|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| March 2024 |
|
|
A plaint failing to plead jurisdictional facts and to state value in specified currency is incurably defective and struck out.
Civil procedure – Pleadings – Order VII Rule 1(f) and (i) – requirement to plead facts showing court’s jurisdiction; requirement to state value in species of currency; courts cannot wander through a plaint to find jurisdictional facts; failure to comply renders plaint incurably defective and liable to be struck out.
|
28 March 2024 |
|
Prisoner’s transfer and misplaced notice held sufficient good cause to grant extension of time to lodge appeal.
Appellate procedure – extension of time to lodge notice of appeal – "good cause" required under s.11(1) AJA. Criminal procedure – prisoners’ restricted liberty and inter-prison transfers as impediments to prosecuting appeals. Discretionary relief – court’s power to extend time where delay is beyond applicant's control; reliance on precedent.
|
26 March 2024 |
|
Failure to plead land size and demarcation is a fatal irregularity justifying extension of time to appeal.
Land law – Pleadings in land disputes – Requirement to state size, location and demarcation under Regulation 3(2)(b) – Non‑compliance is a fatal irregularity affecting execution. Civil procedure – Extension of time – Alleged illegality in lower tribunal’s decision can justify granting extension to enable appellate review. Parties are bound by their pleadings – inconsistent post-judgment execution claims are irregular. Interlocutory orders – Grant of time by DLHT is not final and not appealable.
|
26 March 2024 |
|
Failure to plead and attach letters of administration rendered the land proceedings incompetent; appeal allowed and lower decisions quashed.
Locus standi – representative capacity – must plead and attach letters/ instrument of appointment; failure is fatal and renders proceedings incompetent. Jurisdiction – defects as to locus standi may be raised at any stage, including appeal. Ward tribunal procedure – defects in representation letters and unclear land descriptions undermine proceedings. High Court revisional powers – s.43(1)(b) to nullify and quash lower tribunals’ decisions where material irregularities affect merits.
|
25 March 2024 |
|
|
25 March 2024 |
|
Respondent convicted of murder on watertight eyewitness identification and malice; sentenced to death.
Criminal law – Murder – proof beyond reasonable doubt; visual identification – reliability of child and familiar witness in daylight (Waziri Amani); malice aforethought – weapon used, injury location, single fatal blow; accused’s accidental theory failing to raise reasonable doubt.
|
25 March 2024 |
|
Court convicted accused of grievous harm on strong eyewitness identification and medical evidence; sentenced to eight years and ordered compensation.
Criminal law – Acts intended to cause grievous harm – Section 222(a) Penal Code – conviction based on eyewitness identification and medical evidence. Evidence – Visual identification and recognition – factors for reliability (close range, daylight, prior acquaintance). Evidence – Medical proof of injury and PF3 – establishment of grievous harm (maiming/disablement). Defence – alibi/denial insufficient where prosecution proves case beyond reasonable doubt. Sentence – custodial term and compensation under Criminal Procedure Act s.348(1).
|
25 March 2024 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt due to major witness contradictions and unreliable eyewitness evidence.
Criminal law – Murder – standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt; Eyewitness credibility and material inconsistencies; Weight of post-mortem evidence; Acquittal where prosecution evidence creates reasonable doubt.
|
22 March 2024 |
|
Eyewitness identification under adequate lighting and medical evidence sufficed to convict the accused of grievous harm, alibi rejected.
Criminal law – Acts intended to cause grievous harm – elements of section 222(a) – requirement of wounds/grievous injury Evidence – Identification at night – factors: lighting, familiarity, corroboration, opportunity to observe Evidence – Medical evidence corroborating grievous harm Evidence – Alibi defence – burden and assessment; contradictions in defence evidence Evidence – Material vs. minor contradictions; effect on prosecution case
|
21 March 2024 |
|
Eyewitness and medical evidence upheld conviction for grievous harm; alibi rejected due to contradictory defence testimony.
Criminal law — Acts intended to cause grievous harm — s.222(a) Penal Code — required proof of unlawful wounding or grievous harm. Identification — visual identification at night — reliability assessed by lighting, opportunity, familiarity, and corroboration. Evidence — medical testimony corroborating grievous injuries from sharp instrument. Defence — alibi assessed against contradictions in defence witnesses; peripheral contradictions in prosecution evidence held immaterial.
|
21 March 2024 |
|
Applicant granted leave to defend mortgage summary suit after proving part-payment and raising triable issues.
