|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 2024 |
|
|
Applicant granted 14-day extension to file late notice of appeal due to technical delay prosecuting matter in wrong forum.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Good cause – Technical delay caused by prosecuting an application in wrong forum (dismissed as functus officio) – Uncontroverted affidavit supports grant of extension; costs awarded.
|
18 September 2024 |
|
|
18 September 2024 |
|
Consent judgment records settlement transferring disputed plot, providing TZS 200,000,000 payment and each party bearing own costs.
Land law – dispute over title and rental proceeds; mediation and consent settlement – recording consent deed as court judgment; transfer of land and agreed payment; parties to bear own costs.
|
18 September 2024 |
|
Revision of two distinct tribunal proceedings dismissed/struck out: one time‑barred, the other deemed an incompetent omnibus application.
Civil procedure – Revision under Land Disputes Courts Act – where specific Act is silent on limitation, Law of Limitation Act applies (item 21, Part III – 60 days)
Limitation – non‑party to original proceedings is not automatically exempt from statutory time limits; may seek extension. Civil procedure – Omnibus applications – combining unrelated or incompatible reliefs (time‑barred and non‑time‑barred) is incompetent and liable to be struck out
Costs – successful preliminary objections awarded costs to respondents
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to account for delay and alleged illegalities were not apparent on record—extension refused, application dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – requirement to show sufficient cause and account for each day of delay – Lyamuya and related authorities. Review versus appeal – filing review does not automatically justify delay in appealing. Alleged illegalities – must be apparent on face of record to justify extension of time; errors requiring argument are not sufficient
|
17 September 2024 |
|
A taxing officer may discretionarily apply or depart from the one‑sixth rule when assessing taxed costs.
Taxation of costs — Advocates Remuneration Order, 2015 (Order 48) — one-sixth rule — discretionary application by taxing officer — judicial reluctance to interfere with reasonable exercise of taxation discretion.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Appellant's earlier sale agreement held valid; later conveyances invalid and respondents declared trespassers; appeal allowed.
Land law – double sale/priority principle – validity and authenticity of sale agreements – evaluation and re-appraisal of evidence by first appellate court – locus in quo visits not mandatory in fresh ownership disputes.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Suit dismissed as res judicata: same land dispute already finally decided by competent courts, despite name variations.
Land law — Res judicata — Section 9 Civil Procedure Code — Requirements: competent court, same subject matter, final decision, same parties/under same title — Variation in party names does not defeat res judicata — Preliminary objection disposed on face of record (Lyamuya principle).
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Plaintiffs’ late service of witness statements (without leave) led to striking out statements and dismissal for want of prosecution.
Civil Procedure — Evidence — Election to adduce evidence by witness statements at pre-trial conference — Order XVIII Rules 2, 3 and 4 CPC (as amended) — Mandatory service time for witness statements — Failure to serve in time without court leave — striking out statements — dismissal for want of prosecution.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Failure to join or plead removal/death of a co-administrator defeats administrators' locus standi; suit struck out.
Probate law; locus standi of administrators – where multiple administrators are appointed they must act jointly; pleadings must disclose any death or revocation of a co-administrator; preliminary objection on locus standi determinable from plaint and annexures.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Court granted a further 14‑day extension to file an appeal due to online filing difficulties and the applicant’s efforts.
Civil procedure – extension of time to file an appeal – application based on technical difficulties with online filing – second extension – exercise of court’s discretion considering applicant’s age and efforts.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Mareva injunction dismissed because the statutory 90‑day notice had expired, rendering the application overtaken by events.
Mareva injunction; statutory notice to sue; Atilio v Mbowe test (prima facie case, irreparable loss, balance of convenience); application overtaken by events; inability to grant interim relief once legal impediment lapses.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
|
13 September 2024 |
|
Whether borrower and guarantor are liable for subsequent loans arranged and signed by a third party without their authority.
Land/mortgage – guarantor liability limited to specific mortgage deed; loan documentation and authority – signatures, addresses and account operation as proof of authorization; agency and third‑party misconduct – third party’s admissions and documentary anomalies establish liability; restitution of title; damages and interest – court rate applied where debtor acknowledged debt; commercial interest refused.
|
13 September 2024 |
|
Whether subsequent loan facilities were fraudulently obtained and who is liable; guarantor held liable and title returned to mortgagor.
Banking law – loan facilities and guarantees – proper identification of borrower and guarantor; authenticity of signatures and correspondence; liability of signatory/guarantor who operated account; discharge of mortgage title – court-ordered return; counterclaim liability – debt acknowledged by guarantor; interest awarded at court rate.
|
13 September 2024 |
|
|
13 September 2024 |
|
An executing tribunal cannot add or vary relief; execution is limited to the precise terms of the decree.
