High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
4 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 4 judgments found.

4 judgments
November 1994
Convictions unsafe where night identification was doubtful and recent‑possession did not attach; appeal allowed.
  • Criminal law
    • — Armed robbery — identification evidence — visual ID — caution required where witnesses did not name suspects contemporaneously and arrest followed after delay
    • — Recent possession — does not apply where stolen property found in third party’s house and accused not in possession. Conviction cannot rest on suspicion arising after an intervening search and statement
1 November 1994
April 1994
An out-of-time appeal filed without first obtaining enlargement of time is incompetent and dismissed as a nullity with costs.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — Time bar — Failure renders appeal incompetent and a nullity — Costs awarded
18 April 1994
Identification parade reliability, lack of violence for armed robbery, theft conviction substituted, accessories after the fact upheld with reduced sentences.
  • Criminal law
    • — Accessory after the fact — active steps (harbouring, falsehood) to enable escape from punishment
    • — Distinction between armed robbery and theft — requirement of violence or use/threat of firearm in commission
    • — Evidence — possession of stolen property as corroboration of involvement
    • — identification — fairness of parades and dock identification
6 April 1994
March 1994
Appeal dismissed; respondent’s claim that the contested house was not estate property was upheld and administrator must not deal with it.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Administration of estates — duties of administrator — refrain from disposing of disputed assets pending lawful determination
    • — Locus standi
  • Succession law — Intestacy — inclusion/exclusion of property from estate — burden and sufficiency of evidence to exclude property from administration
28 March 1994