Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
English
Kiswahili
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Government Gazette
Practice Essentials
Judiciary Guidelines & Procedures
National Prosecution Service Guidelines & Manuals
Tanganyika Law Society Guidelines & Manuals
Research Hub
TanzLII Case Digest
Tanzania Law Report
Law Reform Commission Reports
Legal Journals
Articles
Notable Speeches
Paralegal Knowledge Hub
Collections
Street Law
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Help
Home
Collections
Tanzania Law Reports
National Security
1 document
Advanced search
Filters
National Security
Filters
Years
1976
Topics
Duplex charge
Foreign agent
Mitigation and cooperation
Prejudicial communication
Presumptions under the National Security Act
Statement made to a police officer
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
1 document
Title
Date
Juma Thomas Zangira v. Republic (Criminal Appeal 1 of 1978) [1976] TZHC 4 (20 March 1976)
Reported
Evidence - Admissibility - Statement made to a police officer - Appellant told justice of the peace the statement he made to the police was enough-Justice of the Peace not shown the statement - Whether such statement can be incorporated in the statement made to justice of the peace - Whether admissible as a confession - Whether admissible -Whether it amounts to an admission or not
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charge - Duplex - Defence clear what the case against appellant was - Whether defect curable - S.346 of the
Criminal Procedure Code National Security - Espionage and Sabotage - National Security Act- Foreign agent - Whether the person (John Wilson) with whom appellant was communicating was a "foreign agent" - S.2(1) and s.12(1) of the National Security Act
National Security - Espionage - Appellant alleged to have communicated with foreign agent - Whether necessary to prove which particular state or states the alleged agent was working for
National Security - Espionage - When presumption under s.12(1) of the National Security Act comes into play - Effect of the presumption
National Security - Spying on designated organization - Evidence of communication - No order of exact nature or type of information - Whether information for purposes prejudicial to the safety or interests of a designated organization
National Security - Spying on a designated organization - Presumption under s.9(3) of the
National Security Act - When it can come into play
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Sentencing - Co-operation with police - Conviction based on presumption only - Extent of damage impossible to ascertain - Benefit to appellant
Judgment
20 March 1976
1
>