|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| August 2025 |
|
|
A suit for land ownership must include the registered owner as a necessary party to effectually resolve the dispute.
Civil Procedure – Cause of action – Joinder of necessary parties – Disputed land ownership – Registered owner as necessary defendant – Order VII Rule 1(e) CPC.
|
21 August 2025 |
|
Application for extension of time to challenge Taxing Master's ruling dismissed for failure to show sufficient cause or apparent illegality.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Principles governing grant – Dilatory conduct and accountability for delay – Apparent illegality as a ground for extension – Duty of diligence by parties.
|
21 August 2025 |
|
A costs award was set aside where the Tribunal had ordered costs to follow the main suit's outcome, not immediate taxation.
Costs—Award of party-and-party costs—Interpretation of 'costs to follow the event'—Application to enforce bill of costs in contravention of court order—Quashing of erroneous taxation award—Civil Procedure Code s 30(2).
|
20 August 2025 |
|
Extension of time refused where delay was unexplained and alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record.
Civil Procedure – Extension of time – requirements for accounting for every day of delay – sufficiency of grounds – late knowledge and alleged illegality as grounds for extension – necessity of illegality being apparent on the face of the record – abuse of process by parallel proceedings.
|
20 August 2025 |
|
Disputed land could proceed to trial as defendants failed to prove it was subject to a prior court attachment order.
Land law – execution of judgment – attachment and sale of immovable property – propriety of filing objection proceedings versus instituting a fresh suit – proof required to establish identity of attached property as subject matter of present dispute.
|
20 August 2025 |
|
The court dismissed a revision application for lack of merit, finding no material error or procedural irregularity in the tribunal's proceedings.
Civil procedure – Land disputes – Revision – Non-joinder of parties in execution proceedings – High Court revisional powers under section 43(1)(b) – Requirement to demonstrate material error or procedural irregularity causing injustice.
|
20 August 2025 |
|
The Tribunal properly refused a stay because only the Court of Appeal may grant a stay once appellate proceedings are lodged.
Civil procedure – Stay of execution – Jurisdiction – Once proceedings are before the Court of Appeal the trial tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant stay; only the Court of Appeal may grant stay of execution
Appeals – Effect of lodging appeal – Lodging proceedings at the Court of Appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction over stay applications. Land disputes – Execution of tribunal orders – Execution not automatically suspended by parallel or prior applications unless appellate court grants stay
|
20 August 2025 |
|
Application struck out for being supported by an affidavit containing impermissible arguments and conclusions; no order as to costs.
Civil procedure — Affidavits — Order XIX r.3(1) CPC — Affidavits must state facts, not arguments or conclusions — Defective paragraphs may be expunged — After expunction remaining affidavit must be sufficient — Incompetent application struck out. Execution/objection proceedings — third‑party claim in execution.
|
20 August 2025 |
|
Appellants' land ownership claim dismissed due to lack of proof and contradicting evidence; Tribunal's procedure upheld.
Land Law – Evidence of ownership – abandonment and re-possession – credibility of oral testimony – compliance with legal procedures for assessor opinions – locus in quo visits not mandatory unless circumstances require.
|
20 August 2025 |
|
Appellate court allowed the owner's appeal, excluding unverified construction costs and finding the tenant had overstayed, overturning the tribunal order.
Land law – lease/construction agreement – commencement date and cut-off for recoverable construction costs – admissibility of unilateral cost breakdowns – role and weight of assessors’ opinions; tribunal procedure – locus in quo visits discretionary and must be supported by record; contract interpretation – verification and recording obligations; remedy for overstay/trespass.
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Court affirms lawful ownership of land based on clear evidence and dismisses appeal against damage award for trespass and crop destruction.
Land law – priority of ownership – sale agreements – proof of title – evidentiary principles – award of damages for destruction of crops – assessment of documentary evidence – appeal dismissed for lack of merit.
|
19 August 2025 |
|
A preliminary objection on locus standi can be decided from pleadings where title documents show a different name.
