High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

11 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
11 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2012
Reported
Proceedings brought by a non-existent entity and against a person lacking letters of administration were quashed and ordered retried.
Civil procedure – capacity to sue – non-existent/unregistered party; Trusts – legal personality – suits against trustees not the trust; Locus standi – administration of estates – letters of administration required; Appellate powers – calling additional evidence under s.34(1)(b) – requires application, relevance, credibility and opportunity to cross‑examine; Quashing of proceedings and retrial de novo.
31 October 2012
District Land and Housing Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over Ward Tribunal criminal appeals; its proceedings were void.
Jurisdiction of Ward Tribunal to try criminal offences; appeals from Ward Tribunal criminal matters lie to Primary Court; District Land and Housing Tribunal lacks criminal appellate jurisdiction; invalid exercise of section 35(1)(b) where appellate tribunal lacks jurisdiction; proceedings of tribunal without jurisdiction are nullities.
29 October 2012
Land recovery claim dismissed as time‑barred after appellant failed to prove ownership or prior proceedings.
Land law – recovery of possession – limitation period – 12 years; continuous and uninterrupted possession; burden of proof and documentary evidence; alleged prior proceedings treated as afterthought; appellate review of tribunal findings of fact.
29 October 2012
Ex parte appellate judgment quashed for defective service and improper delegation of process-server duties; matter remitted for rehearing with costs.
Land procedure – service of process – process server must effect service personally; delegation to village officials not recognized – substituted service by publication must be proved – ex parte appellate hearing and failure to determine co-appellant’s appeal constitute procedural irregularity – appellate proceedings quashed and matter remitted for rehearing.
29 October 2012
Appeal titled as a "Memorandum" was not fatal; appeal filed beyond 60 days was incompetent and struck out.
Land law – Appeals to High Court under s.38 Cap 216 – nature of document: "Petition of Appeal" vs "Memorandum of Appeal" – nomenclature not fatal. Limitation – s.38(1) Cap 216 – time runs from date judgment pronounced; 60-day period mandatory absent extension. Procedure – attachment of judgment/records not a condition precedent for filing petitions from Ward Tribunal. Remedies – incompetent, time‑barred appeals should be struck out, not dismissed.
25 October 2012
Informal occupation or private grant without lawful allocation does not defeat registered owner's title; respondent held a trespasser.
Land law – Ownership vs. adverse possession – Informal private grant insufficient to confer title – Allocation by Village Land Council required – Trespass.
24 October 2012
Time to appeal from the District Land Tribunal runs from judgment date; late appeals are incompetent and struck out.
Land law — Appeals from District Land and Housing Tribunal — Section 38(1) Cap 216 — Time for filing an appeal runs from date judgment pronounced; copies of proceedings/judgment/decree not mandatory — Petition and payment of fees complete filing — Computation of limitation under Section 19(1) Cap 89 — Incompetent late appeals to be struck out, not dismissed.
18 October 2012
An appeal filed after the 60‑day statutory period is incompetent and is struck out rather than dismissed.
Land law — Appeals — Time for filing appeals under Section 38(1) Cap. 216; limitation computed from date of judgment; petition and fees sufficient for filing; attachment of judgment not mandatory; incompetent appeal struck out (not dismissed); Court raising lateness suo motu — no costs.
17 October 2012
Whether the tribunal erred in assessing evidence and accepting the respondent's title documents in a land ownership dispute.
Land law — ownership dispute; evidentiary weight of oral testimony regarding administration of a deceased's estate; authenticity and admissibility of title documents – alleged forgery and absence of sellers' signatures; proof of transfer — witness requirements; scope of review on second appeal.
11 October 2012
The District Land and Housing Tribunal correctly treated the matter as an appeal from a valid Ward Tribunal; the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Land law – Appeals – Appeal from Ward Tribunal to District Land and Housing Tribunal – existence and constitution of Ward Tribunal and appealability of its decisions. Procedural irregularity – Allegation of improperly constituted Ward Tribunal sitting (number of members, chairperson) – assessment of record and validity of proceedings. Relief – Claim for retrial and challenge to pecuniary jurisdiction – dismissed where no substantiated irregularity.
4 October 2012
Temporary injunction dismissed as overtaken by events after eviction; substantive appeal remains pending.
Land law – interim relief – application for temporary injunction – overtaken by events where eviction occurred – preliminary objection dispositive; Order XXXVII r.1 & S.95 CPC.
2 October 2012