|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 2025 |
|
|
The court lacked jurisdiction because the applicant, bound by TFF and club rules, was barred from suing in ordinary courts.
Sports law — Jurisdiction — TFF Constitution (Arts.66–67) and League Regulations (Rule 25(4)) restrict ordinary‑court access for football disputes; club constitutions can bind members to internal remedies and CAS; application struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
|
6 June 2025 |
| May 2025 |
|
|
Court quashed party removal and expulsion for breach of the applicant's right to be heard.
Judicial review — natural justice — right to be heard; Political Parties Act s.6C(5) and party constitution observance; burden of proof for service; certiorari to quash irregular party decision; mandamus refused for lack of specific legal right.
|
28 May 2025 |
| March 2025 |
|
|
Application seeking declaration that expired injunction was of no effect was misconceived and time-barred.
Civil procedure — temporary injunction — lapse of statutory life of interlocutory injunction — appropriate remedy and limitation — Order XXXVII Rule 5 CPC presupposes live order — Law of Limitation Act Item 21 (60 days) applies where no specific period provided.
|
24 March 2025 |
|
Court granted extension to appeal due to delayed judgment copy and excusable technical delay.
Extension of time to appeal — delay in obtaining certified copy of judgment — technical delay from struck-out application — discretion to extend time — Fortunatus Masha principle.
|
10 March 2025 |
| November 2024 |
|
|
Court granted limited interim injunction restraining majority shareholder from dealing with company assets and management pending petition.
* Companies law – petition for unfair prejudice – interim injunctive relief pending determination of unfair prejudice petition.
* Interim injunction – Atilio v. Mbowe test – prima facie case, irreparable loss, balance of convenience.
* Limits on interlocutory orders – court will not grant relief that decides the main suit.
* Interim management and asset restraints – involvement of minority shareholders in management and prohibition on dealing with company property and advertising pending final determination.
|
13 November 2024 |
| October 2024 |
|
|
Court dismissed petition on children’s political participation, holding statutory remedies under the Political Parties Act should be exhausted before constitutional relief.
* Constitutional jurisdiction – invocation sparingly where statutory remedies exist.* Political Parties Act – section 19 empowers Registrar to regulate and sanction parties; statutory remedies should be exhausted before constitutional litigation.* Child protection – alleged involvement of under-18s in party activities raises statutory questions under Political Parties Act and Law of the Child Act.* Public interest litigation – costs discretion exercised, no order as to costs.
|
3 October 2024 |
| September 2024 |
|
|
Dismissal for alleged forged certificate quashed for denial of investigation report and unfair disciplinary hearing; reinstatement ordered.
Administrative law; judicial review – procedural impropriety and natural justice – requirement to supply investigation report to accused employee; employer’s onus to prove compliance; bias and procedural defects in disciplinary proceedings; prerogative relief – certiorari and mandamus; reinstatement for unlawful dismissal.
|
4 September 2024 |
| July 2024 |
|
|
Constitutional court may strike down subsidiary rules; Law School By-law unconstitutional for denying students right to be heard on appeal.
Constitutional jurisdiction — challenge to subsidiary legislation under BRADEA; Right to fair hearing — Article 13(6)(a) — students’ appeals; Scope of remedies — declaration and mandatory amendment; Damages — dismissed for lack of proof.
|
23 July 2024 |
| June 2024 |
|
|
A conviction cannot stand where judgment was not duly pronounced or signed; proceedings quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure — validity of judgment — requirement for pronouncement in open court and presiding officer’s signature — absence of proceedings on judgment date — certified copy lacking original signature insufficient — conviction and sentence quashed; retrial ordered.
|
19 June 2024 |
|
|
13 June 2024 |
| May 2024 |
|
|
|
23 May 2024 |
|
Most PDPA provisions upheld as constitutional; Sections 22(3) and 23(3)(c),(e) found vague and must be amended within one year.
Constitutional law — Privacy and data protection — Challenges to PDPA provisions — Burden and standard of proof in constitutional petitions — Article 30 limitations and three‑step test — Reading principal legislation with regulations — Vague/overbroad provisions (s.22(3); s.23(3)(c),(e)) declared defective and requiring amendment.
|
8 May 2024 |
|
Whether the 90‑day statutory hearing period runs from assignment to a three‑judge panel, and jurisdiction lapses if that period expires.
