|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2024 |
|
|
Appellant failed to prove payment or forgery; tribunal correctly preferred the clearer written agreement and judgment is upheld.
Land law – sale agreement – competing written agreements – credibility of documents – payment terms; Evidence – burden of proof under s.110 and s.111 Law of Evidence Act; Allegation of forgery – requires documentary proof or criminal action; Appellate review – interference only where tribunal misdirected or evidence improperly evaluated.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time granted where tribunal clerical errors caused delay and the applicant accounted for the period of delay.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Good cause – Whether clerical errors in tribunal records and subsequent correction constitute sufficient cause to extend time under s.41(2) Land Disputes Courts Act – Applicant's duty to account for delay.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time granted where tribunal clerical errors caused delay beyond the applicant's control.
Civil procedure — Extension of time — 'Good cause' is relative and fact-specific — Applicant must account for delay. Clerical errors in tribunal documents — withdrawal and correction of ruling may constitute reasons beyond applicant's control justifying extension. Exercise of judicial discretion — granting leave to file appeal out of time where delay satisfactorily explained.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Tribunal's trespass finding and TZS 2,000,000 award against the appellant affirmed; non-joinder and assessor disagreement not fatal.
Land law – trespass/encroachment – sufficiency of description under Land Disputes Tribunal Regulations (GN 174 of 2003) – application not incompetent. Evidence – appellate scrutiny – trial chairperson may depart from assessors' opinion but must give reasons. Civil procedure – non-joinder of co-purchaser – not automatically fatal where no prejudice shown and matter can be determined between parties present. Relief – award of compensation upheld where not challenged.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to produce credible evidence to rebut presumption of service by newspaper; appeal dismissed.
Land procedure – application to set aside ex parte judgment; sufficiency and credibility of evidence to rebut service by publication; presumption of service via newspaper (Order V, Rule 20(1)); limits on appellate interference with discretionary rulings (Mbogo principle); right to be heard—requires corroborative proof when non‑appearance is alleged.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Affidavits lacking a jurat and proper attestation are incurably defective and render the application incompetent.
Civil procedure — Affidavits — Jurat of attestation essential; absence renders affidavit inadmissible — Attestation requires clear identification of administering authority (seal/stamp) — Defective verification clauses may be amendable but amendment must be sought proactively — Cumulative substantive defects render application incompetent.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Execution by arrest struck out for lack of prior execution attempts, wrong form, and absence of drawn order.
Civil Procedure — Execution by arrest and detention — Order XXI Rule 39(2) — requirement to evidence failed attempts of other execution modes or dishonest conduct; Procedure — Form of application — execution applications seeking exceptional relief should be by chamber summons supported by affidavit where statute is silent; Execution documents — drawn order required for execution proceedings, certificate of taxation not a substitute.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time denied where applicant failed to account for delay, showed negligence, and alleged illegality was unpleaded and not apparent.
Extension of time – section 14 Law of Limitation Act; requirement to account for every day of delay (Bushiri); Lyamuya principles for extension (diligence, inordinate delay, negligence, points of law/illegality); illegality must be pleaded and apparent on face of record (Devram Valambia); submissions cannot substitute affidavit.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
The plaintiff’s counterclaim over the same land is res judicata and is struck out against the government defendants.
Civil Procedure – Res judicata – matter directly and substantially in issue previously decided; constructive res judicata where successor litigates under same title; section 9, Civil Procedure Code (Cap 33). Land law – declaration of ownership; prohibition on relitigation of land rights. Pleading – counterclaim incompetence and strike out.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
An out-of-court settlement transferred 30 acres to the respondent; respondent lacked proof of directorship; applicant owns remaining 29 acres.
Company law – proof of directorship and shareholding (MEMART, share certificate, BRELA registration); Property law – effect and enforceability of out-of-court deed of settlement conveying land; Reliefs – partial grant declaring applicant owner of remaining parcel; costs each party to bear.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Court records deed of settlement as consent judgment restructuring secured loan and authorizing enforcement on default.
