High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
1,906 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
1,906 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2018
A temporary injunction application filed under the wrong CPC provision was struck out and costs awarded.
* Civil Procedure – Temporary injunctions – Proper statutory basis – Order XXXVII governs injunctions; Order XXXVIII concerns appointment of receivers – Wrong provision renders application incompetent – Preliminary objection – Striking out with costs.
26 September 2018
Omission to cite the specific enabling subsection renders the application incompetent and not curable under Article 107A.
Law of Limitation Act s14(1) — failure to cite specific subsection — competence; Article 107A — curative power; improper citation fatal; preliminary objection; affidavit verification (not determined).
25 September 2018
Preliminary objection that jurat omitted the word "TRULY" dismissed; jurat complied by stating place and date; factual disputes require cross-examination.
Notaries and Commissioners for Oaths – jurat to state when oath is taken – compliance with section 8 requiring truthful statement of place and date – omission of specific word "TRULY" not fatal where place and date are correctly stated; factual disputes about deponent's presence not resolvable on preliminary point of law.
25 September 2018
Prisoner’s brief delay and reliance on prison officers justified extension to lodge notice of appeal in trial court.
Criminal procedure – extension of time to lodge appeal under section 361(2) – notice of appeal must be lodged in the subordinate trial court – prisoner delay and reliance on prison officers as justification for brief extension.
25 September 2018
An application to extend time to appeal a taxation (Bill of Costs) decision was struck out for being instituted under the wrong statutory provision.
Advocates Remuneration Order — Taxation of costs — Proper remedy is reference to High Court judge under Order 7(1); Proceedings brought under wrong statutory provision are incompetent and liable to be struck out — Preliminary objections — Jurat on affidavit (raised but not decided).
25 September 2018
Appeal allowed; convictions quashed where prosecution failed to prove park boundaries, possession and seizure, and trial magistrate erred procedurally.
* Criminal law – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – necessity to establish geographic boundaries of protected areas (National Park) to prove entry offence. * Evidence – Requirement for seizure notes/exhibits and corroborative investigative evidence in possession and trophy cases. * Procedure – Material irregularity where trial court fails to specify statutory basis for conviction; such omission vitiates conviction and sentence. * Remedy – Convictions quashed where prosecution fails to discharge burden; remittal or retrial inappropriate in face of evidential insufficiency.
25 September 2018
Conviction quashed where particulars and summary failed to disclose essential elements of possession, rendering plea unreliable.
Criminal procedure — Plea of guilty — Requirements that particulars of offence and summary of material facts disclose essential ingredients of offence (including nature and mode of possession) — Conviction on plea unsafe if material facts deficient — Appellate relief: quash conviction and release; DPP may re-charge.
25 September 2018
Extension application struck out because the affidavit was sworn without authority to represent co‑applicants.
Civil procedure – competence of application – affidavit deposed by one applicant purportedly on behalf of co-applicants without proof of authority – lack of locus standi renders application incompetent; Review versus Rule 75 considerations.
25 September 2018
General and formal defects in the respondent’s defence were curable by amendment, not dismissal.
Civil procedure – Pleadings – Written statement of defence – General and evasive denials contrary to Order VIII Rules 3 and 4 CPC; Signature and verification requirements – Order VI Rules 14–15 CPC; Defects curable by amendment – Order VI Rule 16 CPC; Ex parte hearing where defendant defaulted.
24 September 2018
Appeal allowed: conviction quashed due to defective charge and lack of jurisdiction; insufficient evidence for retrial.
* Criminal law – charge sheet – material variance between statement of offence and particulars – defective charge. * Jurisdiction – conspiracy to murder triable by High Court (s.215 Penal Code) – District Court lacked jurisdiction. * Evidence – conviction relied on cautioned statements for murder, not for charged offence (conspiracy) – expungement leaves insufficient evidence. * Remedy – proceedings, judgment and sentence quashed; no retrial where evidence inadequate.
24 September 2018
A reference founded on repealed taxation rules was incompetent and struck out, with costs awarded to the respondent.
Civil procedure – Competency of proceedings – Application founded on repealed or dis-applied taxation rules (G.N. No. 515/2015) – Effect of replacement by G.N. No. 264/2015 – Proceedings preferred under a 'dead' law are incompetent and liable to be struck out; costs may be awarded where respondent filed opposing pleadings and preliminary objection.
24 September 2018
Sickness supported by medical evidence and respondent's lack of objection justified setting aside dismissal for want of prosecution.
* Probate appeal – dismissal for want of prosecution – application to set aside dismissal. * Evidence of sickness (medical chit) as sufficient cause to excuse non-appearance. * Parties' agreement and lack of objection supporting relief. * Direction for appeal to proceed; no order as to costs.
