|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| April 2025 |
|
|
Time spent obtaining certified judgment is excluded when computing the 45‑day appeal period; appeal held timely.
Limitation of actions – computation of appeal period under s.41(2) LDCA – automatic exclusion of time to obtain certified judgment and decree under s.19(1)–(2) Law of Limitation Act – no prior leave required – requirement to attach certified copies to memorandum of appeal.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
A suit challenging post-decree execution is barred by section 38(1) CPC and must be brought before the executing court.
Civil Procedure Code s.38(1) – execution of decree – exclusive jurisdiction of court which passed the decree to determine questions relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction – preliminary objection – pure point of law – suit struck out.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
Factual, document‑supported affidavit statements are not rendered incurably defective by implied legal conclusions.
Affidavit law – Order XIX Rule 3(1) CPC – Distinction between facts and arguments – Documentary support for affidavit statements – Preliminary objection to strike out – Incurable defect test.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
|
28 April 2025 |
|
Court granted joinder of government land authorities and leave to amend the Plaint to ensure complete adjudication.
Civil procedure — Joinder of necessary parties — Order I Rule 10(2) — Joinder permissible at any stage for effectual and complete adjudication
Pleadings — Amendment of Plaint — Order VI Rule 17 — Leave to amend to determine real issues in controversy. Government proceedings — Joining Attorney General under Government Proceedings Act where government entities (Registrar of Titles/Commissioner for Land) are involved. Land law — Disputes implicating title registration require administrative officials as parties to ensure binding relief
|
28 April 2025 |
|
Time taken to obtain certified copies is excluded from the 45‑day appeal period if the appellant applied diligently.
Land law – Appeals from DLHT – Forty-five day limitation under section 41(2) LDCA – Law of Limitation Act sections 19(2) & (3) – exclusion of time to obtain certified copies – diligence in procuring judgment – computation of limitation period.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
An application that fails to plead wrongful acts and omits necessary state parties in a land dispute is rightly struck out and appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – pleadings – disclosure of cause of action (Order VII Rule 11(a)) – pleading wrongful acts/trespass; Joinder – necessary parties, Commissioner for Lands and Attorney General in land ownership disputes (Order I Rules); Strike out/rejection vs dismissal; Requirement to plead material facts linking ownership claims to wrongful acts.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
Omission of necessary parties to original proceedings renders a revision application incompetent despite earlier admissions.
Civil procedure — Non‑joinder of necessary parties — omission renders revision application incompetent; Effect of admissions vis‑à‑vis execution orders; Order I r10(2) discretion and the overriding objective cannot cure mandatory joinder.
|
28 April 2025 |
|
Applicant failed to account for days of delay and show diligence; extension of time to appeal was refused.
Civil procedure – extension of time – section 14 Law of Limitation Act – requirement to account for every day of delay
Principles in Lyamuya and Bushiri – full explanation of delay and demonstration of diligence
Evidence – sickness and late supply of tribunal ruling insufficient without proof of timely request for copies
|
25 April 2025 |
|
Short technical delay, medical illness and alleged denial of hearing justified a 14-day extension to file appeal.
Extension of time to appeal; technical delay vs inordinate delay; medical illness and appointment evidence as cause for extension; alleged procedural illegality (denial of right to be heard) as supporting ground; negligence of counsel not automatically fatal.
|
25 April 2025 |
|
A notice of appeal does not stay execution; execution within one year made show-cause requirement inapplicable and revision was dismissed.
Land execution — execution proceedings — effect of a notice of appeal on execution — a notice of appeal does not stay execution unless a stay is ordered; Order XXI r.20 Cap 33 — summons to show cause required only where execution is sought after one year or against a legal representative; procedural pleading requirements — applicant must particularize alleged irregularities in affidavit when seeking revision.
|
25 April 2025 |
|
Unexplained, inordinate delay and failure to account for each day warranted refusal of extension to file review.
Civil procedure – extension of time under Rule 10 – duty to account for each day of delay; diligence required. New evidence – criminal investigation/conviction (Economic Case No. 4 of 2023) alleged to show forgery of residential licence – not automatically good cause for extension where respondent not party
Delay – inordinate delay and failure to act promptly after criminal judgment disentitles to condonation
|
25 April 2025 |
|
An unexplained ten-year delay after a litigant’s death and lack of medical evidence defeated an application for extension of time.