Civil procedure — Consent judgment — Recording and adopting a Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII r.3 CPC; secured loan restructuring; enforcement rights on default including sale of securities and attachment of directors’ assets; consent decree binding successors.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to show triable issues or sufficient facts to obtain leave to defend a summary land suit.
Land law – summary proceedings – leave to defend under Order XXXV r.3(1)(b) – requirement to disclose sufficient facts to raise a triable issue – set‑off and counterclaim – sham or illusory defences – jurisdictional challenge to Land Division – effects of COVID‑19 and coercion as pleaded defences.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Mediated settlement recorded as consent decree: plaintiff waives claims; payment plan with landlord/lender power of sale on default.
Land — Consent judgment — Mediation settlement recorded under Order VIII Rules 33(a) and 34 — Compromise waivers of claims and counterclaims — Payment schedule and default clause — Lender’s power of sale exercisable without further court process on default — Discharge of securities on full payment.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Failure to state the landed property's value in the plaint breached jurisdictional and court-fee requirements, warranting striking out.
Civil procedure — Preliminary objection — Requirement under Order VII Rule 1(i) CPC to state value of subject matter for jurisdiction. Land law — Valuation — Mesne profits or loss claims do not replace valuation/express approximation of property value. Court fees — Rule 4, G.N. 247/2018 requires disclosure of property value to assess fees; Registrar acceptance does not cure statutory non-compliance. Preliminary objections — Pure points of law may be decided without adducing evidence of disputed facts.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Tribunal correctly found the respondent owned the business booths; the appellant's appeal is dismissed.
Land law – ownership of structures on public land – proof of ownership and effect of tenant/rental admissions. Civil procedure – jurisdiction of District Land and Housing Tribunal – jurisdiction deduced from pleadings; contractual disputes within tribunal's mandate. Contract law – privity of contract – a stranger to contract cannot sue on its terms. Evidence – burden of proof (s.112 Evidence Act) and adverse inference for failure to call material witnesses.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Respondent’s widowhood and long uninterrupted possession established locus standi and ownership; appeal dismissed.
Land law – ownership of unsurveyed land – widow’s inheritance interest and long uninterrupted possession as evidence of legal interest. Civil procedure – locus standi – requirement to demonstrate a legally recognisable interest in land disputes. Evidence – evaluation of witness credibility, burden of proof, and weight of documentary and possession evidence. Procedure – role and effect of locus in quo visits in clarifying boundary and possession issues.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Applicants must account for each day of delay and produce evidence to justify an extension of time.
Limitation Act s14(1) – extension of time – requirement to show sufficient cause and to account for each day of delay; Evidence Act s110 – need for proof supporting claims of prolonged illness or incapacity; financial difficulty and sympathy are not sufficient grounds for extension.
|
10 December 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time under section 93 CPC; application dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure — Extension of time under section 93 CPC — Applicant must account for each day of delay and show diligence (Lyamuya criteria); Technical/e-filing difficulties — party facing technical problems should seek informal/ex parte relief under Electronic Filing Rules (Rule 24(5)–(6)); Negligence or sloppiness by applicant/advocate is not sufficient cause to enlarge time.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time; 43-day delay was inordinate and application dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – extension of time – section 93 CPC – discretionary relief subject to Lyamuya criteria (account for each day; non-inordinate delay; diligence; other sufficient reasons). Electronic filing – Judicature and Application of Laws (Electronic Filing) Rules 2018 – Rule 24(5)-(6) provides Registrar relief for missed deadlines due to technical problems. Procedural compliance – failure to account for each day of delay and mere negligence are insufficient to obtain extension of time.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
A prior extension does not bar a subsequent extension; res judicata/functus officio inapplicable; matter remitted for merits.
