High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
962 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Outcomes
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
962 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2025
Dispute over image use on electronic media lies in court, not the Media Services Act Complaints Committee.
Media Services Act – jurisdiction – Section 28(1) covers complaints about print media only; electronic media (television, social media) fall outside Complaints Committee’s print-media jurisdiction; Personal Data Protection Act inapplicable to misappropriation of image/likeness; preliminary objection alleging absence of cause of action cannot succeed where it raises mixed questions of law and fact; joinder under Order I Rules 3 and 7 permissible where plaintiff is unsure which defendant is liable.
28 October 2025
Interim attachment and custody of a vessel granted to protect consignment where applicants showed prima facie title and risk of irreparable loss.
Maritime security – attachment before judgment of a vessel; interim restraint and custody orders; prima facie title to goods on board; alleged third-party lien; irreparable harm and balance of convenience; requirement of security; interim procedural directions (service and hearing).
28 October 2025
Plaintiff-lawyer entitled to unpaid 3% professional fees, general damages and 12% interest following ex parte proof of engagement and nonpayment.
* Civil procedure – ex parte proof where defendants absent – credibility of plaintiff's direct evidence. * Contract/professional fees – entitlement to agreed 3% of transaction sum for legal services. * Damages – award of specific and general damages for unpaid professional fees and delay; reasonable post-judgment interest (12%). * Execution – use of prior attachment-before-judgment order as starting point for enforcement.
27 October 2025
Bank liable for unauthorised withdrawals; SMS alerts insufficient to absolve bank; refund, interest, general damages and costs awarded.
* Banking law – fiduciary duty of banks to safeguard customer funds; obligation to prove authorized withdrawals. * Evidence – burden shifts to bank once withdrawal is shown; requirement to produce teller slips/CCTV/identification. * Electronic notifications – SMS alerts notify but do not authenticate or prevent unauthorised withdrawals. * Damages – refusal of punitive damages; award of general damages, interest and costs.
27 October 2025
Contract clause giving automatic conversion to commercial interest upon employment termination was enforceable; appeal dismissed.
* Contract law – loan agreements – staff preferential interest rate – automatic contractual conversion to commercial rate upon cessation of employment. * Regulatory compliance – Bank of Tanzania (Financial Consumer Protection) Regulations 2019 – prior notice requirement vis-à-vis contractual notice. * Evidence – burden of proof in civil claims – party alleging breach must prove on balance of probabilities. * Contract variation – subsequent internal policies not incorporated into an existing contract cannot alter contractual rights.
24 October 2025
Special damages must be strictly proved; general damages upheld for breach causing unpaid services and loss.
Contract existence—oral and written agreements; Admissibility—relevance of exhibits and effect of documents admitted for identification; Special damages—must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved with particulars and supporting documents; General damages—discretionary award must be reasonable, not excessive; Appellate re-evaluation of facts and law.
24 October 2025
The appellant's challenge fails; the child’s credible testimony and medical corroboration sustain the conviction and sentence.
Criminal law – sexual offences against children; Evidence Act sec.135(2) – promise/voir dire for tender-age witness; Corroboration – medical evidence of bruises and friction; Consent immaterial for child victims; Proof beyond reasonable doubt.
24 October 2025
24 October 2025
Conviction quashed due to magistrate-transfer irregularity, unlawful cautioned statement, defective identification parade, and unread exhibits.
Criminal procedure – transfer of magistrate – duty to record reasons and inform parties; cautioned statement – compliance with section 50(1) time limit – inadmissible if breached; identification parade – compliance with Police General Orders No. 232, prior description and timing – defective parade to be expunged; documentary exhibits – requirement to read admitted documents aloud; retrial – ordered only in interests of justice.
24 October 2025
Leave and interim relief granted to challenge allegedly unlawful, unnotified revocation of land titles.
* Judicial review – leave to apply – flexible prima facie/arguable case test at leave stage – not proof of merits * Land law – revocation of title – requirement of notice, hearing and due process; alleged arbitrary revocation and re-registration * Interim relief – maintenance of status quo pending judicial review to prevent irreparable prejudice * Procedural – effect of respondent abandoning counter-affidavit at leave stage
24 October 2025
Administrator failed to show sufficient cause for delayed accounts; court granted a 14-day extension in the interests of justice.
Probate and administration — extension of time to file inventory/accounts — requirements under Section 107 PAEA and Probate Rules — delay must be accounted for; illegality as ground for extension must be apparent on the face of the record — court may grant extension in the interests of justice to prevent perpetual pending of probate matter.
