|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| July 2007 |
|
|
Withdrawal under Order XXIII r.1(1) is discretionary, refused only if abused or prejudicial to vested rights.
Civil Procedure – Order XXIII r.1(1) – Withdrawal/abandonment of suit – Not absolute; subject to court’s discretion – Abuse of process and prejudice to accrued or third-party rights – Matrimonial proceedings – Jurisdictional/residence considerations – Costs under s.90(1) Law of Marriage Act.
|
3 July 2007 |
|
A purported will executed when the deceased was critically ill was invalidated; appeal dismissed and estate distributed accordingly.
Succession law – validity of testamentary document – requirement of testamentary capacity and formalities for wills
Evidence – proof of mental capacity at execution; contemporaneous illness and handwriting evidence. Civil procedure – representation by holder of Power of Attorney for an administrator
Distribution – estate shares under Islamic law (spouse one-third)
|
3 July 2007 |
|
Document claimed as a will invalid for lack of testamentary capacity; wife entitled to one-third; appeal dismissed.
• Probate & administration – validity of alleged will – formalities and testamentary capacity; contemporaneous evidence of illness and death.• Inheritance – Islamic law – entitlement of spouse to one-third share.• Civil procedure – representation – administrator may appear by agent holding power of attorney (Order XI rr.1–2 CPC).
|
3 July 2007 |
|
Applicant's suit dismissed for lack of statutory leave, non-joinder of PSRC and failure to prosecute by filing ordered submissions.
Civil procedure – preliminary objections – requirement of leave to sue or be sued where a specified public corporation is involved (Bankruptcy Act provisions) – non-joinder of PSRC – failure to file court-ordered written submissions equating to want of prosecution – dismissal with costs.
|
1 July 2007 |
| June 2007 |
|
|
Houses gifted and registered in respondent’s name are not divisible matrimonial assets; petitioner ordered to refund utility charges.
Divorce granted earlier; matrimonial property – gifts registered in spouse's name; houses not divisible; consent order binding on maintenance; respondent entitled to refund of utility charges; custody moot as children are adults; personal effects to be enforced in issuing court.
|
29 June 2007 |
|
Defendant admitted liability for bounced cheques; court entered judgment, refused instalments, awarded costs and high interest.
Commercial law – agency/insurance premiums – admission by defendant in respect of bounced post-dated cheques – burden to prove agreement to defer payment – refusal to grant payment by instalments where plea unpleaded, unproven and delayed; interest and costs awarded.
|
29 June 2007 |
|
Extension of time granted because judgment/decree were supplied late and the appeal merits were not prejudged.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Delay caused by late supply of judgment and decree – Applicant not notified that typed judgment was ready – Decree signed after appeal period expired – Court may grant extension without prejudging merits.
|
25 June 2007 |
|
An objection to attachment is premature and incompetent unless the property has been actually attached.
Civil procedure — Order 21 r.57 — Objection to attachment — Third-party claim requires actual attachment — Objection to future or proposed attachment premature and incompetent — Application struck off.
|
22 June 2007 |
|
Parent and custodian of heirs may be appointed estate administrator due to greater interest and duty of care.
Estate administration – appointment of administrator – court discretion to appoint person with greatest interest in heirs; parental responsibility and custody as material considerations; primary court appointment set aside by appellate court where superior interest shown.
|
19 June 2007 |
|
|
12 June 2007 |
|
District Court lacked jurisdiction over respondent's land claim; ex parte affidavit proof and defective judgment rendered proceedings null.
Land law – jurisdiction of subordinate courts after Land Disputes Courts Act 2002; Civil procedure – ex parte proof and use of affidavits (Order VIII r.14(2)(b); Order 19 r.1); Evidence – admissibility under s.34C Evidence Act 1967 (s.34C(3)); Judgment formalities – requirement under Order XX r.4.
|
5 June 2007 |
|
Court marked matter settled after finding respondent complied with order to rectify boundary.
Land law – Boundary rectification – Compliance with court order – Documentary proof and counsel's representation sufficient to mark matter settled.
|
5 June 2007 |
| May 2007 |
|
|
The applicant's Primary Court land suit was a nullity; Primary Courts lacked jurisdiction under the Land Disputes Courts Act.
Land law — Jurisdiction — Land Disputes Courts Act 2002 s.3(2), s.4(1) — Primary Courts lack jurisdiction over land disputes after commencemente — Proceedings and judgments in absence of jurisdiction are nullities — Jurisdiction can be raised at any time (suo motu).
|
29 May 2007 |
|
Advocate’s absence due to being in another court is not sufficient cause to set aside an ex parte judgment; revision refused.