Civil procedure – Extension/enlargement of time – Section 93 Civil Procedure Code – court’s discretion to enlarge time even after expiry; Res judicata and functus officio – inapplicability where prior extension was granted and subsequent application arises from events after the grant; Preliminary objection – appropriate plea is abuse of court process if well grounded; Remittal for merits consideration.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
Where over one-sixth of a bill is disallowed, the party presenting it is not entitled to taxation costs; reference granted.
Advocates Remuneration Order 2015 (Order 48) – where more than one-sixth of a bill of costs exclusive of court fees is disallowed, the party presenting the bill is not entitled to the costs of taxation. Civil procedure – preliminary objections – failure to prosecute results in dismissal. Courts will not entertain relief or prayers raised orally if not pleaded in the chamber summons or supporting affidavit.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
The applicants failed to prove lawful allocation or title to the disputed plots; suit dismissed.
Land law — proof of title and allocation — certificate of occupancy required for statutory allocation; Memorandum of Understanding not a grant of right of occupancy; contradictory pleadings and absence of sale documentation undermine claim; alleged double allocation (CT 28830 vs CT 43939).
|
6 December 2024 |
|
Appellant failed to discharge burden of proof; Tribunal rightly preferred respondent's documentary and oral evidence.
Land law – ownership disputes – burden of proof in civil cases; evaluation of oral and documentary evidence; admissibility and weight of un‑pleaded documents; appellate review of Tribunal fact‑finding.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
Executing tribunal unlawfully varied the decree by accepting payment after eviction; High Court quashed those orders and remitted the record.
Land law – execution of decree – executing tribunal must adhere to the original judgment and mode of execution; variation of decree by execution proceedings unlawful. Civil procedure – execution reports – chairman must specify deficiencies in reports and act consistently with the decree. Revisional jurisdiction – High Court under s.43 may quash irregular or unlawful tribunal orders and remit records for proper execution. Procedural fairness – acceptance of post-eviction payment contrary to decree raises irregularity and miscarriage of justice.
|
6 December 2024 |
|
|
6 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time granted to file revision where delay was accounted for and an illegality on the face of the record existed.
Limitation Act s.14(1) – extension of time; accrual of time counted from striking out of prior application; exclusion of days spent pursuing struck‑out application; illegality as ground for extension – Lyamuya test; distinction between ownership (matter of proof) and illegality apparent on face of record; revision remedy where preliminary ruling declares ownership of a non‑party.
|
5 December 2024 |
|
Court struck out plaintiff's suit as functus officio because it duplicated a previously struck out matter.
Civil procedure – functus officio – court barred from entertaining a refiled or duplicate plaint previously struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction – High Court registries and administrative transfer – transfer does not cure functus officio where pleadings are identical to a struck out suit. Procedure – preliminary objection – effect of prior suo motu jurisdictional ruling on subsequent proceedings. Remedies – refiling after amendment; discretionary waiver of court fees by Deputy Registrar in cases caused by internal judicial arrangements.
|
5 December 2024 |
|
Execution application failed because the decree did not grant appellants any specific, executable ownership or possession rights.
Civil procedure – execution – decree in appeal must clearly specify reliefs granted to be executable; execution must tally with the decree. Natural justice – right to be heard (audi alteram partem) – tribunal record showed parties were heard. Land law – ownership dispute – quashing a judgment does not automatically vest ownership in another party absent an affirmative order to that effect.
|
5 December 2024 |
|
Application to set aside dismissal was time-barred and struck out; non-filing of counter-affidavit limits respondent to legal points.
