High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions.

Physical address

24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004

Visit website

https://jmap.judiciary.go.tz/jmap/jmap-hc

36,113 judgments

Advanced search

Court registries

All years

Filters

Filters
Judges

Aboud, J.

Agatho, J.

Amour, J.

Arufani, J.

Bade, J.

Bahati Salema, J.

Bahati, J.

Bampikya, SDR

Banzi, J.

Barthy, J.

Biron, J.

Bong, J.

Bongole, J.

Bubeshi, J.

Bukuku, J.

Bwana, J.

Bwana, J.A.

Bwegoge, J.

Chaba, J.

Chande, J.

Chikoyo, J.

Chinguwile, J.

Chipeta, J.

Chocha, J.

Chua, J.

Chuma, J.

Chuwa, J.

D'Souza, Ag. J.

De-Mello, J.

Ding'ohi, J.

Dyansobera, J.

Ebrahim, J.

Feleshi, J.

Feleshi, J.K.

Fikirini, J.

Galeba, J.

Gileba, J.

Gonzi, J.

Gwae, J.

Hamid, C.J.

Hassan, J.

Hema, J.

Hemedi, J.

Ihayo, J.

Ihema, J.

Isaya, J.

Ismail, J.

Issa, J.

Itemba, J.

Juma, J.

Jundu, J.

Jundu, J.K

Kadilu, J.

Kaduri, J.

Kafanabo, J

Kaganda, J.

Kagomba, J.

Kah, J.

Kahyoza, J.

Kaijage, D.R.

Kaijage, J.

Kaijage, J.A.

Kainda, J.

Kairo, J.

Kajeri, J.

Kaji, J.

Kakolaki, J.

Kalegeya, J.

Kalombola, J.

Kalunde, J.

Kamana, J.

Kamuzora, J.

Kannonyele, J.

Kapoor, Ag. J.

Karayemaha, J.

Karua, J.

Katiti, J.

Kawishe, J.

Kazimoto, J.

Kente, J.

Kerefu, J.

Khaday, J.

Khalfan, J.

Khamis, J.

Kibella, J.

Kihio, J.

Kihwelo, J.

Kilekamajenga, J.

Kileo, J.

Kilimi, J.

Kimaro, J

Kimaro, J.

Kimaro, J.A.

Kimicha, J.

Kinyaka, J.

Kirekiano, J.

Kisanga, J.

Kisanya, J.

Kitusi, J.

Kiwonde, J.

Komba, J.

Korosso, J.

Korosso, J.A.

Kulita, J.

Kwariko, J.

Kwariko, J.A.

Kyando, J.

Laltaika, J.

Lawena, J.

Lila, J.

Lillian, J.

Longopa, J.

Longway, J.

Luanda, J.

Luanda, J.A.

Lubuva, J.

Lugakingira, J

Lugakingira, J.

Lugakingira, J.A.

Lukelelwa, J.

Luvanda, J.

Luvuba, J.

Lyimo, J.

Mackanja, J.

Madeha, J.

Maghimbi, J.

Magoiga, J.

Mahimbali, J.

Maige, J.

Maige, J.A.

Maina, J.

Makame, J.A.

Makani, J.

Makanja, J.

Makaramba, J.

Makungu, J.

Makuru, J.

Malata, J.

Mallaba, J.

Mambi, J.

Mandia, J.

Mandia, J.A.

Manento, J.

Mango, J.

Mansoor, J.

Manyanda, J.

Mapigano, J.

Mapigano, J.A.

Maruma, J.

Masabo, J.

Masaju, J.

Masanche, J.

Masara, J.

Mashaka, J.

Mashauri, J.

Masoud, J.

Massam, J.

Massati, J.

Massengi, J.

Matogolo, J.

Matui, J.

Matuma, J.

Matupa, J.

Mbagwa, J.

Mchome, J.

Mdemu, J.

Mfalila, J.

Mganga, J.

Mgaya, J.

Mgetta, J.

Mgeyekwa, J.

Mgonya, J.

Mhina, J.

Mihayo, J.

Mipawa, J.

Mirindo, J.

