|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 2024 |
|
|
Appeal allowed; theft convictions quashed for failure to prove ownership and requisite criminal intent.
Criminal law – Theft – Elements: asportation and animus furandi – Burden of proof; Ownership dispute and staying criminal proceedings; Admissions must cover particulars of offence; Appellate interference with concurrent factual findings where misapprehension of evidence exists.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Petitioner’s affidavit satisfied s4(2) BRDEA and non–public servants have locus to challenge Public Service Act provisions.
Constitutional petition — section 4(2) BRDEA affidavit requirement; preliminary objection must be a pure point of law; locus standi under Article 30(3); right to work challenge to Public Service Act s25A.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Court partly allowed appellant's appeal, reduced vehicle valuation and upheld respondent's personal property status.
Matrimonial property – definition and division – Law of Marriage Act ss.58, 60, 114(1); Evidence – burden of proof s.110 Evidence Act; valuation of assets – court must give reasons when accepting or rejecting evidence; second appeal – interference only for misapprehension, perverse or unreasonable findings.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Proceedings in the accused's absence without issuing arrest warrant or summons vitiate the trial and require retrial.
Criminal procedure – accused absent/jumped bail – prosecution's prayer for arrest warrant and summons to sureties – failure to issue orders – proceedings in absence vitiate trial. Statutory compliance – section 226 CPA – necessity to follow prescribed procedure when accused absconds
Remedy – quashing proceedings, judgment and sentence; retrial ordered
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Court allowed appeal, finding statutory notices were given and auction sale of mortgaged land was lawful.
Land law – sale of mortgaged property – statutory notices: 60‑day demand and 14‑day public advertisement – proof by documentary exhibits. Land law – sale below market value – section 133(2) threshold (25%) and effect of valuation evidence
Procedure – admissibility and weight of a security/guarantee document vs a formal valuation report. Auction sales by mortgagee – purchaser’s title valid absent fraud or procedural noncompliance
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
A prisoner's satisfactory explanation and transfer justified extension of time to file an appeal under section 361(2) CPA.
Criminal procedure – extension of time – section 361(2) CPA – "good cause" and satisfactorily explained delay
Prisoners – transfer and reliance on prison officers as ground for delay – equitable leniency
Discretion of High Court – to be exercised judiciously and flexibly. Unopposed application – absence of State objection relevant to exercise of discretion
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
The applicant's extension application filed under the wrong statute was incompetent and struck out.
Arbitration law – application for extension of time to challenge arbitral award – proper enabling provision under Arbitration Act required. Civil procedure – competency – wrong statutory citation goes to the root and cannot be cured by overriding objective
Jurisdiction – absence of proper statutory basis affects competence and warrants striking out
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Failure to file ordered written submissions equates to non-appearance and may justify dismissal for want of prosecution.
Civil procedure — Failure to file written submissions — Amounts to non-appearance — Dismissal for want of prosecution — Order XXXIX Rule 17(1) Civil Procedure Code; discretion to dismiss appeals for default.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Termination was unfair: employer failed to prove misconduct or follow fair disciplinary procedures; statutory benefits and compensation ordered.
Labour law — unfair dismissal — employer must prove valid reason and fair procedure; absence of evidence and witnesses vitiates dismissal for misconduct or corruption; entitlement to statutory terminal benefits and compensation where termination unlawful.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
The applicant failed to prove ownership; village councils lacked title to allocate former parastatal land; suit dismissed.
Land law – ownership and allocation – land formerly owned by defunct parastatal reverted to State; village councils lacked title to confer proprietary rights; possession as invitee does not confer ownership; nemo dat quod non habet; burden and standard of proof in civil land disputes (balance of probabilities; s.119 Evidence Act).
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Challenges to exhibit procedure, chain of custody and identification failed; theft conviction proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft – evidential requirements; admissibility of exhibits – reading seized documents in court; chain of custody – oral and documentary proof; identification – reliability of witness with prior acquaintance; assessment of defence and standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
A person whose proprietary rights are affected must be joined; failure to join requires quashing and remitting for rehearing.
Land law – Recovery of land – Accrual of cause of action on date of death where deceased was in possession (s.9, Law of Limitation Act). Civil procedure – Necessary party/intervener – Joinder required where proprietary rights are directly affected; witness is not a party
Relief – Non-joinder remedy is remittal for addition of necessary party and rehearing
Decrees – Cannot be executed against strangers to the suit
|
30 September 2024 |
|
The appellant's challenge to the divorce and claim to a vehicle failed for insufficient evidence.
Family law – Divorce – Irreparable breakdown – Proof required under sections 107(1) and 107(2) of the Law of Marriage Act. Matrimonial property – Section 114 LMA – Burden to prove joint acquisition; primafacie title and documentary evidence for registered assets
Appeals – Scope of second appeal – limits on raising new factual issues; deference to concurrent findings of fact
Evidence – Rule that he who alleges must prove; oral agreements and need for corroboration in property claims
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed; victim and medical evidence found credible and mandatory life sentence for rape of under‑ten upheld.