Civil Procedure – restoration of suit – dismissal for want of prosecution at Final PTC – restoration governed by Order IX and 30-day limitation under Law of Limitation Act (Part III Item 4). Limitation – Section 19(5) Law of Limitation Act – exclusion of time for obtaining proceedings requires proof of necessity and efforts; not automatic. Procedural law – failure to file counter-affidavit waives factual contest; party may argue points of law only. Requirement – applicant should seek extension of time where technical delay is relied upon before applying to set aside dismissal.
|
5 December 2024 |
|
Refiling a stay application after prior dismissal is barred by res judicata and is an abuse of court process.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Section 9 CPC – dismissal as conclusive determination; abuse of court process – refiling identical stay application barred; preliminary objection – procedural defect (PO filed before counter-affidavit) curable where no prejudice; stay of execution – cannot be re-litigated once prior stay applications were finally dismissed unless dismissal set aside.
|
4 December 2024 |
|
Appeal allowed: tribunal’s execution ruling quashed for improper execution; new court broker ordered to implement original decree.
Execution of decree — duty of executing officer/court broker to implement decree as framed; executing court’s obligation not to go behind decree but to ensure proper execution; locus in quo inspection where execution compliance disputed; power to appoint/replace court broker; procedural fairness in execution proceedings.
|
4 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time granted due to applicant's incarceration; vague preliminary objection on law citation overruled.
Extension of time – discretionary relief – sufficient cause – incarceration as ground for delay; Delay not inordinate when applicant filed promptly after obtaining legal assistance; Preliminary objection – vague allegation of wrong citation of law does not automatically render application incompetent; Court’s duty to determine merits despite citation errors.
|
3 December 2024 |
|
Temporary injunction granted to restrain auction where prima facie title dispute and risk of irreparable harm to applicant exist.
Land law – temporary injunction to restrain auction – prima facie title dispute where certificate of title alleged to be fraudulently obtained – Atilio v Mbowe tests (triable issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience). Mortgage enforcement – bank’s right to realize security weighed against occupant’s risk of losing residence. Damages as alternative remedy vs irreparable loss of home.
|
3 December 2024 |
|
Extension of time and setting aside of striking-out order granted where delay was accounted for and affidavits uncontroverted.
Extension of time — section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act; application of Lyamuya guidelines (account for delay, diligence, inordinate delay); Order VIII r.20(1)(b) CPC — setting aside striking out of pleadings; uncontroverted affidavits deemed admitted; restoration of written statement of defence.
|
3 December 2024 |
| November 2024 |
|
|
A tribunal that strikes out an incompetent suit lacks jurisdiction to decide ownership; its substantive declarations are set aside.
Land law – locus standi – only executor or administrator can sue in respect of causes of action surviving the deceased. Civil procedure – striking out for incompetence – tribunal loses jurisdiction to determine merits thereafter. Power of attorney – donor's personal appearance may render POA redundant but does not cure lack of administrator. Declarations made in incompetent proceedings are nullities and of no legal effect.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Failure to serve statutory 90‑day notice on Attorney General and Solicitor General renders suit incompetent; suit struck out with liberty to refile.
Government proceedings – section 6(2) Government Proceedings Act – mandatory 90‑day notice to relevant department and copies to Attorney General and Solicitor General; non‑compliance renders suit incompetent; misjoinder and overriding objective cannot cure statutory preconditions; remedy – strike out with liberty to refile subject to limitation; no order as to costs.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Administratrix granted Mareva injunction pending expiry of 90‑day notice to protect estate land from irreparable interference.
Mareva injunction – requirements where government is party – intention to sue and service of 90‑day notice. Interim relief – preservation of status quo, prevention of irreparable loss, and balance of convenience. Locus – administratrix of deceased estate entitled to seek injunctive relief. Discretionary relief – court to exercise injunctive power judiciously.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
A final judgment on land ownership creates rights in rem and bars the plaintiff's subsequent suit as res judicata.
Land law – res judicata – section 9 Civil Procedure Code – prior final judgment on land ownership creates rights in rem binding all, barring subsequent suit; preliminary objection admissible where facts assumed true.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Special damages must be strictly proved; unproven special damages and constructive notice defeated the respondent's breach claim.