Mjasiri, J.

Mjasiri, J.A.

Mjemmas, J.

Mkapa, J.

Mkasimongwa, J.

Mkeha, J.

Mkude, J.

Mkuye, J.

Mkwawa, J.

Mkwizu, J.

Mlacha, J.

Mlay, J.

Mlyambina, J.

Mmila, J.

Mmilla, J.A.

Mnyukwa, J.

Mnzavas, J.A.

Mnzavas, J.K.

Mohamed, J.

Mongella, J.

Morris, J.

Moshi, J.

Mpaze, J.

Mrango, J.

Mrema, J.

Mrisha, J.

Mroso, J.

Mruke, J.

Mruma, J.

Mruso, J.

Msafiri, J.

Msoffe, J.

Msoffe, PRM-E.J.

Mstimi, J.K.

Msumi, J.

Msuya, J.

Mtembwa, J.

Mtenga, J.

Mteule, J.

Mtulya, J.

Mtungi, J.

Mugasha, J.

Mugasha, J.A.

Mugeta, J.

Mujulizi, J.

Munisi, J.

Munuo, J.

Munyera, J.

Muro, J.

Muruke, J.

Muruke, J.A.

Mushi, J.

Musokwa, J.

Mussa, J.

Mutungi, J.

Mwaikasu, J.

Mwaikugile, J.

Mwaikusa, J.

Mwaimu, J.

Mwakahesya, J.

Mwakapeje, J.

Mwakasendo, J.

Mwakibete, J.

Mwalusamya, J.

Mwalusanya, J.

Mwambegele, J.

Mwambegele, J.A.

Mwampashi, J.

Mwandambo, J.

Mwandambo, J.A.

Mwanga, J.

Mwangesi, J.

Mwangesi, J.A.

Mwarija, J.

Mwarija, J.A.

Mwaseba, J.

Mwenda, J.

Mwenegoha, J.

Mwenempazi, J.

Mwipopo, J.

Mwita, J.

Mziray, J.

Mzuna, J.

Nangela, J.

Nchalla, J.

Nchimbi, J.

Ndesamburo, J.

Ndika, J.

Ndika, J.A.

Ndumbaro, J.

Ndunguru, J.

Ngigwana, J.

Ngunyale, J.

Ngwala, J.

Ngwembe, J.

Nkwabi, J.

Nongwa, J.

Nsekela, J.

Nyalali, J.

Nyangarika, J.

Nyerere, J.

Omari, J.

Opiyo, J.

Oriyo, J.

Oriyo, J.A.

Otaru, J.

Othman, C.J.

Othman, J.

Phillip, J.

Pomo, J.

Ramadhani, C.J.

Ramadhani, J.

Ramadhani, J.A.

Robert, J.

Rubama, J.

Rugazia, J.

Ruhangisa, J.

Ruhumbika, J.

Rumanyika, J.

Rumisha, J.

Rutakangwa, J.

Rutatinisibwa, J.

Rwakibarila, J.

Rweyemamu, J.

Rwizile, J.

Samatta, J.

Samatta, J.A.

Samatta, J.K.

Sambo, J.

Sameji, J.

Sarwatt, J.

Sehel, J.

Sehel, J.A.

Sekule, J.

Sepetu, J.

Shaidi, J.

Shangali, J.

Shangwa, J.

Shayo, J.

Sheikh, J.

Simfukwe, J.

Sinda, J.

Sisya, J.

Siyani, J.

Siyani, J.K.

Songoro, J.

Sumari, J.

Teemba, J.

Thema, J.

Tiganga, J.

Twaib, J.

Utamwa, J.

Uzia, J.

Wambali, J.

Wambura, J.

Werema, J.
Outcomes

Aappeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, order that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith unless he is held for some other lawful cause.

