High Court Commercial Division

The Commercial Court was officially inaugurated on 15th September, 1999. The Government of Tanzania endorsed the recommendations in 1997. It is a division of the High Court of Tanzania. The difference with other High Court Registries is that this court specializes in the determination of commercial disputes only.

6 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2013
A misdescription of a party in proceedings is a curable typographical error under sections 97 and 17, not a bar to locus standi.
Civil Procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Misdescription/typographical error in party's name – Distinction between clerical mistakes in judgments (s.96) and defects in proceedings amendable under s.97 and s.17 – Locus standi of purportedly misnamed applicant.
21 February 2013
Ex-parte award for unpaid transport services on admission; commercial interest reduced due to lack of proof.
Commercial law – provision of transport services on credit – debt acknowledged by payment‑plan letters – ex‑parte proof assessed on balance of probabilities; documentary evidence (account statement, invoices, demand letter) admissible; interest — commercial rate must be proved, court reduced claimed rate from 30% to 21%; award of costs.
18 February 2013
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for a five‑month delay; extension of time to file restitution application was refused.
Limitation of actions – extension of time under section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act – requirement to show sufficient or reasonable cause and account for each day of delay; residence and need for directors’ consent held insufficient; courts will not relax procedural time limits absent clear justification.
18 February 2013
Appellate court affirmed hire-award: ownership formalities were not a condition precedent and respondent entitled to rental, interest and costs.
Commercial contract – car hire – condition precedent vs. acquiescence; appellate power to reassess scanty trial judgment (Order XX r.4 CPC); repair and detention claims fail without prior permission; clerical errors in decree curable under s.96 CPC; awards of contractual damages and interest.
11 February 2013
Court of Appeal’s finding of valid sale and bona fide purchase binds the High Court; defendants must surrender possession and monetary adjustments ordered.
* Property law – sale by administratrix – effect of Court of Appeal finding that purchaser was bona fide and property transferred. * Civil procedure – res judicata and binding effect of appellate decision – trial court bound by Court of Appeal determination. * Probate and administration – orders against administratrix bind beneficiaries; relief of vacant possession enforceable against beneficiaries. * Rent/accounting – claimant must adduce specific evidence to support claimed rent; court calculated limited rent owing under existing orders.
8 February 2013
Acknowledgements and part payments (Sept 2007) revived limitation; absence of board resolution is not resolvable as a preliminary point.
Limitation law – Law of Limitation Act s.27(3) – acknowledgement/part payment after original accrual gives fresh start to limitation period; Company litigation – authority to sue – absence of board/company resolution requires evidence and is not a preliminary point of law; Preliminary objections – point of law must be determinable without evidence.
5 February 2013