24 October 2025
Appeal dismissed: no documentary proof of claimed special damages; concurrent findings rightly affirmed.
Civil procedure – second appeal – appellate interference with concurrent findings only for perverse/misapprehended evidence; Evidence – tendering and admission of documentary exhibits; Proof of special damages – strict requirement to plead and prove; Pleadings – typographical errors (slip of the pen) not sufficient to overturn merits without evidence of miscarriage of justice.
24 October 2025
Accused convicted of infanticide on circumstantial and medical evidence, then granted absolute discharge due to post‑partum instability and mitigation.
* Criminal law – Infanticide (Section 199 Penal Code) – Elements: age under 12 months, unnatural death, wilful causation, mental instability from post‑partum depression. * Evidence – Circumstantial evidence sufficient to establish guilt where medical and conduct evidence are consistent. * Forensic pathology – Cause of death: asphyxia. * Sentencing – Exercise of discretion under Section 38(1) Penal Code to grant absolute discharge.
24 October 2025
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to call a material witness and evidence left reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – sexual offences – proof beyond reasonable doubt; variance between charge particulars and evidence; identification evidence; medical corroboration; adverse inference for failure to call material witness.
24 October 2025
Court ordered respondents to file counter-affidavits and refused to stay proceedings pending revision of interlocutory orders.
* Civil procedure – interlocutory orders – revision and stay – Section 8(2)(d) AJA and Sections 84(2), 88(2), 89(2) CPC: no revision against interlocutory orders. * Abuse of process – use of appellate/revisional steps to delay proceedings. * Service by publication and time extension to file counter-affidavits in urgent matters.
24 October 2025
Failure to prove mandatory 90‑day notice to government/Attorney General renders suit incompetent and leads to plaint being struck out.
* Government Proceedings Act s.6(2) – mandatory 90‑day notice of intention to sue Government – addressed to government minister/department/officer and copy to Attorney General and Solicitor General required. * Proof of service – notice and proof must be disclosed/annexed to pleadings; absence of evidence of proper service renders suit incompetent. * Jurisdiction – non‑compliance with s.6(2) is jurisdictional and fatal to the suit.
24 October 2025
Suing a respondent personally instead of as administratrix renders proceedings void and the application incompetent.
Probate and administration of estates; capacity to sue – necessity to sue legal representatives in representative capacity; substantive misjoinder of capacity vitiates proceedings; sections 96–97 CPC inapplicable to cure substantive defects at appellate stage; extension of time futile where underlying proceedings are void.
23 October 2025
Main suit dismissed as time-barred; bank’s counterclaim succeeds and mortgage and guaranties upheld, allowing sale to recover debt.

* Civil procedure – locus to sue – representative capacity requires pleading and production of letters of administration; failure is fatal. * Limitation – accrual of action for cancellation/rescission under Limitation Act s.6(1) – suit challenging loan/mortgage dismissed as time-barred. * Evidence – allegations of forgery/criminality in civil suit require higher standard of proof. * Security enforcement – duly registered mortgage under power of attorney is enforceable; bank entitled to sell security to recover loan. * Contract – guarantors’ liability co-extensive with principal debtor under Law of Contract Act s.80.

23 October 2025
A taxation application filed beyond 60 days is invalid; limitation runs from delivery to the party, not certification.
* Advocates Remuneration Order — Bill of Costs — 60‑day filing period — commencement: delivery to party after request, not date of certification; * Law of Limitation Act s19 — exclusion applies only where record proves request and supply/delivery of judgment/decree; * Taxation procedure — filing out of time renders taxation proceedings null for want of jurisdiction.
23 October 2025
Failure to have a child witness promise to tell the truth vitiated her evidence, prompting quashing and a retrial.
Evidence – Child witness – Mandatory promise to tell the truth (s.127(2) Evidence Act) – Non‑compliance vitiates testimony; Conviction unsafe where prosecution hinges on such testimony; Retrial ordered in interests of justice.
22 October 2025
Acquittal upheld where inconsistencies, delayed reporting and inconclusive medical evidence created reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Rape of a child – credibility of child complainant; delay in reporting; inconsistencies in testimony. * Evidentiary value of medical examination – absence of hymen and absence of sperm not conclusive proof of penile penetration. * Standard of proof – reasonable doubt arising from contradictions, practical impossibilities, and corroborative defence evidence.