Civil procedure – Execution of decree – executing court bound by terms of decree; cannot add or vary relief
Execution – interpretation vs alteration – executing court may construe ambiguous decrees but may not create new relief
Pleadings – parties are bound by pleadings (Order VI r.7) and decree must agree with judgment (Order XX r.6)
Land Disputes Tribunals – limits of execution powers under statutory rules
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Court recorded and adopted parties’ Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3, making it a binding consent judgment and withdrawing the suit.
Civil procedure — Consent judgment — Recording and adoption of Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code — Deed given force of court order and binding on parties. Land law — Title registration — Parties agree defendant to be registered owner and plaintiff to release certificate of title upon payment. Settlement effect — Payment, release, discharge and withdrawal of suit; parties to bear own costs
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Delay in obtaining certified judgment copies and alleged irregularities justified a 14‑day extension to file the appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time – appeal out of time – whether delay in procuring certified copies of judgment constitutes sufficient reason to extend time; Requirement to account for delay and "sufficient reasons" principle; Alleged irregularities in impugned judgment as ground for extension; Authorities considered: Principal Secretary v Devram Valambhia and Republic v Yona Kaponda.
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Non-joinder of the Commissioner for Lands rendered the tribunal’s judgment incompetent; appeal allowed and proceedings quashed.
Land law – ownership disputes over allocated land – necessity to join the allocating authority as a party when both litigants claim allocation by that authority. Civil procedure – necessary party vs non-necessary party – Order 1 Rule 9 CPC inapplicable where the omitted party is necessary. Procedural competence – non-joinder of a necessary party renders proceedings incompetent and judgment liable to be quashed
|
12 September 2024 |
|
The suit is barred by res judicata because the same land dispute between the same parties was previously finally decided.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Application of section 9 Civil Procedure Code where matter directly and substantially in issue has been previously heard and finally decided by competent tribunal; identity of parties and privies; reliance on same sale agreements and documents.* Land law – competence of Ward Tribunal and District Land and Housing Tribunal to adjudicate land ownership disputes – effect of prior judgment and execution on subsequent suit.* Procedural – prior non‑decision due to incomplete record does not preclude re‑raising a valid preliminary objection on res judicata.
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Court granted extension of time to file an out-of-time appeal, finding sufficient reasons including alleged illegality on the record.
Land law – Extension of time – Application under s.14(1) Limitation Act read with s.41(2) LDCA and s.95 CPC – Illegality on face of record as ground for extension – Procedural defects in counter-affidavit (jurat/language) – unrepresented litigant and costs.
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Appellate court invalidated an unregistered, consideration-free transfer document and declared the appellant lawful owner.
Land law – validity of title transfer document – agreement without consideration and non-registration; evidence – adverse inference for failure to summon key witnesses; res judicata/precedent of prior ward-tribunal decision; procedure – transfers of presiding Chairperson and change/death of assessors not fatal irregularities (section 23(3) Cap 216).
|
12 September 2024 |
|
Revision is not a substitute for appeal under GN 173/2003; application struck out for incompetence.
Land law – Procedural competence – Regulation 24 GN No.173/2003 grants right of appeal to High Court – Revisional jurisdiction not an alternative to appeal except in exceptional circumstances – Failure to explain non-prosecution of appeal renders revision incompetent.
|
11 September 2024 |
|
Interlocutory injunction granted to restrain title cancellation pending appeal after finding prima facie case and irreparable harm.
Land law – interlocutory injunction – application to restrain cancellation or reallocation of registered titles pending appeal – Atilio v Mbowe test: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience – defence of being overtaken by events insufficient without evidence.
|
11 September 2024 |
|
Extension of time to challenge an ex-parte judgment refused where the applicant failed to account for delay and show good cause.
Limitation law – extension of time under s.14(1) Law of Limitation Act – requirement to account for each day of delay; good cause/good reason principles (Lyamuya, Bushiri); insufficiency of unproven illness; time spent on struck-out application not automatically excusing delay; alleged illegality/conflicting judgments must be established.
|
11 September 2024 |
|
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Appellant’s late challenges to sale agreement fail; un-tendered forensic report expunged and compensation award for poles set aside.