Land law — locus standi — preliminary objection — point of law apparent on face of record — identity of registered proprietor vs deceased — absence of deed poll or proof of name-change — dismissal with costs.
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Review application struck out as incompetent because the same issues were already decided on appeal; costs follow event.
Civil procedure — Review — Order XLII Rule 1 CPC — Review confined to clerical errors, mistakes on the face of the record, or newly discovered evidence — Incompetence where review seeks to re-open issues already decided on appeal; functus officio/section 78(1) raised but not determined.
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Review application struck out as incompetent because it sought to re-agitate issues already decided on appeal.
Civil Procedure – Review under Order XLII Rule 1 – limited to new evidence, clerical/arithmetic or apparent errors on the face of the record
Civil Procedure – Functus officio – matters already determined on appeal are not open to review by the same court
Civil Procedure – Interaction of review jurisdiction and section 78(1) of the Civil Procedure Code
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Delay and inadequate evidence meant the Tribunal rightly found against the appellant; appeal dismissed.
Land law – Boundary/trespass dispute; evaluation of evidence and credibility; harmless error in documentary dates; weight of Tribunal site visit and sketch; effect of delay (laches) on trespass claims.
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed: remote medical evidence and repeated non-appearance did not justify setting aside ex-parte execution order.
Civil procedure – Execution – Ex-parte proceedings – Setting aside ex-parte order – Adequacy of reasons for non-appearance; medical evidence must show incapacity on hearing date. Civil procedure – Fair hearing – Requirement to show sufficient cause for failure to appear; repeated non-appearance supports ex-parte proceedings. Stay of execution – Not warranted where appellant fails to demonstrate prima facie illegality or deprivation of right to be heard
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Whether construction timing and accounted costs determine lease duration and entitlement to damages.
Contract interpretation – lease/construction agreement – commencement date and effect of commencement of trading as cut‑off for recoverable construction costs. Calculation of tenure – deducting construction costs from agreed monthly rent to determine duration
Damages – entitlement to specific and general damages where accounting for construction costs and rent is disputed
Costs – discretion to award costs and rule that unsuccessful party is not entitled to costs. Evidentiary weight of cost breakdowns and timing of expenditures
|
19 August 2025 |
|
Leave to file a representative suit does not entitle applicants to defend or join existing proceedings in a representative capacity.
Civil Procedure – Representative action – Leave to institute versus leave to defend – Limitations on scope of representative capacity – Abuse of court process by acting outside granted leave – Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code interpreted.
|
18 August 2025 |
|
|
18 August 2025 |
|
An appellant’s claim to land ownership failed due to contradictory evidence and inability to prove vendors' title or legal capacity.
Land law – ownership – burden of proof in land disputes – evidentiary contradictions in land sale agreements – capacity and title of vendors – procedures on evidentiary documents – curable errors under the principle of overriding objective.
|
18 August 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed for failure to establish lawful ownership over disputed property in the absence of sufficient evidence.
Land law – Disputed ownership – Burden of proof – Evaluation of evidence – Reliance on oral over documentary evidence – Appeal dismissed for failure to prove lawful ownership.
|
18 August 2025 |
|
A temporary injunction was denied for lack of proof of imminent threat and failure to meet the conditions established by law.
Land law – Temporary injunctions – Proof of irreparable harm – Need for documentary evidence of imminent threat – Requirements for grant of injunction under Atilio v
Mbowe – Dismissal where cumulative conditions not met
|
15 August 2025 |
|
Instruction fees in costs taxation can be further reduced where the underlying case is withdrawn at a preliminary stage.
Costs – Taxation – One-sixth rule – Excessive instruction fee – Powers of taxing officer – Advocates Remuneration Order, 2015 – Inclusion of unrelated matters in bill of costs – Court’s power to alter award.
|
15 August 2025 |
|
The court set aside a tribunal ruling for failure to accord the appellant the right to be heard before dismissal.
