Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
English
Kiswahili
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Government Gazette
Practice Essentials
Judiciary Guidelines & Procedures
National Prosecution Service Guidelines & Manuals
Tanganyika Law Society Guidelines & Manuals
Research Hub
TanzLII Case Digest
Tanzania Law Report
Law Reform Commission Reports
Legal Journals
Articles
Notable Speeches
Paralegal Knowledge Hub
Collections
Street Law
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Help
Home
Collections
Tanzania Law Reports
Labour Law
2 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Labour Law
Filters
Years
1977
Topics
Court Procedures
Malipo ya ujira yaanze atakapoanza kazi
Mfanyakazi arudishwe kazini
Overtime pay
Reinstatement Orders
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
2 documents
Title
Date
General Marketing Co. Ltd. v. A.A. Shariff (Civil Revision 8 of 1977) [1977] TZHC 6 (16 November 1977)
Reported
Ministerial reinstatement orders are enforceable without court decree; referral to a Labour Officer is not obligatory; wages start on return to work.
Security of Employment Act – enforcement of Ministerial decisions – ss.27 and 41: Minister’s decision final, conclusive and enforceable as if decree; Labour law – Employment Ordinance ss.130–132: referral to Labour Officer not a condition precedent to court enforcement; Interpretation of Swahili phrases – 'Mfanyakazi arudishwe kazini' (reinstatement) and 'Malipo ya ujira yaanze atakapoanza kazi' (wages commence on resumption).
Judgment
16 November 1977
Saidi Mzungumwana v. The Manager of SODECO-Songea ((PC) Civil Appeal 1 of 1976) [1977] TZHC 7 (15 November 1977)
Reported
Contract - Employment - Employee entitled to overtime when contract is silent
Contract - Employment - Employee watchman and his family living on the premises of employer at employee's request and not because of exigencies of his employment - Not entitled to overtime during night unless he proves he was on duty
Judgment
15 November 1977
1
>