High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

5 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2014
Proceedings were declared null due to ambiguity over parties and improper composition of the Ward Tribunal.
Land law – dispute over title: pledge (security for loan) versus sale. Civil procedure – Ward Tribunal irregularities: ambiguous parties, failure to record coram, inconsistent recorders. Effect of procedural defects – nullity of Ward Tribunal proceedings and consequent invalidity of appellate Tribunal decision. Statutory requirement – composition of Ward Tribunal (section 11, Land Disputes Courts Act).
24 March 2014
The appellant’s claim to recover land was time-barred under the Limitation Act; appeal dismissed.
Land law – recovery of land – adverse possession – continuous occupation and improvements by occupier; Limitation – Law of Limitation Act, Cap. 89 R.E. 2002, Item 22 Part I Schedule – twelve-year limitation for actions to recover land; Appellate review – correctness of applying limitation to reverse trial tribunal.
21 March 2014
Mis‑citation of a statute does not defeat an application if the correct statutory ground is also pleaded.
Land law – extension of time to appeal – competence of application where incorrect statutory provision cited but correct provision also relied on – mis‑citation does not necessarily render application incompetent; Procedural law – preliminary objection on time bar – burden to substantiate and distinction between preliminary objection and substantive application; Statutes – section 38(1) Land Disputes Courts Act (appeals from Ward Tribunals) vs section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act (extension of time).
14 March 2014
Concurrent factual findings upheld; respondent proved ownership, appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – ownership and title; burden of proof on claimant to establish acquisition (inheritance/transfer); appellate review – concurrent findings of fact not to be disturbed absent misdirection or non-direction (Mussa Mwaikunda principle); evidentiary value of locus in quo visit and witness corroboration; failure to adduce proof of title by appellant.
10 March 2014
Appeal dismissed for failure to prove ownership; lower tribunals' findings on possession and title upheld.
Land law – title disputes – possession and long cultivation – invitee/caretaker status – burden of proof to establish lease or ancestral ownership – appellate review of concurrent tribunal findings.
6 March 2014