|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 2025 |
|
|
A Power of Attorney for litigation must state why the donor cannot act personally; omission robs the donee of locus standi.
* Companies law – petitions concerning conduct of liquidator – standing to sue – reliance on Power of Attorney as source of locus standi.
* Powers of attorney – litigation – requirement that instrument disclose reasons preventing donor from acting personally – omission renders instrument defective.
* Civil procedure – preliminary objections – court may examine foundational documents when authority to sue depends solely on them.
* Procedural consequence – defect in locus standi is fatal and warrants striking out the petition.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Appeal allowed where prosecution failed to prove child rape beyond reasonable doubt due to hearsay and weak corroboration.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Child rape – essential ingredients: victim's age, penetration, and identity must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. * Evidence – Victim testimony: credibility and quality required; not to be accepted as gospel truth. * Evidence – Hearsay: testimonies of non‑eyewitnesses that recount what others said do not substitute for direct proof. * Evidence – Medical reports (PF3): may show penetration but are opinion evidence and do not alone establish identity. * Standard of proof: conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; failure to prove identity quashes conviction.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Failure by the applicant to exhaust the statutory appeal under section 102 renders the counter-claim against land authorities incompetent.
* Land law – Land Registration Act, section 102 – mandatory exhaustion of statutory remedies before suing Registrar/Attorney General/Commissioner.
* Civil procedure – preliminary objection – competence and jurisdiction – when a PO may dispose of a matter as a pure point of law.
* Judicial notice – court entitled to take notice of its own prior orders and records.
* Abuse of process – instituting proceedings contrary to prior court directions.
* Relief – striking out counter-claim as incompetent where statutory preconditions not complied with.
|
12 November 2025 |
|
Summary judgment granted for unpaid NSSF contributions and penalties after defendant failed to obtain leave to defend.
* Civil procedure – Order XXXV summary procedure – effect of defendant’s failure to obtain leave to defend – failure to appear deemed admission (Order XXXV r.2(e)).
* Social security – Recovery of unremitted members’ contributions and penalties under NSSF Act – entitlement established by registration and remittance records.
* Summary judgment – appropriateness where no substantial defence is shown and defendant fails to seek leave to defend.
|
12 November 2025 |
|
Tribunal erred by raising and deciding description/non‑joinder issues suo motu without hearing parties; judgment quashed and remitted.
Land law — pleadings — sufficiency of description of immovable property under Order VII, CPC; locus in quo — tribunal raising issues suo motu; natural justice — right to be heard; remedy — quashing and remittal for fresh judgment.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Conviction quashed where material contradictions, neutral medical evidence and omission to call key witnesses raised reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Statutory rape – Essential elements: penetration, age and identity must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. * Evidence – Credibility – Victim’s testimony may be the best evidence but must be credible; contradictions and admissions of coercion can undermine it. * Medical evidence – Neutral findings (no injuries, no semen) may be exculpatory and must be weighed. * Procedure – Failure to call material witnesses permits adverse inference. * Appeal – Conviction unsafe where cumulative inconsistencies create reasonable doubt.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Court dismissed challenge to taxation ruling, upholding ECMS attachment, Order 48 computation, and TZS 800,000 taxation award.
* Civil procedure – taxation of costs – requirement to attach ruling/order granting costs; effect of electronic filing system (ECMS) on documentary attachment.
* Civil procedure – taxation – application and interpretation of Order 48 Advocates Remuneration Orders (GN. No. 264 of 2015) – exclusion of court fees and discretion over instruction fees in one-sixth computation.
* Electronic case management – system-generated parties’ names – when appearance of names does not vitiate proceedings.
* Judicial review – scope to interfere with Taxing Officer’s discretionary assessment of reasonable costs.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Appellant's conviction quashed due to procedural failure to properly amend charge despite sufficient evidence of rape.