Civil procedure – summary procedure under Order XXXV – leave to appear and defend in mortgage suits; proof that loan or part of loan has been discharged required under Rule 3(1)(c). Evidence – bank statements and correspondence as proof of part-payment and rescheduling requests may raise triable issues. Principles – Mechalec test for granting leave to defend: bona fide triable issues vs. sham defences.
|
20 March 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to prove good cause (notably unproven sickness) for extension of time to appeal; application dismissed.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — applicant must show good and sufficient cause; evidence required. Sickness as ground for extension — valid if proved by medical or credible evidence showing incapacity and prevention of timely steps. Credibility and consistency of explanations (business travel, attendance at meetings, agricultural losses) relevant to due diligence inquiry.
|
19 March 2024 |
|
Eyewitness identification and medical evidence upheld conviction for acts intended to cause grievous harm, trial proceeded in absentia.
Criminal law – Acts intended to cause grievous harm (s.222(a) Penal Code); visual identification – reliability where assailant known to victim, close range and daylight; medical evidence (PF3 and x‑ray) corroborating grievous injury; trial in absentia permissible where accused repeatedly absents and sureties held liable; burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
19 March 2024 |
|
Insufficient proof of malice aforethought, weapon and body custody issues led to manslaughter conviction, not murder.
Criminal law – homicide – distinction between murder and manslaughter – requirement to prove malice aforethought; dying declarations and circumstantial evidence; evidential importance of tendering seized weapons and maintaining chain of custody of the body for post‑mortem reliability; doubts resolved in favour of accused.
|
18 March 2024 |
|
Whether failure to cite Rule 3 renders an extension application incompetent where procedural requirements were complied with.
Appeals from Primary Courts — extension of time — interplay between s.25(1)(b) Magistrates' Courts Act and Rule 3 GN 312 of 1964 — requirement to attach petition of appeal — procedural non‑compliance and overriding objective — preliminary objection dismissed.
|
15 March 2024 |
|
Alleged illegality in Ward Tribunal composition and jurisdiction justified a 30‑day extension to seek certification on a point of law.
Ward Tribunal composition – mandatory requirement of 4–8 members, three women; non-compliance amounts to illegality. Territorial jurisdiction – Ward Tribunal must have territorial competence to hear land disputes. Extension of time – allegations of illegality can justify enlargement of time. Criteria for extension – promptness and accountability; courts may refuse inordinate delay. Record-keeping – failure to indicate members' gender is irregular.
|
15 March 2024 |
|
Eyewitnesss identification upheld; attempted murder not proved—accused convicted of grievous harm and sentenced with compensation.
Criminal law – Visual identification at night – reliability factors (lighting, proximity, duration, prior acquaintance). Attempted murder vs grievous harm – requirement of proof of life‑threatening injury and expert causation. Alibi defence – notice and corroboration. Admissibility – Exhibit expunged for lack of required signature (s.34B(2)(b)). Sentencing and compensation under s.348(1) CPA.
|
14 March 2024 |
|
Technical delay from court electronic filing system justified 14‑day enlargement of time to file appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time to file appeal – technical delay caused by Judiciary’s electronic filing system – good cause – applicant’s diligence; Affidavit formalities – typographical error not fatal; Access to justice and discretion to extend time.
|
14 March 2024 |
|
Omission to plead land size is fatal; tribunal’s deciding unpleaded issue deprived parties and warrants nullification.
Land law — Pleadings and requirements — Regulation 3(2)(b) (size, location, demarcation) — omission is fatal; Procedural fairness — tribunal raising new issue suo motu — right to be heard; Executability of decree — necessity of clear land description; Revisional powers — nullification and setting aside for miscarriage of justice.
|
14 March 2024 |
|
Accused acquitted because prosecution failed to prove attempt to murder beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions.
