High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
71 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
71 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2015
The appellant’s civil marriage was void; court ordered sale and division of joint assets and custody to the mother.
Law of Marriage Act — s.38(1)(c) nullity where existing marriage subsists; s.114(1) division/sale of assets acquired by joint efforts; s.128 custody of infant to mother where marriage is nullity; s.129 paternal duty of maintenance; distinction between void marriage and concubinage; sale and division of matrimonial assets (including motor vehicle).
30 December 2015
A litigant must sue the proper party; an unincorporated branch can be held liable for agents' eviction and seizure of property.
Civil procedure – Proper parties to a suit – Suit against individuals for acts done in course of employment/agency – Liability of unincorporated political party branch; Preliminary objections – Point of law versus factual disputes.
29 December 2015
Employer’s dismissal while employee was hospitalised was unfair; CMA award largely upheld but 50‑month backpay quashed.
Labour law – unfair termination (substantive and procedural) – employer-issued sick sheet and hospital records – requirement to investigate before dismissal – admissibility and evaluation of evidence at CMA – arbitrator may award statutory employment remedies not strictly pleaded in CMA Form No.1 – quashing of excessive backpay where delay is attributable to tribunal.
18 December 2015
Court quashed an unintelligible magistrate’s commercial judgment for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction and upheld beneficiaries’ trust claims against the employer.
Commercial law – banker–customer remittance – pecuniary jurisdiction of Magistrate’s Court; invalidity of proceedings for want of jurisdiction; judgment intelligibility and reasons. Trusts/Employment – group endowment/assurance scheme – existence and enforcement of Trust Deed; trustees as custodians; effect of failure to register trust deed; enforceability against employer but not insurer where insurer paid employer. Relief – percentage-based benefit awards and interest.
18 December 2015
A stay under section 8 CPC requires same parties and substantially identical issues; absent these, stay refused.
* Civil procedure — res sub judice (section 8 CPC) — mandatory rule; plea not defeated by Limitation Act. * Requirements for stay under section 8 CPC — earlier and later suits, same parties/title, directly and substantially same matter, competent jurisdiction. * Locus standi — competency of an administrative receiver to depose affidavits may raise contested factual issues and is not invariably a preliminary legal point. * Res judicata — an earlier decision operates as res judicata only where matters in issue are directly and substantially identical. * Non-joinder — curable by amendment (Order I r.9 CPC).
18 December 2015
Res sub judice is mandatory and not time-barred, but stay denied where parties or subject matter are not substantially identical.
* Civil procedure – res sub judice (section 8 CPC) – mandatory rule – plea for invocation not time-barred under Limitation Act. * Civil procedure – conditions for stay under section 8 CPC – same parties or litigating under same title; matter directly and substantially the same. * Evidence and procedure – locus standi and allegations of contempt based on disputed factual status are not pure preliminary points of law. * Civil procedure – non-joinder – curable by amendment (Order 1 r.9 CPC).
18 December 2015
Adoption granted where petitioners satisfied statutory suitability tests and the child's best interests; registrar to record adoption.
* Adoption law – Law of the Child Act and Adoption Rules – consent of social welfare authority and guardian ad litem report; best interests of the child; statutory tests under ss.54–59. * Registration – entry in Adopted Children Register and marking birth register “ADOPTED” (ss.69, 70(4)). * Change of name and costs.
16 December 2015
Bank may recover funds paid on uncleared, dishonoured cheques; director not personally liable without evidential link.
Banking law — recovery of money paid under mistake — crediting of uncleared cheques — dishonoured cheques reported missing — reversal of entries — change of position/estoppel — personal liability of director absent contractual link.
16 December 2015
High Court has jurisdiction over libel claims under the Newspapers Act; preliminary objection overruled.
Newspapers Act (s.56) – libel actions – High Court concurrent jurisdiction with subordinate courts; Libel presumes general damages – special damages not required to establish jurisdiction; Jurisdictional objections may be raised at any stage; Parties bound by pleadings – rejoinder cannot supply new jurisdictional facts.