Criminal law – Rape – Essential elements: penetration, victim's age and identity – Victim's evidence corroborated by medical report; recognition evidence reliable. Evidence – Hearsay and non‑production of photographs/items not fatal where core elements are proved. Criminal procedure – Amendment/substitution of charge under section 251 CPA requires compliance; failure to follow procedure vitiates proceedings and warrants retrial.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Summary judgment granted where defendant failed to seek leave to defend unpaid NSSF contributions; TZS 810,000, interest and costs awarded.
Civil procedure – Summary judgment under Order XXXV; failure to seek leave to defend treated as admission; recovery of unpaid social security contributions and penalties under NSSF Act; award of interest and costs.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Failure by a primary court magistrate to certify/sign witness testimony vitiates matrimonial proceedings and linked revisional orders.
• Family law – Divorce proceedings – Mandatory procedural prerequisites for competency: Conciliation Board certificate to be annexed and tendered as evidence; • Evidence and procedure – Primary Courts (GN No. 310 of 1964 & GN No. 119 of 1983) Rule 46(3) – Magistrate must record, read back, correct and certify each witness's evidence; omission to sign invalidates proceedings; • Appellate consequence – Proceedings founded on an uncertified record are nullified and consequent revisional orders set aside.
|
5 November 2025 |
| October 2025 |
|
|
An appeal was struck out as incompetent because party description was altered without court leave.
* Civil procedure – competence of appeal – consistency of party description across proceedings; alteration of party designation without leave renders appeal incompetent.
* Representation – Power of Attorney – representative as agent, not a substituted party, absent court leave.
* Court records – authenticity and continuity of party titles; material changes require formal application and court sanction.
* Remedy – striking out appeal for procedural defect.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Whether a conviction may be overturned for an alleged clerical time error and disputed identification of cattle.
Criminal law – damage to property – identification of livestock – appellate review of factual findings – alleged clerical time discrepancy – proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Second appeal dismissed: first appellate court properly re-evaluated evidence; new grounds barred; respondent's evidence upheld.
* Civil procedure – second appeal – jurisdictional limit: new grounds raised for the first time on second appeal are not entertainable; * Evidence – re-evaluation on appeal – appellate court may re-evaluate but will not disturb concurrent findings absent misdirection or miscarriage of justice; * Evidence – credibility: contradictions in witnesses’ testimony may discredit delivery claims; documentary proof (contract, bank statement) supports claimant; * Procedure – failure to file ordered written submissions amounts to waiver of right to be heard.
|
24 October 2025 |
|
Conviction quashed due to inconsistent prosecution evidence and failure to call crucial medical and police witnesses.
Criminal procedure – preliminary hearing (s.192 CPA) – substantial compliance; Evidence – contradictions and inconsistencies in prosecution testimony; Failure to call material witnesses (examining doctor/PF3, police officer, witness Rehema) – adverse inference; Reasonable doubt – benefit to accused in sexual offences.
|
21 October 2025 |
|
Accused convicted of murder: eyewitness, post-mortem, confession and weapon evidence proved malice; provocation and self-defence rejected.
* Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawfulness, causation and malice aforethought. * Evidence – Eyewitness accounts, post-mortem report and weapon recovery corroborating each other. * Evidence – Extra-judicial confession admissible and corroborative. * Evidence – Chain of custody of weapon and exhibits properly established. * Defence – Cumulative provocation (last straw doctrine) and self-defence examined and rejected.
|
17 October 2025 |
|
Accused acquitted where DNA-linked weapon and fingerprints did not exclude reasonable doubt about his guilt.
* Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawfulness, participation, malice aforethought.
* Circumstantial evidence – requirements for conviction; necessity of an unbroken chain excluding reasonable alternative hypotheses.
* Forensic evidence – DNA linking blood on weapon to deceased; fingerprint evidence admissible but timing/persistence can undermine conclusiveness.
* Burden of proof – prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; any reasonable doubt benefits the accused.
* Acquittal where forensic and circumstantial evidence fail to exclude reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
|
17 October 2025 |
|
|
15 October 2025 |
|
Primary court lacks probate jurisdiction if deceased's fixed place of abode was elsewhere; remission to incompetent court invalid.
