufficiency of oral evidence on balance of probabilities — Conditional letters do not constitute unequivocal admission of liability
    • — Evidence and causation — Need for custody records, audits or police reports to establish missing bank files and liability
24 April 2014
Appeal dismissed: certified sale agreement established respondent's ownership; tribunal properly gave reasons for departing from assessors' opinions.
  • Civil procedure — Procedural law
  • Criminal law — Assessors
  • Evidence — weight and authenticity
    • — certified true copy versus uncertified photocopies
    • — contemporaneity of documents
  • Land disputes — proof of ownership
22 April 2014
Appeals from District Court original jurisdiction are governed by a 90‑day Limitation Act period, running from obtaining the judgment copy.
  • Civil procedure
    • — appeal periods — Appeals from District Court in original jurisdiction governed by Law of Limitation Act (90 days)
    • — Limitation computation
    • — Time of appeal — Runs from date appellant obtains copy of judgment/decree, not when typed judgment is ready for collection
22 April 2014
Appeals from district courts in original jurisdiction attract a 90‑day limitation starting on obtaining the judgment copy.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — Limitation period
    • — appeals from District Court in original jurisdiction governed by Law of Limitation Act (Schedule Part II
    • — time runs from actual obtaining of judgment copy
22 April 2014
Appeals from District Court in original jurisdiction attract a 90‑day limit; time runs from obtaining the judgment copy.
  • Limitation law — Limitation of actions
    • — Appeals from District Court in original jurisdiction
    • — preliminary objection on time-bar dismissed
    • — time runs from obtaining copy not from when typed judgment is ready
22 April 2014
Appeals from District Court original jurisdiction attract a 90‑day limitation starting when the appellant obtains a copy of judgment.
  • Limitation law — Limitation of actions
    • — Appeals from District Court in original jurisdiction governed by Law of Limitation Act (90 days)
    • — time runs from date judgment copy obtained, not when typed judgment was ready for collection
22 April 2014
Appellate court quashed burglary/theft conviction where prosecution evidence and cautioned statements were unreliable and identification was inadequate.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — appellate reappraisal of evidence and power to quash conviction where prosecution case is weak
  • Criminal law — Burglary — proof beyond reasonable doubt — possession of stolen property not established
  • Evidence
    • — cautioned statements — admissibility and reliability where dates/procedure are doubtful
    • — non‑calling of witnesses found with stolen items — when non‑calling is excusable versus when tracing is required
22 April 2014
The appellant's cautioned statement was wrongly admitted; conviction upheld on identification and recent possession; sentence reduced.
  • Civil procedure — Procedure — No absolute need to call informer or produce search warrant where accused is found in possession of stolen property
  • Criminal law — admissibility of cautioned statement
    • — expunction where procedure not followed
    • — obligation to hold trial within a trial upon objection to voluntariness
  • Criminal law — sentencing
    • — High Court revisional powers to quash illegal sentence and substitute lawful term
    • — Magistrate’s sentencing limits
  • Evidence
    • — Identification — favourable conditions, prolonged close contact and corroboration by independent witness
    • — recent possession doctrine — possession shortly after theft supports inference of guilt
17 April 2014
Suit struck out where the defendant was not a registered corporate trustee and thus a wrong party to sue.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Preliminary objections — Distinction between points of law and fact — Validity of objection to suit against non-existent corporate entity
    • — Trustees Incorporation Act — Requirement/importance of certificate of incorporation
    • — wrong defendant — Suit not maintainable and liable to be struck out with costs
16 April 2014
A suit against a non‑incorporated/wrong trustee is not maintainable; preliminary objections can dispose of the suit.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Parties — wrong defendant/non‑existent (unincorporated) trustee — suit not maintainable
    • — Preliminary objections — distinction between points of law and matters of fact
  • Trust law — Trustees incorporation act (cap 318 R.E.2002) — incorporation requirement
16 April 2014
Unsafe visual identification and uncorroborated co-accused statement led to quashing of armed robbery convictions.
  • Criminal law
    • — Armed robbery — visual identification
    • — Burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt
    • — Confession/cautioned statement of co-accused — limits as corroborative evidence
16 April 2014
Conviction for stealing by agent quashed because the applicant’s failure to deliver goods was contractual, not agency theft.
  • Criminal law — Theft by agent
16 April 2014
Clearing agent held liable for tampering/loss of imported chemicals; plaintiff awarded the goods' value, costs and interest.
  • Commercial law — Damages
    • — award limited to proven value of lost goods with interest and costs
    • — requirement of strict proof for special/pecuniary losses
  • Commercial law — Evidence — authenticity and probative value of unauthenticated inspection report (TRA) and need for witness corroboration
  • Commercial law — Shipping and carriage of goods — arrival, documentation and responsibility of clearing agents
  • Commercial law — Tampering and opening of container — liability of clearing/forwarding agent for mishandling while in custody
16 April 2014
Suing a regional manager was incompetent and mandatory 90‑day notice to government was not given—suit struck out with costs.