Accept the invitation extended to us by the learned counsel of the parties and hereby invoke our power of revision bestowed upon us under section 4 (2) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 of the Revised Edition 2019, quash and set aside the entire proceedings and judgment of the trial court together with subsequent orders, further direct that Land Case No. 46 of 2014 be set down for trial after the Registrar of Titles is joined as a party in terms of Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the CPC,

Access acquited

Accordingly the application allowed, that means, if this application is not granted, the respondent will proceed to evict the applicant from the suit premises. For that matter, execution of the decree in Land Case No. 16 of 2017 (Mruma J.) dated 23rd April, 2021 is hereby stayed pending the determination of Civil Appeal No. 431 of 2021.

Accused person acquitted

Accused person be kept in a mental health Hospital, as a mental disordered offender

Accused person convicted

Allow appellant's appeal, quash conviction, set aside the sentence imposed on him and proceed to order his immediate release from custody unless otherwise lawfully held

Allow the first ground of appeal and hold that, the prosecution case was not proved beyond reasonable doubt

Appeal allowed , accordingly quash the appellant's conviction and substitute it with an acquittal resulting into setting aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, consequently, order for immediate release of the appellant from prison unless he is being held for some other lawful cause

Appeal allowed and order the appellant to be released from custody unless he is otherwise held for other lawful cause (s).

Appeal dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal Allowed with costs

Appeal No. 619 of 2022 allowed to the extent indicated and strike out Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2023

Appeal Struck out with costs

Appeal allowed

Appeal allowed and consequently, quash the proceedings of both the Tribunal and the High Court and set aside the resultant Judgments

Appeal allowed the appellant's conviction is quashed and the sentence meted out to him is set aside, henceforth, order the immediate release of the appellant from prison if he is not otherwise retained for some other lawful cause

Appeal allowed , further quash the conviction against the appellant and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant.

Appeal allowed , quash conviction of murder against the appellant and set aside the sentence of death passed, and substitute for a conviction of manslaughter.

Appeal allowed quash and set aside the appellant's conviction for murder and sentence of death

Appeal allowed, the judgment, proceedings and the decree of the Mining Commission are hereby quashed and set aside. Further, direct the Mining dispute No. 04 of 2022 between the parties herein be heard afresh and expeditiously by another Arbiter according to the prevailing laws.

Appeal allowed, quash conviction and set aside the appellant's death sentence, immediate release of the appellant from prison unless held for other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, the appellant should be released from prison forthwith, unless held for other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash the appellant's conviction and set aside the sentence. The appellant should be released from prison forthwith unless he is held for other lawful cause

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence and the appellant be immediately set free unless held for some other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on him. We further order the appellant be released from the prison forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. We further order the immediate release of the appellant from prison unless he is otherwise lawfully held.

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction, set aside the sentences meted out against the appellants. We further order that, the appellants be released forthwith from custody unless held for other lawful reasons

Appeal allowed, quash the convictions and set aside the sentence the appellants be immediately set free unless held for some other lawful cause.

Appeal being unmeritorious, is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal devoid of merit and it is hereby dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal dismiss it entirely

Appeal dismiss it in its entirety

Appeal dismiss it in its entirety with costs

Appeal dismiss it on its entirety

Appeal dismissed

Appeal dismissed with costs

Appeal dismissed in its entirety

Appeal dismissed it entirely

Appeal dismissed with costs to the third respondent

Appeal failed

Appeal fails and dismissed

Appeal fails in its entirely, thus dismissed.

Appeal granted

Appeal has no merit and it is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal has no merit and it is dismissed it with costs

Appeal is allowed in part as indicated in this judgment with costs.

Appeal is allowed, conviction quashed and sentence set aside. The appellants are to be set at liberty forthwith, unless otherwise lawfully held.

Appeal is barren of fruits and we accordingly dismiss it in its entirety

Appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn upon the expiry of the prescribed period of sixty days after its lodgment for failure by the respondent to institute the appeal upon been issued with the certificate of delay each party to bear its own costs

Appeal is devoid of merit and dismissed it.

Appeal is devoid of merit and dismiss it.

Appeal is devoid of merit, accordingly, dismiss it

Appeal is devoid of merit, and hereby dismiss it with costs.

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety with costs

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety, for lack of merit.

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of merits.

Appeal is hereby dismissed under section 3 (1) of the Law of Limitation Act, Cap. 89 R.E 2019 for being time barred.

