High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
12 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Outcomes
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
12 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2024
Proceedings resumed after dismissal without restoration are nullities, nullifying ensuing judgments and appeals.
Civil procedure – dismissal for want of prosecution – requirement to restore or file fresh proceedings (Rule 28) – continuation of a dismissed matter without restoration renders subsequent proceedings and judgments nullity; mis-citation of enabling rule not necessarily fatal; appellate court’s duty to notice procedural nullity suo motu.
30 December 2024
17 December 2024
Court granted extension to file review due to technical delay and unclear, irregular orders in the impugned judgment.
Extension of time; condonation for delay; review application; technical delay due to tribunal control; irregularity on face of record; exercise of discretion under section 14(1)(b) Law of Limitations Act; Lyamuya principles.
17 December 2024
Victim’s credible tender‑age testimony and corroborative medical evidence upheld statutory rape conviction and sentence.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Statutory rape under Penal Code ss.130(1), 130(2)(e) and 131(1) – proof of age and penetration. Evidence – Child of tender age – credibility assessment and when corroboration is unnecessary under s.127(6) Evidence Act. Procedure – Right to call witnesses – accused closed defence and prosecution’s choice of witnesses not fatal to conviction. Sentencing – Minimum statutory sentence (not less than 30 years) and compensation ordered.
17 December 2024
Applicant granted 14-day extension to file revision after promptly showing apparent illegality in execution against public funds.
Civil procedure – Extension of time to file revision; requirement of good and sufficient cause; promptness and accounting for delay; illegality apparent on the face of the record; execution against public institution and large public funds.
16 December 2024
Appeal dismissed: prosecution proved unlawful possession of government trophy; documentary valuation and lawful disposal of perishable exhibit upheld.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of government trophy – proof beyond reasonable doubt – cumulative weight of arresting officers, valuation report, inventory/disposal order and cautioned statement. Evidence – documentary evidence prevails over inconsistent oral testimony; minor contradictions immaterial. Evidence – disposal of perishable exhibits lawfully permitted by court order; inventory and remaining exhibits admissible. Evidence – admissibility and voluntariness of cautioned statements; admission of unavailable independent witness’s statement under statutory provisions.
16 December 2024
A revision application aggregating time‑barred and pending matters is incompetent and must be struck out; court lacks jurisdiction.
Land law – Revision – Time limitation; Item 21 Part III Law of Limitation Act (60 days) – Jurisdictional issue – Omnibus applications – Incompetent matters to be struck out; court may raise limitation at any stage.
16 December 2024
Conviction quashed where search procedures were flawed and the chemist’s report was not read into evidence.
Criminal law – Drugs Control and Enforcement Act and CPA – search and seizure — requirement for independent witness to observe search; evidence law – documentary exhibits must be read after admission; failure to comply may warrant expungement and quash conviction for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
16 December 2024
11 December 2024
Non‑compliance with mandatory 90‑day notice to the Attorney General rendered the plaintiff’s suit incompetent and it was struck out.
Government Proceedings Act s.6(1)–(2) – mandatory 90‑day notice of intention to sue – copy to Attorney General and Solicitor General – compliance must appear on face of plaint – non‑service on Attorney General renders suit incompetent – preliminary objection determinable on records.
11 December 2024
11 December 2024
6 December 2024