High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions.

Physical address

24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004

Visit website

https://jmap.judiciary.go.tz/jmap/jmap-hc

36,113 judgments

Advanced search

Court registries

All years

Filters

Filters
Judges

Aboud, J.

Agatho, J.

Amour, J.

Arufani, J.

Bade, J.

Bahati Salema, J.

Bahati, J.

Bampikya, SDR

Banzi, J.

Barthy, J.

Biron, J.

Bong, J.

Bongole, J.

Bubeshi, J.

Bukuku, J.

Bwana, J.

Bwana, J.A.

Bwegoge, J.

Chaba, J.

Chande, J.

Chikoyo, J.

Chinguwile, J.

Chipeta, J.

Chocha, J.

Chua, J.

Chuma, J.

Chuwa, J.

D'Souza, Ag. J.

De-Mello, J.

Ding'ohi, J.

Dyansobera, J.

Ebrahim, J.

Feleshi, J.

Feleshi, J.K.

Fikirini, J.

Galeba, J.

Gileba, J.

Gonzi, J.

Gwae, J.

Hamid, C.J.

Hassan, J.

Hema, J.

Hemedi, J.

Ihayo, J.

Ihema, J.

Isaya, J.

Ismail, J.

Issa, J.

Itemba, J.

Juma, J.

Jundu, J.

Jundu, J.K

Kadilu, J.

Kaduri, J.

Kafanabo, J

Kaganda, J.

Kagomba, J.

Kah, J.

Kahyoza, J.

Kaijage, D.R.

Kaijage, J.

Kaijage, J.A.

Kainda, J.

Kairo, J.

Kajeri, J.

Kaji, J.

Kakolaki, J.

Kalegeya, J.

Kalombola, J.

Kalunde, J.

Kamana, J.

Kamuzora, J.

Kannonyele, J.

Kapoor, Ag. J.

Karayemaha, J.

Karua, J.

Katiti, J.

Kawishe, J.

Kazimoto, J.

Kente, J.

Kerefu, J.

Khaday, J.

Khalfan, J.

Khamis, J.

Kibella, J.

Kihio, J.

Kihwelo, J.

Kilekamajenga, J.

Kileo, J.

Kilimi, J.

Kimaro, J

Kimaro, J.

Kimaro, J.A.

Kimicha, J.

Kinyaka, J.

Kirekiano, J.

Kisanga, J.

Kisanya, J.

Kitusi, J.

Kiwonde, J.

Komba, J.

Korosso, J.

Korosso, J.A.

Kulita, J.

Kwariko, J.

Kwariko, J.A.

Kyando, J.

Laltaika, J.

Lawena, J.

Lila, J.

Lillian, J.

Longopa, J.

Longway, J.

Luanda, J.

Luanda, J.A.

Lubuva, J.

Lugakingira, J

Lugakingira, J.

Lugakingira, J.A.

Lukelelwa, J.

Luvanda, J.

Luvuba, J.

Lyimo, J.

Mackanja, J.

Madeha, J.

Maghimbi, J.

Magoiga, J.

Mahimbali, J.

Maige, J.

Maige, J.A.

Maina, J.

Makame, J.A.

Makani, J.

Makanja, J.

Makaramba, J.

Makungu, J.

Makuru, J.

Malata, J.

Mallaba, J.

Mambi, J.

Mandia, J.

Mandia, J.A.

Manento, J.

Mango, J.

Mansoor, J.

Manyanda, J.

Mapigano, J.

Mapigano, J.A.

Maruma, J.

Masabo, J.

Masaju, J.

Masanche, J.

Masara, J.

Mashaka, J.

Mashauri, J.

Masoud, J.

Massam, J.

Massati, J.

Massengi, J.

Matogolo, J.

Matui, J.

Matuma, J.

Matupa, J.

Mbagwa, J.

Mchome, J.

Mdemu, J.

Mfalila, J.

Mganga, J.

Mgaya, J.

Mgetta, J.

Mgeyekwa, J.

Mgonya, J.

Mhina, J.

Mihayo, J.

Mipawa, J.

Mirindo, J.

Mjasiri, J.

Mjasiri, J.A.

Mjemmas, J.

Mkapa, J.

Mkasimongwa, J.

Mkeha, J.

Mkude, J.

Mkuye, J.

Mkwawa, J.

Mkwizu, J.

Mlacha, J.

Mlay, J.

Mlyambina, J.

Mmila, J.

Mmilla, J.A.

Mnyukwa, J.

Mnzavas, J.A.