Civil procedure – ex parte judgment – Order 9 r.6(a)(ii)(B) – advocate’s absence – Order XVII r.2(c): advocate engaged in another court not ground for adjournment; functus officio – erroneous remark not amounting to illegality warranting revision.
|
29 May 2007 |
|
|
25 May 2007 |
|
Complaint letter sufficed for disciplinary proceedings; refund order exceeded Committee’s statutory powers.
Advocates Act s.13(1)(c) – disciplinary allegations may be instigated by complaint letters; strict Form No.1/affidavit not mandatory; Committee may act where prima facie case exists; service and opportunity to answer essential; disciplinary powers limited to admonition, suspension and orders as to costs/witness expenses – no power to order general monetary ‘refunds’.
|
18 May 2007 |
|
Respondent lacked locus standi and no admissible power of attorney existed, so the appellate court erred in legalising the suit.
Locus standi – whether a non-owner may sue without authority; Power of attorney – admissibility and timing of proof; Affidavit by defendant insufficient to prove grant of authority; Retrospective validation of representation impermissible; Appellate court’s power – limits on regularising trial irregularities.
|
16 May 2007 |
|
High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise proceedings that originated in a Ward Tribunal; application dismissed with costs.
Ward Tribunals – jurisdiction and appeals – appeals/revision from Ward Tribunal lie to Primary Court; point of law to District Court – District Court revisional decisions final – High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise Ward Tribunal-originating proceedings.
|
5 May 2007 |
|
|
4 May 2007 |
| April 2007 |
|
|
Proceedings on unsurveyed land in a court lacking High Court leave are incompetent and nullify the judgment.
Land law – Jurisdiction over unsurveyed land – Section 63 Magistrates' Courts Act requires High Court leave to hear immovable property disputes outside Primary Court – Lack of leave renders proceedings and judgment nullity; estoppel/section 95 cannot cure jurisdictional defect
|
30 April 2007 |
|
|
27 April 2007 |
|
Preliminary objections dismissed: limitation date fixed at discovery of untraceable container; notice non‑compliance is a factual issue for trial.
Procedure — Preliminary objection — limitation under s.67(b) — accrual when inability to trace goods established; notice requirements under s.66(1),(2) — factual issues and s.66(3) impracticability — Mukisa Biscuit principle that preliminary objections cannot decide facts.
|
27 April 2007 |
|
Limitation under s.67(b) not breached; non-compliance with s.66 raises factual issues for trial, so preliminary objections dismissed.
Civil procedure – preliminary objections – limitation under s.67(b) of the Tanzania Harbours Authority Act 1977 – whether cause of action accrues on discovery; Statutory notice requirements – s.66(1)–(2) THA Act 1977 – non-compliance raises factual issues and possible s.66(3) impracticability defence; Mukisa Biscuit principle – preliminary objections limited to pure points of law.
|
27 April 2007 |
|
Appellant failed to show grounds to vary custody or to prove theft-based matrimonial assets; appeal dismissed.
Family law – custody – considerations under s.125 Law of Marriage Act – welfare of child and parental conduct. Family law – variation of custody orders – s.133 – requirement of misrepresentation, mistake of fact, or material change. Matrimonial property – division under s.114 – proof required to classify assets as matrimonial
Evidence – hearsay and witness credibility – rejection of unreliable testimony. Criminal vs civil remedy – theft allegations better pursued in criminal court
|
20 April 2007 |
|
Court upheld joinder of Receiver Manager, allowed amendment for defective verification clause, and ordered costs to the respondent.
Preliminary objection – joinder of Receiver Manager – specification under Public Corporations Act s.43 – Receiver Manager must be joined per Bankruptcy Act s.9; Civil Procedure Code Order VI r.15(3) – verification must state date/place; Order VI r.17 – court’s discretion to allow amendment to cure defective verification; costs awarded to objecting party.
|
18 April 2007 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove defendant trespassed on the plaintiff's hunting block; claim dismissed with costs.
Trespass to land – hunting block allocations – boundary uncertainty from Nicholson sketch map – burden of proof on balance of probabilities (Evidence Act) – need for ground demarcation and digitisation by Wildlife Corporation – no trespass or damages proved; claim dismissed.
|
18 April 2007 |
|
|
16 April 2007 |
|
The applicant’s enlargement‑of‑time application was incompetent: wrong provisions cited and the excuse of registry misdirection was unsupported.