22 October 2025
Appellant’s evidence of preparedness and miscommunication constituted good cause; dismissal and ex parte orders set aside and matter restored for hearing.
Civil procedure – Small Claims – setting aside dismissal and ex parte judgments – "good cause" – mere presence in court premises does not equal appearance, but affidavits showing preparedness and communication may establish good cause – appellate review of discretionary exercise.
22 October 2025
Incomplete trial record prevented appellate determination; conviction quashed and retrial de novo ordered in the interests of justice.
* Criminal procedure – incomplete trial record on appeal – missing testimonies preventing appellate determination. * Evidence – visual identification – reliability challenged but appeal not determinable due to defective record. * Retrial de novo – appropriate remedy in the interest of justice where record is insufficient.
22 October 2025
Conviction on an ambiguous plea of guilty was quashed and a retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure — Plea of guilty — Requirement for prosecution to state facts constituting the offence and for accused to explain — Unequivocal plea; ambiguous or imperfect plea; conviction quashed; retrial ordered.
22 October 2025
General, unspecified objections to a bill of costs do not justify setting aside a Taxing Master's ruling.
Advocates (Remuneration) Order GN. No. 263/2015 — Order 55 requirements for bills of costs; Order 7(1)-(2) — power to call for taxation rulings; Taxation review standard — Asea Brown Boveri: interfere only where wrong principle or manifestly excessive/inadequate; need for specific, particularized grounds of challenge; submissions are not evidence; dismissal for unmeritorious, delay-seeking references.
22 October 2025
Delay in presenting accused to court without prejudice does not vitiate conviction; armed robbery proven by credible ID.
* Criminal law – armed robbery – elements: theft, use/threat of offensive weapon, force directed at person – proof required. * Criminal procedure – detention – requirement to bring arrested person before court within 24 hours (s.33(1) CPA) – delay may be procedural irregularity but does not automatically vitiate conviction absent prejudice. * Evidence – visual identification – applicability of Waziri guidelines; reliability where good lighting and opportunity to observe. * Evidence – contradictions and inconsistencies – minor peripheral discrepancies do not necessarily destroy prosecution case.
22 October 2025
A material contradiction between the victim’s account and medical evidence created reasonable doubt, warranting quashing of convictions.
* Criminal procedure – Partly‑heard trial – Successor magistrate’s discretion under s.230(1) to act on predecessor’s record, re‑summon witnesses or recommence trial. * Evidence – Evaluation of evidence and duty under s.312(1) – necessity to reconcile material contradictions. * Sexual offences – weight of victim’s testimony v. medical evidence; material inconsistency can create reasonable doubt. * Conviction – where central contradiction remains unresolved, prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
22 October 2025
Bail pending committal granted under EOCCA; court set bail at half the alleged stolen amount with strict conditions.
* Criminal procedure – Bail pending committal under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act – application under ss 29(4)(d) and 36(1). * Bailability – Whether offences (leading organized crime and stealing) are bailable where Republic does not oppose. * Bail quantum – Court setting bail at half of the alleged stolen amount and permitting deposit of cash or title deeds. * Bail conditions – requirement of bail bond, sureties, monthly reporting, surrender of travel documents. * Jurisdictional note – amount in charge beyond subordinate court’s jurisdiction but bail pending committal remains cognizable.
21 October 2025
Preliminary objection on non-exhaustion dismissed as premature; extension of time application to be heard on merits.
* Administrative law – exhaustion of internal remedies – whether failure to exhaust internal administrative remedies is a jurisdictional/pure point of law discernible from pleadings. * Civil procedure – preliminary objection – requirements for a pure point of law and limits on premature objections. * Judicial review – extension of time to seek leave – distinction between procedural extension applications and substantive leave/judicial review considerations.
21 October 2025
Omission to fully explain appeal timeframe and compositional issues did not vitiate judgment entered on admission; appeal dismissed.
* Civil procedure – judgment on admission – Rule 44 and Rule 6 (Primary Courts) – admission permits judgment without further hearing on non-new issues. * Appeals – Section 20(3) Magistrates' Courts Act – omission to explain appeal timeframe not automatically fatal. * Appellate review – concurrent findings of fact by two courts not disturbed absent misapprehension of evidence or miscarriage of justice.
21 October 2025
Court recorded a mutual settlement, ordering sale of listed mortgaged assets and mutual release from further claims.
