High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

7 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
7 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2015
Appellate court upheld concurrent findings that earlier lawful sale conferred title; assessor non-participation was not fatal.
Land law – title disputes: prior lawful sale confers superior title; subsequent sale by owner’s daughter ineffective; Assessors in Ward and District Land Tribunals – presence and silence not fatal where record shows attendance; Appellate deference – concurrent findings of fact should not be disturbed absent misdirection or miscarriage of justice; Proof of sale document – absence not fatal where oral and documentary evidence (including locus visit) establish ownership.
27 March 2015
Late supply of tribunal copies does not automatically justify extension for a second appeal; documentary proof required.
Land disputes — Extension of time — Section 38(1)-(3) Land Disputes Courts Act — Second appeal instituted by petition filed in DLHT — DLHT duty to dispatch petition and record within 14 days — Late supply of judgment/ruling by DLHT not good cause unless substantiated by documentary evidence.
25 March 2015
Failure to show prompt steps to obtain certified copies and unreliable medical evidence do not justify extension of time to appeal.
Land procedure – Extension of time to appeal – Requirement for applicant to show prompt, essential steps (written request) to obtain certified copies of proceedings – Illness as cause – medical evidence to be credible – Overwhelming chances of success alone insufficient to grant extension.
12 March 2015
Appellate tribunal's orders to clear public open space and realign walls upheld due to proven encroachment.
Land dispute – boundary/encroachment – open space (uchochoro) – locus in quo inspection – orders to remove walls and realign boundaries – public health/duty to control offensive effluent.
12 March 2015
Extension of time to appeal refused for excessive unexplained delay and lack of sworn evidence showing good cause.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Good cause required – Alleged inadvertent dismissal and delay awaiting estate administration must be substantiated by affidavit evidence. Limitation – Applications for extension are not per se time‑barred but cannot be open‑ended; excessive unexplained delay justifies refusal. Evidentiary requirement – Counsel’s oral statements insufficient to prove good cause.
12 March 2015
An application to set aside an ex parte judgment must explain non‑appearance; re‑arguing merits is not a proper basis to overturn refusal.
Land law – setting aside ex parte judgment – applicant must explain absence and give sufficient reasons – appeal against refusal must show tribunal erred in assessing reasons, not re‑argue merits.
6 March 2015
Days awaiting certified copies are excluded from limitation; appeal held timely and preliminary objection dismissed.
Limitation of actions — computation of time — exclusion of days awaiting certified copies under s.19(3) Law of Limitation Act; Appeals — time for first appeal — 45 days under s.38 Cap 216 R.E.2002; Preliminary objection — time-bar defence dismissed where appeal filed within adjusted limitation period.
5 March 2015