|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 1996 |
|
|
Adjournment refused; 21 of 27 allegations in paragraph 6 struck out, seven to proceed to trial; hearing fixed.
Election law – election petition – preliminary objections to pleadings – striking out defective, vague or embarrassing allegations; amended pleadings – failure to file/amend within time – court proceeds on original petition; adjournment – refusal where no proper cause or amended pleading; advocates’ conduct – court admonition and possible disciplinary referral.
|
26 November 1996 |
|
Court refused adjournment, struck out numerous vague allegations, and ordered trial to proceed on limited allegations.
Election law – election petition – amendment of pleadings – Order 6 Rule 18 – time for amendment – preliminary objections for vagueness and failure to disclose cause of action – striking out pleadings – advocate’s non‑compliance with court orders and disciplinary implications – trial to proceed on limited allegations.
|
26 November 1996 |
|
Primary court’s finding that respondent gifted a shamba to the appellant was upheld and restored on appeal; District Court decision set aside.
Property/land dispute – inter vivos gift – whether respondent gifted shamba to former spouse for her and children’s use – evidential sufficiency and credibility of primary court findings. Civil procedure – appellate review – scope of review of primary court factual findings and when appellate court should restore primary judgment. Estoppel/repudiation – good faith promise cannot be unilaterally abrogated by donor after clear transfer.
|
21 November 1996 |
|
Whether the applicant's land claim was time‑barred and whether village allocation of unattended land was valid.
Prescription – Government Notice No. 311/64 – 12‑year limitation period for land proceedings; Abandonment/unattended land – effect on ownership and local authority allocation; Validity of village/local authority allocation of land left unattended; Appellate review – setting aside a District Court judgment that improperly disturbed Primary Court findings.
|
18 November 1996 |
|
The applicant successfully appealed; the respondent was convicted of theft and forgery and given concurrent four-year sentences plus restitution.
Criminal law – Theft by servant (Penal Code) – employee diverted customer cheques to personal account and pocketed overcharged sums. Criminal law – Forgery – fabrication/alteration of accounting documents to conceal misappropriation. Evidence – books, documents and witness testimony sufficient to prove theft and forgery beyond reasonable doubt. Appeal – appellate intervention where trial acquittal was unsupported by evidence; substitution of conviction and imposition of sentence and restitution.
|
15 November 1996 |
|
Possession and improvements do not confer title to clan land; purported bequest to a non-clan member is invalid.
Land law; customary/clan land ownership; inheritance of clan land; rule 1 of GN 436/1963 prohibiting bequest of clan shamba to non-clan members; possession and improvements insufficient to confer title.
|
6 November 1996 |
| October 1996 |
|
|
The applicant cannot have the father's estate included in the son's estate; father's estate must be distributed to heirs first.
Probate & Administration – Whether property of a deceased father may be included in administration of his deceased son's estate – separation and distribution of father's estate before appointment of administrator of son's estate. Protection of heirs – duty to protect widow's and other heirs' interests where prior administrator died before completing administration and alleged mismanagement. Procedure – primary court directed to comply with appellate directions and interested persons may bring fresh proceedings in respect of the father's estate.
|
31 October 1996 |
|
Non-compliance with mandatory Rule 3 consultations/signature renders Primary Court proceedings a nullity; retrial ordered before different magistrate and assessors.
Magistrates' Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgement of Court) Rules (GN No.2/1988) - Rule 3 mandatory consultations with assessors - judgment must be signed by magistrate and assessors where all agree - summing up cannot replace consultations - failure to comply renders proceedings a nullity - retrial de novo ordered.
|
30 October 1996 |
|
Failure to give statutory notice of intention to appeal renders the appeal incompetent and it is dismissed.
Criminal procedure — Notice of intention to appeal — Section 361 Criminal Procedure Act — Requirement to give notice within ten days and lodge petition within forty-five days — Court's discretion to admit out-of-time appeal — Need to show good cause — Failure to give notice renders appeal incompetent.
|
24 October 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed for lack of evidence of a three-foot land encroachment; appellant ordered to pay costs.
Land dispute – alleged encroachment of steps (approx. 3 feet) – Primary Court failed to address complaint – District Court reversal for insufficient evidence – unserved additional grounds of appeal – ex parte proceedings – appeal dismissed, costs awarded.
|
23 October 1996 |
|
Conviction based on recent possession lacking specific identification is unsafe; sentence quashed and appellant released.
Criminal law – store breaking – recent possession doctrine – requirement of satisfactory identification of stolen items – insufficiency of generic possession to ground conviction – charge of neglect to prevent felony where accused absent – appellate interference where conviction unsafe.
|
18 October 1996 |
|
Appellate court upheld Tshs 1,800,000 compensation for unexhausted improvements and ordered payment in four monthly instalments.
Land – compensation for unexhausted improvements on customary/clan land – valuation where precise evidence lacking – appellate interference with factual findings – payment of monetary awards by instalment due to inflation.
|
16 October 1996 |
|
Missing assessor and absence of a boundary sketch rendered the trial unfair and warranted a retrial without fresh fees.
Civil procedure – trial irregularities – failure to draw/produce sketch map for disputed land; trial conducted with only one assessor – miscarriage of justice; retrial (trial de novo) ordered; retrial to proceed without fresh fees.
|
15 October 1996 |
|
Procedural defects (wrong venue and lack of notice) in probate proceedings justified annulling orders and ordering retrial at the proper primary court.
