|
Whether seizure, identification and valuation proved unlawful possession and dealing in government trophies; confession rejected as unreliable.
Wildlife offences – unlawful possession and dealing in government trophies; seizure and identification of tusks and molars; admissibility and reliability of caution statements; trophy valuation certificate as prima facie evidence under Wildlife Conservation Act; sufficiency of evidence to convict versus acquittal for lack of proof.
|