|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2024 |
|
|
Proceedings resumed after dismissal without restoration are nullities, nullifying ensuing judgments and appeals.
Civil procedure – dismissal for want of prosecution – requirement to restore or file fresh proceedings (Rule 28) – continuation of a dismissed matter without restoration renders subsequent proceedings and judgments nullity; mis-citation of enabling rule not necessarily fatal; appellate court’s duty to notice procedural nullity suo motu.
|
30 December 2024 |
|
|
17 December 2024 |
|
Court granted extension to file review due to technical delay and unclear, irregular orders in the impugned judgment.
Extension of time; condonation for delay; review application; technical delay due to tribunal control; irregularity on face of record; exercise of discretion under section 14(1)(b) Law of Limitations Act; Lyamuya principles.
|
17 December 2024 |
|
Victim’s credible tender‑age testimony and corroborative medical evidence upheld statutory rape conviction and sentence.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Statutory rape under Penal Code ss.130(1), 130(2)(e) and 131(1) – proof of age and penetration. Evidence – Child of tender age – credibility assessment and when corroboration is unnecessary under s.127(6) Evidence Act. Procedure – Right to call witnesses – accused closed defence and prosecution’s choice of witnesses not fatal to conviction. Sentencing – Minimum statutory sentence (not less than 30 years) and compensation ordered.
|
17 December 2024 |
|
Applicant granted 14-day extension to file revision after promptly showing apparent illegality in execution against public funds.
Civil procedure – Extension of time to file revision; requirement of good and sufficient cause; promptness and accounting for delay; illegality apparent on the face of the record; execution against public institution and large public funds.
|
16 December 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed: prosecution proved unlawful possession of government trophy; documentary valuation and lawful disposal of perishable exhibit upheld.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of government trophy – proof beyond reasonable doubt – cumulative weight of arresting officers, valuation report, inventory/disposal order and cautioned statement. Evidence – documentary evidence prevails over inconsistent oral testimony; minor contradictions immaterial. Evidence – disposal of perishable exhibits lawfully permitted by court order; inventory and remaining exhibits admissible. Evidence – admissibility and voluntariness of cautioned statements; admission of unavailable independent witness’s statement under statutory provisions.
|
16 December 2024 |
|
A revision application aggregating time‑barred and pending matters is incompetent and must be struck out; court lacks jurisdiction.
Land law – Revision – Time limitation; Item 21 Part III Law of Limitation Act (60 days) – Jurisdictional issue – Omnibus applications – Incompetent matters to be struck out; court may raise limitation at any stage.
|
16 December 2024 |
|
Conviction quashed where search procedures were flawed and the chemist’s report was not read into evidence.
Criminal law – Drugs Control and Enforcement Act and CPA – search and seizure — requirement for independent witness to observe search; evidence law – documentary exhibits must be read after admission; failure to comply may warrant expungement and quash conviction for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
16 December 2024 |
|
|
11 December 2024 |
|
Non‑compliance with mandatory 90‑day notice to the Attorney General rendered the plaintiff’s suit incompetent and it was struck out.
Government Proceedings Act s.6(1)–(2) – mandatory 90‑day notice of intention to sue – copy to Attorney General and Solicitor General – compliance must appear on face of plaint – non‑service on Attorney General renders suit incompetent – preliminary objection determinable on records.
|
11 December 2024 |
|
|
11 December 2024 |
|
|
6 December 2024 |
| November 2024 |
|
|
|
28 November 2024 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership where customary title’s coordinates did not match the locus in quo; appeal dismissed.
Land law – proof of ownership – customary right of occupancy – coordinates and actual location must correspond; party alleging ownership bears burden under s.110 Evidence Act and standard is balance of probabilities. Civil procedure – locus in quo – permitted in exceptional circumstances; use of surveyor as expert assistance is not improper reception of new evidence. Evidence – credibility assessment; failure to call neighbours weakens claim.
|
28 November 2024 |
|
Second appellate court upheld theft conviction; minor discrepancies in chassis/engine particulars did not vitiate prosecution's case.
Criminal law – Theft – proof beyond reasonable doubt – identification by registration card and receipt; minor discrepancies in vehicle particulars. Evidence – variance between charge sheet and exhibits – materiality test; whether discrepancy goes to root of case. Appellate review – second appeal – deference to concurrent findings of fact unless misapprehension or miscarriage of justice.
|
26 November 2024 |
|
|
26 November 2024 |
|
Absence of a Marriage Conciliation Board certificate renders a divorce petition incompetent and the proceedings a nullity.
Family law – Divorce – Mandatory referral to Marriage Conciliation Board and issuance of certificate under section 101 of the Law of Marriage Act – Certificate as jurisdictional prerequisite; absence renders petition incompetent and proceedings a nullity.
|
25 November 2024 |
|
Buyer who failed to pay final instalment and adduced no proof of title defect failed to acquire ownership; seller declared owner and buyer refunded.