Procedure — Limitation of actions — Extension of time under section 14 Law of Limitation Act — need for good and sufficient reasons and accounting for each day of delay. Civil procedure — Death of litigant — substitution of legal representative — item 16 Part III Schedule to Cap 89 provides 90 days to make administrator/representative a party
Evidence — proof of incapacity — death certificate insufficient to prove period of chronic illness; medical evidence required to justify non-prosecution
Delay — inordinate and unexplained ten-year delay defeats application for extension of time
|
24 April 2025 |
|
Suit struck out for insufficient description of immovable property; withdrawal refused and costs awarded.
Land law/procedure – immovable property – requirement for sufficient description of subject land (Order VII Rule 3 CPC); pleadings – formal v substantive defects; withdrawal of suit (Order XXIII Rules) v striking out; costs discretion under Section 30 CPC.
|
24 April 2025 |
|
An apparent illegality (capacity to sue/necessary party) constituted sufficient cause to grant extension of time to appeal.
Civil procedure – Extension of time under s.11(1) AJA – "sufficient cause" – illegality apparent on the face of the record. Civil procedure – Capacity to sue – proceedings brought against directors vs corporate body – effect on competency of suit. Civil procedure – Joinder of necessary parties – Commissioner for Lands – when joinder is required. Land law procedure – Requirement for assessors in Land Division trials. Overriding objective – limits where mandatory provisions affect foundation of the case
|
24 April 2025 |
|
A sale by a person lacking letters of administration cannot pass title; purchaser failed to prove ownership, appeal allowed.
Land law — capacity to dispose of deceased's property; proof of title — burden of proof in civil cases; letters of administration — only grantee can validly represent deceased's estate; sale by person without title — void ab initio; appellate review — trial Tribunal must satisfy itself on vendor's capacity to pass title.
|
24 April 2025 |
|
Delay in obtaining judgment copies justified 14‑day extension; alleged illegality was not apparent on the record.
Extension of time — delay in obtaining copy of judgment — applicant given benefit of doubt where requests documented and uncontested; alleged illegality must be obvious on the face of the record to justify extension (Doto Isoda test).
|
24 April 2025 |
|
Applicant granted 14‑day extension to file appeal after electronic filing was returned for omission; court finds good cause.
Land law — Extension of time to appeal — Law of Limitation s.14 and Civil Procedure Code s.95 — Electronic filing returned for omission — Diligence and good cause — Fourteen‑day extension granted.
|
24 April 2025 |
|
Plaintiff's deviation from pleaded case and failure to produce the lease or prove indebtedness resulted in dismissal for lack of proof.
Land law – alleged lease and rent arrears – failure to produce written lease; Civil procedure – parties bound by pleadings; evidence outside pleadings fatal; Burden of proof – balance of probabilities; Settlement deed – set-off may alter claimed indebtedness; Ex parte proceedings – defendant struck out for non‑appearance.
|
24 April 2025 |
|
Parties settled an overdraft dispute; court entered consent judgment adopting a payment plan and foreclosure remedy on default.
Civil procedure – consent judgment – adoption of Deed of Settlement under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code
Insolvency/liquidation – dispute over liquidator’s claim of outstanding bank indebtedness and accounting of payments. Land law – mortgage discharge and return of title deeds upon settlement; foreclosure/auction remedy on payment default. Settlement enforcement – conditions, instalment plan, and consequences of default
|
23 April 2025 |
|
The high court finds the DLHT exceeded its jurisdiction, reinstating the Ward Tribunal's decision in a land dispute.
Land Law – Revisional jurisdiction – DLHT exceeding jurisdiction – Jurisdictional limits on extension of time – Functus officio in DLHT decisions.
|
23 April 2025 |
|
Failure to join the current registered owner as a necessary party rendered the land suit incompetent and the judgment quashed.
Land law – necessary parties – non-joinder – effect of failing to join a registered owner on competence and executability of decree; vendor as witness vs. necessary party.
|
23 April 2025 |
|
Application to remove caveat struck out as prematurely filed because no decision by the Registrar was obtained.
Procedural law – Registration of Documents Act, s.34(2)–(3) – requirement to seek Registrar’s decision before instituting High Court suit; whether Registrar’s acknowledgment letter constitutes a decision triggering the 30‑day limitation. Land registration – caveats – proper procedure for removal (Registrar application; High Court summons under s.78(4) LRA). Civil procedure – preliminary objection – competence and time limitation
|
23 April 2025 |
|
Registered owner’s land lay outside statutory railway strip; demolition unlawful and damages awarded.