* Civil procedure – Consent judgment – Court’s power to record and adopt a lawful settlement (Order XXIII r.3 CPC). * Mortgage and recovery – Sale of mortgaged property and chattels under agreed settlement. * Mutual release – Settlement terms barring further proceedings and requiring withdrawal of appeal. * Possession – Compulsory handover of vacant possession as term of compromise.
21 October 2025
Conviction quashed due to evidential contradictions, unexplained delays and a defective preliminary hearing.
* Criminal procedure — Section 214(1) CPA — Reassignment of magistrates — Reasons for takeover required but failure assessed under overriding‑objective/prejudice test. * Criminal procedure — Section 192(3) CPA — Preliminary hearing — Mandatory memorandum of agreed facts, reading, explanation, signature and filing; failure vitiates PH but not necessarily trial. * Evidence — Rape — Victim's testimony must be scrutinised; contradictions between witnesses and medical findings and unexplained delay can raise reasonable doubt. * Delay and investigative omissions — Unexplained delay in arraignment and absence of arresting/investigating witnesses may prejudice prosecution case.
21 October 2025
The appellant succeeded because the respondent failed to prove loss of baggage, so the damages award was set aside.
Aviation law; baggage claims — burden of proof on claimant to establish checked baggage and loss; boarding pass insufficient to link passenger to specific checked baggage; pleadings admissible and binding where they negate claimant's proof; Montreal Convention limits and exceptions noted; appellate re‑evaluation of evidence on first appeal.
21 October 2025
Court upheld unequal division of matrimonial assets on contribution findings, excluded pre‑marriage house, included tractor as matrimonial property.
Family law – division of matrimonial property; Law of Marriage Act ss.58, 60(a), 114 – extent of contribution; rebuttable presumption of separate ownership; exclusion of pre‑marriage assets; inclusion of jointly used agricultural equipment; misappropriation/mismanagement as factor reducing share.
20 October 2025
High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear review after the applicant filed a notice of appeal; review struck out with costs.
* Civil procedure – Jurisdiction – Effect of filing a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal – trial court ceases to have jurisdiction to hear review of same decision. * Civil procedure – Abuse of process – Concurrent filing of notice of appeal and review application constitutes abuse of court process. * Procedure – Withdrawal of appeal – absence of Court of Appeal order withdrawing notice of appeal does not restore trial court jurisdiction.
20 October 2025
Court: civil court had jurisdiction; unlawful eviction established; damages reduced from TZS100m to TZS50m; appeal otherwise dismissed.
Jurisdiction – cause of action approach; res sub judice – requirement of substantially identical matters; eviction – temporary dispossession and forcible removal of possessions establishes actionable interference; vendor liability by implication where purchaser takes possession; electronic evidence – formal defects affect weight not automatic exclusion; partner’s absence from witness box not fatal; general damages subject to appellate reduction where excessive.
20 October 2025
Appeal allowed and conviction quashed due to missing trial record and impossibility of a fair retrial.
• Criminal procedure – Missing trial record – Effect on appellate review and fairness of determination.• Criminal law – Missing exhibits and prosecution documents – Retrial vs quashing of conviction.• Revisionary powers – Use of Magistrates' Courts Act s.31 and Criminal Procedure Act s.395 to nullify lower court proceedings when records are irretrievable.
20 October 2025
Lawful receivership detention insulated the appellant; claimed special and general damages against the appellant were unproven and set aside.
Civil procedure – receivership and lawful detention of property – special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved – departure from pleadings – admissibility and probative value of financial statements – general damages require reasons – pleadings are not evidence.
20 October 2025
No medical negligence proved, but facility liable for allowing a suspended doctor to practise; plaintiff awarded general damages.
* Medical negligence – standard of care and causation – requirement for expert medical evidence to establish breach and causation in neonatal death and wound infection claims. * Health facility liability – statutory duty breached where a suspended practitioner is authorised to provide clinical services. * Professional misconduct (practising while suspended) distinct from negligence; non‑disclosure of suspension can give rise to compensable psychological harm. * Remedies – award of general damages, interest and costs where negligence not proved but statutory breach and psychological injury established.
20 October 2025
Taxing officer’s ruling quashed for lack of proof of service and for proceeding without lawful ex parte order.
* Taxation of costs – Procedural fairness – Necessity of proof of service before ex parte proceedings – Order V r.16 CPC. * Advocates Remuneration Order – Bill of Costs – Reviewable where procedure defective. * Ex parte hearing – requirement for application and court order; unlawful to proceed suo motu. * Remedy – vacation of ruling, nullification of subsequent proceedings and remittal for rehearing.