24 September 2018
Prosecution failed to prove offences beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of chain of custody and procedural defects.
* Criminal law – burden of proof – prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. * Evidence – chain of custody and certificate of seizure required for government trophies. * Procedure – proper sequence for tendering exhibits; caution statements must be tendered in compliance with procedure. * Arrest and identification – intelligence-based arrest at home insufficient without direct linking evidence.
24 September 2018
24 September 2018
Defaulting defendant ordered to appear to record settlement as court order and to perform the agreement; costs awarded.
Default judgment — Rule 22(1) High Court (Commercial Division) Procedure Rules, 2012; Specific performance — enforcement of settlement agreement by ordering appearance to record agreement as court order; Costs awarded on default.
24 September 2018
Conviction based on recent possession unsafe where identification and seizure evidence were deficient.
Criminal law - Cattle theft - Doctrine of recent possession; need for positive identification by special marks (described before viewing); proof of search and seizure (seizure certificate/witness); insufficiency of prosecution evidence; conviction quashed.
24 September 2018
Applicant granted temporary injunction to restrain sale of mortgaged property pending suit due to risk of irreparable loss.
Civil procedure — Temporary injunction — application of Atilio/Giella tests (prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience); Mortgage law — sale of mortgaged property pending suit; Allegations of undue influence and statutory Land Act formalities; Interlocutory relief to preserve status quo pending Land Case No. 24 of 2018.
24 September 2018
The trial tribunal erred in dismissing the applicant's amended land application for lack of locus without proper inquiry.
Land procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Proper filing and receipt of amended application – Locus standi – Tribunal's duty to investigate suspicion before dismissing proceedings – Ex parte injunctive order as evidence of locus – Quash and remit for merits determination.
24 September 2018
Appeal allowed where trial court failed to enter a proper conviction; judgment quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal procedure — invalid judgment; failure to enter conviction; conviction must specify offence and Penal Code section; sections 235(1) and 312(2) CPA; omission of co-accused from judgment; remedy — quash or remit to trial court.
21 September 2018
Application for restoration was incompetent as section 43 does not empower restoration; proceedings struck out with costs.
Land law – Restoration of dismissed proceedings – Jurisdictional basis – Section 43(1)(b) and (2) Land Disputes Courts Act construed as supervisory/revisional, not restoration; Non‑citation/wrong citation of enabling provision renders proceedings incompetent; Requirement of sufficient cause and supporting evidence to revive dismissed matters.
21 September 2018
A court found group constitution clauses discriminatory and ordered reimbursement for funeral materials at market value, allowing the appeal.
Community/group constitution – exclusionary clauses – paragraphs 9B and 14 found discriminatory and unconstitutional; entitlement to mutual burial assistance; remedy: reimbursement at current market value for funeral materials; evaluation of evidence and appropriate relief.
21 September 2018
Primary Courts lack jurisdiction for malicious prosecution claims absent customary or Islamic law rules; acquittal alone does not prove malice.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction of Primary Courts – Primary Court jurisdiction limited to matters governed by customary or Islamic law – tort of malicious prosecution not supported by customary/Islamic rules; Malicious prosecution – acquittal not conclusive of lack of reasonable and probable cause – burden on plaintiff to prove malice and absence of probable cause.
20 September 2018
Appellate court raised an unlawful low fine for corruption to the statutory minimum and ordered payment or imprisonment.
* Criminal law – Corruption – Soliciting and receiving bribe under s.15(1)(a) of the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act No.11/2007 – Sentencing – statutory minimum fine under s.15(2) – appellate correction of illegal sentence – alternative imprisonment and restitution of fines.
20 September 2018
Applicant failed to show good cause for extension of time; wrong procedural step and unexplained delay fatal to application.
* Civil procedure – Extension of time under s.11(1) Appellate Jurisdiction Act – requirement to show good cause and account for each day of delay. * Procedural error – instituting a fresh suit inadvertently does not constitute good cause for extension of time. * Res judicata – striking out intervening suit limits availability of illegality argument; remedy would be to appeal the order rendering matter res judicata. * Costs – unsuccessful extension application dismissed with costs.
20 September 2018
Conviction quashed where the charge failed to cite the substantive theft provision and evidence related to a different offence.
Criminal procedure – Charge framing – Mandatory requirement under s.135 Criminal Procedure Act to describe the offence and cite the law – Defective charge (s.273(a) cited without s.265) vitiates trial; Variance between charge and evidence – evidence relating to different offence may be expunged; Conviction unsafe where no remaining admissible evidence.