Mnzavas, J.K.

Mohamed, J.

Mongella, J.

Morris, J.

Moshi, J.

Mpaze, J.

Mrango, J.

Mrema, J.

Mrisha, J.

Mroso, J.

Mruke, J.

Mruma, J.

Mruso, J.

Msafiri, J.

Msoffe, J.

Msoffe, PRM-E.J.

Mstimi, J.K.

Msumi, J.

Msuya, J.

Mtembwa, J.

Mtenga, J.

Mteule, J.

Mtulya, J.

Mtungi, J.

Mugasha, J.

Mugasha, J.A.

Mugeta, J.

Mujulizi, J.

Munisi, J.

Munuo, J.

Munyera, J.

Muro, J.

Muruke, J.

Muruke, J.A.

Mushi, J.

Musokwa, J.

Mussa, J.

Mutungi, J.

Mwaikasu, J.

Mwaikugile, J.

Mwaikusa, J.

Mwaimu, J.

Mwakahesya, J.

Mwakapeje, J.

Mwakasendo, J.

Mwakibete, J.

Mwalusamya, J.

Mwalusanya, J.

Mwambegele, J.

Mwambegele, J.A.

Mwampashi, J.

Mwandambo, J.

Mwandambo, J.A.

Mwanga, J.

Mwangesi, J.

Mwangesi, J.A.

Mwarija, J.

Mwarija, J.A.

Mwaseba, J.

Mwenda, J.

Mwenegoha, J.

Mwenempazi, J.

Mwipopo, J.

Mwita, J.

Mziray, J.

Mzuna, J.

Nangela, J.

Nchalla, J.

Nchimbi, J.

Ndesamburo, J.

Ndika, J.

Ndika, J.A.

Ndumbaro, J.

Ndunguru, J.

Ngigwana, J.

Ngunyale, J.

Ngwala, J.

Ngwembe, J.

Nkwabi, J.

Nongwa, J.

Nsekela, J.

Nyalali, J.

Nyangarika, J.

Nyerere, J.

Omari, J.

Opiyo, J.

Oriyo, J.

Oriyo, J.A.

Otaru, J.

Othman, C.J.

Othman, J.

Phillip, J.

Pomo, J.

Ramadhani, C.J.

Ramadhani, J.

Ramadhani, J.A.

Robert, J.

Rubama, J.

Rugazia, J.

Ruhangisa, J.

Ruhumbika, J.

Rumanyika, J.

Rumisha, J.

Rutakangwa, J.

Rutatinisibwa, J.

Rwakibarila, J.

Rweyemamu, J.

Rwizile, J.

Samatta, J.

Samatta, J.A.

Samatta, J.K.

Sambo, J.

Sameji, J.

Sarwatt, J.

Sehel, J.

Sehel, J.A.

Sekule, J.

Sepetu, J.

Shaidi, J.

Shangali, J.

Shangwa, J.

Shayo, J.

Sheikh, J.

Simfukwe, J.

Sinda, J.

Sisya, J.

Siyani, J.

Siyani, J.K.

Songoro, J.

Sumari, J.

Teemba, J.

Thema, J.

Tiganga, J.

Twaib, J.

Utamwa, J.

Uzia, J.

Wambali, J.

Wambura, J.

Werema, J.
Outcomes

Aappeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, order that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith unless he is held for some other lawful cause.

Accept the invitation extended to us by the learned counsel of the parties and hereby invoke our power of revision bestowed upon us under section 4 (2) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 of the Revised Edition 2019, quash and set aside the entire proceedings and judgment of the trial court together with subsequent orders, further direct that Land Case No. 46 of 2014 be set down for trial after the Registrar of Titles is joined as a party in terms of Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the CPC,

Access acquited

Accordingly the application allowed, that means, if this application is not granted, the respondent will proceed to evict the applicant from the suit premises. For that matter, execution of the decree in Land Case No. 16 of 2017 (Mruma J.) dated 23rd April, 2021 is hereby stayed pending the determination of Civil Appeal No. 431 of 2021.

Accused person acquitted

Accused person be kept in a mental health Hospital, as a mental disordered offender

Accused person convicted

Allow appellant's appeal, quash conviction, set aside the sentence imposed on him and proceed to order his immediate release from custody unless otherwise lawfully held

Allow the first ground of appeal and hold that, the prosecution case was not proved beyond reasonable doubt

Appeal allowed , accordingly quash the appellant's conviction and substitute it with an acquittal resulting into setting aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, consequently, order for immediate release of the appellant from prison unless he is being held for some other lawful cause

Appeal allowed and order the appellant to be released from custody unless he is otherwise held for other lawful cause (s).

