High Court Land Division

High Court Land  Division was established as a result of the land reforms which were implemented by the Land Act 1999. Until 2010, the Land Court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine land disputes relating to land with a pecuniary value of TZS 50,000 or more. 

1,168 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Outcomes
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
1,168 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2024
Whether subsequent loan facilities were fraudulently obtained and who is liable; guarantor held liable and title returned to mortgagor.
Banking law – loan facilities and guarantees – proper identification of borrower and guarantor; authenticity of signatures and correspondence; liability of signatory/guarantor who operated account; discharge of mortgage title – court-ordered return; counterclaim liability – debt acknowledged by guarantor; interest awarded at court rate.
13 September 2024
13 September 2024
An executing tribunal cannot add or vary relief; execution is limited to the precise terms of the decree.
Civil procedure – Execution of decree – executing court bound by terms of decree; cannot add or vary relief Execution – interpretation vs alteration – executing court may construe ambiguous decrees but may not create new relief Pleadings – parties are bound by pleadings (Order VI r.7) and decree must agree with judgment (Order XX r.6) Land Disputes Tribunals – limits of execution powers under statutory rules
12 September 2024
Court recorded and adopted parties’ Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3, making it a binding consent judgment and withdrawing the suit.
Civil procedure — Consent judgment — Recording and adoption of Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code — Deed given force of court order and binding on parties. Land law — Title registration — Parties agree defendant to be registered owner and plaintiff to release certificate of title upon payment. Settlement effect — Payment, release, discharge and withdrawal of suit; parties to bear own costs
12 September 2024
Delay in obtaining certified judgment copies and alleged irregularities justified a 14‑day extension to file the appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time – appeal out of time – whether delay in procuring certified copies of judgment constitutes sufficient reason to extend time; Requirement to account for delay and "sufficient reasons" principle; Alleged irregularities in impugned judgment as ground for extension; Authorities considered: Principal Secretary v Devram Valambhia and Republic v Yona Kaponda.
12 September 2024
Non-joinder of the Commissioner for Lands rendered the tribunal’s judgment incompetent; appeal allowed and proceedings quashed.
Land law – ownership disputes over allocated land – necessity to join the allocating authority as a party when both litigants claim allocation by that authority. Civil procedure – necessary party vs non-necessary party – Order 1 Rule 9 CPC inapplicable where the omitted party is necessary. Procedural competence – non-joinder of a necessary party renders proceedings incompetent and judgment liable to be quashed
12 September 2024
The suit is barred by res judicata because the same land dispute between the same parties was previously finally decided.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Application of section 9 Civil Procedure Code where matter directly and substantially in issue has been previously heard and finally decided by competent tribunal; identity of parties and privies; reliance on same sale agreements and documents.* Land law – competence of Ward Tribunal and District Land and Housing Tribunal to adjudicate land ownership disputes – effect of prior judgment and execution on subsequent suit.* Procedural – prior non‑decision due to incomplete record does not preclude re‑raising a valid preliminary objection on res judicata.
12 September 2024
Court granted extension of time to file an out-of-time appeal, finding sufficient reasons including alleged illegality on the record.
Land law – Extension of time – Application under s.14(1) Limitation Act read with s.41(2) LDCA and s.95 CPC – Illegality on face of record as ground for extension – Procedural defects in counter-affidavit (jurat/language) – unrepresented litigant and costs.
12 September 2024
Appellate court invalidated an unregistered, consideration-free transfer document and declared the appellant lawful owner.
Land law – validity of title transfer document – agreement without consideration and non-registration; evidence – adverse inference for failure to summon key witnesses; res judicata/precedent of prior ward-tribunal decision; procedure – transfers of presiding Chairperson and change/death of assessors not fatal irregularities (section 23(3) Cap 216).
12 September 2024
Revision is not a substitute for appeal under GN 173/2003; application struck out for incompetence.
