|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| April 2026 |
|
|
Failure to plead and undertake bona fide preβaction ADR under s.13 rendered the land suit incompetent and struck out.
Civil Procedure Code s.13 β mandatory preβaction bona fide steps; statutory 90βday Government Proceedings Act notice insufficient; jurisdictional objection; contractual ADR/mediation requirement; pure point of law on pleadings
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Affidavit by counsel lacked proper personalβknowledge verification; material paragraphs expunged and application struck out.
Civil procedure β interlocutory injunction; affidavits β advocate deposing β personal knowledge, hearsay and verification β Order XIX r.3(1) β expunction of offensive paragraphs β striking out application
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Adjournment for late amendment and counterclaim refused for lack of sufficient cause and inordinate delay.
Civil procedure β Adjournment β Order XVII Rule 1 β sufficient cause and circumstances beyond control; Counterclaim β Order VIII Rule 9 β timing of counterclaims; Scheduling orders β departure; Court discretion to prevent backlog and sanction lack of diligence
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Court permitted ex-parte against absent defendant but granted extension for appearing defendant to file defence in land dispute.
Civil procedure β Written Statement of Defence β Order VIII R.1 & R.14 β Ex-parte proceedings β Section 105 CPC β Extension of time β Overriding objective β Land title and mortgage dispute β Failure to enter appearance
|
15 April 2026 |
|
A stated estimate of value and adequate property description suffice; no valuation report required at filing; objections overruled.
Land law β Pecuniary jurisdiction β Order VII r.1(i) CPC β Statement of estimated value required, valuation report not mandatory at filing; Order VII r.3 β description of immovable property; preliminary objections β evidence vs. jurisdictional pleading
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Whether a taxing officer may, in taxation, exercise discretion so that the one-sixth rule does not collapse the entire claimed costs.
Taxation of costs β Advocates Remuneration Order 2015 β Orders 12(1) and 48 β one-sixth rule β scope of taxing officer's discretion β taxation fixes quantum not entitlement β conflicting High Court authorities reconciled by preferring Encod Limited
|
14 April 2026 |
|
Tribunal's failure to determine a preliminary point of law warranted setting aside and remittal for proper determination.
Land law β Revision β Failure to determine preliminary objection on point of law β Tribunal erred by proceeding to merits; Written submissions β filing versus service β non-service does not automatically justify striking out; Order XIV r.2 CPC β issues of law to be decided before facts; Quashing and remittal
|
14 April 2026 |
|
A land suit seeking boundary recovery was struck out for failure to join indispensable land authorities, costs awarded.
Land law β Boundary disputes β Nonβjoinder of necessary parties β Commissioner for Lands, municipal council (boundary recovery), and Registrar of Titles as indispensable parties β Failure to join land authorities fatal to suit β Suit struck out
|
14 April 2026 |
|
Court entered consent judgment enforcing a settlement resolving a mortgage dispute over matrimonial property.
Land law β mortgage and matrimonial property β deed of settlement recorded as consent judgment β enforcement on default; Order XII r.4 CPC
|
2 April 2026 |
|
Court recorded an outβofβcourt settlement as a consent judgment, enforcing mortgage repayment terms and sale-on-default powers.
Land law β mortgage β enforceability of deed of settlement β consent judgment under Order XII r.4 CPC β repayment schedule, interest waiver and capitalisation on default β bankβs right to sell mortgaged property on default β settlement deemed to discharge related proceedings
|
2 April 2026 |
| March 2026 |
|
|
Ex-parte ruling set aside where applicants showed good cause for non-appearance due to post-election lockdown and internet outage.
Setting aside ex-parte orders β good cause for non-appearance β public emergency/internet outage as excuse β right to be heard β uncontested affidavits β restoration and timetable
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Failure to prove mandatory 60βday and 14βday notices rendered the respondent's auction, eviction and transfer null and void.
Land law β mortgageeβs power of sale β mandatory 60βday default notice under s.137 Land Act β proof of service required; Auctioneers Act β 14βday public notice and publication; Nonβcompliance vitiates sale; Service via local government office insufficient without proof; Microfinance Regulations β notice requirements
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Blank-plot sale agreement read with receipts and vendor admissions can support ownership; unexecuted provisional agreement and refunded payments defeat prior claim.