Appeal dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal Allowed with costs

Appeal No. 619 of 2022 allowed to the extent indicated and strike out Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2023

Appeal Struck out with costs

Appeal allowed

Appeal allowed and consequently, quash the proceedings of both the Tribunal and the High Court and set aside the resultant Judgments

Appeal allowed the appellant's conviction is quashed and the sentence meted out to him is set aside, henceforth, order the immediate release of the appellant from prison if he is not otherwise retained for some other lawful cause

Appeal allowed , further quash the conviction against the appellant and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant.

Appeal allowed , quash conviction of murder against the appellant and set aside the sentence of death passed, and substitute for a conviction of manslaughter.

Appeal allowed quash and set aside the appellant's conviction for murder and sentence of death

Appeal allowed, the judgment, proceedings and the decree of the Mining Commission are hereby quashed and set aside. Further, direct the Mining dispute No. 04 of 2022 between the parties herein be heard afresh and expeditiously by another Arbiter according to the prevailing laws.

Appeal allowed, quash conviction and set aside the appellant's death sentence, immediate release of the appellant from prison unless held for other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant, the appellant should be released from prison forthwith, unless held for other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash the appellant's conviction and set aside the sentence. The appellant should be released from prison forthwith unless he is held for other lawful cause

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence and the appellant be immediately set free unless held for some other lawful cause.

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on him. We further order the appellant be released from the prison forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. We further order the immediate release of the appellant from prison unless he is otherwise lawfully held.

Appeal allowed, quash the conviction, set aside the sentences meted out against the appellants. We further order that, the appellants be released forthwith from custody unless held for other lawful reasons

Appeal allowed, quash the convictions and set aside the sentence the appellants be immediately set free unless held for some other lawful cause.

Appeal being unmeritorious, is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal devoid of merit and it is hereby dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal dismiss it entirely

Appeal dismiss it in its entirety

Appeal dismiss it in its entirety with costs

Appeal dismiss it on its entirety

Appeal dismissed

Appeal dismissed with costs

Appeal dismissed in its entirety

Appeal dismissed it entirely

Appeal dismissed with costs to the third respondent

Appeal failed

Appeal fails and dismissed

Appeal fails in its entirely, thus dismissed.

Appeal granted

Appeal has no merit and it is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal has no merit and it is dismissed it with costs

Appeal is allowed in part as indicated in this judgment with costs.

Appeal is allowed, conviction quashed and sentence set aside. The appellants are to be set at liberty forthwith, unless otherwise lawfully held.

Appeal is barren of fruits and we accordingly dismiss it in its entirety

Appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn upon the expiry of the prescribed period of sixty days after its lodgment for failure by the respondent to institute the appeal upon been issued with the certificate of delay each party to bear its own costs

Appeal is devoid of merit and dismissed it.

Appeal is devoid of merit and dismiss it.

Appeal is devoid of merit, accordingly, dismiss it

Appeal is devoid of merit, and hereby dismiss it with costs.

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety with costs

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety, for lack of merit.

Appeal is dismissed in its entirety.

Appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of merits.

Appeal is hereby dismissed under section 3 (1) of the Law of Limitation Act, Cap. 89 R.E 2019 for being time barred.

Appeal is hereby dismissed with costs for being unmerited.

Appeal is partly allowed

Appeal is partly allowed by setting aside the decision of the first appellate court and subsequently, the decision the trial Court is upheld. The appellant shall pay the respondent costs of this appeal.

Appeal is strike out

Appeal is struck out the respondents shall have their costs

Appeal is struck out with cost

Appeal partially allowed

Appeal partly allowed

Appeal partly is allowed

Appeal partly succeeds to the extent of the second and third grounds of appeal.

Appeal quashed and set aside the evidence of witnesses so that another Chairman shall hear witnesses afresh by administering oaths before taking their evidence.

Appeal stand dismissed with costs

Appeal strike out

Appeal strike out l with no order as to costs.

Appeal struck out

Appeal succeeds

Appeal without merit and, it is accordingly dismissed with costs.

Appeals are dismissed for lack of merit

Appellant be released from prison forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held

Appellant should remain in custody pending being committed to the High Court for trial

Appellants be released forthwith from prison, unless they be held there for other lawful cause.