20 September 2018
Conviction quashed where the victim’s unsatisfactory testimony, medical findings, and inconsistencies raised reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Rape – Evidence of child victim – unsworn testimony under section 127(7) Evidence Act admissible only if credible and detailed; credibility, medical report inconsistencies, missing material witnesses, and prejudicial charge particulars (‘diverse dates’) may vitiate conviction.
19 September 2018
A temporary injunction cannot restrain disposal of property that is not the subject matter of the underlying suit.
Civil Procedure — Temporary injunction (Order 37 r.1 CPC) — Requirements for granting injunctions — Property must be subject matter of the suit — Application extraneous/misplaced — Dismissal without costs.
19 September 2018
An appeal against dismissal for non-appearance is premature; the correct remedy is an application to set aside the dismissal.
* Criminal procedure – Appealability – Order dismissing appeal for want of appearance is generally not appealable; proper remedy is an application to set aside dismissal upon showing sufficient cause.
19 September 2018
An appeal against dismissal for non-appearance is premature; the proper remedy is an application to set aside the dismissal.
* Criminal procedure – dismissal of appeal for non-appearance – generally not appealable; remedy is application to set aside dismissal and readmit appeal – reasons not on trial court record are matters for a setting-aside motion.
19 September 2018
Valuation/inventory cannot substitute perishable trophy without a court destruction order in the accused's presence.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of government trophy – perishable exhibits – substitution by valuation/inventory – requirement of court destruction order and presence of accused – chain of custody – material contradictions in prosecution evidence undermining proof beyond reasonable doubt.
19 September 2018
Ex‑parte decree set aside where service on corporate defendant via a driver and publication was ineffective.
Civil procedure – service on corporate defendant; substituted service by publication; requirement to serve secretary/director or affixation; examination of process server; vacating ex‑parte decree for want of effective service.
18 September 2018
An extension application omitting Section 38(1) LDCA is incompetent and was struck out for wrong citation.
Land law – extension of time to appeal – competency of application – mandatory citation of Section 38(1) Land Disputes Courts Act – wrong citation renders application incompetent – striking out.
18 September 2018
High Court dismisses matrimonial appeal as time-barred; awaiting a decree did not suspend the limitation period.
Matrimonial appeals – limitation period under s.80(2) Law of Marriage Act – 45 days from date of judgment; Limitation Act s.19(1) exclusion applies only where copy of judgment is mandatory; Law of Marriage (Matrimonial Proceedings) Rules, r.37 – memorandum of appeal to be filed in subordinate court; late appeal dismissed as time-barred.
18 September 2018
Appeal allowed where claimant failed to prove contractual debt and lacked locus standi; trial court orders set aside.
Civil procedure – burden of proof – plaintiff must prove contractual relationship and indebtedness on the balance of probabilities; locus standi – claimant must show a cause of action against the defendant; improper admission of exhibits – objectors should be given opportunity to state objections; appellate intervention where trial court fails to dismiss unproven claim.
18 September 2018
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause or account for delay; alleged irregularity did not justify extension of time.
* Civil procedure – extension of time – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1) – requirement to show sufficient cause and account for each day of delay * Execution proceedings – notice of execution – unexplained delay of more than five months * Alleged irregularity – mere allegation is insufficient; only irregularity affecting legality may justify extension
18 September 2018
A material defect in the charge sheet (wrong date) vitiated the prosecution; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
* Criminal procedure – defective charge sheet – material error in the date on the charge sheet vitiating the prosecution. * Criminal law – robbery: elements of theft/extortion plus violence or intimidation; proof beyond reasonable doubt required. * Remedy – quashing of conviction and sentence and remittal for amendment and retrial.
17 September 2018
Application to file appeal out of time struck out for incorrect High Court heading and un‑attested/unsigned affidavit.
* Criminal procedure – application for extension of time to file appeal – requirement to use correct High Court registry heading per High Court Registries Rules (Rule 8(2)); * Civil/criminal procedure – formal requirements of affidavits – necessity of attestation clause and deponent's signature; * Procedural law – fatal irregularity and incompetence – striking out defective applications.
17 September 2018
Appellant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time; appeal dismissed with costs.
• Civil procedure — Extension of time — Applicant must show sufficient cause and account for each day of delay; medical evidence must be timely and attached to supporting affidavit. • Evidence — Credibility — Contradiction between affidavit and oral testimony undermines credibility. • Civil procedure — Joinder of parties — Plaintiff as dominus litis chooses opponents; non-joinder of vendor not necessarily fatal.
14 September 2018
Execution relief must conform to the decree; court struck out application seeking acceleration and detention for unpaid instalments.
