High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

6 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 2014
An extension of time order was interlocutory and not appealable; the appeal was struck out and remitted to the tribunal.
Interlocutory order — appealability — "nature of the order" test; extension of time to file application to set aside dismissal — whether final determination of rights; premature appeal; remittance to trial tribunal.
26 July 2014
Long uninterrupted possession for over 17 years established the respondent's title by adverse possession; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – adverse possession – long uninterrupted occupation conferring title Evidence – delay and abandonment – prolonged failure to assert claim weakens title claim. Documentary evidence – alleged grant/gift and its legal effect considered in context of possession and delay
11 July 2014
A person suing personally for land of a deceased lacks locus standi; incompetent tribunal proceedings were quashed and a fresh suit permitted.
Civil procedure – locus standi – claim brought personally for land of deceased estate without letters of administration or compliance with Probate and Administration of Estates Act renders proceedings incompetent and liable to be quashed. Appellate procedure – lower appellate court should not entertain appeals arising from nullity proceedings Remedies – quashing of incompetent tribunal proceedings and allowance to file fresh suit following proper procedure
11 July 2014
Proceedings are null where claimant lacks locus standi for failing to sue as administrator of a deceased’s estate.
Land law - locus standi - claimant asserting rights of deceased must sue as administrator under Probate and Administration of Estates Act; proceedings by person lacking capacity are incompetent/nullity; appeal arising from null ward-tribunal proceedings is wrongly entertained by appellate tribunal.
11 July 2014
District tribunal correctly issued a ruling and quashed Ward Tribunal decision due to jurisdictional and procedural defects.
Land procedure — Ward Tribunal lacks appellate jurisdiction; only receives references from Village Council — proceedings founded on defective procedure can be quashed; District Tribunal may issue ruling rather than judgment when matter not decided on merits due to jurisdictional irregularity.
11 July 2014
Application for extension of time struck out for being founded on wrong statutory provision and thus incompetent.
Land law — Extension of time — Competence of application — Wrong or non‑enabling statutory provision — Section 52(2) Land Disputes Courts Act; Limitation Act inapplicable where appeal originates from Ward Tribunal — Failure to properly move the Court is fatal.
4 July 2014