High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
14 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
14 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2008
Ex parte land possession order upheld; letters of administration confer locus standi; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – possession and demolition orders; Administration of estates – letters of administration establish locus standi; Civil procedure – ex parte proceedings lawful where defendant evades service and fails to file defence; Jurisdiction – admission of probate documents does not convert matter into probate jurisdiction; Professional conduct – allegation that counsel acted as witness unfounded.
12 December 2008
A credible child’s testimony corroborated by mother and medical evidence suffices to uphold a rape conviction; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Rape – Evidence of child witness – Corroboration – Medical evidence (PF.3) – Admissibility and reliance on caution statement – No mandatory requirement for sperm comparison/DNA to sustain conviction.
2 December 2008
Insufficient and inconsistent eyewitness evidence defeated the dangerous-driving conviction; failure to produce insurance proof upheld the insurance offence conviction.
Road Traffic Act – causing death by dangerous driving – requirement of sufficient and consistent eyewitness and documentary evidence; Motor Vehicle Insurance – driving without third-party insurance – duty to produce proof of valid cover; appellate review of factual sufficiency where material inconsistencies exist.
1 December 2008
November 2008
Eyewitness identification and recovered exhibits upheld; appeal against armed robbery conviction dismissed.
Criminal law – Armed robbery – Identification evidence – Contemporaneous and corroborated eyewitness identification; Admission of exhibits – recovery and tendering of mobile phone, firearm and ammunition; Identification parade – not required where in-scene identification and corroborative evidence are reliable; Appeal – conviction and sentence upheld where prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.
24 November 2008
Appeal against rape conviction dismissed where victim's testimony and PF.3 corroboration sufficed despite absence of medical or local leader witnesses.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Rape of a child – Evidence of age – medical witness not always required where testimony and medical form corroborate facts. * Evidence – corroboration – discovery of the victim by a third party and PF.3 may corroborate victim's account. * Procedure – prosecution not obliged to call every possible witness if case is otherwise proved. * Caution statement – denial in caution statement may be outweighed by direct and corroborative evidence.
4 November 2008
October 2008
Convictions quashed where visual identification was unsafe, identification parade absent and procedural irregularity occurred.
Criminal law – Armed robbery; visual identification – identification parade necessary where witnesses first see accused during a frightening one-off incident; alibi – weight may be given even if raised at defence; evidentiary procedure – admission of documentary exhibit without ruling on objection constitutes procedural irregularity; appellate review – benefit of doubt and quashing of unsafe convictions.
9 October 2008
September 2008
Applicant’s claim to recover clan land was time‑barred; respondents’ long continuous occupation showed permanent allocation.
* Land law – clan land – whether allocation was permanent or temporary; * Possession – continuous and uninterrupted occupation and cultivation as evidence of ownership; * Limitation – application of item 22, Part I, schedule to the Law of Limitation Act (Cap. 89 R.E.2002) – twelve‑year bar to recovery of land; * Procedural – appeal dismissed where claim prescribed.
10 September 2008
August 2008
Tribunal's acceptance of affidavit-only ex parte proof was ultra vires; proceedings nullified and judgment void, appeal allowed with costs.
* Civil procedure – Land Disputes Courts Regulations – Ex parte proof – Where a duly served respondent is absent and has not given good cause, tribunal should hear and determine matter by oral evidence (Reg. 11(1)(c)); affidavit-only ex parte proof is ultra vires. * Evidence – Validity of written agreements – requirement for proper witnessing and attestation to establish enforceability. * Capacity/procedure – necessity to prove legal authority to act for estates before determination. * Relief – Fundamental procedural irregularity renders tribunal proceedings void; appellate nullification with costs and liberty to institute fresh proceedings.
15 August 2008
July 2008
Conviction based on recent possession and weak identification was unsafe; appeal allowed, conviction quashed and appellant released.
* Criminal law – Doctrine of recent possession – conditions for invocation – prosecution must identify stolen goods as those charged and prove recentness. * Criminal law – Identification of stolen property – need for description/distinguishing features and trial record note. * Criminal law – Burglary – requirement to prove breaking occurred at night. * Evidence – Hearsay has no place for proving primary facts; prosecution bears burden beyond reasonable doubt.
28 July 2008
January 2008
Appellate court found the respondent’s acquittal erroneous where child victims’ evidence was corroborated by medical and parental examinations.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Rape of minors – Evidence of children of tender years – voir dire omission reduces such evidence to unsworn evidence requiring corroboration. * Corroboration – PF3/medical findings and parental examinations corroborating victims’ accounts. * Appellate review – Reasonableness of trial court’s assessment of credibility and sufficiency of evidence.
1 January 2008
Failure to consider prior judicial determinations on the same land rendered the Tribunal's decision a miscarriage of justice.
Civil procedure – prior judgments/res judicata – duty of tribunal to inquire into previous determinations of same land; Procedural fairness – right to be heard and proper evidence-taking at locus; Customary land – necessity to consider clan ownership and consent.
1 January 2008
Tribunal erred by failing to consider prior court proceedings over the land; decision quashed and retrial ordered.
Land law – jurisdiction and res judicata – failure of Land Tribunal to consider prior judgments on same land – omission amounts to miscarriage of justice – appeal allowed and matter remitted for retrial.
1 January 2008
An imprudent purchaser cannot retain estate property bought from a vendor without title; caveat emptor applies.
Land — sale by person without title — illegal sale of estate property; purchaser’s remedies and limitations — caveat emptor; entitlement to vacant possession where vendor lacked authority; liability for restitution — vendor’s independent act; admissibility issue raised regarding photocopied sale agreement (s.66 Evidence Act).
1 January 2008
A land tribunal cannot award unclaimed employment terminal benefits; its eviction order in favor of the receiver was upheld.
Land law – possession and eviction – receiver/liquidator’s entitlement to premises; jurisdiction – limitations of District Land and Housing Tribunal to adjudicate employment terminal benefits; courts will not grant relief not pleaded or claimed; prior determination of employment benefits in other fora.
1 January 2008