* Probate jurisdiction – Primary courts – Fifth Schedule, s.19(1)(c) Magistrates' Courts Act – "fixed place of abode" means permanent residence.
* Territorial jurisdiction – proceedings in court lacking jurisdiction are nullities.
* Evidence – trial court record and issue estoppel prevent contradicting unchallenged findings on place of abode.
* Remission – appellate court cannot remit to an incompetent court.
|
15 October 2025 |
|
Murder not proved as malice aforethought absent; killing occurred in intoxication and provocation, conviction substituted to manslaughter.
Criminal law – Homicide – proof of death and unlawful causation; participation in fatal act; malice aforethought – factors for inference (weapon, force, part targeted, number of blows, conduct before/after); intoxication and provocation as negating intent; substitution of murder with manslaughter.
|
15 October 2025 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and voluntary confession established accused's guilt for murder by suffocation.
Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawful killing, participation, malice aforethought; Circumstantial evidence – complete chain; Confession – discovery rule and voluntariness; Admissibility contested by torture allegations.
|
15 October 2025 |
|
A plea is equivocal and unsafe if the accused is not given opportunity to respond to prosecution’s narrated facts.
Criminal procedure – Plea-taking procedure – Compliance with s.245(1)&(2) – Unequivocal plea required; guilty-plea appeals generally barred by s.381(1) but exceptions where plea is equivocal, involuntary or facts do not disclose an offence – Conviction unsafe where accused not afforded chance to respond to prosecution’s facts.
|
9 October 2025 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction quashed due to unreliable identification, credibility issues and procedural shortcomings.
Criminal law – Statutory rape – sufficiency of charge sheet; proof of age and penetration; recognition/identification in intra‑familial settings; corroboration by PF3; failure to call material witnesses; unexplained prosecutorial delay; proper evaluation of defence and standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
9 October 2025 |
|
Whether the prosecution proved a prima facie murder case linking the accused via medical and forensic evidence.
Criminal law – Murder – Prima facie case under s.230 Criminal Procedure Act – Elements: unlawful, unnatural death and sufficient implication – Eyewitness, postmortem, fingerprint and DNA evidence linking accused to fatal weapon.
|
9 October 2025 |
|
Taxing officer’s award of instruction fees upheld; fees assessed by subject matter, not multiplied per co‑litigant.
Costs – Taxation – instruction fees – discretion of Taxing Officer – limits of appellate interference; instruction fees pegged to subject matter not number of co‑litigants; relevance of stage of proceedings in assessing fees; proportionality and reasonableness in taxation.
|
8 October 2025 |
|
High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise interlocutory DLHT orders; revision struck out as incompetent.
• Land revision – interlocutory orders – nature of order test – whether order finally disposes rights; • Civil Procedure – section 79(2)/89(2) Cap 33 – bar on revision of interlocutory or preliminary orders; • Supervisory/revisional jurisdiction – limits where interlocutory orders are involved; • Pleadings – signature requirement and consequences; • Jurisdictional objections – alleged lack of Ward Tribunal mediation certificate does not convert interlocutory order into final order.
|
8 October 2025 |
|
Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case to require the accused to enter his defence on a murder charge.
Criminal procedure – case to answer/prima facie standard; Murder – elements: death, unlawful killing, malice aforethought; Evidence – eyewitness identification and medical evidence; Confession and investigatory testimony as implicating evidence.
|
7 October 2025 |
|
Court found a prima facie murder case based on confession, post‑mortem and corroborative circumstantial evidence.
* Criminal law – Murder – Elements: proof of death and causal link to accused. * Prima facie/case to answer – standard at close of prosecution under Criminal Procedure Act. * Circumstantial evidence – requirement for coherent, unbroken chain. * Extrajudicial admission – corroboration by witnesses and post‑mortem. * Forensic evidence – post‑mortem confirmation of suffocation.
|
7 October 2025 |
|
Acquittal upheld where penetration was shown but identity not proved due to missing witnesses and delayed medical corroboration.