14 December 2015
Expiry of a fixed‑term contract is not unfair termination absent a reasonable expectation of renewal.
Employment law – fixed‑term contract – expiry vs unfair termination – reasonable expectation of renewal – clause requiring advance written notice – appraisal of CMA evidence and award certainty.
14 December 2015
Appellate court restored the Primary Court’s finding that the appellant was entitled to land exceeding one quarter acre.
Land dispute; assessment of parcel size and ownership; appellate review of factual findings; weight of locus in quo and village allocation evidence; failure to file reply submissions treated as acceptance of opposing written submissions.
14 December 2015
Conviction quashed where cautioned statement lacked voluntariness inquiry and identification and exhibit linkage were unreliable.
Criminal law – visual identification at night – weaknesses of identification without adequate description; cautioned statement – necessity of trial-within-a-trial to determine voluntariness; admissibility and probative linkage of recovered exhibits to charged offence; proof beyond reasonable doubt; procedural defects in identification parade.
11 December 2015
Complaint alleging suspension and constructive termination was premature and dismissed for being filed without first referring the dispute to the CMA.
* Labour law – jurisdiction – forum non-conveniens – requirement to commence employment disputes at the CMA; * Employment and Labour Relations Act s.94 – limited exceptions for direct access to Labour Court; * Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration) Rules GN No.64/2007 – referral time limits and mediation prerequisite; * Complaint alleging suspension/constructive termination dismissed as premature.
4 December 2015
Excess ward members not fatal; appellate court will not disturb trial credibility findings absent misdirection.
* Land law – boundary/trespass – proof of long peaceful occupation and locus in quo visit; * Tribunal composition – ward tribunal may sit with more than statutory minimum provided minimum of three members (one woman) is met; * Appellate review – limited interference with trial credibility findings absent misdirection.
1 December 2015
November 2015
Dismissal set aside where court’s failure to notify reassignment caused applicant’s non-appearance.
Civil Procedure – Order IX Rule 9(1) – Setting aside dismissal for non-appearance – Default authored by the court – Failure to notify parties of reassignment or to serve hearing summons – Good cause to restore suit.
27 November 2015
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for delay; instalment payment claim unsupported, appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — Applicant must show sufficient cause and account for delay; alleged instalment payment not prima facie good cause where unsupported by record — Execution order may be the proper subject of appeal.
27 November 2015
Applicant failed to prove irreparable harm or that damages were inadequate; injunction refused and application dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Temporary injunction – Tests for grant: serious triable issue; irreparable injury not adequately compensable by damages; balance of convenience – Adequacy of damages – Applicant failed to demonstrate inadequacy or irreparability – Application dismissed with costs.
13 November 2015
An unexplained three-year delay defeats an application for extension of time despite defective court-issued documents.
* Appellate procedure – extension of time – s.11(1) Appellate Jurisdiction Act – requirements for sufficient cause to extend time. * Court error – defective documents (wrongly dated decree) may justify extension if delay not attributable to applicant or counsel. * Delay and explanation – prolonged unexplained inaction (over three years) defeats application for extension of time. * Costs – unsuccessful extension application results in costs to respondent.
13 November 2015
Reported
Court dismissed the applicant's contempt bid, finding wrong procedure and lawful shareholder changes negated the alleged disobedience.
Contempt of court — procedure for enforcement of final civil orders — Order XXI (execution) v. Penal Code s.124 — contempt powers extraordinary and sparingly exercised — filing of chamber summons/affidavit does not ipso facto establish prima facie criminal contempt — effect of subsequent lawful shareholder resolutions and interim management on reinstatement orders.
11 November 2015
A trial court’s suo motu striking out of the applicant's suit without hearing parties violated natural justice; case remitted for rehearing.
* Civil procedure – natural justice – trial court raising point of law suo motu and deciding it without hearing parties – requirement to invite party submissions before making a definitive finding.* Civil procedure – striking out for want of cause of action – cannot be decided at judgment stage without giving parties chance to be heard.* Procedure – remittal to another magistrate for fresh determination after curing procedural irregularity.
