High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
9 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 9 judgments found.

9 judgments
December 2011
Allegations of judicial bias unsupported; refusal to address court is abuse—recusal denied and application dismissed with costs.
  • Civil procedure — Abuse of process
    • — court may invoke inherent powers
    • — refusal to address the court to have a compromise (Deed) registered may be an abuse
  • Civil procedure — Judicial recusal
    • — mere apprehension without evidence insufficient (Rugaimukamu; Registered Trustees; Mwita Chacha)
    • — standards for disqualification: need evidence of close relationship, personal bias or financial interest
19 December 2011
November 2011
Revision cannot substitute for appeal; the application was time‑barred and dismissed.
  • Civil procedure — Revision — Revision not an alternative to appeal
  • Limitation law — Application filed out of time — 60‑day time limit for applications originating from Primary Courts/Magistrates' Courts Act
  • Probate law — appointment of administrator — proper procedure to challenge appointment
18 November 2011
September 2011
Transitional provisions preserve jurisdiction of district/resident magistrates for employment disputes arising before the new labour law commenced.
  • Employment law — Transitional provisions — Jurisdiction of district/resident magistrate versus newly established labour institutions — Pending or pre-commencement disputes governed by old law
20 September 2011
Hospitalisation does not excuse late filing; appellant must seek statutory extension before instituting suit.
  • Limitation Act (Cap. 89) — tort actions limited to three years; section 16 (disability) permits exclusion of time but must be invoked by application; section 14(1) (court may extend time) and section 44(1) (Ministerial extension) are the proper remedies; section 3(1) mandates dismissal of proceedings instituted after prescribed period.
2 September 2011
August 2011
Failure to pay ordered security for costs within statutory time rendered the petition incompetent and justified dismissal under section 111(7).
  • Civil procedure
    • — Costs — dismissal for want of security for costs and costs to follow the event
    • — Procedural default — consequences for competence of petition
    • — security for costs
18 August 2011
18 August 2011
July 2011
A revision application filed beyond 60 days from the challenged ruling is time‑barred and dismissed with costs.
  • Limitation law — Limitation — Revision applications — Applicability of Item 21 Part III Schedule to the Law of Limitation Act
5 July 2011
Primary courts lack jurisdiction over malicious prosecution; appeals from primary courts must be filed within thirty days.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appeals from Primary Courts — Extension of time to appeal — Magistrates' Courts Act s 20(3)-(4)
    • — Jurisdiction of Primary Courts — Torts (malicious prosecution) — Fourth Schedule to the Magistrates' Courts Act
1 July 2011
June 2011
24 June 2011