High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
2,481 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip to results

Results. 2,481 judgments found.

2,481 judgments
March 2025
An advocate’s attendance at court‑annexed mediation suffices as authority to settle; MD/3 is not mandatory.
  • Civil procedure — mediation — Authority to settle — Representation by advocate
25 March 2025
A conviction based on an unequivocal guilty plea for rape was upheld despite minor errors in the charge sheet.
  • Criminal procedure — plea of guilty — Rape — Whether plea was unequivocal — Right to appeal on conviction following guilty plea
25 March 2025
Trial court’s failure to assist an accused in remand custody to procure defence witnesses violated Section 231(4) and nullified proceedings from defence closure.
  • Criminal procedure — duty of trial court to assist accused in remand custody to procure defence witnesses
    • — fair trial right
    • — mandatory requirement
24 March 2025
Whether the taxing officer properly exercised discretion in assessing applicant's transport, advocate, instruction and taxation-hearing fees.
  • Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — assessment of instruction fees and attendance fees — Separate assessment of advocate transport and appearance fees
  • Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — assessment of necessity and reasonableness of transport, court-attendance and drafting charges
  • Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — instruction fee
    • — contingent fee prohibition
    • — Proof of instruction
24 March 2025
Prior Commercial Court decision that the company was dormant bars re‑litigation; plaintiff failed to prove misappropriation.
  • Civil procedure — res judicata/functus officio — court lacks jurisdiction to re-adjudicate ownership already finally determined by a prior unchallenged judgment — Civil Procedure Code s 9
24 March 2025
Conviction for obtaining goods by false pretence upheld despite unreadable receipts; circumstantial evidence and common intention proved.
  • Evidence — Evidentiary law
    • — admissibility and readability of electronic/documentary evidence
    • — Circumstantial evidence and doctrine of common intention
    • — Variance in charge/flynotes not fatal where judgment and evidence are consistent
21 March 2025
Adoption granted where statutory requirements met and social inquiry found adoption to be in the child’s best interests.
  • Family law — Adoption
    • — Whether requirements for adoption are met — Law of the Child Act ss. 56, 59
    • — compliance with procedural requirements: Commissioner’s consent, social investigation report, Guardian ad litem — Social welfare inquiry and guardian ad litem report sufficiency
20 March 2025
A Certificate of title presumptively establishes ownership; the defendant failed to rebut and was declared trespasser and evicted.
  • Land law — Certificate of title presumed to establish ownership — burden of proof on challenger — trespass established by GPS and title evidence — injunctive relief and eviction ordered
19 March 2025
A court cannot grant interim relief pending arbitration unless arbitration proceedings have been properly commenced as required by law.
  • Arbitration — Temporary injunction — Jurisdiction
19 March 2025
An appeal was dismissed for failure to file written submissions within the prescribed time, constituting failure to prosecute.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — Determination of filing date in electronic case management — Consequence of non-compliance with court orders — Dismissal for want of prosecution
17 March 2025
The applicant's appeal fails; evidence proved armed robbery and grievous harm, and identification parade/production of weapon were unnecessary.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appeal — Credibility and minor inconsistencies — insufficient to overturn convictions when core evidence is consistent and corroborated
    • — Procedure — Police interrogation — no absolute prohibition on same officer interrogating multiple persons
  • Criminal law — Armed robbery — Elements: stealing, use of a dangerous/offensive weapon at or immediately after stealing, and weapon directed at the victim — proof by victim and corroborative witnesses
  • Evidence
    • — Identification — Identification parade unnecessary where witnesses knew the accused and arrest immediately followed the offence
    • — Production of weapon or stolen property — non-production does not necessarily undermine proof if oral and corroborative evidence suffice
17 March 2025
Applicant's dismissal quashed for lack of proof and denial of fair hearing; ordered payment from termination until retirement.
  • Labour law
    • — procedural fairness — employer’s failure to conduct/produce investigation and ensure hearing safeguards renders termination procedurally unfair — Right to fair hearing under Article 13(6)(a)
    • — remedies for unfair termination under section 40 ELRA — reinstatement, re-engagement, or compensation — monetary compensation where reinstatement impracticable (payment until retirement)
    • — unfair termination — substantive fairness — burden of proof on employer
17 March 2025
Beneficiaries' objections to the estate inventory and accounts were dismissed as res judicata due to prior final determinations.
  • Civil procedure — Res judicata — Conditions for application (same matter, same parties or privies, same title, competent court, heard and finally decided) — Effect: finality of litigation
  • Probate law — Administration of estates — Proper remedy is appeal from original probate determination, not instituting a fresh probate cause — Civil Procedure Code s 9
14 March 2025
Relatives’ testimony need not be corroborated; tribunal rightly found respondents’ title; appeal dismissed.