Land law – registered title – proof of ownership; Railways law – definition and legal effect of 'railway strip' vs Engineers’ Manual; Demolition of structures – requirement of proper boundary ascertainment; Proof of special damages – requirement of strict, specific proof; Assessment and award of general damages for unlawful demolition.
|
23 April 2025 |
|
Committal application dismissed for reliance on hearsay and failure to call a material witness.
Contempt/Committal proceedings – requirement to prove existence of order, breach and awareness; Hearsay evidence – insufficiency in committal applications; Failure to call material witness – adverse inference (Hemedi Saidi v Mbilu).
|
17 April 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed: claimant failed to prove land ownership; pleadings and burden of proof were decisive.
Land law – burden of proof under section 110 Evidence Act – claimant must prove ownership; Pleadings bind parties – unpleaded long possession cannot be raised on appeal; Locus in quo – discretionary, required only when necessary; Civil Procedure Code (ss.3A,3B) – "oxygen" principle permitting consideration of wrongly-captioned submissions; Weight and sufficiency of title documents (Deed of Gift, Hati).
|
17 April 2025 |
|
|
15 April 2025 |
|
A suit refiled after dismissal for want of prosecution is constructive res judicata and an abuse of court process.
Res judicata – constructive res judicata – dismissal for want of prosecution bars subsequent proceedings; abuse of court process; section 9 CPC; functus officio; substitution/privy parties.
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Failure to join necessary parties directly affects injunctive relief applications, rendering them incompetent and subject to striking out.
Civil procedure – Temporary injunction – Joinder of necessary parties – Non-joinder of buyer and broker – Incompetence of application – Right to be heard – Inability to grant effective relief without all necessary parties.
|
14 April 2025 |
|
Revision dismissed: District Tribunal properly executed intact Ward Tribunal decree; earlier appeals did not invalidate execution.
Land law – Revision under s.43(1)(b) – Execution of Ward Tribunal decree – Functus officio – Limitation and jurisdiction – Failure to file counter‑affidavit.
|
11 April 2025 |
|
Payments and site inspection without registration or certificate of occupancy do not establish ownership of registered land.
Land law – ownership of registered land determined by registration and certificate of occupancy; burden of proof in civil claims; payments/receipts and site inspection insufficient to establish ownership; title search and registration conclusive absent proof of fraud; refusal to cancel registered title.
|
11 April 2025 |
|
Failure to file court-ordered written submissions and absence without notice justifies dismissal for want of prosecution.
Civil procedure – Extension of time (s.11 Appellate Jurisdiction Act) – written submissions – failure to file as ordered – want of prosecution – dismissal with costs.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
Failure to account for days of delay defeats extension of time to seek setting aside of an ex parte judgment.
Civil procedure – extension of time under Section 14(1) Law of Limitation Act – requirement to account for every day of delay; Lyamuya guidelines applied
Procedure – ex parte judgment – allegations of defective/substituted service belong to substantive setting-aside application, not extension stage
Authority – Hassan Bushiri (account for each day) and Lyamuya Constructions (factors for extension)
|
10 April 2025 |
|
A Registrar's rectification notice must be appealed under section 102 before initiating a suit; suit struck out.
Land Registration Act s.102 – Appeal against act, order or decision of Registrar of Titles – Notice for rectification as an "act" invoking statutory appeal – Preliminary objection on point of law – Requirement to exhaust statutory appeal remedy before suing.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
Plaintiff established title to the disputed land; defendants declared trespassers, restrained and ordered to demolish structures at their cost.
Land law — Proof of title by sale agreement and witness evidence; burden and weight of evidence — where plaintiff’s evidence is heavier the claim succeeds; unpleaded facts raised at trial unreliable; trespass — declaration, injunction and demolition as remedies; award of costs.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
Court granted extension to applicant because taxation ruling showed apparent illegality excluding parties and misallocating costs.
Extension of time – Advocates Remuneration Order (Order 8) – principles in Lyamuya: account for all delay, no inordinate delay, diligence required – illegality apparent on face of record justifying extension – taxation proceedings where parties were excluded and costs misallocated.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
An application based on an affidavit attested by an unqualified person was struck out as incurably defective.
Civil Procedure – Affidavit – Attestation by unqualified person – Effect – Overriding objective rule – Application to incurable defects – Application struck out for defective affidavit.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
Proceedings quashed for failure to sufficiently and distinctly describe the subject land in pleadings, rendering suit incompetent.
Land law – description of unsurveyed land – sufficiency of subject matter identification – nullity of proceedings for vagueness – Order VII Rule 3 of CPC applied – revisionary powers of High Court.
|
10 April 2025 |
|
|
9 April 2025 |
|
Interim injunction granted to protect applicant's contractual interest in land pending main suit determination.