Land law β Sale agreement with deferred plot identification β Read with payment receipts and vendorβs admission it can support ownership; provisional/unexecuted agreement unenforceable; proof of payment and chain of title; relevance of criminal judgment and refund orders in civil proprietary dispute; burden of proof on balance of probabilities; locus to appeal re non-appealing necessary parties
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Res judicata cannot be raised as a preliminary objection if not pleaded; misjoinder of Registrar of Titles is not fatal.
Civil procedure β preliminary objection β res judicata β requirement that facts establishing res judicata be pleaded β Mukisa Biscuits test; Civil procedure β misjoinder of parties β Order I r.9 CPC β joinder of Registrar of Titles in respect of unregistered land not fatal to suit; Land law β applicability of Land Registration Act to unregistered land
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Whether administratrix proved deceasedβs title and whether long occupation by appellants (invitees) established ownership via adverse possession.
Land law β proof of title; letters of administration not proof of ownership of specific land β Evidence β burden of proof vs onus of proof β Adverse possession/invitee rule β long occupation by invitee not conferring title β Administrative act (residential licence) treated as expired, not cancelled
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Attestation defects in witness statements sworn abroad are procedural and curable by amendment, not grounds for expungement or dismissal.
Civil procedure β admissibility of witness statements β attestation/jurat by foreign commissioner for oaths β procedural (jurat) defects curable by amendment β amendment preferred to expungement or dismissal; overriding objective; substantive justice
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Court granted 14-day extension to file appeal based on applicant's ill-health and prompt action despite advocate issues.
Extension of time β condonation β good cause β effect of litigant's ill-health and advocate's conduct β duty to follow up proceedings β exercise of judicial discretion
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Court granted 14βday extension to file revision, noting 60βday revision period and registry delays.
Civil procedure β Extension of time to file revision β Alleged illegality and delay in supply of ruling β Registry rejection of filing β Mandatory 60βday period for revision β Discretionary grant of 14 days extension
|
31 March 2026 |
|
|
31 March 2026 |
|
An expired caveat (oneβyear limit under s.32(2)) is functus officio and may be removed under s.78(4) of the Land Registration Act.
Land law β Caveat β Effect and duration β A caveat is effective for one year under s.32(2) Registration of Documents Act; expiry renders it functus officio and removable under s.78(4) Land Registration Act β Nullified decree and pending appeals do not prevent removal of an expired caveat
|
31 March 2026 |
|
Suit by an administrator dismissed as time-barred, procedurally defective for not stating accrual/death date, and prematurely filed without pre-litigation steps.
Limitation of actions (land) β Item 22: 12-year limitation period; failure to plead statutory exemption; Order VII r.1(e) β duty to state when cause of action arose and date of death for administrators; Section 13 CPC β requirement to take bona fide pre-litigation steps; incompetence and dismissal for time-bar, defective Plaint, and prematurity
|
30 March 2026 |
|
High Court struck application out for abuse of process where the applicant had concurrent Court of Appeal applications.
Civil procedure β Jurisdiction β Preliminary objection β Concurrent applications β Abuse of court process ("riding two horses") β Withdrawal after objection β Incompetence and striking out with costs
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Non-compliance with Section 13 pre-action requirements renders a multi-defendant suit prematurely filed and incompetent.
Civil Procedure Code s13 β mandatory pre-action engagement with all intended defendants; failure to comply is a jurisdictional defect rendering the suit incompetent; preliminary objections on jurisdiction can be raised at any stage
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Tribunal rightly used a trial judgment as evidence; applicant failed to prove estate ownership, so appeal dismissed.
Land law β Admissibility and weight of a lower courtβs judgment as evidence (Exhibit RE1) β Burden of proof in civil claims β Locus standi of estate administrator β Declaration of trespass β Appeal cannot raise new jurisdictional issues
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Unilateral omission of necessary parties from a derivative land application without leave renders the application incompetent and is struck out.
Civil procedure β derivative proceedings β misjoinder/non-joinder β necessity of leave to vary parties β Order I Rule 9 limits β right to be heard and authenticity of court records
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove title; land declared school property and 24 illegal bandas ordered demolished.