Constitutional petitions — Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act and Rules — composition of High Court for petitions (s.10) — competence determined by single judge but hearing by three‑judge panel — rule 15(2) ninety‑day time limit — computation from assignment to panel — jurisdiction lapses by effluxion of time — inability to extend time once jurisdiction lost.
|
6 May 2024 |
|
Applicant has a constitutional right to access Clubhouse, but no evidence showed state restriction; petition dismissed.
Digital rights – access to social media – Clubhouse – constitutional right to seek, receive and impart information online; limitation of rights – three‑part test (prescribed by law, legitimate aim, necessary and proportionate); burden of proof in constitutional claims; admissibility/credibility of third‑party network reports (OONI); regulatory powers of TCRA to block or restrict under law.
|
3 May 2024 |
| April 2024 |
|
|
A court is functus officio and cannot reopen a concluded judgment to impose new enforcement conditions.
Constitutional enforcement – structural interdicts – enforcement of appellate declarations of unconstitutionality; functus officio – finality of judgments and prohibition on reopening decided matters; execution of constitutional decrees – court's discretion and available modalities; locus standi under BRADEA (section 4(2)).
|
24 April 2024 |
|
A framework procurement contract required call‑off orders; no purchase order meant no breach and the claim was dismissed.
Procurement law – Framework contract – Call‑off (purchase) orders required to trigger performance; tender/bid documents not part of contract unless annexed; absence of purchase order means no breach; specific contractual damages must be proved.
|
12 April 2024 |
|
A single judge may hear preliminary BRADEA matters, but anonymity for petitioners cannot be granted pre-institution; minors must sue by next friends.
* Constitutional procedure – BRADEA Rules – preliminary matters handled by single Judge (Rule 9(1)); assignment to three-judge panel after competence (Rule 15(1)).
* Inherent powers – Rule 2(3) – cannot be used to create pre-institution anonymity of petitioners where statute requires names and addresses.
* Child protection – anonymity and protective measures provided by Child Act and Chief Justice’s circular operate after institution of proceedings.
* Civil procedure – minors must sue by next friend (Order XXXI Rule 1 CPC); failure renders application incompetent.
|
5 April 2024 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove medical negligence; treating doctor acted within accepted professional standards and consented procedures.
* Medical negligence – standard of care – Bolam principle – conduct judged against ordinary competent practitioner in specialty. * Consent – signed consent covering necessary procedures and intra‑operative conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy. * Causation and damages – adverse outcome alone does not establish negligence; need expert evidence linking breach to harm. * Burden of proof – plaintiff must prove facts alleged on balance of probabilities.
|
4 April 2024 |
|
|
3 April 2024 |
|
|
3 April 2024 |
|
Leave to seek judicial review granted where arguable fair‑hearing and administrative law issues require full hearing.
Judicial review — Leave to apply — Prima facie/arguable case required — Fair hearing/natural justice alleged breaches (investigation report, impartial tribunal, adequate notice, opportunity to mitigate, access to minutes) — Good faith and leave-stage limitation.
|
2 April 2024 |
|
Applicant's challenge to ministerial public consultations dismissed as matter already finally adjudicated; court functus officio.
* Judicial review – prerogative orders – certiorari, prohibition, mandamus – repetition of issues already adjudicated.* Doctrine of functus officio and finality of judgments – court barred from re‑litigating matters finally determined by same court.* Enforcement of court orders – compliance versus parliamentary legislative process; contempt proceedings as remedy for false statements on compliance.
|
2 April 2024 |
| March 2024 |
|
|
Member granted leave to seek judicial review over allegedly procedurally defective call for an Extra Ordinary General Meeting.
* Judicial review — leave to apply — tests: sufficient interest, arguable case, impugned decision, exhaustion of remedies, promptness.
* Justiciability — internal society/Governing Council decisions may be reviewed where procedural illegality or lack of compliance with statutory/regulatory rules is alleged.
* Meetings law — compliance with Tanganyika Law Society Act and Meetings Regulations (notice period, circulation of documents, authorized signatory) relevant to challenge of convening general meetings.
|
29 March 2024 |
|
Member granted leave to challenge society meeting convening for alleged procedural irregularities.
* Judicial review — leave to apply — tests: sufficient interest, arguable case, existence of decision, exhaustion of remedies, promptness.
* Administrative law — procedural impropriety — convening of meetings: notice period, circulation of documents, agenda variation, signatory authority.
* Internal governance — justiciability of decisions by society organs at leave stage.
|
29 March 2024 |
|
Form defect curable; new affidavit facts expunged; debarment upheld as complaint was lodged within statutory 28 days.