Land law — ownership dispute — admissibility of sale agreement — stamp duty omission curable; non-original document not objected to at trial considered admitted
Evidence — reliance on un-tendered forensic/handwriting report is improper and report must be expunged
Damages — award for destroyed property must be supported by proof of quantity and value; unsupported award set aside. Location/measurement discrepancies — minor variances (measurement by paces vs survey; administrative reclassification of locality) do not defeat ownership claim
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Revision struck out because applicants included strangers and there was no tribunal order properly before the Court for revision.
Civil procedure – Preliminary objection – improper joinder of parties; Revision jurisdiction – High Court cannot revise non-existent or non-final tribunal orders; Execution – enforcement based on earlier costs orders remains valid despite later deregistration of judgment creditor.
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Application for interim maintenance of status quo rendered moot by expiry of statutory 90‑day notice; application withdrawn.
Civil procedure – Interim relief/Mareva‑type injunction – Maintenance of status quo pending statutory 90‑day notice – Effect of expiry of notice on justiciability; Statutory notices to government – 90‑day notice – centrality to interim relief; Judicial restraint – refusal to adjudicate moot or academic disputes; Withdrawal of application overtaken by events; No order as to costs.
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Review dismissed as an appeal in disguise; court functus officio and review limited to errors apparent on the face of the record.
Civil procedure – Review versus appeal – review confined to errors apparent on face of record and cannot be used to re‑assess evidence; functus officio prevents a court from sitting as its own appellate court after delivering judgment. Grounds for review – manifest error on the face of the record; deprivation of hearing; nullity; lack of jurisdiction; fraud or perjury. Dismissal for want of prosecution – challenge to procedural conduct amounting to appeal in disguise is not reviewable
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Court set aside striking-out of applicant’s land appeal, finding electronic records show it was filed within time.
Land appeal — calculation of appeal period from date decree supplied — effect of electronic filing/CMS and exchequer receipt in fixing filing date — review for error apparent on the face of the record — appropriate remedy for time-barred appeal (dismissal, not striking out).
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution after plaintiff failed to appear on scheduled hearing days despite adjournment.
Civil Procedure – Dismissal for want of prosecution – Order IX Rule 5 CPC – plaintiff's persistent absence and failure to show sufficient cause – adjournment to second day – prejudice to defendants – reliance on Tanganyika Motors precedent.
|
10 September 2024 |
|
Application for extension of time dismissed for want of prosecution after prolonged non-appearance by applicant.
Civil procedure – Dismissal for want of prosecution – Order IX Rule 2 CPC – case management – laches – failure to appear – extension of time to appeal.
|
9 September 2024 |
|
Non‑joinder of land authorities made the suit incompetent; statutory 90‑day notice to government entities could not be waived.
Land law – non‑joinder of necessary parties; competing Certificate of Title and Residential Licence; necessity to join land authorities (Commissioner for Land, Registrar of Titles, Municipal Council); requirement of 90‑day notice to sue government under Government Proceedings Act; court’s duty to add necessary parties; incompetence and striking out for non‑joinder.
|
9 September 2024 |
|
A plaint lacking required description of immovable property under Order VII Rule 3 is defective and the suit is struck out.
Civil Procedure — Order VII Rule 3 — Description of immovable property — Unsurveyed land requires size, boundaries and neighbouring features — Failure to state title/survey details renders plaint defective — Incompetent suit struck out.
|
9 September 2024 |
|
Court struck out land suit for failure to join AG, Commissioner for Lands and Registrar of Titles as necessary parties.
Civil procedure – Joinder of necessary parties – Attorney General, Commissioner for Lands, Registrar of Titles must be joined where ownership depends on government-issued land documents
Government Proceedings – 90‑day notice requirement and procedure when suing the government (Government Proceedings Act)
Overriding Objective – substance over technicalities; court’s duty to add necessary parties (citing TRC v. GBP Tanzania Ltd.)
Remedy – striking out for failure to join necessary parties with liberty to refile; no costs where matter raised suo motu
|
9 September 2024 |
|
Non-joinder of an interested person claiming part of the disputed land requires quashing the tribunal's proceedings and a re-hearing.
Land law – non-joinder of interested/necessary party – unimpleaded person claiming ownership within disputed land – material irregularity vitiating proceedings. Civil procedure – parties and pleading – duty to implead persons whose rights are directly affected; amendment of pleadings and framing of issues (including time-bar)
Remedies – quashing and setting aside tribunal proceedings, judgment and decree and ordering re-hearing; costs withheld where court raised anomaly suo motu
|
6 September 2024 |
|
Administrator’s land recovery claim was time‑barred; letters of administration date governs accrual and negotiations do not suspend limitation.
