Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

High Court Commercial Division

The Commercial Court was officially inaugurated on 15th September, 1999. The Government of Tanzania endorsed the recommendations in 1997. It is a division of the High Court of Tanzania. The difference with other High Court Registries is that this court specializes in the determination of commercial disputes only.

Visit website

https://www.comcourt.go.tz/comcourt/

1 judgment

Advanced search

All years

All months

Filters

Sort by:

1 judgment

Citation	Judgment date
March 2013
GJIS P. De Raadat & Another vs Jan W. Halfwerk, Gert Borst and Patrick R. Devine (Misc. Cause No. 30 of 2012) [2013] TZHCComD 10 (1 March 2013) Court dismissed challenge to arbitral award, holding parties consented to procedure and judicial review cannot re‑weigh arbitral findings. Arbitration Act s.16 – setting aside awards – misconduct or improper procurement; consent to procedural variations – preliminary objections decided in award; issue framing – arbitrator’s discretion where issues proposed by parties; validity of contract – matters for arbitral tribunal; limits of judicial review – courts will not reappraise facts or evidence; allegations of ex parte communications/bias require cogent proof; enforcement – award registrable as decree when statutory grounds not shown.	1 March 2013

Citation

Judgment date

March 2013

GJIS P. De Raadat & Another vs Jan W. Halfwerk, Gert Borst and Patrick R. Devine (Misc. Cause No. 30 of 2012) [2013] TZHCComD 10 (1 March 2013)

Court dismissed challenge to arbitral award, holding parties consented to procedure and judicial review cannot re‑weigh arbitral findings.

Arbitration Act s.16 – setting aside awards – misconduct or improper procurement; consent to procedural variations – preliminary objections decided in award; issue framing – arbitrator’s discretion where issues proposed by parties; validity of contract – matters for arbitral tribunal; limits of judicial review – courts will not reappraise facts or evidence; allegations of ex parte communications/bias require cogent proof; enforcement – award registrable as decree when statutory grounds not shown.

1 March 2013