Land law – interim injunction – prerequisites: prima facie triable issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience; contract for land in exchange for town‑planning/survey works; intervention and multiple conflicting defences indicating risk of third‑party interference; injunction over whole parcel where subdivision not yet identifiable.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Appellant failed to prove customary ownership; village allocation documents supported respondent’s title and appeal was dismissed with costs.
Land law – customary ownership and proof of possession; village land allocation – evidentiary chain (application, DAS letter, receipts, uthibitisho) sufficient; non‑production of minutes or private sale agreements not necessarily fatal; variance between pleadings and testimony undermines claimant; burden of proof on claimant.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
High Court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction; preliminary objection upheld and suit struck out for improper forum choice.
Land law – Pecuniary jurisdiction of High Court (Land Division) – Section 37 Land Disputes Courts Act; Preliminary objection – pure point of law determinable from plaint and annexures (Mukisa principle); Specific law (Land Disputes Courts Act) overrides general provisions (Section 13 CPC); Exchange rate annexure determinative of monetary value.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Non-joinder of third-party occupants who were not made parties did not amount to material error justifying revision; application dismissed with costs.
Land law – non-joinder and necessary parties – revisional jurisdiction under section 43(1)(b) – material error and injustice – locus standi of strangers to original proceedings – finality of litigation.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Review granted for overlooked prayer; applicant given 14 days to lodge the intended appeal, no costs.
Land — Extension of time — Notice of intention to appeal and extension to file appeal — Review for omission — Where the grounds for delay are the same and delay is accounted for, omission to adjudicate second prayer may be remedied by review; applicant allowed to file appeal within specified period.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
High Court dismissed stay application for tribunal proceedings for failure to show danger to property and for being filed in the wrong forum.
Civil Procedure – Order XXXVII Rule 1 CPC – temporary injunction/stay of proceedings – applicant must show property in danger of being wasted, damaged, alienated or losing value. Requirements for injunctive relief – Attilio v Mbowe test – cumulative conditions must be pleaded and proved. Forum-competence – stay of tribunal proceedings should be sought in the tribunal where proceedings are pending; High Court not proper forum for such relief in these circumstances
Procedural – substituted service where respondents absent
|
8 April 2025 |
|
High Court nullified and struck out taxation proceedings for incompetence due to non-payment of prescribed filing fees and time-bar.
Land law — District Land and Housing Tribunal procedure — Regulation 3(1) (payment of prescribed filing fees) — competence of proceedings; Advocates Remuneration Order (Order 4) — time for filing bill of costs; Taxing Officer’s powers — sustaining preliminary objection vs ordering subsequent fee payment; High Court supervisory jurisdiction — Sections 42 and 43 Land Disputes Courts Act — nullification and striking out of incompetent proceedings.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Taxing master properly disallowed instruction and attendance fees for lack of proof; taxation costs not awarded.
Advocates Remuneration Order GN No.263 of 2015 – taxation of bills of costs – burden of proof for instruction and attendance fees – statutory scales (8th and 11th Schedules) – entitlement to costs of taxation where bill reduced – exercise of taxing officer’s discretion.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Surviving joint tenant established sole ownership of the Mbweni house; no proprietary share awarded in Mpigi-Magohe.
Land law – joint tenancy and survivorship – transfer documents as primary proof of joint ownership; Allegations of forgery require strict proof; Contributions to improvements may create equitable claims but must be proved and quantified; Mediation consent incorporated into court decree; Administrator of estate holds lands not passing by survivorship for deceased's heirs.
|
8 April 2025 |
|
Objection proceedings under Order XXI Rule 57 can exclude third‑party properties from execution if prima facie interest and possession are shown.
Execution – Order XXI Rule 57(1) – Objection proceedings by third parties to attachment of property in execution
Execution – Order XXI Rule 58 – Burden on objector to prove interest in and possession of attached property at time of attachment; prima facie title/possession sufficient in summary inquiry. Land law – Priority of title – priority principle not dispositive in summary objection proceedings; substantive suit required to resolve competing titles
Procedure – Objection vs revision – objection proceedings may protect third‑party property without altering original decree
|
8 April 2025 |
|
The High Court reversed a Tribunal's dismissal for being time-barred, ordering amendment to correct a pleading error.
Civil Procedure – amendment of pleadings – correction of typographical errors – discretion of courts and tribunals to permit amendments.
|
4 April 2025 |