Appellants should remain in custody pending composition and delivery of the judgment by the trial court

Applicant did not demonstrate any good cause that would entitle her to the sought extension, in the result, the application is not merited it is accordingly dismissed in its entirety.

Application allowed

Application allowed for extension of time to file the appeal

Application be stayed

Application before the court is therefore time barred, it is dismissed with costs.

Application declared a nullity, quashed and set aside

Application dismissed

Application dismissed with costs

Application dismissed in it entirely

Application dismissed with costs

Application dismissed without costs

Application fails and is accordingly dismissed with costs.

Application fails and is dismissed

Application fails and is, accordingly, dismissed with costs

Application for extension of time granted

Application for reference before the High Court judge was incompetent since such court had no jurisdiction to entertain and determine it. Consequently, we find merit in the application and grant it.

Application for reference devoid of merit and it is hereby dismissed with costs.

Application for reference devoid of merit it is accordingly dismissed with costs

Application for reference is dismissed.

Application granted

Application granted and order that the execution of the Judgment and Decree of the High Court (Land Division) in Land Case No. 60 of 2022 which was delivered on 7th March, 2023, be stayed pending the hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. 800 of 2023 pending in the Court, further order that the applicants should deposit a Bank's Guarantee covering the value of the disputed land to the tune of 5 million Shillings as security for the due performance of the decree within thirty days from the date of the delivery of this Ruling.

Application granted with costs

Application is allowed

Application is devoid of merits, it is dismissed with costs.

Application is found to be meritorious and granted

Application is granted

Application is hereby adjourned to a future session of the Court

Application is hereby marked withdrawn with leave to refile under Rule 55 (1) and (2) of the Labour Court Rules, the same be refiled within fourteen (14) days from the ruling hereof.

Application is hereby struck out with costs.

Application is meritorious and thus granted..

Application is strike out with costs

Application is unfounded and thus dismissed it with costs.

Application is unmerited and stands dismissed.

Application lacks merit and dismiss it with cost.

Application lacks merit and hereby dismiss it in its entirety

Application strike out

Application strike out with costs

Application struck out

Application struck out each party shall bear its costs

Application struck out from the statute book

Application struck out with costs.

Application with no merit and dismissed it with costs.

Both accused persons not guilty of the offence of Murder contrary to sections 196 and 197 of the Penal Code, [Cap 16, R.E. 2002] now [R.E 2022] as charged and proceed to acquit and immediate release from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.

Consequently, the entire appeal is struck out for being incompetent. Each party to bear own costs as the disposal of this appeal was based solely on the point raised by this court suo mottu. It is so ordered. Right of appeal explained.

Defendants liable for defamation and, hereby grant Plaintiff reliefs.

Dismissed the second respondent's preliminary objection

For the foregoing reasons and being guided by the aforementioned authorities, the appeal is allowed solely on the ground raised by this court suo mottu. The conviction is hereby quashed and the sentence is set aside. Further, I order that the appellant be released from custody and be set free forthwith unless he is held for some other lawful cause. Order accordingly

For those reasons, this application has not met the threshold for this court to exercise the discretion to grant bail pending appeal. As the result, the application is hereby dismissed for want of merit. Order accordingly.

In the circumstances, the Court remit the case file to the DLHT at Dodoma and direct that Misc. Land Application No. 110 of 2021 be heard afresh and expeditiously by another chairman and a new set of assessors. It is so ordered.

In the upshot, the Court find that this appeal lacks merit and it is entirely dismissed. As the result, the Court hereby order the appellant to pay the respondent the outstanding amount of TZS 6,690,000/-. The mode of payment of the outstanding amount or execution of the decree is exclusively left to the discretion of the parties herein. No order as to costs.

In view of the foregoing, and having found that this appeal is time-barred, no need to address the second issue concerning the variation in the names of the parties in the records of DLHT and this court, accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs for being time barred.

Invoke revisional authority in pursuance of section 4 (2) of the AJA and quash the consequential order

Invoke the revisional powers under section 4 (2) of the Appellate jurisdiction Act [Cap 141, R.E. 2019], quash that part of the High Court order dated 10.12.2020 directing EBK to file its written statement of defence and nullify all the proceedings subsequent to that order, also quash the resultant judgment and remit the record of Commercial Case No. 105 of 2020 to the High Court (Commercial Division) for retrial of the case after the mandatory provisions of Order I rule 10 (4) of the CPC have been complied with.