Probate jurisdiction – proper venue for administration of estate; Notice and participation of interested persons in probate proceedings; Procedural irregularity/miscarriage of justice – annulment of orders and retrial at correct primary court.
|
15 October 1996 |
|
|
3 October 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed where evidence showed claimant’s son was not fathered by the deceased, negating any inheritance claim.
Inheritance/disputed land – paternity as basis for intestate succession – whether claimant’s child was biological child of deceased; testamentary instrument alleged in favour of claimant — validity and withdrawal; weight of documentary evidence (baptismal record, hospital birth chit) on balance of probabilities.
|
2 October 1996 |
| September 1996 |
|
|
Application to extend time for filing appeal dismissed for failure to show good cause; applicant ordered to pay costs.
Extension of time to appeal – requirement to show "good cause" – inaction or sitting on rights is not excusable – costs awarded to respondent.
|
23 September 1996 |
|
A purported representative must prove lawful authority to represent a deceased; failure renders the application incompetent.
Administration of estate — Locus standi — Representation of deceased — Proof of authority required before instituting or continuing proceedings on behalf of a deceased — Application incompetent if representation not established — Costs to unsuccessful applicant.
|
19 September 1996 |
| August 1996 |
|
|
|
29 August 1996 |
|
Survey boundaries upheld; pre‑survey improvements may attract compensation; appeal dismissed and trial orders confirmed.
Land law – boundary disputes – respect for survey boundaries – removal of encroaching structures. Pre‑survey occupation – unexhausted improvements – entitlement to compensation for demolished parts. Evidence – sufficiency of documentary and witness evidence – site visit not essential where record is adequate. Civil appeal – confirmation of trial court where findings are supported by evidence.
|
7 August 1996 |
|
Appellate court upholds lower courts’ findings of ownership and dismisses appeal for lack of grounds.
Land dispute – ownership of shamba and house – appellate review of concurrent findings of fact – evidence overwhelmingly supports respondent – appeal dismissed with costs.
|
2 August 1996 |
|
|
1 August 1996 |
| May 1996 |
|
|
Conviction for theft by servant quashed where evidence failed to exclude other persons and prosecution's case was doubtful.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – burden of proof; evidence must exclude reasonable alternative suspects; access to premises by employer/family undermines exclusive attribution to servant; biased auditing evidence and absence of State support render conviction unsafe.
|
3 May 1996 |
| April 1996 |
|
|
High Court restores Primary Court divorce and property distribution, finding District Court's separation order unsupported by evidence.
Matrimonial law — Divorce and distribution of matrimonial property — Appellate review — Illegality of substituting judicial separation without evidential basis — Restoration of trial court orders.
|
30 April 1996 |
|
An appellate court may not substitute an unsupported separation order; the Primary Court's divorce and property distribution was restored.
Family law — Divorce — Trial court’s finding of marriage breakdown and distribution of matrimonial property — Appellate review — Appellate court must not substitute findings or order separation absent evidential basis.
|
30 April 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed: clan land cannot be validly alienated without clan consent; respondent’s redemption claim upheld.
Customary land – clan land – validity of bequest or disposal under Bahaya custom; Disposal requires clan consent and customary restrictions on alienation; Minority and limitation – claim instituted after attaining majority is timely; Compensation for unexhausted improvements; Costs on unsuccessful appellant.
|
30 April 1996 |
|
High Court sets aside District Court refusal to stay execution and remits appeal to another magistrate; costs to respondent.
Probate and administration – conflicting primary court proceedings decided by different magistrates – stay of execution pending appeal – interest of justice – District Court ruling set aside and appeal remitted to another magistrate with competent jurisdiction.
|
30 April 1996 |
|
Second appeal dismissed: will proved respondent’s title since 1928; alleged auction/execution evidence inadequate.
Civil appeal — title to land — alleged transfer by execution/auction — requirement to produce primary court judgment and proper sale documentation; proof of ownership by will — balance of probabilities; appellate review of factual findings — second appeal dismissed for lack of genuine grounds.
|
15 April 1996 |
| March 1996 |
|
|
Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed for lack of good cause and unreliable affidavit.
Civil procedure – Application for leave to appeal out of time – Requirement to show "good cause" – Credibility of affidavits – Failure to prosecute/abandonment of rights – Dismissal with costs.
|
8 March 1996 |
| February 1996 |
|
|
Appellant failed to prove sole ownership; joint tenancy and purchaser’s title upheld and appeal dismissed.
Land law – Dispute over ownership of surveyed plot – joint occupancy since 1970s – survey and grant of joint tenancy (1991). Transfer/purchase – Validity of purchaser’s title from deceased co-occupant – evidence supporting lawful purchase. Civil appeal – Appellate review of findings of fact and exercise of discretion by trial court – no error found.
|
28 February 1996 |
| January 1996 |
|
|
Execution must follow the earlier unappealed Primary Court judgment (27.2.92); conflicting later order set aside.
Execution — conflicting Primary Court judgments by different magistrates — earlier unappealed judgment prevails for execution; irregular execution set aside.
|
11 January 1996 |