Appeal is hereby dismissed with costs for being unmerited.

Appeal is partly allowed

Appeal is partly allowed by setting aside the decision of the first appellate court and subsequently, the decision the trial Court is upheld. The appellant shall pay the respondent costs of this appeal.

Appeal is strike out

Appeal is struck out the respondents shall have their costs

Appeal is struck out with cost

Appeal partially allowed

Appeal partly allowed

Appeal partly is allowed

Appeal partly succeeds to the extent of the second and third grounds of appeal.

Appeal quashed and set aside the evidence of witnesses so that another Chairman shall hear witnesses afresh by administering oaths before taking their evidence.

Appeal stand dismissed with costs

Appeal strike out

Appeal strike out l with no order as to costs.

Appeal struck out

Appeal succeeds

Appeal without merit and, it is accordingly dismissed with costs.

Appeals are dismissed for lack of merit

Appellant be released from prison forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held

Appellant should remain in custody pending being committed to the High Court for trial

Appellants be released forthwith from prison, unless they be held there for other lawful cause.

Appellants should remain in custody pending composition and delivery of the judgment by the trial court

Applicant did not demonstrate any good cause that would entitle her to the sought extension, in the result, the application is not merited it is accordingly dismissed in its entirety.

Application allowed

Application allowed for extension of time to file the appeal

Application be stayed

Application before the court is therefore time barred, it is dismissed with costs.

Application declared a nullity, quashed and set aside

Application dismissed

Application dismissed with costs

Application dismissed in it entirely

Application dismissed with costs

Application dismissed without costs

Application fails and is accordingly dismissed with costs.

Application fails and is dismissed

Application fails and is, accordingly, dismissed with costs

Application for extension of time granted

Application for reference before the High Court judge was incompetent since such court had no jurisdiction to entertain and determine it. Consequently, we find merit in the application and grant it.

Application for reference devoid of merit and it is hereby dismissed with costs.

Application for reference devoid of merit it is accordingly dismissed with costs

Application for reference is dismissed.

Application granted

Application granted and order that the execution of the Judgment and Decree of the High Court (Land Division) in Land Case No. 60 of 2022 which was delivered on 7th March, 2023, be stayed pending the hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. 800 of 2023 pending in the Court, further order that the applicants should deposit a Bank's Guarantee covering the value of the disputed land to the tune of 5 million Shillings as security for the due performance of the decree within thirty days from the date of the delivery of this Ruling.

Application granted with costs

Application is allowed

Application is devoid of merits, it is dismissed with costs.

Application is found to be meritorious and granted

Application is granted

Application is hereby adjourned to a future session of the Court

Application is hereby marked withdrawn with leave to refile under Rule 55 (1) and (2) of the Labour Court Rules, the same be refiled within fourteen (14) days from the ruling hereof.

Application is hereby struck out with costs.

Application is meritorious and thus granted..

Application is strike out with costs

Application is unfounded and thus dismissed it with costs.

Application is unmerited and stands dismissed.

Application lacks merit and dismiss it with cost.

Application lacks merit and hereby dismiss it in its entirety

Application strike out

Application strike out with costs

Application struck out

Application struck out each party shall bear its costs

Application struck out from the statute book

Application struck out with costs.

Application with no merit and dismissed it with costs.

Both accused persons not guilty of the offence of Murder contrary to sections 196 and 197 of the Penal Code, [Cap 16, R.E. 2002] now [R.E 2022] as charged and proceed to acquit and immediate release from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.

Consequently, the entire appeal is struck out for being incompetent. Each party to bear own costs as the disposal of this appeal was based solely on the point raised by this court suo mottu. It is so ordered. Right of appeal explained.

Defendants liable for defamation and, hereby grant Plaintiff reliefs.

Dismissed the second respondent's preliminary objection

For the foregoing reasons and being guided by the aforementioned authorities, the appeal is allowed solely on the ground raised by this court suo mottu. The conviction is hereby quashed and the sentence is set aside. Further, I order that the appellant be released from custody and be set free forthwith unless he is held for some other lawful cause. Order accordingly

For those reasons, this application has not met the threshold for this court to exercise the discretion to grant bail pending appeal. As the result, the application is hereby dismissed for want of merit. Order accordingly.