Sexual offences – proof of rape requires penetration, age and identity; Identification evidence – reliability of identification parade; Failure to call material witnesses – adverse inference; Delayed medical examination – limits on corroboration; Standard of proof – reasonable doubt and cumulative evidential weaknesses. |
3 October 2025 |
|
High Court lacks jurisdiction to set aside decisions by resident magistrates exercising extended jurisdiction after statutory revocation; matter to continue before that magistrate.
* Judicial review and jurisdiction – effect of revocation of extension orders (GN Nos. 542 & 565 of 2025) – continuity clause preserves proceedings before Resident Magistrates with extended jurisdiction.
* Magistrates’ Courts – Resident Magistrate exercising extended appellate/revisional jurisdiction is deemed to sit as a High Court Judge for decisions made under that extension.
* Jurisdiction – ordinary High Court is divested of jurisdiction to set aside decisions lawfully made by Resident Magistrates with extended jurisdiction; remedies lie before the Resident Magistrate or the Court of Appeal as provided.
* Procedure – application struck out for want of jurisdiction; matter to proceed before the Resident Magistrate vested with extended jurisdiction.
|
2 October 2025 |
|
Representative-suit leave refused where claimants lacked a common interest and authentic, statutory consent.
Representative actions – Order I r.8(1) CPC – conditions: numerosity, same/common interest, and authentic consent; necessity for existence and mandate of represented persons; minutes must be duly signed and identify attendees; statutory notice against the Government must identify claimants per s.6(2) Government Proceedings Act, Cap.5 R.E.2023; parallel distinct land claims across multiple villages do not constitute the "same interest."
|
1 October 2025 |
|
Guilty plea found equivocal due to uninvestigated marriage defence; conviction set aside and plea to be retaken.
Criminal law – guilty plea – equivocal or entered under misapprehension; marital status as potential defence to rape; trial court duty to elicit material defences; exceptions to bar on appeals from guilty pleas; conviction set aside and matter remitted for plea to be retaken.
|
1 October 2025 |
| September 2025 |
|
|
Defective service by an unauthorised tribunal staffer vitiated ex parte proceedings; matter remitted for fresh inter partes hearing.
Land procedure – service of summons – Regulation 6 of GN No. 174/2003 and GN No. 363/2017 – competence of process server – staff member/night watchman not authorised – defective service vitiates ex parte proceedings – remittal for fresh inter partes hearing.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
A third party can object to execution despite an appeal; substitution of "declare" for "affirm" is a curable formality.
* Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act, s.4 – form of jurat – declaration versus affirmation – formal irregularity not necessarily fatal.
* Affidavit formalities – jurat and signature present; absence of prejudice/fraud renders defect curable.
* Execution proceedings – third‑party objection under Order XXI Rules 59–60 and s.48(1)(e) Civil Procedure Code – executing court retains jurisdiction to hear third‑party proprietary claims.
* Functus officio – pending appeal on substantive judgment does not automatically oust executing court from adjudicating execution/third‑party objections.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
A mixed factual/argumentative counter-affidavit need not be struck out; offending parts may be expunged and verification in representative capacity upheld.
Civil Procedure – Affidavits – Order XIX Rule 3(1)&(2) CPC – affidavits confined to facts; statements of belief must state grounds – mixed factual and argumentative paragraphs to be expunged not necessarily struck out – verification by representative not fatally defective where knowledge or belief is present.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
Marriage certificate accepted; property status unresolved—attachment only on fresh execution with land search and proof of non‑residence.
* Civil Procedure – Execution – Protection of matrimonial home – Application of section 54(1)(e) (formerly 48(1)(e)) prohibiting sale of residential house occupied by judgment debtor, wife and dependent children.
* Evidence – Documentary evidence – Marriage certificate with accompanying affidavit sufficient unless rebutted by cogent evidence.
* Execution procedure – Duty of executing officers/decree holders to verify attachability; requirement for fresh execution supported by land search and proof of non-residential use.