9 November 2015
October 2015
Whether the trial magistrate properly evaluated evidence and whether the defendant unlawfully detained the respondent’s truck.
Civil appeal — evaluation of evidence and appellate interference; seizure/detention of vehicle; burden of proof under Evidence Act s.110; insufficiency of defendant's rebuttal evidence; costs on failed appeal.
16 October 2015
Charge defects were curable; convictions on abuse of office sustained, overlapping loss count quashed, sentences reduced to two years.
Criminal law – Abuse of office (s.96 Penal Code) – Particulars of charge – use of "interests" vs "rights" – curability under s.388 Criminal Procedure Act – sufficiency of particulars; Evidence – non‑production of witnesses – when adverse inference not warranted; Double jeopardy – overlapping offences (abuse of office and occasioning loss) – quashing of duplicative conviction; Sentencing – wrong statutory provision applied – substitution of sentence; Conviction appeal – acquittal of third accused upheld for lack of evidence.
2 October 2015
2 October 2015
September 2015
Lack of notice of reassignment of the presiding judge justified readmission of an appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
* Civil procedure – extension of time and readmission of dismissed appeal – whether lack of notice of reassignment of presiding judge amounts to good cause for readmission; * Civil procedure – omnibus applications – when combining prayers in one chamber summons is permissible; * Dismissal for want of prosecution – effect of failure to notify parties of reassignment or hearing changes.
30 September 2015
Affidavit failed Order XIX Rule 3(1) disclosure and contained legal argument; application struck out and counsel ordered to pay costs.
* Civil procedure – Affidavit requirements – Order XIX Rule 3(1) CPC – must not contain legal argument and must disclose source of information. * Extension of time – affidavit deficiencies – expungement of defective paragraphs where appropriate. * Incompetence – defective affidavit may render an application incompetent and liable to be struck out. * Costs – counsel may be ordered to pay costs personally where counsel’s conduct risks unjustly penalising the client.
30 September 2015
District Court’s failure to hear parties vitiated proceedings, but subsequent appeals were time-barred; appellate judgment nullified.
* Probate and administration – appointment of administrators – challenge to administratrix’s status; right to be heard and natural justice in appellate proceedings; adherence to statutory appeal time-limits under Magistrate's Court Act (s.20(3), s.25(1)(b)); nullification and setting aside of vitiated appellate judgment.
30 September 2015
Appeals were time‑barred and therefore nullified; the appeal was struck out for incompetence.
Civil procedure — appeals — time limits and competence: Appeal from Primary Court to District Court time‑barred under Magistrates' Courts Act s.20(3); appeal to High Court time‑barred under Law of Marriage Act s.80(2); effect of nullity — nothing can validly emanate from an incompetent appeal.
30 September 2015
Application struck out for defective affidavits and jurats and failure to comply with r.24(3); applicant granted 28 days to refile.
Labour Court procedure; competence of revision application; chamber application vs chamber summons; compliance with Labour Court Rules r.24(3) (affidavit must state reliefs); jurat requirements and identification of deponent; defective affidavits leading to striking out with leave to refile.
22 September 2015
Non-compliance with section 214(1) CPA by a successor magistrate vitiates proceedings and warrants quashing and retrial.
Criminal procedure — succession of magistrates — non-compliance with section 214(1) CPA — failure to inform accused of right to have witnesses re-summoned — fatal irregularity — fair trial prejudice — quashing of proceedings and order for retrial.
7 September 2015
Contract entered by an unincorporated bidder was rendered void by misrepresentation; plaintiff's claim dismissed, defendant awarded damages.
Contract law – formation by offer and acceptance; corporate capacity – effect of entering contract prior to company incorporation; misrepresentation and voidability (or void ab initio) of contracts; entitlement to general damages where consent obtained by misrepresentation.
4 September 2015
August 2015
Defendant failed to give mandatory written notice and stock-taking; plaintiff failed to meet minimum purchases—only stock value awarded.
* Contract Law – Marketing Licence Agreement – Requirement to serve prior written notice before termination (clauses 16.1, 16.4). * Contract Law – Breach – dealer’s obligation to meet minimum monthly purchase volumes; failure amounts to breach. * Evidence – special and expectation damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved; failure to produce supporting records defeats such claims. * Remedies – recovery of value of stock left on premises; dismissal of unproven claims and counterclaims.