Criminal law – Rape – Victim’s testimony as primary and best evidence; corroboration by parent and medical officer; medical evidence of hymen perforation and penetration; inability of medical witness to identify specific blunt object not fatal to prosecution; sentencing – mandatory life imprisonment for rape of girl under ten (s.131(3) Penal Code).
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Conviction quashed for armed robbery due to doubtful identification, failure to name assailant early, and omitted material witnesses.
Criminal law – Identification by recognition and visual identification; requirements on duration, distance and intensity/source of light; importance of naming assailant at earliest opportunity; adverse inference from failure to call material witnesses; variance between charge and initial police report (grievous harm vs armed robbery).
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Appellate court upheld convictions: victim credible, PF3 corroborative, charge sufficient, appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Sexual offences against a child – reliance on victim’s evidence as best evidence; corroboration by medical report (PF3). Criminal procedure – adequacy of charge where offences alleged on diverse dates; specificity of time and place
Evidence – delay in reporting sexual offences explained by fear does not necessarily affect credibility. Medical evidence – clinical officer qualified to give opinion; PF3 admissible corroborative evidence
Procedure – change of magistrate/calling fresh witnesses requires proof of material prejudice
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Applicant granted four‑month extension to file estate inventory and accounts upon showing sufficient cause.
Probate law – Extension of time to file inventory and accounts – s.107(2) Probate and Administration Estates Act – Court’s discretion to grant extension upon showing good and sufficient cause; Administrator’s duties – delays caused by trespass, third‑party registrations and scattered assets may justify extension; Civil procedure – application supported by affidavit and uncontested submissions.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Appeal partly allowed: default judgment quashed for failure to fix ex parte proof date under Order VIII Rule 14(1).
Civil procedure – Default judgment – Appealability of default/ex parte judgments; Order VIII Rule 14(1) CPC – requirement to fix date for ex parte proof; Order VIII Rule 15 and Order XL Rule 1(b) CPC – setting aside and right to appeal; Audi alteram partem – right to be heard and tribunal’s discretion to refuse extension.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Applicant’s illness and unreachable phone constituted sufficient cause to grant extension and set aside the dismissal order.
Civil procedure — Extension of time — "Sufficient cause" and good cause — Illness as supervening event — Order IX Rule 6 CPC — Setting aside dismissal for failure to appear — Liberal construction of "sufficient cause"; failure to strictly account for delay does not preclude relief where interest of justice demands it.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Unexplained delay in arraignment and detention created reasonable doubt, leading to quashing of sexual‑abuse conviction.
Criminal law – sexual offences – proof of sexual abuse: victim’s testimony as best evidence; medical absence of injuries not necessarily fatal
Evidence – cautioned statement admitted without contemporaneous objection; later challenge treated as afterthought. Criminal procedure – unexplained delay in arraignment/detention – adverse inference against prosecution; failure to call arresting officer weakens case
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Failure to mark/endorse tendered documentary exhibits denied fair hearing and warranted quashing and remittal for rehearing.
Land law; admissibility of documentary exhibits — failure to mark/endorse exhibits and effect on record; right to be heard and fair hearing; prejudice and failure of justice; appellate re-evaluation and remittal for rehearing.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Court granted extension to file appeal, holding illness constituted sufficient cause despite incomplete day-by-day accounting.
Civil procedure – Extension of time to file notice of appeal – requirements for 'sufficient cause' – illness as supervening event; discretion to extend time despite imperfect day-by-day accounting. Extension of time – necessity to account for each day of delay is important but not absolute; court may exercise discretion in interest of justice. Alleged illegality in impugned decision – not determined by court when granting procedural extension
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Manager granted power to sue for the protected person but denied sole control of family property; entitled to half the rent.
Mental Health Act – management of estate of person of unsound mind; authority to lease and control property; power to sue on behalf of protected person; preservation of prior court-limited powers; family/matrimonial property and rent division.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Court upholds three‑year separation, finds wife contributed to matrimonial assets and reduces award to respondent to TZS 417,500,000.
Matrimonial law – separation versus divorce – exercise of discretion under s.110 Law of Marriage Act; Division of matrimonial property – recognition of domestic services and business involvement as contributions under s.114 LMA; Proof of bank balances – role of party admissions and s.60 Evidence Act; Requirement for documentary proof where facts disputed; First appellate court’s re-evaluation of facts and law.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Applicant's imprisonment and a withdrawn defective appeal justified extension to file notice and appeal out of time.
Criminal procedure – extension of time – s.361(2) Criminal Procedure Act – requirement of sufficient cause; Custody and delay – detainee's reliance on prison officers to prepare appeal documents can constitute sufficient cause; Defective/withdrawn appeal – prior withdrawn appeal relevant to showing cause for delay; Unopposed applications – court must still assess sufficiency of grounds.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Applicant's extension to file revision against ex parte CMA award dismissed for unproven illegality and unexplained delay.