* Civil procedure – Execution of decree – Application under Order XXI and s.109B – Whether execution may accelerate entire decretal sum where decree provides instalment payments; * Execution relief must conform to the decree’s terms; * Civil imprisonment sought for non-payment of amounts not presently due under decree.
14 September 2018
Retrial ordered because the trial court failed to determine parties' joint contributions to matrimonial assets under section 114 LMA.
* Family Law – Division of matrimonial assets – Requirement to receive evidence on joint contributions under section 114(1) and (2) Law of Marriage Act. * Evidence – Informal village/hamlet division of assets – Not substitute for court evidence of joint efforts. * Family obligations – Spousal medical treatment costs – Not automatic set-off against matrimonial share absent proof.
14 September 2018
Court granted stay of execution to prevent rendering the applicant’s pending extension-of-time appeal nugatory.
Land law — stay of execution pending appeal — Order XXXIX r.5 Civil Procedure Code — injunctional nature to prevent rendering appeal nugatory; irreparable harm — attachment of construction machinery; pending application for extension of time to appeal — discretion to grant stay; procedural abuse/delay considered but not found decisive.
14 September 2018
An applicant's request for objection proceedings under Rule 47 was dismissed with no order as to costs.
* Commercial Procedure – Rule 47 – application for objection proceedings – dismissal * Civil procedure – disposal in absence of parties * Costs – no order as to costs
14 September 2018
Appeal allowed: improper locus in quo visit and failure to specify the substantive offence rendered the judgment invalid.
* Criminal law – dangerous driving causing death – procedure – locus in quo inspections: exceptional, must be conducted with parties, measurements recorded and read into proceedings, and evidence adduced. * Criminal procedure – conviction must specify the substantive offence and the statutory section; citing procedural provisions only renders judgment invalid. * Judgment – inclusion of extraneous facts not supported by court record vitiates proceedings.
14 September 2018
Appellant lacked locus standi to sue over deceased’s land; appeal dismissed and lower tribunals upheld.
Land law — Locus standi — Suit concerning land held in safekeeping for a deceased — Only legal representative or heir has standing to sue in respect of deceased’s estate — Ward Tribunal and District Land and Housing Tribunal decisions upheld.
14 September 2018
Secretary’s participation in ward tribunal decisions voids proceedings; High Court nullified and remitted matter for retrial.
Ward Tribunals Act s.5(3) – Secretary may attend but is not a member for decisions – Secretary’s signature/participation renders ward tribunal decision null; Jurisdiction v. procedure; High Court revisional powers under s.43 Land Disputes Courts Act – nullification and remittal for retrial.
14 September 2018
High Court allowed fourth applicant an out‑of‑time appeal due to denial of hearing and stayed execution.
Land law — revisional jurisdiction (s.43(1)(b) Cap 216) — right to be heard — service/summons — extension of time to appeal — stay of execution.
14 September 2018
Wrong statutory citation renders leave-to-appeal application incompetent; s.25(1)(b) Magistrates' Courts Act governs appeals from Primary Court.
* Civil procedure – procedural competence – citation of enabling provision – wrong statutory citation renders application incompetent; specific provision (s.25(1)(b) Magistrates' Courts Act) governs leave to appeal from Primary Court; Law of Limitation general provisions not a substitute.
14 September 2018
Court may decide asset division when granting or after divorce; remitted for rehearing on assets, custody and maintenance.
* Matrimonial procedure – primary courts – application of Magistrates' Courts Act and civil procedure rules mutatis mutandis (s.93 Law of Marriage Act). * Divorce and ancillary reliefs – court may order division of matrimonial assets when granting or subsequent to grant of divorce (s.114 Law of Marriage Act). * Pleadings – petitioner need not expressly pray for asset division for court to make ancillary orders once divorce is granted. * Judicial duty – court must inquire into custody and maintenance of infant children (s.108 Law of Marriage Act). * Remittal – defective handling of asset evidence and failure to consider custody/maintenance justifies rehearing limited to those issues.
14 September 2018
Application to appeal without judgment was struck out as incompetent; Registrar ordered to supply appeal documents.
Criminal procedure – Appeal without possession of judgment – Incorrect statutory citation renders application incompetent; administrative duty of Registrar/Deputy Registrar to supply judgment; remedy by administrative action and possible application for extension of time.
14 September 2018
The applicant's appeal was dismissed as time-barred; a 45-day limitation under the Limitation Act applies to DLHT appeals.
Limitation of actions — Appeals from District Land and Housing Tribunal — Absence of prescribed period in Cap 216 — Application of Law of Limitation Act Part II(2) (45 days) — Appeal filed out of time — Dismissal with costs.
14 September 2018