28 August 2015
Temporary injunction dismissed for procedural misfiling and failure to satisfy Attilio v Mbowe criteria.
Land law – temporary injunction – procedural competence of application (Miscellaneous Land vs Miscellaneous Civil Application); interim relief – Attilio v Mbowe three conditions (serious question/probability of success; irreparable injury; balance of convenience); weight of prior sale and substantial developments as factor against interim relief; compliance with statutory requirements for grant of right of occupancy.
21 August 2015
Both parties held contributorily negligent; specific damages not proved; subsistence and general damages awarded with interest.
Contributory negligence – equal apportionment; Workmen's Compensation — effect of prior payment and requirement of proof; special damages — strict pleading and proof; award of general damages and subsistence allowance.
21 August 2015
Applicant granted extension to file appeal after court found she was within 90‑day limitation and showed sufficient cause.
* Limitation of actions – Appeal under Civil Procedure Code – 90 days under Part II item 1, Law of Limitation Act. * Law of Limitation Act s.19(2) – time awaiting certified copy excluded from limitation period. * Extension of time – discretionary remedy – requires good and sufficient cause; promptness and misconception may constitute sufficient cause.
17 August 2015
Plaintiff precluded from re‑litigating same land dispute; suit struck out and dismissed as time‑barred and abusive.
* Civil procedure – preclusion under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC – prior withdrawal bars relitigation; * Limitation – Part I item 22 Law of Limitation Act – suit time‑barred; * Abuse of process – repeated suits on same subject matter; * Land law – single parcel interest, no subdivision under s.83 Land Registration Act; * Court powers – section 95 CPC to restrain vexatious litigant.
17 August 2015
An appeal is instituted on filing the memorandum; time awaiting a certified copy may be excluded, so the appeal was not time‑barred.
Civil procedure — limitation of actions — computation of appeal period where certified copy awaited — exclusion of time awaiting certified copy under section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act — appeal instituted on filing memorandum under section 3(2)(b).
14 August 2015
Filing of memorandum after awaiting certified copy was within statutory time; preliminary objection dismissed.
Limitation of actions; appeals under Civil Procedure Code; Law of Limitation Act — 90 days; section 19(2) exclusion for time awaiting certified copy; section 3(2)(b) institution of appeal by filing memorandum; preliminary objection on limitation dismissed.
14 August 2015
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal; application dismissed with costs.
* Civil procedure Extension of time to file appeal (s.11(1) AJA); sufficiency of cause; counsel's omission and duty under Advocates Act s.66; limits on relying on merits to obtain extension; Court of Appeal Rules (time limits).
13 August 2015
An incompetent bill of costs must be struck out, not dismissed; Taxing Master erred and costs awarded.
* Civil procedure – taxation – incompetent bill of costs – absence of vouchers/receipts under Rules 4 and 55 of Advocates Remuneration and Taxation of Costs Rules (G.N. 515/1991) renders a bill incompetent. * Procedure – incompetent matters – proper remedy is striking out (striking off), not dismissal (See Willow Investment v Mbombo Ntumba [1997] TLR 93). * Taxing Master – limited to striking out incompetent bills where matter is not properly before the court; dismissal is inappropriate if merits were not determined.
12 August 2015
High Court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction over defamation claim where plaintiff pleads slander without special damages, so suit struck out.
Civil procedure — pecuniary jurisdiction depends on substantive claim; Defamation — libel v. slander distinction; slander requires pleading special damages; failure to file written submissions treated as non-appearance; incompetent suit struck out.
7 August 2015
July 2015
Appeal allowed: prosecution failed to prove stealing by agent; conviction quashed for insufficient evidence and defective charge particulars.