In the circumstances, the Court remit the case file to the DLHT at Dodoma and direct that Misc. Land Application No. 110 of 2021 be heard afresh and expeditiously by another chairman and a new set of assessors. It is so ordered.

In the upshot, the Court find that this appeal lacks merit and it is entirely dismissed. As the result, the Court hereby order the appellant to pay the respondent the outstanding amount of TZS 6,690,000/-. The mode of payment of the outstanding amount or execution of the decree is exclusively left to the discretion of the parties herein. No order as to costs.

In view of the foregoing, and having found that this appeal is time-barred, no need to address the second issue concerning the variation in the names of the parties in the records of DLHT and this court, accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs for being time barred.

Invoke revisional authority in pursuance of section 4 (2) of the AJA and quash the consequential order

Invoke the revisional powers under section 4 (2) of the Appellate jurisdiction Act [Cap 141, R.E. 2019], quash that part of the High Court order dated 10.12.2020 directing EBK to file its written statement of defence and nullify all the proceedings subsequent to that order, also quash the resultant judgment and remit the record of Commercial Case No. 105 of 2020 to the High Court (Commercial Division) for retrial of the case after the mandatory provisions of Order I rule 10 (4) of the CPC have been complied with.

Law reform recommendation

Matter is marked settled

Notice of Appeal has to be amended

Nullify the proceedings and judgment of the Tribunal and that of the High Court

Nullify the proceedings of the trial court, quash the judgment and set aside the decree, further make an order for an expedited retrial of the suit by another Judge

Objection overruled

Objection sustained

Preliminary Objection overlewd with no costs

Preliminary objection by the first respondent is upheld, application is thus struck out with costs.

Preliminary objection is overruled with costs.

Preliminary objections are devoid of substance, they are accordingly overruled with costs

Proceedings nullified ito section 4(2) of the AJA

Proceedings of the subordinate court are nullified meanwhile, the accused shall remain in custody pending the holding of fresh committal proceedings and his ultimate trial.

Proposed order to remit the case file to the trial Magistrate or his successor in office to compose a proper judgement in compliance with section 312(2) of the CPA is, in the circumstances of this matter, superfluous, thus allow the appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence of three (3) years in community service and the compensation of TZS 1,500,000/=.

Quash his conviction and set aside the sentence immediate release from prison.

Quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant and the appellant be set free unless he is being held for other lawful cause.

Quash the proceedings before the High Court as well as the judgment, and set aside the resultant orders

Quashed

Quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence awarded to the appellant, and order his immediate release from prison unless lawfully held.

Reference Dismissed

Reference is unmerited, it stands dismissed.

Reject the applicant's motion for change of panel or for the recusal of one of us because that is against the clear provisions of rule 66 (5) of the Rules

Retrial

Revision dismissed

Revision granted

Sentence of the accused shall start from 2nd November, 2023 because the irregularity was prompted by the trial court.

Set aside the sentence

Strike out the application with costs.

Suit dismissed without costs

Suit dismissed with costs

Suit granted

Summary Judgement entered in favour of the plaintiffs

The Court find it just that time is extended for the applicants to lodge the intended appeal, the intended appeal shall be lodged in this court within 30 days from the date of this Ruling.

The Court find nothing to fault the two courts below because the prosecution case was proved to the required standard, in the end, Court find no substance in the entire appeal and it is hereby dismissed.

The Court grant the order to stay the execution of the CMA award in Labour Dispute No. CMA/SGD/29/2018/06/2019 pending the hearing and final determination of Labour Review No. 25141 of 2024 pending before this court. This being a labour matter, the parties shall bear their own costs. Order accordingly.

The Court order the case file to be remitted to the District Court, for the parties to be heard expeditiously, before Katemana, PRM or his successor in office, on the question of time limitation which was raised suo mottu. Each party to bear own costs as the irregularity was prompted by the District Court.

