High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
8 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Outcomes
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
8 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1976
Reported

Inquest — Application to hold an inquest — Application made after trial court’s ruling that death not substantially caused by collision of motor vehicle — Whether application incompetent.

18 December 1976
November 1976
Convictions for forgery-based stealing and uttering quashed where forgery was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Forgery – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – Missing duplicate of document – No sufficient evidence to infer accused caused disappearance; no adverse inference permitted. * Criminal law – Dependent charges – Stealing and uttering charges failing where foundational forgery not proved.
29 November 1976
August 1976

Torts - Defamation - Damages - Defendant published false information without lawful justification or excuse - Plaintiff arrested, detainedand interrogated - Plaintiff’s business dwindled - General public shunned him - Whether general damages awardable. Torts - Damages - Assessment of- Assessors' unanimous view that Shs.. 470,400/= be awarded - Plaintiff's to produce books of accounts to prove what he actually earned before publication of the article - Plaintiff had opportunity to mitigate the damage  Whether assessor’s view correct.

13 August 1976
May 1976
Reported

Criminal Practice and Procedure — Declaring a witness as 'hostile' — Who to determine a witness has turned ’hostile'.
Criminal Practice and Procedure — Procedure before court may permit a party to cross examine his own witness.
Evidence — Evidence of a 'hostile' witness — Its effect and weight.

5 May 1976
April 1976
Reported

Criminal Practice and Procedure — Seizure of documents from accused — Whether court is to assist in their recovery.
Criminal Practice and Procedure — Partly heard case — Transfer to another magistrate — Principles to be followed — S.80 80(1) (a) Criminal Procedure Code Cap. 20.
Evidence Act — Application to inspect Banker's Books — Whether must be made orally — S. 81 Evidence Act 1967

28 April 1976
Applicants' out-of-time leave to appeal dismissed for unexplained delay; ignorance of law insufficient to extend time.
Criminal law – Appeal out of time – Leave to appeal – Applicant must show good cause for extension of time – Ignorance of law is not a sufficient excuse – Proposed grounds substantially factual and previously considered; application dismissed. Fauna Conservation offences (possession and failure to report government trophies).
21 April 1976
March 1976
Reported

Evidence - Admissibility - Statement made to a police officer - Appellant told justice of the peace the statement he made to the police was enough-Justice of the Peace not shown the statement - Whether such statement can be incorporated in the statement made to justice of the peace - Whether admissible as a confession - Whether admissible -Whether it amounts to an admission or not.

Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charge - Duplex - Defence clear what the case against appellant was - Whether defect curable - S.346 of the Criminal Procedure Code

National Security - Espionage and Sabotage - National Security Act- Foreign agent - Whether the person (John Wilson) with whom appellant was communicating was a "foreign agent" - S.2(1) and s.12(1) of the National Security Act.

National Security - Espionage - Appellant alleged to have communicated with foreign agent - Whether necessary to prove which particular state or states the alleged agent was working for.

National Security - Espionage - When presumption under s.12(1) of the National Security Act comes into play - Effect of the presumption.

National Security - Spying on designated organization - Evidence of communication - No order of exact nature or type of information - Whether information for purposes prejudicial to the safety or interests of a designated organization. 

National Security - Spying on a designated organization - Presumption under s.9(3) of the National Security Act - When it can come into play.

Criminal Practice and Procedure - Sentencing - Co-operation with police - Conviction based on presumption only - Extent of damage impossible to ascertain - Benefit to appellant.

20 March 1976
January 1976
A magistrate may not fine uncharged owners; owner liability requires formal charge and emergency use may mitigate non-compliance.
* Transport Licensing Act s.28(3)(c) and s.32(1) – duty to carry approved timetables; owner/operator liability. * Criminal procedure – illegality of imposing punishment on persons not charged. * Mitigation – emergency/relief use of vehicle as relevant explanatory circumstance.
26 January 1976