  • Administrative law — Government proceedings act s.6(2) — mandatory 90‑day notice to government and Attorney General before suing
  • Civil procedure — Procedural law
    • — Preliminary objections
    • — suit struck out for wrong defendant and failure to give statutory notice
16 April 2014
Pleas of guilty were disowned; conviction and sentence quashed and retrial ordered under section 388 CPA.
  • Criminal procedure — plea of guilty disowned — plea nullified and conviction premature
  • Criminal procedure — Sentencing
    • — custodial sentence a last resort for first offenders
    • — Wildlife offences
15 April 2014
Cautioned statements expunged, but prosecution witnesses' credible evidence upheld conviction for obtaining money by false pretences.
  • Criminal law — Obtaining Money by False Pretences — Elements: false representation and intent to defraud — Penal Code s302
  • Criminal procedure — Judgment requirements — points for determination, decision and reasons — s 312(1) Criminal Procedure Act
  • Evidence — Confessions/caution statements — repudiated statements and the role of trial-within-trial — Evidence Act s.27(2)-(3)
15 April 2014
Appeal dismissed: expunged cautioned statements left sufficient credible evidence to uphold convictions for false pretence.
  • Criminal law — Evidence — Cautioned statements inadmissible without prior inquiry (trial-within-trial) by subordinate court
    • — such statements expunged if improperly admitted
    • — Weight of evidence
  • Criminal law — obtaining money by false pretence — Proof beyond reasonable doubt
15 April 2014
High Court rules primary and district courts lacked jurisdiction over large probate estate; proceedings nullified.
  • Civil procedure — Probate jurisdiction — High Court’s exclusive jurisdiction under section 3 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act
  • Evidence — Judicial notice
15 April 2014
Appeal allowed where trial court issued omnibus convictions without separate findings and no loss was proved.
  • Criminal law
    • — Economic and Organized Crime — Causing loss to a specified authority (proof of actual loss required)
    • — Minimum Sentences Act — Obligation to make compensation orders where loss to a specified authority is established
  • Criminal procedure — Judgment requirements — non‑compliance with s.312(2) CPA renders conviction nullity — Criminal Procedure Act s 312(2)
15 April 2014
A printed email is admissible; admissibility is distinct from weight and requires proper foundation to challenge.
  • Evidence — Documentary and electronic evidence — Primary evidence, notice to produce, and authenticity requirements — Printouts may be originals or admissible secondary evidence
  • Evidence — admissibility of electronic evidence
    • — Admissibility determined by relevancy and foundation
    • — authenticity and probative value assessed at trial
15 April 2014
Failure to state when the cause of action arose is fatal; plaint struck out, amendment refused.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Pleadings — cause of action — Mandatory nature and effect of non‑compliance
    • — adequacy of plaint’s paragraph disclosing jurisdiction and value — Jurisdiction and court fees
    • — amendment of pleadings — unauthorized amendment cannot cure jurisdictional/mandatory procedural defects — Amendment refused where it defeats objection's purpose
14 April 2014
Ignorance, poverty or age do not constitute good cause for extension of time to appeal; application dismissed with costs.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — delay not excused by poverty, age, geographic remoteness, or ignorance of law — certified copies obtained in time — exercise of judicial discretion
14 April 2014
Recent possession, failure to prove purchase and procedural irregularity upheld; convictions and concurrent sentences affirmed.
  • Civil procedure — Procedure — change of magistrate between conviction and sentencing does not automatically vitiate sentence absent manifest unfairness
  • Criminal law
    • — Recent possession doctrine — reasonable and probable explanation for possession required to rebut presumption of theft
    • — sentencing — concurrent custodial sentences within statutory limits not excessive
14 April 2014
Second appellate court upheld tort damages for demolition, finding appellant acted personally and civil standard of proof met.
  • Administrative law — Administrative acts of village government — Personal acts outside authorised official capacity attract personal liability
  • Appellate practice — Second appeal — Disturbing concurrent findings
  • Tort — Civil damages — burden of proof lies on plaintiff to prove loss on balance of probabilities
14 April 2014
Inconsistent particulars and denial of opportunity to call defence witnesses nullified the rape conviction; retrial ordered.
  • Criminal law — Rape — variance between charge and evidence
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Alibi notice (s194 CPA) — Particulars required under s.194 Criminal Procedure Act and effect of inadequate notice
    • — Right to be heard — Denial of opportunity to be heard / missing witnesses
14 April 2014