The Court therefore find the illegality pleaded not to constitute a reasonable cause for extension of time, in conclusion therefore, having the two grounds for extension of time not met by the applicant sufficiently to move this court to exercise its discretionary powers, the Court find this application to be without merits and is hereby dismissed.

The Court is hereby dismiss the appeal in its entirety and sustain the conviction and sentence meted out against the appellant by the trial court.

The appeal is hereby allowed and the decision of the trial court is upheld accordingly. For the purpose of emphasis, the parties are at liberty to refer the land dispute to the competent civil forum for conclusive determination on the question of ownership. From then onwards, encroachment onto the land of the other could be a trespass and a criminal charge can be brought against the offending party. It is accordingly ordered. Right of appeal explained.

The entire Preliminary Objections have no legal basis and, are hereby overruled.

The entire appeal is hereby dismissed.

The matter before this court is, by the consent of both parties, marked settled as per the terms and conditions contained in the deed of settlement

The matter before this court is, by the consent of both parties, marked settled as per the terms and conditions contained in the deed of settlement.

The matter to be remitted to the trial court for a trial to be conducted as expeditiously as possible

The suit before the Court is incompetent for want of jurisdiction. Consequently, the suit is hereby struck out with costs.

The suit is hereby struck out with costs awarded to the defendants.

immediate release of the appellants from prison unless they are lawfully held.

strike it out each party shall bear his own costs.
Topics

Arrest and detention

Immutable characteristics

National security

Persecution

Persecution based on religion

Refugees

Rights of refugees

custody and maintenance

division of matrimonial property

evidence

injunctions

judicial review

jurisdiction to interpret an organisation’s constitution

labour court

offences

public officers

termination of guarantee agreements

validity of mortgage documents
Alphabet

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Sort by:

