|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| May 2025 |
|
|
Conviction for trafficking in Catha edulis where laboratory report, chain of custody and seizure procedure were upheld.
Criminal law – Trafficking in narcotic drugs (Catha edulis/khat) – proof beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – Admissibility and conclusiveness of Government Analyst report under s.48A(2) DCEA. Procedure – Chain of custody, inventorying (DCEA Form No.006/PF16), sample submission (DCEA 001) and destruction compliance under s.36 DCEA and Reg.14 GN.173/2016. Criminal procedure – Requirement to notify alibi under s.42 EOCCA; consequences of afterthought alibi. Evidence – Role and independence of an independent witness to search and seizure (CPA s.38(3); DCEA s.48(2)).
|
26 May 2025 |
|
Acquittal where prosecution proved narcotic identity but failed to establish an unbroken chain of custody.
Criminal law – Narcotics trafficking – Proof of substance and weight by Government Chemist; Chain of custody – necessity of unbroken, documented handover and credible witnesses; Seizure procedure – requirement for independent witness and consistent testimony; Acquittal where chain of custody defects vitiate prosecution case.
|
23 May 2025 |
|
A seizure certificate’s authenticity is a factual issue; a clerical committal error does not bar its admission if no prejudice occurred.
Evidence — Admissibility of statutory certificate of seizure — requirement to read documents at committal under s.246(2) CPA and Rule 8(2) CECD Rules — clerical error in committal record — authenticity of signature/thumbprint is a factual matter to be proved — no prejudice, document admissible.
|
21 May 2025 |
|
Court found prima facie case against three accused but acquitted fourth for un-cautioned, uncorroborated implication.
Criminal procedure – EOCCA ss.40–41 – duty of court after close of prosecution to determine whether prima facie case established. Narcotics – DCEA – elements of trafficking: proof of narcotic identity and statutory weight threshold (200g). Evidence – Government Chemist report under s.48A(2) DCEA treated as conclusive unless challenged. Confessions – oral confessions and co-accused statements require cautioning and independent corroboration; un-cautioned statements carry little weight. Digital evidence – failure to produce cybercrime reports/documentation undermines reliance on alleged electronic communications.
|
13 May 2025 |
|
Court granted ex‑parte witness protection orders—anonymity, withheld identifying material, in‑camera and video testimony due to credible threats.
Criminal procedure – witness protection – ex‑parte orders under Prevention of Terrorism Act s.34(3) and Criminal Procedure Act ss.188(1),(2) – anonymity, withholding identifying materials, in‑camera proceedings, and video testimony. Witness safety – credible threats from organised/terrorist associates – balancing fair trial and witness protection. Economic and Organised Crime Control Act s.30 and Rules 8–9 (Procedure Rules) to be observed subject to protective measures.
|
6 May 2025 |
|
Forensic proof of mirungi existed, but defective search/seizure (no genuine independent witness) defeated prosecution's burden; accused acquitted.
Criminal law — Drug trafficking — Catha edulis (mirungi) — Forensic analysis admissible and conclusive — Search and seizure — requirement for independent witness — Chain of custody — Destruction of perishable exhibits complying with statute/regulations — Burden of proof and dubio pro reo.
|
6 May 2025 |
|
The 1st accused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life, while the 2nd accused was acquitted.
Criminal law – Drug trafficking – Possession and control of narcotic drugs – Chain of custody of evidence – Reasonable doubt.
|
2 May 2025 |
|
The prosecution proved possession of 174.77 kg heroin beyond reasonable doubt; the accused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Criminal law – Drug trafficking – Possession as trafficking; 174.77 kg heroin seized. Evidence – Burden of proof – Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – Chain of custody – Oral and documentary proof required to exclude tampering. Evidence – Forensic analysis – Laboratory report admissible and conclusive under s.48A(2) DCEA. Criminal procedure – Warrantless emergency search lawful under s.42(1) CPA when exigent circumstances exist. Sentencing – Life imprisonment prescribed for trafficking of large quantity of narcotics; forfeiture and destruction orders.
|
2 May 2025 |