Land law β proof of title β burden of proof and admissible evidence; occupation and long use not determinative of ownership; hearsay and inconsistent oral testimony weaken claim; town planning drawings relevant to use but do not confer title; municipal planning regularization and amendment lawful; order to demolish illegal structures on public school land
|
30 March 2026 |
|
The plaintiff's land recovery suit filed after twelve years without pleading statutory exceptions is time-barred and dismissed.
Limitation of actions β recovery of land β Part I Item 22 Law of Limitation Act β accrual of cause of action β plaint and annexures as basis for preliminary objection β Order VII Rule 6 CPC β statutory exceptions (ss.20β23 LLA) not pleaded
|
30 March 2026 |
|
High Court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over a possession suit valued at TZS 300,000,000; suit struck out with costs.
Land law β Pecuniary jurisdiction β District Land and Housing Tribunal threshold TZS 300,000,000 β Section 36(2)(a) Land Disputes Courts Act β Suit to be instituted in lowest competent court (s.16 CPC) β Non-joinder of necessary parties β Incompetent suits struck out; withdrawal inappropriate
|
30 March 2026 |
|
The plaintiffβs land recovery suit was time-barred; limitation accrued when plaintiff was denied possession in 2013.
:[
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Taxation may proceed despite an appeal, but failure to vacate an adjournment vitiates the taxation and requires remittal.
Refusal of stay β Taxation vs execution β Jurisdiction to tax despite pending appeal β Interference with taxation only where wrong principle or manifest excess β Ex parte proceedings and entitlement to costs β Procedural fairness: need to vacate or explain earlier adjournment β Remittal to different Taxing Master
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Application dismissed for want of prosecution after both parties failed to file ordered written submissions.
Civil procedure β Want of prosecution β Failure to file ordered written submissions amounts to want of prosecution
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Failure to identify land, omitted material witnesses, apparent bias and misrecording vitiated the tribunal's decision.
Land law β identification of subject land β boundaries and size must be ascertained; Failure to call material witness β adverse inference; Conflict of interest/nemo judex in causa sua β allocation of land by local leader to self taints claim; Misrecording and mis-evaluation of evidence β ground for quashing judgment
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Applicants failed to identify the land or prove irreparable harm; temporary injunction dismissed.
Civil procedure β Temporary injunction β ATILIO v Mbowe test β requirement of prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience; Order VII Rule 3 CPC β description of land β surveyed/registered village land β public land management
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Temporary injunction granted to prevent eviction and demolition where applicants raised triable equitable ownership issues.
Land law β Temporary injunction β prima facie case; irreparable injury where eviction/demolition threatens subject matter; balance of convenience; equitable interests (constructive trust, proprietary estoppel); struck out counter-affidavit and unchallenged evidence
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Extension granted where nonβparty allegedly denied hearing; revision permitted despite procedural delay.
Extension of time β sufficient cause β illegality and denial of audi alteram partem β nonβparty affected by decision entitled to seek revision β time spent pursuing defective proceedings may be excusable; Law of Limitation Act s.14(1)
|
30 March 2026 |
|
Appellant failed to prove title; certificate of regularization did not match disputed parcel, appeal dismissed.
Land law β proof of title: certificate of regularization must correspond to the parcel pleaded; mismatch undermines probative value; Pleading and evidence β cannot introduce new acquisition facts at testimony stage; Burden of proof β claimant must prove ownership on balance of probabilities; Gifts inter vivos β valid transfer during donor's lifetime may confer title independent of probate issues; Nemo dat β challenge to sale's validity is moot if claimant fails to establish superior title; Court record sanctity β alleged missing annexures insufficient to impeach tribunal record.
|
28 March 2026 |
|
Mediated Deed of Settlement recorded as consent judgment declaring a long-term lease and ordering lease registration; settlement final and enforceable.
Land Law β Consent judgment β Recording and adoption of mediated Deed of Settlement β Characterisation of transaction as long-term lease β Obligation to execute and register lease β Subdivision conversion and treatment of rent as purchase price β Finality and enforceability of settlement.
|
27 March 2026 |
|
Whether the applicant met the Atilio v Mbowe conditions for a temporary injunction over disputed land.
Land law β Temporary injunction β Atilio v Mbowe conditions β prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience β proof of payment β registered title weight
|
27 March 2026 |
|
Applicant established a triable issue but failed to prove irreparable harm or balance of convenience; injunction dismissed with costs.
