High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

12 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
12 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2012
Reported
A sale of matrimonial land without the applicant’s consent is null; purchaser must inquire under the Land Act.
Land law – Sale of land held in one spouse’s name – duty of purchaser to inquire about co‑spouse’s consent (Land Act s.161(2),(3); Law of Marriage Act s.59) – sale without spousal consent voidable/null – tribunal decision set aside.
29 November 2012
Extension of time for revision refused where applicant defaulted at trial and the Tribunal had jurisdiction.
Civil procedure – extension of time for revision – applicant’s default at trial and withdrawal of application to set aside ex parte decree – jurisdictional objections must be raised during trial – Rule 4 Order XLII CPC.
28 November 2012
High Court set aside an ex parte stay of execution given after a consensual strike-out, holding the tribunal erred and natural justice was affected.
Civil procedure – stay of execution – ex parte interlocutory orders – requirements and limits Civil procedure – effect of consensual/struck-out orders on subsequent execution proceedings Natural justice – right to be heard where interlocutory relief affects a party who sought strike-out for settlement Tribunal jurisdiction – error in issuing stay without evidence of ongoing settlement or performance
19 November 2012
Whether customary law confers title and standing to mortgage, and whether a boundary can be a physical land feature.
Customary land law – clan-inheritance rules – effect on capacity to own, mortgage or sell land. Informal (unregistered) mortgages – redemption and sale – effect of mutual sale agreement between mortgagor and mortgagee. Locus standi – representative suits on clan land – requirement to demonstrate explicit authority to represent the clan. Civil procedure – role of assessors and written submissions – effect on participation and disqualification claims. Boundary disputes – characterization of a physical feature (hill) as the land in dispute; reliance on Ward Tribunal evidence on appeal
5 November 2012
Appellate tribunal erred by deciding ex parte without proper service and without original Ward Tribunal record; rehearing ordered.
Land procedure – Service of process – Service by Village Executive Officer or Hamlet Chairman is not proper; Court Process Server must effect service. Procedural fairness – Right to be heard – Ex parte determination without proper service violates right to be heard. Record requirements – Appellate tribunal must have original or certified proceedings of Ward Tribunal; uncertified photocopies are inadequate Remedy – Quash lower proceedings and order rehearing de novo
2 November 2012
District Land Tribunal correctly applied res judicata but lacked jurisdiction to nullify Primary Court letters of administration.
Land law – res judicata – effect of an unreversed Ward Tribunal decision on subsequent proceedings between same parties. Tribunal jurisdiction – District Land and Housing Tribunal lacks power to hear probate and administration matters or to nullify letters of administration. Probate law – Probate and Administration Ordinance (Cap 445) governs grants; Law of Limitation Act not strictly applicable to probate. Procedural law – proper forum to challenge letters of administration is the issuing court or a superior court on appeal
2 November 2012
Subsequent suit on same easement between same parties was barred by res judicata; appeal allowed with costs.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Section 9 Civil Procedure Code – applicability where same parties, same cause (easement), competence and final decision in prior suit – subsequent suit barred.
2 November 2012
Appellant failed to prove ownership or tenancy; tribunal’s factual findings upheld and appeal dismissed with costs.
Land disputes — proof of ownership — credibility of oral testimony and absence of documentary evidence; Jurisdiction — proceedings before courts lacking land jurisdiction are void; Burden of proof — party alleging ownership or asserting tenancy must call supporting witnesses/documents; Appellate review — appellate court will not disturb tribunal’s factual findings absent good reason.
2 November 2012
Negotiations and a litigant’s unfamiliarity with procedure can justify enlargement of time to file an appeal.
Extension of time – Reasonable and sufficient cause – Negotiations and execution as grounds for delay; Procedural rules as handmaids of justice – courts should not use technicalities to bar access to justice; Lay litigant’s unfamiliarity with procedure as factor in granting enlargement of time; Need for fresh tribunal chair to hear reheard appeal to preserve fairness.
2 November 2012
Appellant’s uncorroborated hearsay failed to rebut Village Land Committee evidence; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – proof of ownership/occupation – allocation during villagilization – evidentiary value of Village Land Committee testimony and DLHT locus inspection; hearsay insufficient to displace concurrent tribunal findings.
2 November 2012
Reported
Earlier occupant had superior claim, but practical impossibility of restoration justified compensation and alternative plot.
Land law – priority of occupation/title – earlier occupant has superior claim to subsequently allocated plot; Administrative acts – unlawful subdivision and allocation by local authority; Remedies – when restoration is impracticable due to permanent structures and resurvey, compensation and allocation of alternative plot are appropriate remedies.
1 November 2012
Respondent's long possession and witnessed written allocation established ownership; appeal dismissed.
Land law – long possession/adverse possession and allocation within family – proof by written allocation, witness testimony and tribunal locus visit; appellate review of concurrent findings of fact.
1 November 2012