Public procurement — judicial review — procedural compliance with prescribed forms — curability under Interpretation of Laws Act s.64; leave to apply for review — Rule 8(1)(a) GN No.324/2014 — new facts in main affidavits expunged; debarment — reckoning of statutory 28‑day time limit (Reg.94 GN No.446/2013) — awareness date established by bank correspondence; burden of proof and adverse inference — not engaged; apportionment of disciplinary sanction in joint venture — not appropriate.
|
27 March 2024 |
|
Judicial review dismissed: disciplinary findings and nullification of results upheld for lack of breach of natural justice.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Certiorari and mandamus; Natural justice – right to be heard – service of charge sheet, written reply and inquiry minutes; Disciplinary procedure – examination irregularity – evidence from invigilators and witnesses; Procedural irregularity – omission in later correspondence does not invalidate prior served disciplinary notices.
|
25 March 2024 |
|
Leave granted to challenge whether PPAA improperly struck out an appeal as time‑barred without condoning trivial delay.
* Judicial review — leave to apply for prerogative orders — prima facie case requirement. * Public procurement — appeals — time limits, condonation/leave and whether time bar is a procedural 'technicality' or a jurisdictional defect. * Procedural impropriety and alleged failure to exercise jurisdiction by the Public Procurement Appeals Authority.
|
25 March 2024 |
|
Extension of time granted where illegality in the impugned ruling was apparent on the face of the record.
Extension of time – Illegality as sufficient cause – Illegality must be apparent on the face of the record and of sufficient importance (Lyamuya; Devram Valambhia) – Affidavit averments may be argumentative but tolerable – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1).
|
18 March 2024 |
|
|
18 March 2024 |
|
|
14 March 2024 |
|
|
14 March 2024 |
Constitutional Law – Separation of Powers – Executive Interference in Judicial Functions
Constitutional Law – Due process – Ministerial discretion to extend limitation periods
Constitutional Law – Bill of Rights – Right to Access to Justice |
13 March 2024 |
|
Misnumbering/expungement of affidavit paragraphs was an error on record but caused no miscarriage of justice; review dismissed.
Civil procedure — Review of court’s ruling — Error apparent on face of record — Misquotation/misnumbering of affidavit paragraphs; admissibility of affidavit content — Arguments and conclusions versus facts — Limited grounds for review (manifest error causing miscarriage of justice, fraud, denial of hearing).
|
8 March 2024 |
|
Leave granted for judicial review where the statutory appeals tribunal was shown not to be operational and an arguable case existed.
Judicial review – leave stage – timeliness, locus/ sufficient interest and arguability – availability of alternative remedy – Environmental Appeals Tribunal under Environmental Management Act – evidential burden to prove existence/operation of statutory tribunal – availability of alternative remedy not per se bar to judicial review.
|
7 March 2024 |
Constitutional Law – Union Matters – Jurisdiction of High Court
Constitutional Law – Locus Standi – Public interest litigation by individuals
Civil Procedure – Joinder of parties – Whether improper joinder renders petition invalid
|
4 March 2024 |
| February 2024 |
|
|
Leave granted to seek certiorari challenging an appeals decision; leave operates as a stay pending substantive judicial review.
Administrative law – judicial review – leave to apply for prerogative orders – test of locus standi, timeliness and arguability (Emma Bayo test); res judicata – applicability to related procurement challenges; certiorari – nature and effect; stay pending review (Rule 5(6), GN No.324/2014).
|
23 February 2024 |
|
Availability of military grievance remedies does not automatically bar judicial review; preliminary objection dismissed and matter to proceed on merits.
Judicial review — prerogative orders (certiorari, mandamus, prohibition); military grievance procedures; National Defence Act; exhaustion of alternative remedies; preliminary objection — pure point of law vs. factual inquiry; court’s discretion to entertain judicial review despite alternative remedies.
|
21 February 2024 |
Administrative Law – public officers – president’s powers to retire public officers in the public interest – procedure for retiring public officers in the public interest – failure by president to give reasons for retiring applicant in the public interest – validity of president’s decision – Public Service Act, cap 298 RE 2019, Section 24(1); Regulation 29(1), and Order F40
Administrative Law – judicial review – certiorari – applicant seeking to quash the president’s decision to retire him in the public interest – failure by president to give reasons for retiring applicant in the public interest – whether president’s decision was ultra vires and against the rules of natural justice |
8 February 2024 |
| December 2023 |
|
|
High Court struck out constitutional petition for failure to exhaust statutory remedies, finding judicial review the appropriate recourse.