Land law β interlocutory injunction β Atilio v Mbowe threeβfold test β affidavit evidence required; submissions not evidence β certificate of title prima facie evidence of ownership β procedural point on 90βday notice inappropriate in interlocutory application
|
27 March 2026 |
|
Preβsuit Mareva injunction granted to prevent demolition pending suit, on arguable possession and risk of irreparable harm.
Civil procedure β Mareva (preβsuit) injunction β preservation of status quo pending statutory notice and suit β Atilio v. Mbowe criteria (prima facie case; irreparable harm; balance of convenience) β possession and long occupation v. registered certificate of title β imminent demolition as irreparable injury
|
26 March 2026 |
|
A land court lacks jurisdiction to decide tortious damages pleaded alongside land-title claims, warranting striking out the suit.
Land law β jurisdiction β mixed causes of action β declaratory and injunctive relief for land ownership vs. tortious damages β strike out for want of jurisdiction
|
26 March 2026 |
|
An interlocutory application was struck out because its supporting affidavit contained impermissible prayers, conclusions and arguments.
Civil procedure β Affidavit requirements β Order XIX Rule 3 CPC β Affidavits must state facts within deponent's knowledge, not prayers, conclusions or arguments β Expungement of defective paragraphs β Incurably defective affidavit warrants striking out interlocutory application β Costs awarded
|
26 March 2026 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership or trespass; tribunal wrongly declared respondent owner without a counterclaim.
Land law β Trespass and ownership β burden of proof under Evidence Act s.117(1); Insufficient description of unsurveyed land (size, neighbours, boundaries); Pleadings binding β evidence must support pleaded facts; Judicial relief β court cannot grant unpleaded relief (declaration of ownership quashed).
|
26 March 2026 |
|
Whether an ex parte land-tribunal judgment and execution affecting a non-party's land is void for want of jurisdiction.
Land law β jurisdiction of Land Tribunal β distinction between land dispute and breach of contract β sufficiency of land description β joinder/impleader of interested third parties β validity of ex parte judgments and consequent execution.
|
26 March 2026 |
|
Whether the plaintiffβs claim is barred by res judicata under section 11 of the CPC.
Civil procedure β Res judicata (section 11 CPC) β matters directly and substantially in issue β finality of prior judgment; Civil procedure β Mediation requirement (section 13 CPC) β non-retrospectivity; Functus officio; Merger and identity of parties (NCBA) β judicial notice for res judicata
|
26 March 2026 |
|
An appeal filed 12 years after judgment was struck out as time-barred where no proof of requesting judgment copies existed.
Limitation of actions β Appeals under Land Disputes Courts Act β 45βday time limit β Law of Limitation Act s.19(2) exclusion for time obtaining judgment copies β requirement to prove written request β incompetence of appeal β struck out with costs
|
26 March 2026 |
|
Whether the respondent had locus standi and whether allegedly defective sale documents were admissible and proved ownership.
Locus standi β sufficiency of direct oral evidence to show legal interest; Documentary evidence β admissibility versus weight; Stamp Duty Act β non-stamping curable/waivable if not timely objected to; National Emblem Act β misuse of Coat of Arms penal but does not void document in evidence; Evaluation of evidence β appellate restraint on factual findings; Proof of ownership on balance of probabilities.
|
26 March 2026 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership; counterclaim set aside due to uncertain boundaries and lack of locus in quo.
Land law β proof of ownership β sale agreement void for lack of contractual capacity of purchaser (minor) β contradictions in evidence β first appellate courtβs duty to re-evaluate evidence β counterclaim uncertainty due to differing descriptions and neighbours β necessity of locus in quo visit
|
25 March 2026 |
|
Tribunal properly extended time where respondent only learned of the exβparte judgment much later.
Extension of time β condonation β accounting for delay begins from date of awareness of judgment β service of summons disputed β hearsay and bias allegations dismissed
|
25 March 2026 |
|
Appellant failed to prove land ownership; probate allocation and insufficient evidence upheld, appeal dismissed.
Land law β proof of ownership β oral evidence versus documentary title; probate and administration β conclusiveness of estate allocation; name discrepancy on official search; evidentiary burden and balance of probabilities.
|
25 March 2026 |