Land law – Procedural competence – Regulation 24 GN No.173/2003 grants right of appeal to High Court – Revisional jurisdiction not an alternative to appeal except in exceptional circumstances – Failure to explain non-prosecution of appeal renders revision incompetent.
11 September 2024
Interlocutory injunction granted to restrain title cancellation pending appeal after finding prima facie case and irreparable harm.
Land law – interlocutory injunction – application to restrain cancellation or reallocation of registered titles pending appeal – Atilio v Mbowe test: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience – defence of being overtaken by events insufficient without evidence.
11 September 2024
Extension of time to challenge an ex-parte judgment refused where the applicant failed to account for delay and show good cause.
Limitation law – extension of time under s.14(1) Law of Limitation Act – requirement to account for each day of delay; good cause/good reason principles (Lyamuya, Bushiri); insufficiency of unproven illness; time spent on struck-out application not automatically excusing delay; alleged illegality/conflicting judgments must be established.
11 September 2024
10 September 2024
Appellant’s late challenges to sale agreement fail; un-tendered forensic report expunged and compensation award for poles set aside.
Land law — ownership dispute — admissibility of sale agreement — stamp duty omission curable; non-original document not objected to at trial considered admitted Evidence — reliance on un-tendered forensic/handwriting report is improper and report must be expunged Damages — award for destroyed property must be supported by proof of quantity and value; unsupported award set aside. Location/measurement discrepancies — minor variances (measurement by paces vs survey; administrative reclassification of locality) do not defeat ownership claim
10 September 2024
Revision struck out because applicants included strangers and there was no tribunal order properly before the Court for revision.
Civil procedure – Preliminary objection – improper joinder of parties; Revision jurisdiction – High Court cannot revise non-existent or non-final tribunal orders; Execution – enforcement based on earlier costs orders remains valid despite later deregistration of judgment creditor.
10 September 2024
Application for interim maintenance of status quo rendered moot by expiry of statutory 90‑day notice; application withdrawn.
Civil procedure – Interim relief/Mareva‑type injunction – Maintenance of status quo pending statutory 90‑day notice – Effect of expiry of notice on justiciability; Statutory notices to government – 90‑day notice – centrality to interim relief; Judicial restraint – refusal to adjudicate moot or academic disputes; Withdrawal of application overtaken by events; No order as to costs.
10 September 2024
Review dismissed as an appeal in disguise; court functus officio and review limited to errors apparent on the face of the record.
Civil procedure – Review versus appeal – review confined to errors apparent on face of record and cannot be used to re‑assess evidence; functus officio prevents a court from sitting as its own appellate court after delivering judgment. Grounds for review – manifest error on the face of the record; deprivation of hearing; nullity; lack of jurisdiction; fraud or perjury. Dismissal for want of prosecution – challenge to procedural conduct amounting to appeal in disguise is not reviewable
10 September 2024
Court set aside striking-out of applicant’s land appeal, finding electronic records show it was filed within time.
Land appeal — calculation of appeal period from date decree supplied — effect of electronic filing/CMS and exchequer receipt in fixing filing date — review for error apparent on the face of the record — appropriate remedy for time-barred appeal (dismissal, not striking out).
10 September 2024
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution after plaintiff failed to appear on scheduled hearing days despite adjournment.
Civil Procedure – Dismissal for want of prosecution – Order IX Rule 5 CPC – plaintiff's persistent absence and failure to show sufficient cause – adjournment to second day – prejudice to defendants – reliance on Tanganyika Motors precedent.
10 September 2024
Application for extension of time dismissed for want of prosecution after prolonged non-appearance by applicant.
Civil procedure – Dismissal for want of prosecution – Order IX Rule 2 CPC – case management – laches – failure to appear – extension of time to appeal.
9 September 2024
Non‑joinder of land authorities made the suit incompetent; statutory 90‑day notice to government entities could not be waived.