20 October 2025
Self‑defence negated malice aforethought; murder charge reduced and the accused convicted of manslaughter.
Criminal law – Homicide – Distinction between murder and manslaughter – Malice aforethought – Self‑defence as negating malice – Reduction of charge from murder to manslaughter; burden of proof; reliance on post‑mortem and eyewitness evidence.
20 October 2025
Whether an alleged illegitimate child may inherit under Islamic/customary law and whether legitimacy was lawfully declared.
Inheritance law – legitimacy and inheritance rights of children born out of wedlock under Islamic/customary law; scope of High Court to declare legitimacy; certification of points of law to Court of Appeal.
17 October 2025
An applicant must promptly account for each day of delay; unexplained prolonged delay defeats an extension to file a bill of costs.
* Civil procedure – extension of time – application under Section 93/103 CPC to file bill of costs – requirement to show sufficient cause and account for each day of delay (Lyamuya). * Court procedure – non-notification of ruling and reassignment of presiding officer – failure to notify does not excuse prolonged unexplained delay without prompt follow-up. * Relief refused – unexplained delay and lack of diligence justify dismissal; each party to bear own costs.
17 October 2025
A pledgee may take reasonable preservation steps but cannot materially alter pledged collateral without the pledgor’s consent; damages reduced.
* Security/pledge law – duty of pledgee to preserve collateral; implied limited right to inspect and effect reasonable repairs in urgent cases. * Contract law – scope of implied authority vs express contract terms; material alteration (engine replacement) requires pledgor’s consent. * Evidence – technical findings require expert opinion; trial court must not speculate. * Civil procedure – documents must be disclosed/listed under Order XIII Rule 1(2); failure justifies exclusion despite overriding objective. * Damages – general damages for deprivation of use may be inferred but must be proportionate; appellate reduction where award excessive.
17 October 2025
Whether the prosecution proved admissibility of an extra-judicial statement amid timing and authorship discrepancies.
* Criminal procedure – admissibility of extra-judicial/confessional statements – requirement to prove voluntariness and authenticity beyond reasonable doubt. * Trial within a trial – resolving disputed extra-judicial statements. * Evidence – impact of documentary discrepancies and witness credibility on admissibility. * Compliance with procedural guidelines (Chief Justice Guideline) and proper recording of statements.
17 October 2025
Brief delay and missing third‑party affidavit did not bar grant of extension to file defence; extension granted.
Extension of time – Order VIII r.1(3) CPC – account for delay; promptness and diligence; short/non-inordinate delay; prejudice to respondent; Affidavit law – mention of third party does not automatically vitiate application; Service – receipt by receptionist effective but excusable delay may be granted in interest of justice.
16 October 2025
Partial overlap with a pending land suit does not make a judicial review application an abuse of process; it proceeds to merits.
* Judicial review – leave to apply – procedural filter at leave stage – not for conclusively deciding forum shopping or overlapping jurisdiction. * Civil procedure – abuse of court process/res sub judice – parallel proceedings and forum shopping – partial overlap not automatically fatal. * Land law – revocation of title – overlapping remedies in different divisions – scope and parties relevant to competence.
16 October 2025
Court granted interim injunction protecting the applicants’ access to the temple and right to worship pending the main suit.
• Interim injunction – preservation of access to religious premises pending substantive suit • Fundamental rights – freedom of worship and peaceful enjoyment of religious sites • Interim relief conditioned by non-interference with committee affairs and avoidance of confrontation • Consent/non-objection by respondents as factor in court’s exercise of discretion to grant interim relief
16 October 2025
Court granted interim injunction allowing applicants access to temple pending trial, subject to non-interference condition.
Religious freedom – Interim injunction to protect access to place of worship – Urgent (certificate of urgency) application – Consent/non‑objection by respondents – Conditions limiting injunction to prevent interference with committee and public order – Costs: each party to bear own costs.
16 October 2025
Respondent convicted of manslaughter for fatal assault during a fight causing internal injuries and death.
* Criminal law – Manslaughter – Liability where death results from a fight – Eyewitness and medical evidence linking assault to fatal injuries. * Evidence – Admissibility of caution statement – Trial within a trial. * Sentencing – Medium-level manslaughter; application of Tanzania Sentencing Guidelines 2023; mitigation and aggravation considered.
16 October 2025