High Court Commercial Division

The Commercial Court was officially inaugurated on 15th September, 1999. The Government of Tanzania endorsed the recommendations in 1997. It is a division of the High Court of Tanzania. The difference with other High Court Registries is that this court specializes in the determination of commercial disputes only.

4 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2009
The court dismissed preliminary objections, allowing the suit concerning an adjudicator’s decision to proceed on its merits.
Civil Procedure – Preliminary objections – Cause of action, res judicata, party joinder, and procedural defects.
23 October 2009
Applicant awarded container replacement cost; detention, clearing charge and general damages not proved; interest reduced.
Commercial law – clearing and forwarding – claims for demurrage/detention, replacement and clearing charges; burden of proof on claimant; inconsistent invoices undermine claimed sums; general damages require pleading and proof; court reduces excessive interest rates.
23 October 2009
The defendant bank negligently failed to verify account‑opening documents per BoT guidance and is liable for conversion of the plaintiff’s funds.
Banking law – duty of bank to verify identity, directors and authenticity of company documents when opening accounts – compliance with Bank of Tanzania Circular No. 8 of 2000. Negligence – banker’s failure to make proper inquiries and follow up referees amounts to negligence; liability for conversion of funds. Forgery and fraud – third party presenting forged memorandum/articles and false resolution. Indemnity – bank entitled to be indemnified by fraudulent third party for sums paid to injured customer. Damages and interest – award of principal, general damages and post‑judgment interest.
22 October 2009
Citing general procedural provisions when specific rules apply renders an interlocutory application incompetent.
Civil Procedure – Interlocutory relief – Where specific procedural rules (Order XXXVII) apply, general powers under sections 68 and 95 cannot be invoked in their place. Execution – Sale in execution – Remedy to set aside sale for irregularity located in Order XXI r.88(1). Procedural competence – Citing wrong enabling provisions renders an application incompetent.
5 October 2009