Land law – non‑joinder of necessary parties; competing Certificate of Title and Residential Licence; necessity to join land authorities (Commissioner for Land, Registrar of Titles, Municipal Council); requirement of 90‑day notice to sue government under Government Proceedings Act; court’s duty to add necessary parties; incompetence and striking out for non‑joinder.
9 September 2024
A plaint lacking required description of immovable property under Order VII Rule 3 is defective and the suit is struck out.
Civil Procedure — Order VII Rule 3 — Description of immovable property — Unsurveyed land requires size, boundaries and neighbouring features — Failure to state title/survey details renders plaint defective — Incompetent suit struck out.
9 September 2024
Court struck out land suit for failure to join AG, Commissioner for Lands and Registrar of Titles as necessary parties.
Civil procedure – Joinder of necessary parties – Attorney General, Commissioner for Lands, Registrar of Titles must be joined where ownership depends on government-issued land documents Government Proceedings – 90‑day notice requirement and procedure when suing the government (Government Proceedings Act) Overriding Objective – substance over technicalities; court’s duty to add necessary parties (citing TRC v. GBP Tanzania Ltd.) Remedy – striking out for failure to join necessary parties with liberty to refile; no costs where matter raised suo motu
9 September 2024
Non-joinder of an interested person claiming part of the disputed land requires quashing the tribunal's proceedings and a re-hearing.
Land law – non-joinder of interested/necessary party – unimpleaded person claiming ownership within disputed land – material irregularity vitiating proceedings. Civil procedure – parties and pleading – duty to implead persons whose rights are directly affected; amendment of pleadings and framing of issues (including time-bar) Remedies – quashing and setting aside tribunal proceedings, judgment and decree and ordering re-hearing; costs withheld where court raised anomaly suo motu
6 September 2024
Administrator’s land recovery claim was time‑barred; letters of administration date governs accrual and negotiations do not suspend limitation.
Limitation of actions — recovery of deceased’s land — 12‑year limitation (s.3(1) and item 22 Schedule, Limitation Act); accrual for administrator — interval between death and grant excluded (s.35); pre‑action negotiations/municipal recognition do not stop running of limitation; unpleaded facts cannot defeat limitation.
6 September 2024
An administrator’s land recovery claim was time-barred; pre‑litigation negotiations do not suspend limitation.
Limitation of actions – recovery of land – twelve‑year period under Law of Limitation Act – accrual of cause of action in estate claims. Estates and administration – effect of grant of letters of administration on limitation reckoning. Civil procedure – pre‑court negotiations and communications do not stop the running of limitation periods
6 September 2024
Non-joinder of the municipal council as a necessary party rendered the land ownership proceedings incompetent and the judgment was quashed.
Land law – ownership dispute over undeveloped/surveyed land – necessity to implead local government/municipal authority when its prior allocation decision affects title. Civil procedure – necessary party and non-joinder – inability to pass effective decree in absence of necessary party renders proceedings incompetent and liable to be struck out/quashed Jurisdiction – tribunal’s competence limited where essential parties are omitted from proceedings
5 September 2024
Cause of action for recovery of deceased’s land accrued earlier; negotiations did not toll limitation, appeal dismissed.
Limitation of actions – recovery of land – accrual of cause of action for deceased’s estate – letters of administration – effect of pre‑litigation negotiations on limitation – Law of Limitation Act (s.35; s.3(1) & item 22).
5 September 2024
A later suit on the same lease dispute involving the same principal parties is res subjudice and struck out.
Land law – res subjudice under section 8 Civil Procedure Code; same subject matter and principal parties; addition of parties irrelevant; counterclaim does not negate res subjudice; multiplicity of suits barred.
5 September 2024
The Application was struck out as res subjudice because an earlier tribunal case with the same subject matter and reliefs was pending.
• Civil procedure — Res subjudice — Application struck out where a previously instituted matter before a tribunal involved the same parties (or parties claiming under the same title), same subject matter and same reliefs — section 8 Civil Procedure Code. • Interim restraining orders and annexed tribunal records as evidence of pendency. • Preliminary objection as a legal question properly determined on the record (Mukisa test).