Civil procedure – Land/lease disputes – burden and strict proof of special damages; speculative awards impermissible. Contract/land law – non-payment of rent may amount to constructive notice of termination and defeat later breach claim. Civil procedure – non-joinder – objections must be raised early; late objections deemed waived. Formalities – mistaken description of signatory’s capacity in a lease may be a minor slip not invalidating the instrument.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to account for delay and alleged illegality was not pleaded or apparent, so extension of time denied.
Civil procedure – extension of time – applicant must account for each day of delay; affidavit must disclose reasons for delay. Civil procedure – supporting affidavit – issues relied upon must be pleaded in the affidavit, not only in submissions. Extension of time – illegality as sufficient cause – illegality must be apparent on the face of the record of the impugned decision. Locus standi – alleged lack of locus standi not sufficient for extension where not pleaded or apparent on the record.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Court granted Mareva injunction to preserve disputed land pending expiry of the 90‑day notice to sue the government.
Mareva injunctions – requirements for granting against government claims; 90‑day notice to sue the Government; prima facie interest in land; balance of convenience and prevention of irreparable loss.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed: ownership action timely, no proven procedural irregularity or miscarriage of justice.
Land law — limitation period for land ownership (12 years) — ownership versus trespass; Procedural irregularity — representation by allegedly unqualified advocate — appellate restraint where issue not raised at trial; Appellate review — s.45 Land Disputes Courts Act — reversal only for errors causing miscarriage of justice; Evidence — adequacy of tribunal's evaluation and site visit for boundary description.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause or apparent illegality to justify extension to appeal an ex parte judgment.
Limitation of actions – extension of time under s.14 – requirement to show good cause and account for each day’s delay; illegality ground – must be apparent on face of record (Lyamuya) – procedural irregularity (non-service/non-notification) challenges the ex parte order and should be pursued by setting aside that order at the tribunal.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Court granted extension to file review, finding delay technical from pursuing wrong forum; no costs.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Technical delay caused by pursuing wrong forum – Delay not inordinate where subsequent application dismissed as res judicata; accounting for delay assessed in context.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Inheritance evidence established ownership; tribunal had jurisdiction; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – ownership by inheritance; proof of root of title without registered certificate; District Land and Housing Tribunal jurisdiction over ownership and possession claims arising from inheritance; long-term occupation insufficient to confer ownership.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
High Court lacks jurisdiction over tax charge registration; claim also time‑barred, so application dismissed.
Tax law – tax enforcement charge under Tax Administration Act – jurisdiction of tax dispute settlement forums v. High Court; Limitation – challenge to initial registration is time‑barred; continuing wrong principle inapplicable.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
A prior final judgment on the same plots barred the later application; execution delay did not defeat res judicata.
Res judicata – constructive res judicata – preclusive effect of final judgment between same parties/privities on same subject matter; Execution of decree – limitation (12 years) applies to enforcement proceedings, not to res judicata preliminary objections; Rectification of land register – administrative process under section 99(1) Land Registration Act, no express limitation; Change of administrator – does not avoid prior judgment's effect; Finality of litigation – courts must prevent multiplicity of suits.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
Appellate court set aside tribunal judgment, declared appellants owners, voided uncorroborated village land sale and restrained respondents.
Land law – village land sale formalities and corroboration; appellate re-evaluation of conflicting evidence; jurisdictional limits where land disputes implicate matrimonial issues; assessors' opinions – requirement to consider and give reasons for departure.
|
29 November 2024 |
|
A pending notice of appeal does not oust a tribunal's jurisdiction to tax costs; the applicant's challenge was dismissed.
Taxation — jurisdiction to tax costs — effect of pending notice of appeal; Preliminary objection — whether addressed by Tribunal; Court records — presumption of accuracy and requirement of compelling evidence to impeach; Stay of proceedings — necessity to apply for stay if prosecution of appeal is to suspend taxation; Execution separate from taxation — taxation does not automatically effect enforcement of costs.
|
29 November 2024 |