Limitation of actions — recovery of deceased’s land — 12‑year limitation (s.3(1) and item 22 Schedule, Limitation Act); accrual for administrator — interval between death and grant excluded (s.35); pre‑action negotiations/municipal recognition do not stop running of limitation; unpleaded facts cannot defeat limitation.
|
6 September 2024 |
|
An administrator’s land recovery claim was time-barred; pre‑litigation negotiations do not suspend limitation.
Limitation of actions – recovery of land – twelve‑year period under Law of Limitation Act – accrual of cause of action in estate claims. Estates and administration – effect of grant of letters of administration on limitation reckoning. Civil procedure – pre‑court negotiations and communications do not stop the running of limitation periods
|
6 September 2024 |
|
Non-joinder of the municipal council as a necessary party rendered the land ownership proceedings incompetent and the judgment was quashed.
Land law – ownership dispute over undeveloped/surveyed land – necessity to implead local government/municipal authority when its prior allocation decision affects title. Civil procedure – necessary party and non-joinder – inability to pass effective decree in absence of necessary party renders proceedings incompetent and liable to be struck out/quashed
Jurisdiction – tribunal’s competence limited where essential parties are omitted from proceedings
|
5 September 2024 |
|
Cause of action for recovery of deceased’s land accrued earlier; negotiations did not toll limitation, appeal dismissed.
Limitation of actions – recovery of land – accrual of cause of action for deceased’s estate – letters of administration – effect of pre‑litigation negotiations on limitation – Law of Limitation Act (s.35; s.3(1) & item 22).
|
5 September 2024 |
|
A later suit on the same lease dispute involving the same principal parties is res subjudice and struck out.
Land law – res subjudice under section 8 Civil Procedure Code; same subject matter and principal parties; addition of parties irrelevant; counterclaim does not negate res subjudice; multiplicity of suits barred.
|
5 September 2024 |
|
The Application was struck out as res subjudice because an earlier tribunal case with the same subject matter and reliefs was pending.
• Civil procedure — Res subjudice — Application struck out where a previously instituted matter before a tribunal involved the same parties (or parties claiming under the same title), same subject matter and same reliefs — section 8 Civil Procedure Code. • Interim restraining orders and annexed tribunal records as evidence of pendency. • Preliminary objection as a legal question properly determined on the record (Mukisa test).
|
5 September 2024 |
|
Plaintiff’s unfiled/unpleaded documents inadmissible for lack of foundation; only annexed 1999 letter admitted.
Civil procedure – Documentary evidence – Requirement to plead, file or produce documents at first hearing – Order XIII Rules 1–2 CPC – Copies and absence of foundation – Admissibility. Identification documents and internal correspondences do not excuse compliance with filing and listing requirements
|
4 September 2024 |
|
Application for interim injunction struck out after applicant conceded preliminary objections of incompetence and misjoinder.
Civil procedure – competence of proceedings – preliminary objection – effect of conceding preliminary objection; withdrawal versus striking out. Civil procedure – locus standi and misjoinder – documents in name of different legal person raising competence issues. Land law – interim injunctions over registered title – competence prerequisite to interim relief
|
4 September 2024 |
|
Suit dismissed for being res‑subjudice, an abuse of process, and incompetent for suing an unregistered entity.
Civil procedure – res‑subjudice / res judicata – application of section 8 CPC where matter and parties (or privies) are directly and substantially the same. Civil procedure – abuse of process – failure to comply with prior court orders directing retrial
Parties – competence to be sued – suing an unregistered/non‑existent trustee entity. Doctrine of functus officio and respect for prior appellate orders
|
3 September 2024 |
|
An application for extension of time to appeal is premature without a lodged notice of appeal and is struck out when conceded.
Appellate procedure – requirement to lodge notice of appeal under Rule 83; notice of appeal commences civil appeal process. Extension of time – application premature where no notice of appeal has been filed. Preliminary objection – once registered, party cannot withdraw to evade determination; concession results in matter being struck out. Remedy for incompetent proceedings – striking out with appropriate costs order
|
2 September 2024 |
|
An interim injunction application pending a 90‑day notice was dismissed as incompetent and overtaken by events.
Civil procedure – interim relief – injunction pending the lapse of 90‑day notice – mootness/overtaken by events; competence and jurisdiction; res judicata objection.
|
2 September 2024 |
|
Court granted temporary injunction maintaining status quo on leased airport premises pending determination of applicant's land suit.
Land law – Temporary injunction – Application to maintain status quo pending suit – Atilio v Mbowe three-fold test: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience – Lease dispute at airport premises – Ex parte proceedings due to respondents' non-appearance.
|
2 September 2024 |