Law reform recommendation

Matter is marked settled

Notice of Appeal has to be amended

Nullify the proceedings and judgment of the Tribunal and that of the High Court

Nullify the proceedings of the trial court, quash the judgment and set aside the decree, further make an order for an expedited retrial of the suit by another Judge

Objection overruled

Objection sustained

Preliminary Objection overlewd with no costs

Preliminary objection by the first respondent is upheld, application is thus struck out with costs.

Preliminary objection is overruled with costs.

Preliminary objections are devoid of substance, they are accordingly overruled with costs

Proceedings nullified ito section 4(2) of the AJA

Proceedings of the subordinate court are nullified meanwhile, the accused shall remain in custody pending the holding of fresh committal proceedings and his ultimate trial.

Proposed order to remit the case file to the trial Magistrate or his successor in office to compose a proper judgement in compliance with section 312(2) of the CPA is, in the circumstances of this matter, superfluous, thus allow the appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence of three (3) years in community service and the compensation of TZS 1,500,000/=.

Quash his conviction and set aside the sentence immediate release from prison.

Quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant and the appellant be set free unless he is being held for other lawful cause.

Quash the proceedings before the High Court as well as the judgment, and set aside the resultant orders

Quashed

Quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence awarded to the appellant, and order his immediate release from prison unless lawfully held.

Reference Dismissed

Reference is unmerited, it stands dismissed.

Reject the applicant's motion for change of panel or for the recusal of one of us because that is against the clear provisions of rule 66 (5) of the Rules

Retrial

Revision dismissed

Revision granted

Sentence of the accused shall start from 2nd November, 2023 because the irregularity was prompted by the trial court.

Set aside the sentence

Strike out the application with costs.

Suit dismissed without costs

Suit dismissed with costs

Suit granted

Summary Judgement entered in favour of the plaintiffs

The Court find it just that time is extended for the applicants to lodge the intended appeal, the intended appeal shall be lodged in this court within 30 days from the date of this Ruling.

The Court find nothing to fault the two courts below because the prosecution case was proved to the required standard, in the end, Court find no substance in the entire appeal and it is hereby dismissed.

The Court grant the order to stay the execution of the CMA award in Labour Dispute No. CMA/SGD/29/2018/06/2019 pending the hearing and final determination of Labour Review No. 25141 of 2024 pending before this court. This being a labour matter, the parties shall bear their own costs. Order accordingly.

The Court order the case file to be remitted to the District Court, for the parties to be heard expeditiously, before Katemana, PRM or his successor in office, on the question of time limitation which was raised suo mottu. Each party to bear own costs as the irregularity was prompted by the District Court.

The Court therefore find the illegality pleaded not to constitute a reasonable cause for extension of time, in conclusion therefore, having the two grounds for extension of time not met by the applicant sufficiently to move this court to exercise its discretionary powers, the Court find this application to be without merits and is hereby dismissed.

The Court is hereby dismiss the appeal in its entirety and sustain the conviction and sentence meted out against the appellant by the trial court.

The appeal is hereby allowed and the decision of the trial court is upheld accordingly. For the purpose of emphasis, the parties are at liberty to refer the land dispute to the competent civil forum for conclusive determination on the question of ownership. From then onwards, encroachment onto the land of the other could be a trespass and a criminal charge can be brought against the offending party. It is accordingly ordered. Right of appeal explained.

The entire Preliminary Objections have no legal basis and, are hereby overruled.

The entire appeal is hereby dismissed.

The matter before this court is, by the consent of both parties, marked settled as per the terms and conditions contained in the deed of settlement

The matter before this court is, by the consent of both parties, marked settled as per the terms and conditions contained in the deed of settlement.

The matter to be remitted to the trial court for a trial to be conducted as expeditiously as possible

The suit before the Court is incompetent for want of jurisdiction. Consequently, the suit is hereby struck out with costs.

The suit is hereby struck out with costs awarded to the defendants.

immediate release of the appellants from prison unless they are lawfully held.

strike it out each party shall bear his own costs.
Topics

Arrest and detention

Immutable characteristics

National security

Persecution

Persecution based on religion

Refugees

Rights of refugees

custody and maintenance

division of matrimonial property

evidence

injunctions

judicial review

jurisdiction to interpret an organisation’s constitution

labour court

offences

public officers

termination of guarantee agreements

validity of mortgage documents
Alphabet

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Sort by:

Citation	Judgment date
July 2018
Ainea Mkoma vs Kilwa Labala (Misc. Land Application No. 191 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2198 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Alfred Reuben Mswia & 3 Others vs Trem Reuben Mswia & Another (Land Case No. 18 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2181 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Amiel Kaaya vs Consolidated Holding Corporation (Civil Application No. 58 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2175 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Ibrahim Kassim @ Abdallah vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 306 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2889 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Leonce Bura vs Kushana Sasuma (Civil Appeal No. 22 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2284 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Thomas Changula & Another vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 255 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2884 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
Zephania Shanyanda vs Toti Andrea (Misc. Land Appeal No. 42 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2173 (2 July 2018)	2 July 2018
June 2018
Abel Adriano & Others vs Republic (Criminal Appeal 184 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2908 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Alex Nyaisa & Another vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 241 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2913 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Anna Benjamin Malongo vs Yohana Balole (Matrimonial Appeal 1 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2664 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Anna Benjamin Malongo vs Yohana Balole (Matrimonial Appeal No. 1 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2936 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Ibrahim Antony Fonka Joseph vs Rupublic (Criminal Appeal No. 271 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2886 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
International Director World Vision Tanzania vs Basinda Construction Company Limited (Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2633 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Joel M. Mabiba Ltd vs CRDB Insurance Brokers Ltd & Others (Civil Appeal No. 181 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2778 (29 June 2018) Reported	29 June 2018
Jumanne Endrew @ Mgogo vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 156 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2903 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Lemmy Paschal Bashange vs Grace Julius Makoa (Misc. Civil Application No. 643 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2929 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Mama Jovina vs Calist Aloyce (Land Revision 1 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2699 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Martin Erasto @ Mawanja & Others vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 261 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2916 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Mathias Mfumya & Others vs Christopher Nyirabu & Others (Misc. Land Application No. 8 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2854 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Milembe Insurance Co. Ltd vs Jaffari Hussein Selemani (Civil Appeal No. 150 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2777 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Stanton Mugenyi vs Jackson Babyekorera & Another (Civil Appeal 16 of 2015) [2018] TZHC 2646 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Yohana Said @ Bwire vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 379 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2798 (29 June 2018)	29 June 2018
Abdallah Nguchika vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2910 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Deogratius Kiria vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2793 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Felex Joseph @ Apolo & Others vs Republic (Criminal Appeal 386 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2927 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Geofrey Mosi vs Mwananchi Insurance Company Limited (Civil Appeal No. 252 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2869 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Godfrey Alex Mbecha vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. m130 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2794 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Hassan Moris Shifta vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 358 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2925 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Mohamed S/o Said @ Nusuhela vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Application No. 158 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2859 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Morities Corporation Limited vs CRDB Bank Plc (Misc. Civil Application No. 24 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2700 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Samson Festo @ Puchu vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 393 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2799 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Shukuru s/o Peter vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 115 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2803 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Yassin Abasi vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 282 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2918 (28 June 2018)	28 June 2018
Ahmed Said Kindamba vs Wananchi Group Tanzania Limited (Civil Appeal No. 152 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2729 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Ahmed Said Kindamba vs Wananchi Group (tz) Limited (Civil Appeal No. 152 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2867 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Fabian Buberwa vs Leonida Daniel (Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2679 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Hemed s/o Omary @ Dalla vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2907 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Ibrahim Yusuph Kamugisha vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 318 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2797 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Iddy s/o Athuman @ Ally vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2911 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Paulo Thobias Komba & Another vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 376 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2810 (27 June 2018)	27 June 2018
Ex PIn the matter of the Estate of the Late Melleo Auye Mrema vs Janeth William Kimaro $others (Misc. Civil Application No. 53 of 2018) [2018] TZHC 2095 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
George Nsekanabo vs Edwin Pascal (Civil Appeal No. 236 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2868 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
Godfrey Evarist Kivamba vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 402 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2902 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
Hood Transpoort Company Limited v Rahma Yusuph NO (Misc. Civil Application No. 81 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2094 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
Issa Mwanjiku @ White vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2792 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
Rajabu Ally @ Changon vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 378 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2809 (26 June 2018)	26 June 2018
Asha Ally Mateke vs Abdallah Salim Maganga (Civil Appeal No. 254 of 2016) [2018] TZHC 2870 (25 June 2018)	25 June 2018
Hussein Ahamad Shemg'ombe vs Director of Public Prosecution (Misc. Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2892 (25 June 2018)	25 June 2018
Salum Shaban Simwiche vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2795 (25 June 2018)	25 June 2018
Abdallah Ngenya vs Amina Luluba (Misc. Civil Application No. 546 of 2017) [2018] TZHC 2856 (22 June 2018)	22 June 2018