Land sale — contract for sale in instalments — failure to pay final instalment — burden of proof (Evidence Act s.110) — Sale of Goods Act excludes land — first appellate court re-evaluation of evidence — remedy: refund and declaration of ownership.
|
25 November 2024 |
|
A stay of execution requires proof of substantial loss, promptitude and security; failure to show security defeats the stay application.
Stay of execution – Order XXI r.24 and Order XXXIX r.5(3) CPC – requirement of substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay and provision of security – ex parte arbitral award – CMA proceedings – security requirement is mandatory and cumulative.
|
22 November 2024 |
|
Interlocutory injunction granted to protect applicant's use of disputed farmland pending ownership determination.
Land law – Temporary injunction – Interlocutory relief pending trial – Atilio v Mbowe tests: prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience – Land dispute supported by Certificate of Title – Mis-citation of procedural provisions not fatal.
|
21 November 2024 |
|
Appeal allowed where tribunal's dismissal lacked clear record of notice and proceedings were procedurally contradictory.
Land Disputes Courts – dismissal for non-appearance – Regulation 11(1)(b) – notice requirement and presence when hearing date fixed. Setting aside dismissal – applicant's affidavit and proof of good cause – burden on applicant. Procedural irregularity – unclear coram entries and contradictory proceedings – benefit of doubt and restoration of proceedings. Misapplication of Regulation 13 – sanctioning a party for alleged advocate absenteeism without record of representation.
|
18 November 2024 |
|
An Attorney General's application for revision was not an abuse of process; preliminary objection dismissed and costs awarded to applicant.
Government Proceedings Act — section 6A (intervention by Attorney General) and section 16 (procedure for execution against government); abuse of court process — when an application is frivolous or impracticable; execution of decree — certificate issuance and finality; competence of Attorney General to bring revision where not party to original proceedings.
|
18 November 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to account for delay or show illegality on the face of the record; extension of time denied.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to file notice of appeal — Applicant must account for every day of delay; delay must not be inordinate; applicant must show diligence (Lyamuya; Bushiri). Illegality — To justify extension, alleged illegality must be apparent on the face of the record and demonstrated by annexed documents. Equity/mercy — Courts will not substitute mercy for legal requirements. Ex parte hearing — No costs ordered.
|
14 November 2024 |
|
Appellant's locus standi, general damages award, and minor boundary discrepancies do not overturn tribunal's decision for the respondent.
Locus standi – defendant sued as alleged trespasser – requirement to appoint administrator of deceased's estate not mandatory where defendant claims ownership. Damages – distinction between general and specific damages – general damages do not require strict pleading and proof. Evidence – minor contradictions in oral testimony (boundaries, dates) are tolerable; ownership of unsurveyed land assessed on balance of probabilities and credibility.
|
13 November 2024 |
|
Trial proceedings nullified for denying several accused their constitutional right to be heard; appeal dismissed.
Constitutional right to fair hearing — Article 13(6)(a) — Accused must be given opportunity to be heard; violation renders proceedings nullity; nullification appropriate remedy even if outcome might have been same; primary court procedure; criminal charge of disobedience of lawful orders arising from land execution proceedings.
|
12 November 2024 |
|
Leave granted to seek prohibitory judicial review of repeated seizure and fining of the applicant’s cattle.
Judicial review — leave to apply for prerogative order — requirements: arguable case; sufficient interest; timely filing — payment of fine not necessarily an admission; dispute over land use and implementation of by-laws.
|
11 November 2024 |
|
Respondent failed to prove joint acquisition of coffee farms; appellate division order set aside and trial court upheld.
Matrimonial property – division of matrimonial assets – burden of proof on person alleging joint acquisition (Evidence Act s110) – requirement to prove contribution on balance of probabilities (Law of Marriage Act s114(2)) – corroboration required for witnesses with interest – failure to call named seller or produce documents undermines claim of purchase.
|
7 November 2024 |
|
|
7 November 2024 |
|
|
7 November 2024 |
|
|
7 November 2024 |
|
|
6 November 2024 |
|
|
6 November 2024 |
|
Affidavit by one applicant on behalf of co-applicants was incurably defective; revision application struck out.
Labour procedure — admissibility of affidavits — one applicant swearing for co-applicants — hearsay where mentioned persons do not swear; Representation — notice under section 56 and Labour Court Rules does not authorise co-applicant to swear affidavits; Representative suits — rule 44(2) requires leave to act for multiple applicants.
|
6 November 2024 |
|
|
6 November 2024 |
| October 2024 |
|
|
Applicant failed to show good cause; economic hardship and unproven family problems did not justify extension.
Application for extension of time – Law of Limitations Act s.14(1)(b) – requirement to show good and sufficient cause – economic hardship only in exceptional circumstances – need to account for delay day-by-day – unsubstantiated family illness insufficient.
|
29 October 2024 |
|
An appellate court cannot raise and decide a new issue suo moto without affording parties the right to be heard.
Civil procedure — appellate procedure — raising issues suo moto — duty to invite parties to address the court before deciding such issues. Natural justice — audi alteram partem — denial of hearing vitiates proceedings and renders decision void ab initio. Remedy — quash impugned decision and remit for fresh determination with parties heard.
|
28 October 2024 |
|
Affidavit by one applicant claiming authority of others without their affidavits is incurably defective; application struck out.