  • Land disputes — Evidence
    • — burden and standard in civil cases
    • — competence of relatives as witnesses
    • — credibility and contradictions as basis for dismissal
    • — materiality of surveyor evidence
    • — no general rule requiring corroboration
    • — pleadings limit appellate issues
  • Land disputes — Land dispute
    • — inheritance and distribution of deceased’s estate
    • — probate evidence
13 March 2025
Extension of time granted where applicants, non‑parties, demonstrated jurisdictional and hearing irregularities apparent on record.
  • Civil procedure
    • — extension of time — discretion exercised where sufficient cause shown
    • — Illegality as good cause — jurisdictional defects and denial of hearing may justify extension if apparent on face of record
    • — Non‑party discovery at execution — non‑participation in original suit can constitute sufficient cause for delay
  • Legal profession — Conflict of interest by counsel — raised as alleged illegality but entitlement to extension founded on jurisdiction and right to be heard grounds
13 March 2025
Appellant's trafficking conviction quashed where contradictions and exhibit timing discrepancies undermined proof beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law — Trafficking in narcotic drugs — ingredients: identity, possession, weight, chain of custody — repudiated cautioned statement — material contradictions and exhibit timing discrepancies may vitiate proof beyond reasonable doubt
10 March 2025
Failure to call material witnesses and unexplained reporting delay created reasonable doubt; the appellant's convictions were quashed.
  • Criminal law — sexual offences
    • — child witness procedure
    • — delay in reporting
    • — identification and best‑evidence principle
    • — in‑camera proceedings
    • — reasonable doubt resolved in favour of accused
    • — Sufficiency of evidence
10 March 2025
First accused convicted of murder on confession and DNA evidence; second accused acquitted for lack of corroboration.
  • Criminal law — Circumstantial evidence — forensic proof required to link blood stains to victim
  • Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statements — No objection at trial renders tendering permissible — Voluntariness of cautioned statement
  • Evidence — Confession of co-accused — conviction cannot rest solely on co-accused’s confession — Evidence Act s.33(2)
10 March 2025
Court held prosecution proved statutory gang rape beyond reasonable doubt; appeal dismissed.
  • Criminal law — sexual offences against a child — Statutory rape — Proof of age, penetration and identity
  • Criminal procedure — variance between charge and evidence — Requirement to amend charge under section 234(1) Criminal Procedure Act
  • Evidence — Failure to call material witnesses — adverse inference for failure to call material witnesses — Where omitted witness would elucidate missing links
10 March 2025
Prosecution proved theft beyond reasonable doubt; conviction upheld but sentence reduced for first offender.
  • Criminal law — Theft — Elements of theft and burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt — Section 265 Penal Code
  • Criminal procedure — Sentencing — mitigation for first offenders — Appellate discretion to mitigate punishment
7 March 2025
Acquittal where identification evidence was unreliable, uncorroborated and prosecution failed to call obvious witnesses.
  • Criminal law — identification evidence — corroboration required where identification conditions not ideal
  • Criminal procedure — duty to call material witnesses — Failure to call material witnesses may attract adverse inference
  • Evidence — Admissibility of written statements under section 34B Evidence Act — Admissibility does not dispense with requirement of reliability
6 March 2025
Extension of time granted due to alleged illegality despite failure to account for all days of delay.
  • Criminal procedure — Extension of time to file notice of appeal — exercise of judicial discretion guided by Lyamuya and appellate authorities
5 March 2025
February 2025
Appellants’ challenges on variance, seizure formalities, cautioned statements and search were rejected; convictions upheld.
  • Criminal law — armed robbery and malicious damage — proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • Criminal law — Evidence — variance between charge and testimony
  • Criminal law — identification of recovered property — requirement of distinctive features
  • Criminal law — Search and seizure
    • — emergency search
    • — omission of receipt not necessarily fatal
28 February 2025
Failure to prove an objective expectation of renewal defeats an unfair termination claim; repatriation and subsistence awards upheld.
  • Labour law
    • — expectation of renewal — objective basis required — Rule 4(5), GN No. 42 of 2007
    • — fixed-term contracts — reasonable expectation of renewal — Section 36(a)(iii), Employment and Labour Relations Act No. 6 of 2004
    • — repatriation costs and subsistence allowance — statutory entitlement — Section 43 and 44, Employment and Labour Relations Act No. 6 of 2004, Regulation 16 GN No.47 of 2017
28 February 2025
Perishable-exhibit inventory procured without the appellant present invalidated evidence, leading to quashing of conviction.
