High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
13 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
13 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
August 2013
Incurable jurat defects (missing name/place/date) invalidate affidavits and the applications they support; court may raise this sua sponte.
Civil procedure – Affidavit formalities – Jurat must state name, place and date of attesting notary/commissioner – omission renders affidavit incurably defective. Statutory interpretation – "shall" connotes mandatory duty under Interpretation of Laws Act. Procedure – Court may raise points of law suo motu; incurable jurat defects invalidate supporting applications.
30 August 2013
Redeployment Committee could represent union branches; unexplained revisional reversal quashed and single-judge award restored.
Employment law – redundancy – Redeployment Committee’s authority under Voluntary Agreement and Security of Employment Act to represent union field branches; Procedural fairness in retrenchment – requirement for consultation and labour officer approval; Appellate review – necessity of reasons when reversing trial awards.
30 August 2013
The appellant’s failure to meet court-ordered filing deadlines rendered the appeal time-barred and it was struck out.
Criminal procedure — appeal out of time — court-ordered filing deadlines — Notice of intention to appeal and petition of appeal — adequacy of explanation for delay — preliminary objection upheld; appeal struck out.
29 August 2013
Application struck out for invoking supervisory (s.30 MCA) instead of revisional jurisdiction; no costs ordered.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction – supervisory (administrative) powers vs. revisional jurisdiction under the Magistrates' Courts Act; s.30(1)(a) and (b)(i) MCA confers supervisory, not revisional, powers; Revisional jurisdiction over Primary Court-originated matters: s.31 MCA; Revisional jurisdiction over District/Resident Magistrates' original jurisdiction: s.44(1)(b) MCA; Wrong/enabling provision cited renders application incompetent – strike out; Leave to re-file may be refused where procedural prejudice is likely.
27 August 2013
Representative unfair-termination claim filed in court must be referred to CMA; Labour Court transferred the complaint for arbitration.
Labour law – Jurisdiction – Representative suits – Whether unfair termination disputes must first be referred to CMA under Rule 10(1) – Application of s.94(3)(a)(i),(ii) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act – Transfer to CMA for arbitration.
26 August 2013
Delay excused where initial procedural error was caused by an unqualified person acting without a practising certificate.
Extension of time – sufficient cause – ordinarily counsel’s mistake not sufficient; representation by unqualified person – practising certificate required; acts of unqualified representative not imputable to client; Section 93 Civil Procedure Code.
23 August 2013
Labour Court lacks jurisdiction until dispute on fairness of termination is first referred to CMA; complaint transferred for mediation.
Labour law — Jurisdiction — Mandatory mediation at the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration before Labour Court — Employment and Labour Relation Act sections 86 and 94(2)(a); Procedural objections — time limitation and formality of signatures — court may transfer premature matters to CMA under s.94(3)(b)(i).
23 August 2013
Application for leave to appeal struck out for defective affidavits and failure to cite the correct enabling Labour appeal provisions.
Labour law — leave to appeal — procedural compliance — correct citation of enabling provisions (Labour Institutions Act s.57; Labour Court Rules r.54 and r.24(11)) — defective affidavits — non‑citation renders application incompetent — strike out with liberty to refile.
23 August 2013
Late supply of certified judgment copies justified granting the applicant an extension of time to file an appeal.
Administrative law – Limitation of actions – Extension of time under section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act – Late supply of certified copies of proceedings, judgment and decree – Time for filing appeal runs from supply of documents – Exclusion under section 19 not applicable where supply occurs after expiry.
16 August 2013
Employer circular on minimum salary applies to existing oral‑contract employees; appellants entitled to salary differential.
Employment law – employer circulars – Waraka wa Utumishi No.11 of 1999 – applicability to existing employees on oral contracts; requirement to formalise oral contracts; entitlement to minimum salary differential; overtime circular (P3) inapplicable where not pleaded.
12 August 2013
High Court declines review where disputes were improperly filed and must first be determined by the CMA under statutory procedure.
Labour law – Review jurisdiction – Improper filing and lack of merits hearing at CMA bars High Court review; alleged second contract must be determined by CMA under s.42(2) – Res judicata and procedural compliance – role of the Labour Commissioner.
9 August 2013
Absence of required public-service approval rendered the employment contract void and the CMA award was set aside.
Labour law – Mediation and arbitration – mediator acting as arbitrator without formal appointment; parties’ consent to mediator-arbitrator – reviewability. Public service employment – requirement for Principal Secretary approval (S.19(1) GN.168/2003) – failure to obtain approval renders contract null ab initio. Jurisdiction – CMA lacks mandate to entertain disputes arising from void employment contracts.
9 August 2013
Application to revise an ex parte CMA award was improperly brought and time‑barred; applicant should have sought review of CMA's refusal.
Labour law – arbitration – ex parte arbitration award; procedural requirement to apply to CMA to set aside ex parte award (s.88(8)); remedy after CMA refusal is review of refusal, not revision of original award; time limitation and compliance with court‑granted filing period.
2 August 2013