High Court Labour Division

High Court Labour Division is responsible for hearing and determining employment disputes. It was first inaugurated and launched in June 2007 under the Employment and Labour Relations Act.

569 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
569 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2021
24 December 2021
24 December 2021
24 December 2021
23 December 2021
23 December 2021
22 December 2021
22 December 2021
20 December 2021
20 December 2021
20 December 2021
17 December 2021
17 December 2021
15 December 2021
15 December 2021
15 December 2021
Applicant granted 14 days to file revision where alleged jurisdictional illegality and technical delay warranted extension.
Labour procedure — Extension of time under rule 56(1) — "Good cause" test — factors: reasons for delay, length, diligence, prejudice — technical delay vs inordinate delay — illegality on face of record (jurisdictional defect) as sufficient ground for enlargement of time.
15 December 2021
Employer failed to prove misconduct; termination was substantively unfair and compensation awarded.
Employment law – unfair termination – employer’s burden to prove substantive and procedural fairness (s.37, s.39 ELRA) – evidential standard and proof of misconduct – requirement for clear documentary evidence (signatures, withdrawal vouchers, job authority) – compensation under s.40(1)(c) ELRA where reinstatement impracticable.
15 December 2021
15 December 2021
15 December 2021
14 December 2021
Where dismissal had a valid reason but procedural defects, compensation must reflect Rule 32(5) factors; excessive award reduced.
Labour — unfair termination — compensation discretion under Rule 32(5) GN. No.67/2007 — factors to consider (extent of unfairness, remuneration, ability to find alternative work, length of service, prior awards) — probation status and entitlement to unfair‑termination remedies — appellate review of excessive arbitral awards.
14 December 2021
14 December 2021
14 December 2021
An advocate verifying facts beyond personal knowledge renders the applicant's affidavit incurably defective and the application incompetent.
* Civil procedure – Affidavit verification – Order XIX r.3 CPC governs affidavits; verification essential and must be proper. * Advocate's affidavit – Limits – Advocate may swear only to matters within personal knowledge; must disclose sources for other facts. * Labour Court Rules – Rule 55(1) – where silent, Civil Procedure Code applies to verification requirements. * Procedural defect – Incurable defective affidavit renders supported application incompetent and liable to be struck out.
14 December 2021
14 December 2021
Applicant failed to show good cause to restore struck-out revision due to an inadequate, hearsay affidavit.
Labour procedure – restoration of struck-out application – requirement to show good cause; affidavit evidence prevails over submissions; hearsay: references to third parties require their affidavits; need for particulars and efforts to secure counsel attendance.
13 December 2021
Applicant failed to prove ownership; unstamped, defective settlement deed and inadequate affidavit evidence doomed challenge to execution sale.
Execution — challenge to sale of goods — locus standi to object — proof of ownership required; Evidence — affidavits as substitute for oral evidence — hearsay and section 110(1) Evidence Act; Stamp Duty Act s.47(1) — unstamped instruments inadmissible; Attachment and sale procedure — movable/immovable distinction; Bona fide purchaser protection.
13 December 2021
13 December 2021
10 December 2021
Condonation denied where affidavit and medical evidence failed to show good cause or due diligence for long delay.
Labour law — condonation for late filing — Rule 11 GN No.64/2007 and Rule 29 procedure — affidavit suffices; Rule 25 GN No.67/2007 (oath) applies to oral witnesses only — medical evidence must cover delay period; lack of due diligence defeats condonation.
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
Unexplained multi‑month delay and non‑apparent alleged illegality warranted refusal to enlarge time to refile the revision.
Labour law – Extension of time (Rule 56(3), GN. No.106/2007) – Good cause – account for each day of delay – diligence and reliance on personal representative – illegality must be apparent on record to justify extension.
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
Respondents on three-month unpaid leave were entitled to salary after leave until retrenchment despite the applicant's financial constraints.
Labour law – unpaid leave – scope and duration of leave without pay; entitlement to salary after unpaid leave if employment continues; retrenchment date determines pro rata pay; employer’s financial difficulties do not extinguish accrued salary obligations.
10 December 2021
Extension of time granted due to misfiling through electronic system and representative’s illness.
Labour law – extension of time to file revision – Rule 56(3) Labour Court Rules; meaning of "good cause"; factors: promptness, explanation for delay, diligence, prejudice; electronic filing errors (JSDS) and representative’s illness as grounds for condonation.
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
Extension of time denied where illness explanation was unsupported, partly hearsay, and application appeared a delaying tactic.
Extension of time — application to set aside dismissal for want of prosecution — adequacy of explanation — requirement of supporting evidence (medical report, primary affidavits) — hearsay — abuse of court process/delay tactics in face of pending execution (garnishee nisi).
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
Failure to administer oath or affirmation at CMA vitiates proceedings and requires trial de novo before a different arbitrator.
Labour law – evidence – failure to administer oath/affirmation vitiates CMA proceedings; mandatory requirement under Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act s.4(a) and Rule 25(1) of the Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration Guideline) Rules, 2007; remedy – nullification of proceedings, setting aside award and trial de novo before a different arbitrator.
10 December 2021
10 December 2021
8 December 2021
8 December 2021
8 December 2021
8 December 2021
8 December 2021
8 December 2021