5 September 2024
Plaintiff’s unfiled/unpleaded documents inadmissible for lack of foundation; only annexed 1999 letter admitted.
Civil procedure – Documentary evidence – Requirement to plead, file or produce documents at first hearing – Order XIII Rules 1–2 CPC – Copies and absence of foundation – Admissibility. Identification documents and internal correspondences do not excuse compliance with filing and listing requirements
4 September 2024
Application for interim injunction struck out after applicant conceded preliminary objections of incompetence and misjoinder.
Civil procedure – competence of proceedings – preliminary objection – effect of conceding preliminary objection; withdrawal versus striking out. Civil procedure – locus standi and misjoinder – documents in name of different legal person raising competence issues. Land law – interim injunctions over registered title – competence prerequisite to interim relief
4 September 2024
Suit dismissed for being res‑subjudice, an abuse of process, and incompetent for suing an unregistered entity.
Civil procedure – res‑subjudice / res judicata – application of section 8 CPC where matter and parties (or privies) are directly and substantially the same. Civil procedure – abuse of process – failure to comply with prior court orders directing retrial Parties – competence to be sued – suing an unregistered/non‑existent trustee entity. Doctrine of functus officio and respect for prior appellate orders
3 September 2024
An application for extension of time to appeal is premature without a lodged notice of appeal and is struck out when conceded.
Appellate procedure – requirement to lodge notice of appeal under Rule 83; notice of appeal commences civil appeal process. Extension of time – application premature where no notice of appeal has been filed. Preliminary objection – once registered, party cannot withdraw to evade determination; concession results in matter being struck out. Remedy for incompetent proceedings – striking out with appropriate costs order
2 September 2024
An interim injunction application pending a 90‑day notice was dismissed as incompetent and overtaken by events.
Civil procedure – interim relief – injunction pending the lapse of 90‑day notice – mootness/overtaken by events; competence and jurisdiction; res judicata objection.
2 September 2024
Court granted temporary injunction maintaining status quo on leased airport premises pending determination of applicant's land suit.
Land law – Temporary injunction – Application to maintain status quo pending suit – Atilio v Mbowe three-fold test: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience – Lease dispute at airport premises – Ex parte proceedings due to respondents' non-appearance.
2 September 2024
August 2024
Appellate court held purchaser at valid auction acquired lawful ownership where loan agreement granted creditor power to sell.
Land law – sale by power of sale under loan/mortgage agreement – purchaser at public auction – admissible certificate of sale, auction advertisement and DC permission; parties bound by contract terms (s.37 Law of Contract Act); appellate re‑analysis of evidence.
30 August 2024
A mediated deed of settlement in a land ownership dispute was recorded as a consent judgment, imposing payment and registration obligations and resolving all claims.
Land law – disputed ownership of unsurveyed land – mediation and Deed of Settlement recorded as consent judgment – payment, survey and registration obligations – settlement declared full and final and enforceable by execution.
30 August 2024
An unappealed district court judgment binds parties and requires land registry to issue title despite competing administrative claims.
Land law – ownership dispute – binding effect of unappealed district court judgment; res judicata bars relitigation; administrative refusal to register title contrary to judicial determination; nullification of newspaper advertisement of purported lost letter of offer.
30 August 2024
Res judicata objection premature where factual determination of identity of disputed land is required.
Land law – res judicata under Section 9 CPC; conditions for res judicata (Peniel Lotta) – identity of subject matter, parties, title, competence and finality; preliminary objections – Mukisa Biscuits principle that objections must raise pure points of law; jurisdictional objection premature where factual evidence required to establish identity of disputed land (plot/farm numbers, map references).
30 August 2024
An amended plaint failing to disclose a cause of action and omitting necessary government parties is rejected and struck out.