  • Evidence — disposal/inventory of perishable exhibits — primary court disposal valid where accused present and signatures/seal genuine — P.G.O. 229 para 25
  • Wildlife offences — unlawful possession of Government trophy — proof by seizure, inventory and disposal order — Inventory procured without accused's presence inadmissible
26 February 2025
Appeal dismissed: prosecution proved rape beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies and missing exhibits were immaterial.
  • Criminal law — Rape — proof of penetration — Victim's testimony as primary evidence
  • Evidence
    • — Discrepancies and contradictions — materiality and whether they go to root of case — Minor inconsistencies do not necessarily vitiate conviction
    • — Exhibits — Non‑tendering of physical exhibits does not necessarily vitiate convictions — Failure to tender underwear or call peripheral neighbours not necessarily fatal if core elements are proved
21 February 2025
Material variance in charges and unsafe night identification led to quashing of convictions and setting aside of sentences.
  • Criminal law — Material variance between charge and evidence (gang rape vs. single-perpetrator rape) — Duty to amend charges under section 234(1) CPA — Visual identification — convictions unsafe
19 February 2025
Conviction quashed where search lacked warrant and exhibits were destroyed without recorded hearing of the accused.
  • Criminal law — Search and seizure
    • — PGO
    • — Requirement of search warrant and compliance with CPA (time and court leave)
  • Criminal procedure — disposal of exhibits — accused’s right to be heard before pre-trial disposal
    • — Buluka Leken Ole Ndidai
    • — Exhibits Management Guidelines 2020
  • Evidence — Admissibility and sufficiency
17 February 2025
Accused sentenced to 12 years for high‑level manslaughter after one‑third plea discount and remand deduction.
  • Criminal law — sentencing — Manslaughter — gravity of offence and weapon used (panga) as aggravating factors
17 February 2025
Minor variances and inconsistencies did not vitiate conviction where child testimony and medical evidence proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law
    • — Credibility of child witnesses — inconsistencies and corroboration by medical evidence
    • — Evidence Act s.127(2) — child of tender age’s promise to tell truth and effect of 2023 amendment
    • — Standard of proof — beyond reasonable doubt
    • — Unnatural offence — Variance between charge and evidence (place, date, number of victims) — Materiality of variance
14 February 2025
Conviction for statutory rape quashed due to procedural flaws in assessing complainant's competence and insufficient evidence.
  • Criminal law — Rape
    • — Competency of witness
      • — Proof of age
    • — Procedural irregularities in witness assessment
      • — Quashing conviction where doubt remains
    • — standard of proof
      • — Competency of evidence
  • Criminal law — Rape (statutory rape)
    • — Mental capacity of victim
11 February 2025
Child identification and s127(2) compliance upheld; conviction affirmed and sentence increased to mandatory life imprisonment.
  • Criminal law
    • — Child witness evidence — compliance with promise to tell the truth — Minor omission not fatal
    • — Unnatural offence — identification of accused by child victim — Admissibility and reliability
  • Criminal procedure — Sentencing — Offence against a minor warrants life imprisonment (s.154(2) Penal Code) — Appellate revisionary enhancement (s.373(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Act)
11 February 2025
A suit previously prosecuted through appeals is not time-barred if time spent in prior proceedings is excluded under limitation law.
  • Limitation law — Limitation of actions — Exclusion of time spent on related proceedings
10 February 2025
Failure to conduct required inquiry into voluntariness of cautioned statement vitiated conviction; retrial ordered.
  • Criminal procedure — voluntariness of cautioned statements
    • — admissibility of exhibits allegedly obtained by force or false promises
    • — appellate revisionary power
    • — Exhibits Management Guidelines
    • — objection
    • — submissions are not evidence
10 February 2025
January 2025
An uncorrected variance between the charge date and trial evidence rendered the charge unproved; conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
  • Criminal law
    • — Offence of threat by weapon — particulars may make exact words non-essential
    • — Primary Courts — Rules of Evidence in Primary Courts
  • Criminal procedure — variance between charge and evidence — duty/court power to amend charge under Paragraph 22 of the Primary Courts Criminal Procedure Code — uncorrected variance renders charge unproved
  • Evidence — Material contradictions — evaluation of witness credibility
27 January 2025
Whether defilement of an imbecile was proved by eyewitness and medical evidence, and whether the maximum sentence was excessive.
  • Criminal law
    • — sentencing — mitigation for first offender — Reduction of statutory maximum sentence where mitigation warranted
    • — sexual offences — Defilement of imbeciles — Ingredients and proof that accused knew victim's condition
  • Evidence — Evidential weight of medical (PF3) and witness testimony — Medical evidence corroborates penetration — Eyewitness and medical evidence sufficient to prove offence beyond reasonable doubt
24 January 2025
Court upheld statutory rape conviction based on victim testimony, medical evidence and accused’s confession.