Labour law — Revisionary jurisdiction of the Labour Court under Rule 28(1) — Alleged illegality in CMA proceedings; Evidence — Requirement to administer oath to witnesses — Record showing oath dispels claim of illegality; Civil procedure — Service of summons and ex parte proceedings — Proof of receipt by manager suffices; Extension of time — Applicant must account for each day of delay; negligence and unexplained delay justify refusal.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
1st accused convicted of murder on credible visual ID and medical evidence; 2nd acquitted for unreliable identification.
Criminal law – murder – proof of death and causation; visual identification and identification parade – requirements and credibility; malice aforethought (s.200 Penal Code) inferred from nature and number of blows; defective prior description may render parade identification unreliable.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
A contractual claim filed five days after the six-year limitation expired is time-barred and dismissed.
Limitation of actions – Contract claims – Item 7, Part I Schedule to the Law of Limitation Act – six-year limitation; Accrual of cause of action – expiry of defect liability period; Electronic filing – date of filing determined from court’s electronic record; Time-barred suit dismissed under section 3(1) LLA.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Minister cannot grant extension under section 44(1) once that provision has been declared unconstitutional.
Constitutional law – validity of ministerial discretion under section 44(1) Law of Limitation Act – Constitutional Court declaration of invalidity. Judicial review – prerogative orders (certiorari and mandamus) – futility where underlying statutory power is void. Civil procedure – effect of striking out for lack of board resolution on ability to seek ministerial extension of time
|
30 September 2024 |
|
An electronic filing system rejection amounted to sufficient cause to extend the applicant's time to file an appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1) – sufficient cause. Electronic filing systems – JEFS rejection as procedural mishap capable of constituting sufficient cause
Diligence – prompt steps seeking clarification and exemption support grant of extension
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Appellant proved ownership on balance of probabilities; tribunal mis-evaluated evidence so appeal partly allowed.
Land law – proof of ownership – burden of proof on claimant – standard: balance of probabilities
Evidence – oral vs documentary evidence – admissibility and weight where documents lack particulars or contradict oral testimony
Evidence Act – sections 61, 100, 110–111 – exceptions permitting oral proof of factual ownership
Procedure – absence of vendor’s testimony by substituted service; adverse inference not automatic. Probate inventory not conclusive proof of ownership in land disputes before land tribunals
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed for unreasonable doubt and unfair trial caused by prosecution examining the accused.
Criminal law – statutory rape – incorrect citation of statutory provision curable; Evidence – proof of rape and corroboration by medical evidence; Evidence of child witness – procedural requirements; Criminal procedure – examination‑in‑chief and cross‑examination roles; Fair trial – prosecution conducting accused’s examination constituted denial of fair hearing; Contradictions in prosecution evidence going to root of case.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Whether respondent's ownership can be upheld despite inconclusive title evidence and non-joinder of the vendor.
Land law – ownership disputes – burden of proof on a claimant to establish title; Non-joinder – duty of plaintiff to join persons he alleges have interest; Evidence – inconsistent testimony and lack of proof of vendor’s title undermining purchaser’s claim; Effect of prior tribunal judgment – binds only parties to that judgment, not the world.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Application for extension of time dismissed: alleged illegality not shown on face of record and delay unaccounted for.
Extension of time – discretion under Section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act; requirements from Lyamuya; apparent illegality on face of record; necessity to account for all days of delay; pleadings bind parties; illness not pleaded inadmissible.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
The applicant's unproven search for an advocate and ignorance of law did not justify extension of time to appeal.
Extension of time – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1) – requirements for condonation – Lyamuya principles: account for each day of delay, diligence, non-inordinate delay; ignorance of law/searching for an advocate not sufficient cause; necessity to prove and account for delay (Hassan Bushiri).
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Conviction for unlawful possession of elephant tusks upheld; chain of custody and search lawful; sentence reduced to 20 years.
Wildlife offences – unlawful possession of government trophies – identification of elephant tusks by wildlife expert; chain of custody – custody from arrest to valuation; search and seizure – intermediate search and seizure certificate sufficiency; prosecutorial instruments – omission of named offence not fatal; sentencing – within statutory range but reduced for first offender.
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Suit struck out for suing the wrong corporate entity under the university charter; plaintiff may refile correctly.
Civil procedure — preliminary objection — competency of suit — whether the correct corporate entity is sued under a university charter. Statutory interpretation — Universities Act and university Charter — body corporate capable of suing and being sued
Evidence — annexures and correspondence can disclose the proper party when contract is not attached
Remedy — striking out incompetent suit; costs awarded; right to refile
|
30 September 2024 |
|
|
30 September 2024 |
|
Court upheld convictions, finding recognition identification reliable despite hearsay, absent exhibits, and minor inconsistencies.
Criminal law – Visual identification at night – Recognition evidence and adequacy of description; Hearsay – weight of complainant’s hearsay vs direct witness evidence; Evidence – absence of exhibits and non‑production of arresting officer not necessarily fatal; Proof beyond reasonable doubt – materiality of inconsistencies in witness statements.
|
30 September 2024 |