Land law – Appeals – Limitation period – Exclusion of time for obtaining certified copy of ruling – Right to be heard (natural justice) – Allegations of bias – Restoration of application following technical dismissal – Proper procedure for striking out applications.
|
15 August 2025 |
|
Application for revision found premature and struck out; remedy after striking out for incompetence is to refile, not revise.
Civil Procedure – Application for revision – Section 89(1) Civil Procedure Code – Striking out for incompetence – Proper remedy to refile – No jurisdictional or procedural error shown – Abuse of process.
|
15 August 2025 |
|
Denial of natural justice and lack of tribunal records justify extension of time to challenge a land decision.
Land Law – Extension of time – Failure to serve summons – Denial of right to be heard – District Tribunal’s duty to call for lower tribunal records – Illegality as ground for extension – Procedural fairness.
|
15 August 2025 |
|
Extension of time granted where technical striking-out and alleged illegality justified the applicants' delay.
Civil procedure – Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal – s.11(1) Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 10 – technical striking out of notice of appeal – alleged illegality on face of record – accounting for delay – reliance on Lyamuya, Devram Valambhia, Masatu Mwinzarubi.
|
14 August 2025 |
|
|
14 August 2025 |
|
A land tribunal lacked jurisdiction over contractual debt enforcement, and its decision against a deceased person was tainted by illegality and bias.
Land law – Jurisdiction – Whether District Land and Housing Tribunal can hear contractual loan disputes where land is used as collateral – Illegality as sufficient ground for extension of time – Judgment entered against a deceased person – Evaluation of evidence; fair hearing and bias – Duty to recuse arising from appearance of bias.
|
14 August 2025 |
|
Court quashes Tribunal's ruling for lack of jurisdiction, procedural irregularities, and conflict of interest, granting extension to set aside judgment.
Land law – Jurisdiction – Debt recovery secured by land – Illegality as ground for extension of time – Judgment against deceased – Procedural fairness and bias – Right to be heard.
|
14 August 2025 |
|
|
14 August 2025 |
|
Suit struck out for non-joinder of necessary parties, preventing issuance of an effective and executable decree.
Civil procedure — Non-joinder of necessary parties — Duty of court to add parties where absence prevents effective and executable decree — Road reserve claim by public authority — Striking out for incompetence.
|
14 August 2025 |
|
An application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was dismissed due to failure to account for delay and lack of apparent illegality.
Civil Procedure – Extension of time – Application for extension of time to file notice of appeal – Sufficient cause – Illegality as ground for extension – Overriding objective – Non-fatal procedural defects – Requirement to account for each day of delay.
|
14 August 2025 |
|
A temporary injunction was refused as the applicant failed to show irreparable harm or that damages would be inadequate pending arbitration.
Land law – application for temporary injunction – lease dispute pending arbitration – cumulative requirements for injunction – adequacy of damages as remedy – Attilio v Mbowe principles considered.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
An application relying on an affidavit containing legal arguments and extraneous matter is incompetent and must be struck out.
Civil Procedure – Affidavits – Order XIX Rule 3 CPC – Inclusion of extraneous matter in affidavits – Effect of non-severable defects – Competence of applications dependent on defective affidavits.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Extension of time granted due to technical delay and alleged illegality in the appealed decision, permitting a fresh Notice of Appeal.
Appellate procedure – extension of time – technical delay – sufficient cause for extension of time – illegality as an independent ground for extension of time – diligent prosecution of appeal – late filing of reminder letter – computation and accounting for delay.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Application for extension of time based on alleged illegality in cost proceedings dismissed for lack of apparent illegality.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Sufficient cause – Illegality as ground for extension – Requirement that illegality be apparent on the face of the record – Parties to bill of costs proceedings.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
A tribunal's failure to determine the core issue of land ownership invalidates its decision and necessitates a full retrial.
Land law – appellate review – failure by the lower tribunal to determine core issue of ownership – retrial ordered – importance of determining all framed issues
|
13 August 2025 |
|
A DLHT decision over registered land was set aside for lack of jurisdiction and non-joinder of necessary parties.