Civil procedure — Enlargement of time to file Notice of Appeal — Limitation governed by Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 76(2)) — Section 14 Law of Limitation Act inapplicable — Sections 93 and 95 CPA limited — Properly moving the court — Insufficient evidence of registry misdirection — Incompetent and meritless application
|
16 April 2007 |
|
A tribunal may not order transfer of mortgaged land; a clause granting absolute ownership on default is void.
Land law – Mortgage – mortgagor’s equity of redemption – clause purporting to vest absolute ownership on default void
Land (Amendment) Act 2004 – section 116(1) prohibits transfer of mortgagor’s interest to mortgagee; mortgagee’s remedies are possession and sale, not automatic transfer
Procedural – tribunal ordered transfer of title not properly prayed for; such order set aside
|
15 April 2007 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause to extend time to apply to set aside a dismissal for non‑appearance.
Civil procedure – limitation – section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act – extension of time – requirement to show reasonable or sufficient cause. Civil procedure – dismissal for non‑appearance and setting aside orders – consequences of failing to obtain extension of time. Litigation conduct – negligence of counsel – litigant’s duty to be vigilant and follow up proceedings; counsel’s fault not automatically sufficient for extension
|
12 April 2007 |
|
Primary Courts may administer estates including registered land; distribution disputes must be determined by a competent court.
Primary Courts — jurisdiction to administer estates — applicability to registered land where customary/Islamic law governs; binding Court of Appeal authority; limits of Primary Court powers — administrator’s duty to collect and distribute estate; disputes over bequests of registered land to be litigated in competent court.
|
11 April 2007 |
|
A tribunal ruling without stated reasons is defective and must be remitted for a reasoned ruling.
Civil Procedure – Rulings and judgments – Requirement to state concise statement of case, points for determination and reasons – Order XX Rule 4 CPC. Administrative fairness – Duty of tribunal to give reasons – omission may amount to abdication of judicial duty
Procedure – Preliminary objections and dismissal for non-compliance must be expressly recorded as basis of decision
Remittal – Defective ruling to be remitted for a reasoned ruling
|
3 April 2007 |
|
|
3 April 2007 |
| March 2007 |
|
|
Appeal dismissed; conviction for theft upheld based on witnesses' direct evidence and trial court credibility findings.
Criminal law — Theft — Proof beyond reasonable doubt; hearsay v direct evidence — when testimony of witnesses who observe admission or delivery of cheques is admissible; appellate deference to trial court credibility findings; evidential value of post‑dated cheques as corroborative admission.
|
30 March 2007 |
|
The appellate court upheld the respondent's theft conviction, finding prosecution evidence credible despite some hearsay.
Criminal law – Theft – Sufficiency of evidence – Hearsay versus direct evidence – Witness corroboration – Appellate deference to trial court on credibility – Conditional discharge
|
30 March 2007 |
|
Proceedings initiated by an unqualified advocate are reviewable and the Tribunal’s record must be revised under supervisory powers.
Advocates Ordinance – unqualified person acting as advocate – documents drawn by unqualified advocate – effect on validity of proceedings. Civil procedure – review v. appeal – error apparent on face of record – court’s inherent supervisory powers. Courts (Land Disputes Settlements) Act s.43(1)(b) – revision of Tribunal proceedings. Referral/discipline of practitioner acting without a practising certificate
|
14 March 2007 |
|
Preliminary objection dismissed: disputed factual issues (absence of contract, alleged false statements, employer identity) are for trial, not preliminary determination.
Civil procedure – preliminary objection – Distinction between points of law and questions of fact – Alleged absence of contract and falsity of pleadings do not constitute preliminary points of law – Cause of action defined as operative facts giving rise to suit – Objection overruled.
|
13 March 2007 |
|
A factual dispute over employment/termination cannot be disposed of by preliminary objection alleging lack of contract.
Civil procedure – Preliminary objection – Distinction between points of law and issues of fact – Allegations of false statements and failure to annex contract are factual matters to be proved at trial. Cause of action – Defined as operative facts giving rise to a remedy – termination and denial of employment benefits may disclose a cause of action even absent an annexed contract
Pleadings – Whether plaint discloses cause of action – factual disputes immaterial at preliminary stage
|
13 March 2007 |
|
Default judgment after proper ordinary and substituted service cannot be stayed absent appeal or application to set aside.
Civil procedure – service of process – ordinary and substituted service by publication – default judgment under Order VII r.14(1) – distinction between ex parte hearing and judgment by default – stay of execution requires pending appeal or successful application to set aside judgment.
|
12 March 2007 |
|
Resident Magistrate lacked jurisdiction; estate governed by Islamic law must be heard in the Primary Court and prior proceedings set aside.