Labour revision — affidavit requirements — Order XIX Rule 3(1) Civil Procedure Code — hearsay where one deponent alleges authorization by others — notice of representation under rule 43(1) and section 56 Labour Institutions Act — representative suits and leave under rule 44(2) — defective affidavit leads to striking out application.
|
24 October 2024 |
|
Appellant failed to prove land ownership; locus in quo visit unnecessary and trial Tribunal’s decision upheld.
Land law — proof of ownership — burden and standard of proof in civil cases — weight and credibility of witnesses — locus in quo visits are discretionary and only in exceptional circumstances — document (Kibali) admissibility and relevance to ownership.
|
23 October 2024 |
|
Non-joinder of the municipal council that issued the applicant's permits rendered the trial judgment irregular and was quashed.
Land dispute — ownership contested by purchase — documentary evidence (sale agreements, receipts, building permit) — necessary party — non-joinder of municipal council that processed application and issued permit — procedural irregularity — quashing of tribunal proceedings and order to file fresh suit with necessary parties joined.
|
23 October 2024 |
|
Court upheld division of house and business rooms but set aside shop compensation pending valuation and ordered 60/40 split.
Matrimonial property – Presumption of marriage and joint acquisition – Contribution as basis for division under s.114(2)–(3) Law of Marriage Act – Burden and standard of proof in civil disputes – Requirement to value assets and give reasons before ordering compensation – Judgment must state reasons (Order XX Rule 4 CPC).
|
23 October 2024 |
|
Appellant properly sued for trespass; respondent proved ownership on balance of probabilities; appeal dismissed.
Land law – trespass – whether defendant may be sued personally where alleged invasion committed by him rather than deceased predecessor – locus standi. Civil procedure – pleadings versus evidence – departure from pleadings and impact on limitation. Limitation – period for suits founded on land and relevance of alleged years of trespass. Evidence – standard of proof in civil matters: preponderance of probabilities; evaluation of witnesses and adverse inference for failure to call material witnesses.
|
23 October 2024 |
|
Victim’s credible testimony and corroborative medical evidence uphold rape conviction; confession admissible and semen testing unnecessary.
Criminal law – Rape: proof requires age, penetration and identity; victim’s testimony as primary evidence; confession admissibility — voluntariness and trial within a trial; medical/forensic testing of semen not legally required to prove rape; failure to cross‑examine equals acceptance of evidence.
|
22 October 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed: identification, exhibits and cautioned statement proved offences beyond reasonable doubt; alibi raised on appeal was inadmissible.
Criminal law – Armed robbery and grievous harm – sufficiency of identification evidence – factors: duration, distance, lighting, prior acquaintance, and earliest opportunity to name accused. Criminal procedure – admission of exhibits and seizure certificates; failure to object at trial bars appellate challenge. Criminal procedure – alibi notice requirement; new factual assertions on appeal treated as afterthoughts. Use of cautioned/confession statements as corroborative incriminating evidence.
|
22 October 2024 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership; untendered letters rightly excluded; appeal dismissed and tribunal’s decision upheld.
Civil procedure – admissibility of documents: a document attached to pleadings but not tendered at trial is not evidence (Order XIII Rule 7(2) CPC). Evidence – burden and standard: claimant bears burden; proof on balance of probabilities in land disputes. Land law – possession and village allocation: long undisturbed occupation and village allocation can establish lawful title/ownership.
|
21 October 2024 |
|
|
18 October 2024 |
|
|
17 October 2024 |
|
|
10 October 2024 |
|
Extension granted due to apparent illegality (missing Marriage Conciliation Board certificate); economic hardship not accepted.
Family law – Matrimonial proceedings – Requirement to refer matrimonial disputes to Marriage Conciliation Board and obtain certificate under section 101(1) of the Law of Marriage Act – absence of certificate vitiates jurisdiction. Civil procedure – Extension of time – Applicant must show good cause; economic hardship may be exceptional but requires credible evidence. Extension of time – Apparent illegality on the face of the record can justify condonation and extension of time.
|
10 October 2024 |
|
District court properly set aside trial court judgment for denying the respondent the constitutional right to be heard.
Constitutional right to be heard – breach of audi alteram partem renders judgment voidable; Revisional jurisdiction – district court may nullify trial proceedings for illegality; Ex parte judgments – require express order and specific procedure; Courts must balance expedition and fairness in delivering judgment.
|
10 October 2024 |
|
The appellant's guilty plea was unequivocal because the charge and facts showed the victim's age, upholding conviction and sentence.
Criminal procedure — guilty plea — requirements for an unequivocal plea; application of six Chaki conditions. Appeal from conviction on guilty plea — exceptions under Laurence Mpinga (imperfect/ambiguous plea, mistake, no offence disclosed, admitted facts cannot sustain conviction). Substantive law — rape of a minor (section 130(2)(e)): victim's age as essential ingredient; consent immaterial. Retrial — principles from Fatehali Manji: retrial only when original trial illegal or defective and in interest of justice.
|
9 October 2024 |