Land law; civil procedure — Order VII r.11(a) CPC — plaint not disclosing cause of action; amended plaint — rejection vs further amendment; non‑joinder of necessary parties (government institutions) — suit rendered incompetent and struck out.
30 August 2024
Time awaiting a certified judgment is excluded if proved; short two-day delay satisfactorily accounted for, extension granted.
Land law — Extension of time to appeal — Exclusion of period awaiting copy of judgment under Section 19(2) Law of Limitation Act — Proof required of request and supply dates — Short residual delay to be accounted for per Bushiri standard — Extension granted.
30 August 2024
Plaintiff’s challenge to mortgagee’s auction failed: default notice valid, sale lawful, purchaser protected; suit dismissed with costs.
Mortgage and sale by auction – service of statutory default notice via postal address; comparison of signatures under Evidence Act s.75; duty of mortgagee to obtain best price – burden on mortgagor to prove sale under value; auctioneer licensing – lack of renewed licence not necessarily vitiating sale where procedures substantially complied; bona fide purchaser protection under Land Act.
30 August 2024
30 August 2024
A land tribunal lacked jurisdiction over an unconcluded land sale contract; its proceedings were nullified and quashed.
Jurisdiction – Land Disputes Courts Act – Whether an unconcluded contract for sale of land is a "land matter" within the Land and Housing Tribunal's jurisdiction – Tribunal's lack of competence renders proceedings null and void Procedure – Court may raise competence sua sponte and, under s.43 LDC Act, revise and nullify tribunal proceedings Remedies – Contractual disputes over formation and enforcement are for ordinary civil jurisdiction, not land tribunal adjudication
30 August 2024
An applicant may withdraw and re-file if sufficient grounds or formal defects exist; costs awarded to the applicant.
Civil Procedure – Withdrawal of suit/application – Order XXIII Rules 1(1) and 1(2) CPC; Leave to re-file – requirement of formal defect or other sufficient grounds; Withdrawal may be granted despite respondent having filed defence/counter-affidavit; Costs – court may award costs on withdrawal.
30 August 2024
Appeal dismissed because the suit land was insufficiently described and the appellant failed to prove title on balance of probabilities.
Land law – description of immovable property – requirement to describe property sufficiently to identify it (Order VII r.3 CPC); Evidence – standard of proof on balance of probabilities (s.110 Evidence Act); Document authenticity – effect of handwritten/typed inconsistencies and alterations on proof of title; Civil procedure – inability to grant effective decree where subject matter is not properly identified.
30 August 2024
Non‑joinder of Registrar of Titles and Director of Survey and Mapping rendered the land suit incompetent and it was struck out.
Land law — necessary parties — Registrar of Titles — Director of Survey and Mapping — revocation of certificates of title — non‑joinder — suit incompetent — strike out; test for necessary party: right of relief against party and inability to pass effective decree without them.
30 August 2024
A valid Certificate of Title establishes prima facie ownership unless its validity is successfully challenged.
Land law – evidentiary weight of Certificate of Title – a valid title to a surveyed parcel is prima facie proof of ownership unless its validity is impugned. Civil procedure – pleadings and admissibility of documents – documents not properly pleaded/admitted may be disregarded but do not undermine a valid Certificate of Title. Civil procedure – duty of parties to produce witnesses – courts are not obliged to summon a party’s unpleaded witnesses suo motu. Expert evidence – party must apply for an expert; court not required to call an expert absent grounds on record
30 August 2024
Failure to give statutory 90‑day notice and to describe land adequately renders suit against the government incompetent and struck out.
Government Proceedings Act s.6(2) – mandatory 90‑day notice to sue the Government; non‑compliance renders suit incompetent Civil Procedure Code, Order VII r.3 – requirement to adequately describe suit land; failure to do so renders plaint defective and suit incompetent. Preliminary objections – parties cannot withdraw suit to circumvent a raised objection; conceding an objection yields its consequences Remedy – striking out incompetent suit; costs ordered for parties to bear their own
29 August 2024