Constitutional procedure — admissibility — requirement to exhaust alternative statutory remedies under sections 4(5) and 8(2) of the Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act; administrative action — availability of judicial review/prerogative writs under Law Reform Act; preliminary objection — frivolous/vexatious objection premature; strike out for incompetence; costs withheld.
|
18 December 2023 |
|
Constitutional petition struck out for failing mandatory affidavit requirements and for not exhausting alternative remedies.
Constitutional petitions — locus standi — BRADEA s4(2) affidavit requirement — exhaustion of alternative remedies — BRADEA s4(5)/s8(2) — administrative acts subject to judicial review — challenge to Land Act s51 procedures.
|
15 December 2023 |
|
Judicial review is premature where a statutory appeal to the Minister remains pending; applicant must exhaust or compel decision first.
Administrative law – judicial review – exhaustion of alternative remedy – Rule 11(1) appeal to Minister – permissive "may" does not absolve duty to decide – prematurity and abuse of process – mandamus to compel determination – amendment to implead Minister refused.
|
15 December 2023 |
|
A striking‑out order disposing of an application can be final, permitting review under section 78(1) CPC.
Civil Procedure – Review under section 78(1) CPC – Section 78(2) bar on review of interlocutory or preliminary orders – Test of finality: whether the order finally disposes of parties' rights – Striking out an application for defective affidavit can be a final order – Review competent where struck-out order finally determined the matter.
|
15 December 2023 |
|
A BRADEA constitutional petition may challenge subsidiary legislation if it pleads violation of basic rights; necessary parties must be joined.
Constitutional procedure – BRADEA jurisdiction to enforce basic rights – Distinction between BRADEA remedies and judicial review (Cap 310) – Challenges to subsidiary legislation under BRADEA – Joinder of necessary parties for enforceable orders.
|
15 December 2023 |
|
Governing Council breached impartiality; court quashed its decision and ordered party to observe due process.
Political party disciplinary proceedings; Regulation for emergency disciplinary measures; adequacy of notice and opportunity to be heard (natural justice); rule against bias — members sitting at first instance and on appeal; availability of certiorari and mandamus; prohibition unavailable when proceedings are complete.
|
14 December 2023 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time to seek judicial review; application dismissed.
Limitation—extension of time under section 14 Law of Limitation Act; requirements from Lyamuya—account for each day, diligence, inordinate delay; necessity of evidencing reasons in affidavit; non-service of termination letter and alleged exhaustion of domestic remedies insufficiently pleaded; dismissal for failure to show sufficient cause.
|
13 December 2023 |
|
Applicant granted extension because alleged illegality was apparent on face of record despite unexplained delay.
* Civil procedure – extension of time – illegality as ground for extension – point must be of sufficient importance and apparent on the face of the record.
* Evidence – judicial notice – court’s duty under sections 58 and 59(2) of the Evidence Act.
* Appeal procedure – notice of intended appeal – requirement to account for each day of delay but illegality may excuse unexplained delay if apparent on record.
* Admission of facts – admitted facts require no proof and trial court’s treatment of admissions may raise a pure point of law.
|
11 December 2023 |
|
|
8 December 2023 |
|
Failure to exhaust mandatory internal dispute-resolution under community regulations renders the court application premature and it is struck out.
Administrative law — judicial review — requirement to exhaust internal remedies under community regulations before approaching court; Preliminary objection — sufficiency and timing — point of law may be decided at any stage; Procedural compliance — citation of provisions and jurat defects not determined as dispositive where other grounds dispose of the matter.
|
5 December 2023 |
|
Judicial review dismissed where statute provided an appeal and applicant was previously held to lack locus standi.
Land Registration Act s.102(1) – statutory appeal to High Court for any person aggrieved by Registrar’s decision; judicial review inappropriate where statute provides appeal; locus standi – prior High Court rulings declaring applicant lacked interest preclude maintenance of suit; re‑registration equates to assertion of ownership.
|
5 December 2023 |
|
Case‑management remarks and procedural events do not alone establish a real possibility of judicial bias; recusal dismissed.
Recusal – apprehension of bias – test of the fair‑minded and informed observer – judicial ethics rule 9(1)(a) – case‑management comments and preliminary objections – adjournment and appearance of multiple state attorneys – standards for disqualification.
|
1 December 2023 |