Citation	Judgment date
October 2018
Lemsei Kimono vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2247 (24 October 2018)	24 October 2018
Mohamed Said @ Iman Hambali & Others vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 56 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2357 (24 October 2018)	24 October 2018
Airtel Tanzania Ltd vs Domician Njau & Another (Civil Appeal No. 16 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2245 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Mathew Jones Mrema vs Morris Gems Limited (Misc. Land Application No. 110 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2588 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Noors Farm Ltd vs Laroi Village Council (Land Case 10 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2355 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Republic vs Abdallah Athuman @ Dulla & Another (Criminal Session case No 22 of 2015) [2018] TZHC 133 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Republic vs Bujingwa John @ Juma Kijiko (Criminal Session case No. 76 of 2014) [2018] TZHC 128 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Tom Morio vs Athuman Hassan (Administrator of the Estate of the Late Hassan Mohamed Siara) & Others (Misc. Land Application No. 146 of 201) [2018] TZHC 2585 (23 October 2018)	23 October 2018
Maria Lazaro Nanyaro Alias Sikuyamungu Eliya Adamu Wa P Ili vsirene Haaland , Monica Muezenze and Ritta W Ainaina vs (Probate & Administration Case No. 18 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2593 (22 October 2018)	22 October 2018
Bryson Japhet Msemo vs Salanayaheki & Another (Misc. Land Application No. 173 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2592 (19 October 2018)	19 October 2018
Emmanuel Gidahotay vs Gambanyashita Muhale (Misc. Land Application No. 41 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2506 (19 October 2018)	19 October 2018
Hamada Kaungu vs Mathias Mushuti (Land case Appeal 40 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 134 (19 October 2018)	19 October 2018
Mariam Said Chura vs Sabaya Lolutu Bung'ando (Misc. Land Appeal No. 37 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2257 (19 October 2018)	19 October 2018
Samson Emson Masangwa & Another vs Magreth Emson Masangwas (Misc. Civil Application No. 212 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2510 (19 October 2018)	19 October 2018
Peter Michael Madeleka vs Attorney General & Others (Misc. Civil Cause No. 22 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2587 (18 October 2018)	18 October 2018
Christina John & Others vs Idd Baghayo (Misc. Land Application No. 32 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2589 (17 October 2018)	17 October 2018
Kimali Lemani vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 24 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2580 (17 October 2018)	17 October 2018
Geremialh Philipo vs Boniface Damiano Ngao (Land Appeal No. 32 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2274 (16 October 2018)	16 October 2018
Hon. Minister for Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development vs Tanzania Plantations Limited (Misc. Land Application No. 41 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2586 (16 October 2018)	16 October 2018
Augustino Yeromin vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 73 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2582 (15 October 2018)	15 October 2018
Flycatcer Safari Ltd vs Gurupreet Singh Bhachu (Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2272 (11 October 2018)	11 October 2018
Lucia Siima vs Bura Siima & Another (Misc. Land Application No. 89 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2584 (11 October 2018)	11 October 2018
Boniface Linus vs Venance Butina (PC Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2270 (10 October 2018)	10 October 2018
Edward Wilson Lyimo vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 72 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2581 (8 October 2018)	8 October 2018
Daudi Bura vs Yustina Safari (Misc. Land Application No. 158 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2591 (7 October 2018)	7 October 2018
John Kiyan Kivuyo vs Mathayo Kiyan Kivuyo (Misc. Land Appeal No. 5 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2260 (5 October 2018)	5 October 2018
Jackson Sailepu vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2251 (4 October 2018)	4 October 2018
Jackson sailepu vs Republic (PC Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2265 (4 October 2018)	4 October 2018
Jackson Sailep vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2269 (4 October 2018)	4 October 2018
Ahmed Saad vs Magreth Masawe (Misc. Land Appeal No. 4 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2259 (2 October 2018)	2 October 2018
September 2018
Ali Juma & Another vs Yusuph Mohamed (PC Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2597 (26 September 2018)	26 September 2018
Julius Chedi Mbegeni vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 98 (26 September 2018)	26 September 2018
Robert Richard vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 2008) [2018] TZHC 99 (26 September 2018)	26 September 2018
Sylvery Sylvester Mushema vs Commercial Bank of Africa Tanzania & Others (Misc. Civil Application No. 33 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2706 (26 September 2018)	26 September 2018
Exim Bank (T) Limited vs Nuru Benedict Senga (Misc. Civil Application No. 5 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2227 (25 September 2018)	25 September 2018
Melkiory Mallya vs Rose Peter Massawe (Misc. Land Application No. 55 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2594 (25 September 2018)	25 September 2018
Felix Christopher Mrema vs Milcah Kalondu Mrema (Civil Reference No. 1 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2213 (24 September 2018)	24 September 2018
John Bilisingi Raphael vs Diana Bilisingi (Misc. Probate Application No. . 4 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2718 (24 September 2018)	24 September 2018
Juma Rashid Mohamed & Others vs Magara Village Council & Others (Misc. Land Application No. 13 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2226 (24 September 2018)	24 September 2018
Sylvester Paul Massawe vs Akiba Commercial Bank & Another (Land Appeal No. 12 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2155 (24 September 2018)	24 September 2018
Felix Abel vs Clement Kajubi (Misc. Land case Application No. 37 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2716 (21 September 2018)	21 September 2018
Dpp vs Honoratus Bilungi Sylivester (Hc Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2639 (20 September 2018)	20 September 2018
Abdallah Hassan Hamis @mpemba vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 97 (19 September 2018)	19 September 2018
G.S Holding (T) Ltd & Another vs Ecobank Trust Tanzania Limited (Misc. Civil Application No. 80 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2239 (19 September 2018)	19 September 2018
Israel John vs Daud John & Others (PC Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2240 (19 September 2018)	19 September 2018
Thomas Kimaro @ Mngoni vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2146 (19 September 2018)	19 September 2018
Morgan Jacob Moshi vs Glory Benjamin Kanza (Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2140 (18 September 2018)	18 September 2018
Nutmeg Auctioneers & Managers Co. Ltd. vs Bethuel Nehemia Tarimo (Misc. Civil Application No. 105 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2229 (18 September 2018)	18 September 2018
Muchunguzi Gervazi vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 10 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2709 (17 September 2018)	17 September 2018
Adelick Faustin vs Jolum Simba (Misc. Land Case No. 84 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2675 (14 September 2018)	14 September 2018