* Appellate procedure – Existence of pending appeal before Court of Appeal noted; directions made subject to appeal.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
Delivery of a reserved ruling must proceed despite a party’s death; appointment of an administrator does not suspend delivery.
Civil procedure – delivery of reserved judgment – effect of death of a party – section 34 CPC (timely delivery) – Order XXII Rule 6 CPC (deliver as if party alive) – rejoinder filed after death does not prevent delivery.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
Failure to annex the tribunal’s decree to a DLHT appeal is fatal; appeal struck out despite correct petition form.
* Civil procedure – Preliminary objection – pure point of law – competence of appeal.
* Appellate procedure – Land Disputes Courts Act v Civil Procedure Code – specific statute prevails; CPC applies where lacuna exists.
* Appeal requirements – petition of appeal from DLHT; necessity to annex decree/order to petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) CPC.
* Effect of non‑compliance – omission to attach decree is fatal; appeal incompetent and struck out.
|
30 September 2025 |
|
Appeal struck out as time-barred for failure to prove when the corrected decree was availed.
* Civil procedure – Limitation and competence – Appeal after striking out – leave to refile within 30 days of obtaining corrected decree – when time begins to run determined by tribunal records. * Preliminary objection – point of law – limitation affects jurisdiction. * Evidence – tribunal’s official record required to prove date decree was availed; advocate’s office stamp insufficient. * Result: appeal struck out as time-barred; costs awarded to respondent.
|
29 September 2025 |
|
A child accused tried in an ordinary court: proceedings nullified and conviction quashed for lack of juvenile jurisdiction.
Law of the Child Act – age determination – medical certificate under s.114(3) as sufficient evidence; juvenile jurisdiction – s.98(1)(a) exclusive; proceedings in ordinary court against a child are nullity; quashing of conviction and sentence; discretionary refusal to remit for retrial where custody time and interests of justice warrant release.
|
29 September 2025 |
|
Illegality apparent on the record justified a 21‑day extension despite the appellants' unexplained delay.
* Civil procedure – extension of time – applicant must account for each day of delay or demonstrate illegality apparent on the face of the record; * Illegality/ procedural irregularity – denial of right to be heard and ineffective service may justify extension; * Substituted service by publication – effect and limits; * Jurisdiction – dispute over registered land raises jurisdictional point but must be raised appropriately in proper proceedings.
|
26 September 2025 |
|
An equivocal guilty plea that fails to admit essential elements (victim's age) renders the conviction unsafe and is quashed.
* Criminal procedure – guilty plea – requirement that plea be unequivocal, voluntary and informed – exceptions permitting appellate interference where plea ambiguous, mistaken, or facts admitted do not disclose offence. * Statutory rape – age of victim is an essential element that must be admitted or proved. * Trial court duty – ensure accused admits all ingredients of offence before convicting on plea. |
25 September 2025 |
|
|
25 September 2025 |
|
Whether a brief meeting satisfied statutory consultation requirements for fair retrenchment under section 38 ELRA.
Labour law – Retrenchment – Section 38 ELRA – Meaningful consultation; burden of proof on employer but applicant must particularise breaches; procedural compliance; limitation; Rule 43(1) representation formalities.
|
23 September 2025 |
|
|
18 September 2025 |
|
|
18 September 2025 |
|
The plaintiff's fresh suit was dismissed as barred by res judicata because a prior suit on the same mortgage and guarantee had been finally dismissed.
* Civil Procedure – Res judicata (s.9 Civil Procedure Code) – requirements: same matter, same parties or privies, same title, heard and finally decided – applicability where prior suit dismissed for want of prosecution and appeal pending.
* Property law – mortgage and guarantee – validity of security agreements and challenge in successive suits.
* Procedural law – dismissal for want of prosecution constitutes a final decision precluding fresh suit on same cause of action.
|
17 September 2025 |
|
|
12 September 2025 |
|
|
11 September 2025 |
|
|
8 September 2025 |