Land law – Jurisdiction – Registered land – Non-joinder of necessary parties – Registrar of Titles, Commissioner for Land, Attorney General – Requirement for Ward Tribunal mediation – Retrospective application of law.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Individual church members lack locus standi to challenge trust property transactions without following statutory procedures.
Trusts – locus standi – beneficiaries – powers of registered trustees – requirement for Attorney General consent – religious trust property – preliminary objection – capacity to sue.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Individual church members lack locus standi to sue over trust property without written consent from the Attorney General.
Trusts law – locus standi – religious organizations – capacity of church members to sue regarding trust property – requirement for Attorney General's consent under section 67 CPC.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Church members lack standing to sue over trust property without the Attorney General's written consent under section 67 CPC.
Trust law – locus standi – beneficiaries' right to sue – trustees' powers – consent of Attorney General – Civil Procedure Code, section 67 – Trustees Incorporation Act, section 8 – church property – trust property – procedural requirements in trust disputes.
|
13 August 2025 |
|
Technical procedural defects (signing, unsworn evidence, one assessor absent) were curable and did not invalidate the tribunal's decision.
Land law – procedural formalities – presiding officer's signatures and authentication of proceedings; Evidence – oath/affirmation – unsworn evidence curable where non-prejudicial; Land disputes – sufficiency of pleadings and description of land under regulation 3(2)(b) GN.174/2003; Tribunal composition – assessors' absence – s.23(3) Land Disputes Courts Act allows continuation; Appeal – procedural irregularities do not vitiate proceedings absent prejudice.
|
12 August 2025 |
|
A tribunal may not entertain further enforcement applications after execution is concluded and is functus officio, absent obstruction evidence.
Land Law – Execution of decrees – Order XXI Rule 97 Civil Procedure Code – Obstruction or resistance – Functus officio – Judicial consistency and jurisdiction – Contradictory rulings – Civil versus criminal enforcement.
|
12 August 2025 |
|
A mortgagee cannot survey and register mortgaged land in their name without the mortgagor's consent or compliance with statutory procedures.
Land law – Mortgages – Pledge of land as security – Whether a mortgagee can lawfully survey and transfer ownership without mortgagor's consent – Registration of land – Burden of proof – Reliefs for unlawful registration and occupation of mortgaged property
|
11 August 2025 |
|
A donor of loan security was declared rightful owner after the mortgagee improperly registered the property, with counterclaim dismissed.
Land law – Mortgage – Pledge of land as loan security – Remedies of mortgagee – Survey and registration of mortgaged property without consent – Ownership and title rectification – Counterclaim for improvements – Burden of proof.
|
11 August 2025 |
|
A land suit lacking a sufficient property description was struck out for failing to meet legal requirements for land disputes.
Land Law – Civil Procedure – Requirement for sufficient property description in land disputes – Inadequate identification of suit land – Proceedings and judgment based on vague property description set aside – Order VII Rule 3 CPC and Regulation 3(2)(b) of GN. No. 174 of 2003 construed
|
11 August 2025 |
|
A guarantor's liability is triggered upon loan default where pledged assets are unavailable, absent strong evidence to the contrary.
Land law – Guarantee – Default by principal debtor – Remedies against guarantor – Burden of proof – Collateral and realization of securities – Contractual liability of guarantors.
|
7 August 2025 |
|
Ex-parte land tribunal judgment set aside for failure to summon appellant and notify judgment date, violating rights to be heard.
Land law – jurisdiction – ex-parte proceedings – right to be heard – procedural irregularities – failure to notify of hearing and judgment dates – ex-parte judgment set aside for non-compliance with due process
|
7 August 2025 |
|
Sickness of counsel and alleged judgment irregularities were held insufficient to restore an appeal dismissed for non-appearance.
Civil procedure – Application to set aside dismissal order – Sufficient cause for non-appearance – Sickness of advocate – Discrepancy in evidence – Alleged illegality of judgment as ground for restoration – Negligence of counsel.
|
6 August 2025 |