Probate and administration — Jurisdiction of courts — Resident Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to grant or revoke letters of administration absent District Delegate appointment; Estates governed by Islamic law fall within Primary Court jurisdiction under section 92 and Fifth Schedule — Proceedings found to be a nullity and set aside.
|
8 March 2007 |
|
Resident Magistrate lacked jurisdiction in probate matter; estate under Islamic law belongs to Primary Court jurisdiction, proceedings set aside.
Probate and Administration — jurisdiction — Resident/Senior Resident Magistrate lacked jurisdiction absent appointment as District Delegate; estates under Islamic law fall within Primary Court jurisdiction under section 92 and Fifth Schedule to Magistrate's Court Act; proceedings nullity and set aside.
|
8 March 2007 |
|
Appeal allowed where District Court heard revisional application outside the twelve‑month limit under s.22(4), quashing its decision.
Magistrates' Courts Act s.22(4) — revisional jurisdiction — time limit for revision; Procedural fairness — requirement to consider extension of time application; Probate and administration — limits on District Court revision and jurisdictional excess by hearing out-of-time applications; Appointment of administrators — impropriety of suo motu appointment without application or Family Baraza recommendation.
|
8 March 2007 |
|
Resident Magistrate lacked jurisdiction over an Islamic-law estate probate; proceedings set aside and to be reinstituted in Primary Court.
Probate and Administration — Jurisdiction — Resident Magistrate must be appointed District Delegate to hear probate matters; absence of appointment renders proceedings nullity. Islamic law estates — section 92(1) Cap. 352 and Fifth Schedule Cap. 11 — administration lies with Primary Court unless statutory direction to apply Probate Act
|
8 March 2007 |
|
Whether extension and stay were proper where an ex parte judgment arose from proceedings lacking service and proper constitution.
Civil procedure – extension of time under s.14 Law of Limitation Act – requirement to show reasonable/sufficient cause
Stay of execution – proper forum for stay is the court which passed the decree (Order XXXIX/Order XXI principles) and not an appellate court where decree not sent for execution
Ex parte judgment – validity requires adequate service and lawful origin of the enabling orders
Magistrates' courts – requirement for a properly constituted Resident Magistrate's Court under s.6(1)(c) of the Magistrates Court Act
Revisionary powers – High Court may set aside lower court proceedings under s.44(1)(b) where material irregularities cause injustice
|
1 March 2007 |
|
Magistrate lacked power to hear claims outside the labour officer's report; proceedings set aside and remitted.
Employment law – Labour officer’s report – Magistrate empowered to try only issues in the report (s.141, s.143 Cap 366 RE 2002); pleadings not required in such proceedings; introduction of claims not in the report is unlawful and fatal to proceedings; proceedings quashed and remitted for rehearing.
|
1 March 2007 |
| February 2007 |
|
|
Ward Tribunal had jurisdiction; limitation began on withdrawal of licence, so respondent’s claim was not time-barred and appeal dismissed with costs.
Ward Tribunal jurisdiction – minor customary land possession disputes; Limitation Act – 12-year prescription; adverse possession commences on withdrawal of licence; appeal procedure – must appeal Ward Tribunal decision to Primary Court, not institute fresh suit
|
26 February 2007 |
|
Appellate court upheld tribunal’s finding that tenant surrendered keys and vacated; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – vacant possession – surrender of keys as evidence of vacation of premises – appellate deference to tribunal credibility findings. Tenancy agreements – oral tenancy valid despite absence of written agreement; termination by surrender. Civil procedure – locus in quo visits discretionary; failure to visit not necessarily an error
Recordal – omission to record portions of testimony does not automatically vitiate proceedings absent prejudice
|
20 February 2007 |
|
Registered trade mark ownership proven but infringement not established due to lack of samples or documentary proof, claim dismissed.
Trade mark law – registered proprietor’s exclusive rights; infringement – burden of proof on proprietor; need for samples/documentary evidence to show resemblance and deception; ex parte proceedings do not relieve burden.
|
19 February 2007 |
|
A sua motu, unnotified dismissal of a review by a magistrate lacking jurisdiction was quashed; review to be reheard.
Civil procedure — Review applications — Jurisdiction under Order XLII CPC — Requirement that review be heard by the court/judge that made the order or by a judge continued attached — Sua motu dismissal without notice fatal — Disqualification where magistrate participated in execution proceedings — Costs to lie where they fall.
|
13 February 2007 |
|
High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear appeal from a Ward Tribunal-origin matter once District Court determined points of law.
Ward Tribunals Act s.20(3) — limitation of appeals from matters originating in Ward Tribunals; District Court finality on points of law; High Court lacks jurisdiction where District Court has finally decided points of law
|
9 February 2007 |