  • Criminal law — sexual offences — Statutory rape — Elements: age, penetration, identity — Confessional statement and medical evidence corroboration
20 January 2025
Child’s testimony and contradictory PF3 undermined prosecution; conviction quashed for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law — sexual offences against a child
    • — identification parade and consideration of defence evidence
    • — inconsistencies in medical report (PF3) undermining prosecution case
    • — requirement of rigorous truthfulness assessment
15 January 2025
December 2024
Extension to file written statement of defence granted for short, accounted delay and apparent illegality on the record.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Illegality on face of record — Apparent illegality as sufficient ground for extension without deciding merits
    • — extension of time — Good cause for delay — Order VIII r.3 CPC
31 December 2024
Persistent citation of a wrong statutory provision justified striking out the application despite minor jurat errors.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Amendment of defective documents — Typographical error in deponent’s name — Minor irregularity not fatal if it does not go to the root of the case
    • — Pleadings — Inconsistent prayers and incorrect citation of statutes render application incurably defective
    • — Preliminary objections — affidavit jurat requirements (date, place, commissioner’s introduction)
24 December 2024
Failure to frame and record issues before hearing vitiated the judgment and warranted quash and remittal for rehearing.
  • Civil procedure — Order XIV r.1(5) CPC
    • — appellate power to remit and permit additional evidence
    • — Mandatory duty to frame and record issues before hearing
    • — omission may vitiate proceedings if it causes miscarriage of justice
    • — remittal for framing and rehearing
24 December 2024
Second appeal dismissed: maintenance upheld and house division affirmed; new facts raised on appeal were inadmissible.
  • Appellate practice — Second appeal — New facts or grounds not raised or proved in lower courts are inadmissible
  • Family law — Child maintenance
    • — assessment of maintenance
    • — court may consider payer's means and prior contributions
  • Family law — Division of matrimonial property
23 December 2024
High Court dismissed vague interim application lacking pending matter and proper property description; stay of execution falls under Court of Appeal.
  • Civil procedure
    • — interim relief — Temporary injunction and stay of execution — Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 11)
    • — jurisdiction — Stay of execution — Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 11)
23 December 2024
Appeal allowed: prosecution contradictions and failure to call key witnesses defeated proof beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law
    • — Adverse inference — burden on prosecution to prove offence beyond reasonable doubt
    • — evaluation of evidence — material contradictions between victim and other witnesses
    • — sentencing for young offenders — concession by State rendered moot by acquittal
23 December 2024
Court appointed the surviving spouse as administrator after finding statutory requirements and publications satisfied.
  • Probate law
    • — Administration of estates — appointment of (co-)administrators — Requirements under Administration of the Estate Act Cap. 352 R.E.2019
    • — Probate procedure — publication of citation (Government Gazette vs newspaper) and family consent to appointment of administrator — Inventory and final accounts filing obligations under s.107(1)
20 December 2024
Challenge to exhumation dismissed: Graves Act procedures not mandatory for private re‑interment; applicants failed to prove non‑consultation.
  • Civil procedure — Revision of District Court order — Applicability of Graves (Removal) Act to non‑public‑interest removals — Court may rely on Section 95 CPC and customary practice
  • Customary law — Consultation of interested persons — Requirement to notify relatives/clan — Not every clan member must be consulted in person
19 December 2024
Reference allowed in part: costs re-taxed to TZS 789,000 after reductions for unproven and excessive claims.
  • Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — Right to be heard in taxation proceedings
19 December 2024
Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for extension; delay unaccounted and alleged illegality not apparent on record.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time
    • — illegality apparent on face of record as sufficient cause — Point of law of sufficient importance apparent on face of record — Law of Limitation Act s 14(1)
    • — sufficient cause — Accounting for each day of delay — Law of Limitation Act s 14(1)
19 December 2024
Ignorance of proceedings or an accused’s change of plea does not establish good cause to extend time to challenge forfeiture.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time
    • — accounting for delay
    • — diligence
  • Civil procedure — Inordinate delay — Lyamuya guidelines
  • Civil procedure — Technical delay — ignorance of proceedings or change of plea not constituting sufficient cause
  • Criminal law — Forfeiture proceedings — entitlement to apply for discharge and procedural follow-up obligations
18 December 2024
Conviction for statutory rape quashed due to material contradictions and implausible prosecution evidence despite child’s promise to tell truth.
  • Criminal law — Rape involving a child — Evidence of child of tender age — Material contradictions and delays in complaint may vitiate prosecution case — Burden to prove offence beyond reasonable doubt
17 December 2024