* Criminal law – Stealing by agent – necessity to prove entrustment and link between alleged proceeds and disposals; * Standard of proof – prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; * Burden of proof – accused should not be convicted for failing to explain bank deposits where prosecution has not established case; * Evidential law – cautioned statements admitted without opposition still require judicial scrutiny and may be valueless if procured unlawfully or untrue; * Criminal procedure – charge-sheet particulars must identify the who/when/where/how (four W principle); use section 234 CPA to cure particulars where possible; contradictions must be resolved in accordance with authority.
25 July 2015
Court struck first application for failure to cite enabling provisions; held agency‑shop deductions lawful under section 72 and dismissed injunction.
Labour procedure — competency of chamber applications — necessity to cite correct rules and statutory provisions; Affidavits — permissible content and verification requirements; Collective bargaining — recognition agreements and organizational rights; Agency‑shop agreements — definition of non‑member, lawfulness of deductions without consent (s.72 ELRA), and permitted use of deducted funds.
24 July 2015
Delay from awaiting certified judgment plus an arguable legal issue amounted to sufficient cause to extend time to appeal.
* Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — "Sufficient cause" depends on all the circumstances of each case. * Primary court appeals — Rule 3, G.N.312/1964 — no strict requirement to attach judgment copies, but delay in supplying certified copies may justify extension. * Court discretion — applicant's honest belief and existence of arguable point of law can constitute sufficient cause.
24 July 2015
The court granted the petitioners' adoption application, finding them fit and adoption in the child's best interests.
* Adoption – Law of the Child Act, ss.54–55 – consent of Commissioner for Social Welfare – guardian ad litem and social investigation – suitability of adoptive parents – best interests of the child – change of name.
22 July 2015
The appellant's guilty-plea conviction was quashed for lack of an unequivocal plea due to material contradictions; retrial ordered.
* Criminal procedure — Plea of guilty — Court must ensure plea is unequivocal and that accused understands elements of charge before recording conviction. * Immigration and nationality — Offences of unlawful presence and false statements to obtain passport — Seriousness may justify consecutive sentences but conviction must rest on a valid plea. * Evidence and procedure — Material contradictions in prosecution facts and absence of expert opinion on alleged forged documents can vitiate plea-based convictions. * Remedy — Quashing of conviction and sentences and ordering of retrial de novo where plea improperly taken.
13 July 2015
Court upheld maintenance order and affirmed that pre‑marriage land substantially improved during marriage is divisible.
* Family law – Maintenance – Assessment of maintenance and proof of means – Trial court may infer means from conduct and activities shown in evidence. * Family law – Matrimonial property – Division of assets – Pre‑marriage property that is substantially improved during the marriage is divisible under section 114(3) of the Law of Marriage Act.
10 July 2015
Alleged date discrepancies in judgment did not amount to material irregularity; revision dismissed with costs.
* Civil Procedure – Revision – Alleged irregularity in judgment delivery – Whether inconsistent dates in record constitute material irregularity. * Pleadings – Preliminary objections – Requirement for notice and that unpleaded points should not ambush opposing party. * Order XX r.3 Civil Procedure Code – Requirements for judgment to be dated, signed and pronounced in open court.
10 July 2015
Reported
The court overruled all preliminary objections, finding plaintiffs' tort claims timely and Tanzania a proper forum.
Civil procedure — preliminary objections: corporate authority and board resolution as question of fact; Limitation — torts, three-year period, continuing tort and accrual; Locus standi — managerial/court-appointed control confers standing; Res sub-judice/abuse — foreign proceedings do not preclude local suit (CPC explanation); Forum non conveniens — tortious claims arising in Tanzania justify local forum.
6 July 2015
3 July 2015
June 2015
Enforceable loan limited interest to six months; inadequate payment records left Shs 149,220,000 outstanding, plus damages, interest, and costs.
* Contract — Loan agreement — Validity and terms — Interest expressly limited to six months (Shs 10,000,000/month). * Evidence — Bank pay-in slips and petty cash vouchers — Requirement to specify purpose of payment; insufficiency reduces evidential weight. * Remedies — Calculation of outstanding principal, general damages, and post-judgment interest. * Negotiable instruments — Dishonoured cheque proved. * Criminal/Police procedures — No proof of duress in caution statement.
26 June 2015