Criminal law – Attempted murder – burden on prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; material contradictions defeat conviction. Evidence – Witness credibility and contradictions – identification, scene and exhibit record inconsistencies undermine prosecution case. Exhibits – recovery and recording of weapon; inconsistencies in exhibit book affect evidential value. Principle – doubts resolved in favour of accused; acquittal where prosecution case is tainted by contradictions.
|
13 March 2024 |
|
Non‑compliance with Advocates’ Remuneration Order invalidates a bill of costs; fresh compliant bill ordered within 14 days.
Advocates Remuneration Order (GN No. 264 of 2015) – Regulation 55(1) (five‑column bill of costs) – Regulation 64(1) (single bill by advocate finally on record) – mandatory procedural requirements; non‑compliance vitiates bill and taxing master’s ruling; time‑bar preliminary objection overruled where filing within prescribed period.
|
11 March 2024 |
|
Revocation of a grant under Rule 9 leaves the probate open, so a fresh administration application is not barred by res judicata.
Probate law – Revocation under Rule 9(1)(d) – Revoked grant means administration ceases but probate remains open – No res judicata to bar fresh application for letters of administration.
|
8 March 2024 |
|
Court granted 20-day extension to seek judicial review due to apparent illegality despite unexplained delay.
Limitation of actions – extension of time to apply for leave for judicial review; requirement to account for each day of delay; manifest illegality on the face of the record as sufficient cause for extension; interplay of sections 14(1) and 21(2) Law of Limitation Act; review of disciplinary proceedings and appellate handling.
|
7 March 2024 |
|
Prosecution credibly proved grievous harm; accused convicted, sentenced to four years and ordered to pay TSh 1,000,000 compensation.
Criminal law – Acts Intended to Cause Grievous Harm – proof beyond reasonable doubt; credibility of victim and corroboration by PF.3. Defence of self‑defence – burden to raise reasonable doubt and supporting evidence required. Sentencing – consideration of aggravating factors (use of weapon, permanent disability, treatment costs) and mitigation; court’s power to order compensation under Penal Code.
|
7 March 2024 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and a corroborated confession established the accused's guilt of murder, resulting in a death sentence.
Criminal law – murder – conviction on circumstantial evidence corroborated by confession and recovery of exhibits. Evidence – admissibility of cautioned/confession statement – trial‑within‑a‑trial and voluntariness. Evidence – weight of medical report alleging police torture; adverse inference for failure to call material alibi witnesses. Penal Code – malice aforethought established from weapon, force and injuries (section 200). Sentence – murder attracts death sentence under section 197.
|
5 March 2024 |
|
Court exercised discretion to order locus in quo visit after close of trial to verify disputed land features.
Land law – locus in quo – discretionary power of court to visit site after close of evidence where justice requires verification of physical features. Civil procedure – timing of applications – late request not automatically barred; court may order inspection to resolve factual conflicts. Precedent – judicial discretion and ends of justice in ordering locus in quo visits (M/s Georges Center Ltd and related authorities).
|
5 March 2024 |
|
Failure to obtain leave to defend a summary suit resulted in judgment for unpaid local government levy with interest and costs.
Summary suit — Order XXXV Rule 2 CPC — failure to obtain leave to defend — allegations deemed admitted — entitlement to summary judgment for claimed levy; decretal interest and costs awarded.
|
4 March 2024 |
|
Speculative allegation of "double taxation" without evidence does not disclose a triable issue to obtain leave to defend a summary levy suit.
Civil procedure – Summary suit (Order XXXV Rule 3(1)) – leave to defend – affidavit must disclose sufficient, particularized facts to raise a triable issue; speculative assertions of "double taxation" are inadequate. Procedural objections under Advocates Act – documents prepared by non-advocate litigants not necessarily invalid for omission of preparer's name. Interpleader/payment proof appropriate where competing claims to tax/levy exist.
|
4 March 2024 |
|
Accused convicted of murder for poisoning a child; confession and forensic toxicology evidence upheld.
Criminal law – poisoning – forensic toxicology linking profenofos (Mocron 720E) to fatal poisoning.* Evidence – admissibility of cautioned/confessional statement – voluntariness and corroboration.* Evidence – failure to call material witness and adverse inference.* Murder – malice aforethought inferred from method, preparation and prior threats.* Sentencing – mandatory death penalty under section 197 Penal Code for murder.
|
4 March 2024 |